Breast conservation in locally advanced breast cancer in developing countries: wise or waste

Survival Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Mastectomy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy (MT) and breast conservation surgery (BCS) are two common surgical options for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is frequently administered before surgery to shrink tumors and improve surgical outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal surgical approach after NACT and its impact on survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to compare the survival outcomes between MT and BCS in patients treated with NACT.

METHOD

A PRISMA selection was used to identify studies across electronic database such as PubMed, and Cochrane Library from inception until 11th July, 2023. A total of 10 comparative studies involving a total of 5018 patients were included. Among them, 2898 patients underwent MT while 2120 underwent BCS after receiving NACT. The outcomes assessed were the 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). The data from the included studies were pooled, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the differences between MT and BCS in terms of survival outcomes. Prospero: CRD42024496831.

RESULT

The meta-analysis revealed that patients who underwent MT after NACT had a higher 5-year OS compared to those who underwent BCS (OR 2.68, 95% CI [2.19-3.28; p < 0.00001]). Additionally, the 5-year DFS was significantly better for patients who underwent MT (OR 3.11, 95% CI [1.80-5.38; p < 0.0001]).

CONCLUSION

MT after NACT may be associated with better 5-year OS and DFS compared to BCS.

Locally advanced breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery and other factors linked to overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment

Background

Recent data suggest that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may positively impact overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer. However, the role of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 530 LABC patients who underwent surgery after NAT between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes examined included OS, distant recurrence rates (DRR), and loco-regional recurrence rates (LRRs).

Results

Among the 927 breast cancer patients who received NAT, 530 were eligible for our study. Of these, 24.6% underwent BCS, while 75.4% underwent mastectomy (MS). The median follow-up duration was 79 months. BCS patients exhibited a higher pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to those who underwent MS (22.3% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). The 6-year OS rates for BCS and MS were 81.5% and 62%, respectively (p < 0.000). In multivariate OS analysis, MS was associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.678; 95% CI 1.069-2.635; p = 0.024), as was body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.031; 95% CI 1.006-1.058; p = 0.017), and stage IIIB or IIIC (OR 2.450; 95% CI 1.561-3.846; p < 0.000). Conversely, PCR (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.220-0.801; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival. DRR was significantly lower in BCS (15.4%) compared to MS (36.8%) (OR 0.298; 95% CI 0.177-0.504). LRRs were comparable between BCS (9.2%) and MS (9.5%) (OR 0.693; 95% CI 0.347-1.383).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that BCS is oncologically safe, even for patients with large lesions, and is associated with superior OS rates compared to MS. Additionally, lower BMI, lower pretreatment stage, and achieving PCR were associated with improved survival outcomes.

An Audit of Breast Conservation Surgery for Breast Cancer - a 7-Year Experience from Southern India

To audit the use of breast conservation surgery for breast cancer treatment in a tertiary care centre over a 7-year period, and also to chart the clinical, demographic and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients treated in the setting of a referral centre in a middle income (MDI) group country. A retrospective analysis of the case records of all patients of invasive breast cancer treated at our institute between January 2014 and December 2020 was done after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC). The number of patients seen, age, parity, menopausal status, family history of cancer, laterality, site of tumour in the breast, the symptomatology, clinical stage and presence or absence of metastases was the clinical parameters examined. The pathological stage and grade of the tumour, receptor status, treatment offered according to stage and the patterns of failure with respect to the surgery performed were recorded. Statistical analysis was a direct head to head comparison of the percentage proportions of the different variables. A total of 685 patients of breast cancer were treated between January 2014 and December 2020. A total of 53% of the cohort was more than 45 years old and 56.7% were post menopausal. A total of 58.8% of the patients presented with a cancer in the left breast and in the upper outer quadrant. Nearly 41% of the tumours were more than 4 cm in size. The most common receptor profile in our patient population was ER positive, PR positive and HER 2 negative. A total of 27.7% of the patients were offered neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 63.06% underwent upfront surgery. A total of 19.7% of all surgeries performed (overall) were breast conservation surgeries (BCS). The use of BCS showed an increasing trend over the 7 years studied rising from 16.79 to 25% (annually). The local failure rate for BCS was 11.8% but the incidence of distant metastases was not significantly different compared to the patients who underwent a mastectomy. Breast conservation is safe and feasible in a referral setting even in a middle income nation with multi-disciplinary treatment planning and needs to be adopted widely to preserve the body image and self esteem of patients with breast cancer.

Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Under Neoadjuvant Therapy: Protocol of a Systematic Review

Introduction

Women with breast cancer eligible for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) present a disorder of biopsychosocial variables and alteration of their quality of life. They cope with this changing by adopting psychological adjustment strategies, either passive or active. This systematic review aims to investigate the psychological distress, coping strategies, and quality of life in breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley Online library represent the databases that were searched to identify relevant published articles until September 27, 2021. Full-text published articles, written in English and assessing the main outcomes (namely: psychological distress, coping strategies, and quality of life) in women with breast cancer under NAT will be included. Also, we will integrate papers dealing with the related bio psychosocial variables to the main variables. The paper selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of selected studies will be performed independently by two researchers, and disagreements will be resolved through discussions. We will bring together the results of all of the included studies to draw conclusions based on the body of evidence. The narrative approach will be adopted to analyze the results and conclusions extracted and we would perform quantitative groupings if we have similar data.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval is not required as the proposed systematic review will not use primary data. The results of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021230300.

Impact of surgery associated with radiotherapy on the prognosis of breast cancer - Guinea Breast Cancer Cohort Study

Background

In a country where radiotherapy (RT) is not available, advocacy based on the relevance of surgery + adjuvant RT in locoregional control and survival is needed.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of surgery with RT on local control and survival compared to surgery alone in breast cancer (BC).

Methods and results

Between 2007 and 2016, 210 patients with BC were retrospectively reviewed, of which 90 patients underwent surgery with RT (group 1) and 120 patients' surgery (group 2). There were several treatment combinations, including surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [ACT], RT, and ACT. The results showed 88 (41.9%) cases of relapse, including 31 (34.4%) (group 1) and 57 (47.5%) (group 2) (p = .046). Recurrence occurred after a mean time of 1.5 years in group 1 versus 0.66 years in group 2 (p = .006). The 5‐year overall and BC‐specific survivals were 49.5% and 62.5%, respectively. The 5‐year survival was 60.0% (group 1) and 40.0% (group 2) (p < .05). In a multivariate analysis by Cox model, we found that the risk of death was 1.90 81 (95% CI [1.17 09–3.0701]) higher in group 2 (p = .009022), 1.69 85 (95% CI 1.00087–23.86157) in obese patients and decreased by 0.21 (95% CI [0.129–0.368]) in patients who did not relapse (p < .001).

Conclusion

In this study with several combination therapies, we cannot confirm that RT improves mainly locally advanced BC prognosis regardless of systemic treatment. However, we found that the risk of death correlated with the absence of RT, overweight, and risk of recurrence. Consideration of combinations of locoregional and systemic therapies, clinicopathological and biological data could improve the relevance of these results with a large sample size.

Breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: an emerging and challenging epidemic

Breast cancer is a major health care problem that affects more than one million women yearly. While it is traditionally thought of as a disease of the industrialized world, around 45% of breast cancer cases and 55% of breast cancer deaths occur in low and middle income countries. Managing breast cancer in low income countries poses a different set of challenges including access to screening, stage at presentation, adequacy of management and availability of therapeutic interventions. In this paper, we will review the challenges faced in the management of breast cancer in low and middle income countries.

Changing trends of breast cancer survival in sultanate of oman

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in women, with elevated incidence in developing countries. This retrospective study included all 122 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2003 to December 2008 in the Sultanate of Oman. Age at presentation was 47.41 years (SD±12.88), with one-third of patients younger than 40 years. The majority of patients presented with stage III (41.2%) and IV (18.2%) breast cancer. T size (P = .023), skin involvement (P = .003), and stage at presentation (P = .004) were significantly associated with overall survival. Skin involvement at presentation (P = .003), T size (P = .09), lymph node status (P = .013), and stage (P = .003) were strong predictors of relapse-free survival. Patients had a 5-year survival of 78%, compared to 64% of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2002 identified in our previously published study. Thus, despite Omani breast cancer patients continuing to present with advanced breast cancer, survival rates have significantly improved.