1
|
González-Martín A, Harter P, Leary A, Lorusso D, Miller RE, Pothuri B, Ray-Coquard I, Tan DSP, Bellet E, Oaknin A, Ledermann JA. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:833-848. [PMID: 37597580 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A González-Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumors Cima-Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid and Pamplona, Spain
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - R E Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College Hospital, London; Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Pothuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Bernard and Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - E Bellet
- ACTO-Alleanza contro il Tumore Ovarico, Milan, Italy
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Certelli C, Russo SA, Palmieri L, Foresta A, Pedone Anchora L, Vargiu V, Santullo F, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Gallotta V. Minimally-Invasive Secondary Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4769. [PMID: 37835463 PMCID: PMC10571765 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been widely increased in recent years, especially in trying to improve the quality of life of these patients by utilising a minimally-invasive (MI) approach. However, surgery in previously-treated patients may be challenging, and patient selection and surgical planning are crucial. Unfortunately, at the moment, validated criteria to select patients for MI-SCS are not reported, and no predictors of its feasibility are currently available, probably due to the vast heterogeneity of recurrence patterns. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery and, in particular, minimally-invasive procedures, in ROC, analyzing patient selection, outcomes, criticisms, and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Certelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvio Andrea Russo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Palmieri
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Aniello Foresta
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Vargiu
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Gallotta
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wimberger P, Pfisterer J, du Bois A, Hilpert F, Kerkman M, Sehouli J, Mahner S, de Gregorio N, Hanker L, Heitz F, Marmé F, Woelber L, Holtmann L, Elser G, Harter P. Quality of therapy in early ovarian cancer: results of the quality assurance program of the AGO Study Group. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004233. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe quality assurance program for ovarian cancer (QS-OVAR) evaluates the implementation of treatment standards and impact on survival for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I ovarian cancer.MethodsPatients with a first diagnosis of ovarian cancer, diagnosed in the third quarter of 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016, were documented. Surgical quality was categorized as optimal (maximum one surgical item missing) versus suboptimal (≥2 surgical items missing). Chemotherapy was defined as optimal according to national guidelines. Treatment quality was classified into four categories: surgery and chemotherapy were optimal, optimal surgery and suboptimal chemotherapy, suboptimal surgery and optimal chemotherapy, and surgery and chemotherapy were suboptimal.ResultsIn total, 19.9% (n=700) of ovarian cancer patients were diagnosed with FIGO stage I. Median age was 60 years (range 18–96), 47.1% had FIGO stage IA and 47.9% had stage IC, with 37.1% high grade serous histology. Optimal surgical quality increased over time from 19.9% to 54.1%. The optimal surgery population increased from 42.2% to 70.9%. Disease free survival improved significantly in the optimal surgery population (84% after 48 months vs 71% in the suboptimal surgery population). Overall survival increased with 91% after 48 months in the optimal surgery population versus 76% in the suboptimal surgery population. In total, 20.7% of patients were undertreated concerning systemic treatment and 1% overtreated. Optimal chemotherapy standard was administered increasingly over time (71.4–80.8%). Disease free survival and overall survival were prolonged with adjuvant chemotherapy. The optimal surgery/chemotherapy subgroup increased from 37.9% to 54.1% with significantly longer disease free survival and overall survival (overall survival at 48 months: optimal surgery and chemotherapy 93%; suboptimal surgery and chemotherapy 68%).ConclusionAlthough QS-OVAR data showed that the quality of therapy has improved over the years, not all surgical standards were met in nearly 50% of patients. The steady increase in the optimal surgery and chemotherapy collective is an important tool for improvement of prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Imterat M, Bizzarri N, Fruscio R, Perrone AM, Traut A, du Bois A, Rosati A, Ferrari D, De Iaco P, Ataseven B, Ergasti R, Volontè S, Tesei M, Heitz F, Perri MT, Concin N, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Harter P. Impact of substage and histologic type in stage I ovarian carcinoma survival: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:42-49. [PMID: 36104079 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This international study aimed to investigate the impact of substage, histological type and other prognostic factors on long-term survival for stage I ovarian carcinoma. METHODS Our study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (IA-IC3) ovarian carcinoma treated at four European referral centers in Germany and Italy. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves we compared overall and disease-free survival between the different stage I groups. RESULTS A total of 1115 patients were included. Of these, 48.4% (n=540) were in stage IA, 6.6% (n=73) stage IB, and 45% (n=502) stage IC, of the latter substage IC1, 54% (n=271), substage IC2, 31.5% (n=158), and substage IC3, 14.5% (n=73). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 94% and 86%, respectively, with no difference between stage IA and IB. However, there was a significantly better overall and disease-free survival for stage IA as compared with stage IC (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed incomplete/fertility-sparing staging (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.99, and HR 3.54; 95% CI 1.83 to 6.86, respectively), and stage IC (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.63 to 3.75) as independent risk factors for inferior disease-free survival, while low-grade endometrioid (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.72) and low-grade mucinous (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.44) histology had superior disease-free survival. Considering overall survival, stage IC (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.01) and older age (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.46 to 3.95) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION Although stage I ovarian carcinoma exhibited excellent outcomes, the prognosis of patients with stage IA differs significantly compared with stage IC. Sub-optimal staging as an indicator for quality of care, and tumor biology defined by histology (low-grade endometrioid/mucinous) independently impact disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majdi Imterat
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Ferrari
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raffaella Ergasti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Volontè
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Tesei
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Teresa Perri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Droste A, Anic K, Hasenburg A. Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Neoplasms - What is Possible, What is Useful? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1368-1377. [PMID: 36467976 PMCID: PMC9715350 DOI: 10.1055/a-1787-9144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques is becoming increasingly important in gynecologic oncology due to technical advances and the increasing level of surgical expertise. In addition to laparoscopic approaches for the treatment of benign neoplasms, minimally invasive surgical methods have also become established in some areas for treating gynecologic malignancies. For tumor entities such as endometrial and cervical carcinoma, there are conclusive studies emphasizing the role of laparoscopy in surgical therapy. By contrast, due to a lack of prospective data with survival analyses, no clear conclusions can be drawn on the significance of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of ovarian carcinoma. However, some smaller, mostly retrospective case-control studies and cohort studies open the way for a discussion, positing the possibility that laparoscopic surgical procedures, particularly for early ovarian carcinoma, are technically feasible and of a quality equivalent to that of conventional longitudinal laparotomy, and may also be associated with lower perioperative morbidity. In this article we discuss the most important aspects of using minimally invasive surgical techniques for ovarian carcinoma based on the current literature. In particular we look at the relevance of laparoscopy as a primary approach for surgical staging of early ovarian carcinoma, and we evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the operability of advanced ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Droste
- 611615Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany,Korrespondenzadresse Dr. med. univ. Annika Droste Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für
Geburtshilfe und FrauengesundheitLangenbeckstraße 155131
MainzGermany
| | - Katharina Anic
- 611615Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- 611615Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gallotta V, Jeong SY, Conte C, Trozzi R, Cappuccio S, Moroni R, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Kim TJ, Fagotti A. Minimally invasive surgical staging for early stage ovarian cancer: A long-term follow up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1698-1704. [PMID: 33573854 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The standard treatment for epithelial early stage ovarian cancer (eEOC) includes laparotomic surgical staging, according to ESGO-ESMO guidelines. In the last decade, many investigators have assessed the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) staging in properly selected patients. However, survival data related to different surgical approaches (open versus MIS) are extremely limited. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term oncological outcomes in eEOC patients treated with MIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted in two tertiary oncological centers. We selected all consecutive women who underwent a laparoscopic or robotic staging for eEOC. RESULTS From January 2008 to December 2016, 254 eEOC patients underwent a MIS staging (188 laparoscopic staging and 66 robotic staging). Overall, 18.1% of patients were upstaged due to pathological findings. A total of 203 (79.9%) patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 13-118), 39 (15.3%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-years progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 84.0% and 93.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, favorable variables influencing PFS were young age (≤45 years), non-serous histotype, tumor grade 1-2, and FIGO stage IA/IB. In the multivariate analysis, only grade 3 was shown to keep its negative independent prognostic value (HR = 3.47; p = 0.004), whereas FIGO stage ≥ IC showed a trend toward significance (HR = 1.75; p = 0.099). CONCLUSION This retrospective study represents the longest follow-up of eEOC patients managed by MIS. The MIS is a valuable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients, although a randomized controlled trial is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Gallotta
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - Soo Young Jeong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Carmine Conte
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Rita Trozzi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Tae-Joong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grabowski JP, Glajzer J, Richter R, Plett H, Muallem MZ, Braicu EI, Taube E, Sehouli J. Lymphovascular space invasion and Ki67 as predictors of lymph node metastasis in primary low grade serous ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:98-103. [PMID: 33127866 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low grade serous ovarian cancers characterize a unique clinical pattern and likely less frequent incidence of lymphatic metastasis. The expression level of Ki67 is associated with differences in prognosis and therapy outcome. However, its expression in combination with lymphovascular space invasion has not been evaluated in the prediction of lymphatic metastasis. METHODS Patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer were identified in an institutional database. Patients with primary low grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed and/or treated at our center between September 2000 and December 2018 were identified. Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis was performed to find the cut-off values of per cent Ki67 to discriminate patients with lymph node metastasis. The association between the presence of lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node involvement was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 109 patients with primary low grade serous ovarian cancer were identified in our institution's database. Of these, 72 (66.1%) patients underwent primary surgery with pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Complete data for Ki67 expression and lymphovascular space invasion were obtained for 61 (84.7%) of these patients. Among them, 37 (60.7%) patients had lymph node metastasis. The presence of lymphovascular space invasion was associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastases (odds ratio (OR)=12.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 51.81; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis including age >65 years, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and ascites>500 mL, lymphovascular space invasion remained a significant risk factor for lymphatic metastases (OR=35.11, 95% CI 2.38 to 517.69; p=0.010). Ki67 ≥6% was associated with a higher risk of lymphovascular space invasion (OR=3.67, 95% CI 1.26 to 10.64; p=0.017). No significant correlation between Ki67 expression level and nodal metastases was found (OR=2.19, 95% CI 0.76 to 6.26; p=0.14). Neither presence of lymphovascular space invasion or nodal metastases was associated with a statistically poorer prognosis. CONCLUSIONS We showed an association between lymphovascular space invasion, Ki67 expression, and risk of lymph node metastasis in primary low grade ovarian cancer. Further prospective trials evaluating lymphovascular space invasion and Ki-67 as predictors of lymph node metastasis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek P Grabowski
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joanna Glajzer
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf Richter
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helmut Plett
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mustafa-Zelal Muallem
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eliane Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clinical Outcome After Completion Surgery in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The Charite Experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 28:1491-1497. [PMID: 30095708 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to estimate surgical outcome and survival benefit after completion surgery. METHODS We evaluated 164 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent incomplete primary cytoreductive surgery or rather received only staging procedures from January 2000 to December 2014 in outside institutions. Patient-related data were registered in prospective database of Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer. The outcome analyses were performed for early and advanced stages of ovarian cancer separately. RESULTS The majority of patients were at the time of completion surgery in advanced stages of disease. From overall 111 advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients, 74 (66.6%) could be operated macroscopically tumor free, minimal residual disease 1 cm or less was achieved in 15.3% of the cases. Mean overall survival for patients without versus those with any tumor residual was 70 months (95% confidence interval, 61.3-81.5) versus 24.7 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1-42.4; P ≤ 0.0001). After applying completion surgery, 47 (28.6%) and 12 (6.7%) patients were upstaged in FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) IIIC and IV stages, respectively. Upstaging resulted in therapy changes in 10 patients (19%) with assumed FIGO IA stages. Major operative complications were registered in 28.8% of advanced cases, and 30-day mortality reached 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS Recent research has shown that the most profound impact on survivorship occurs when women get proper care from surgeons trained in the latest techniques for treating ovarian cancer. Completion surgery maintained that even after initial incomplete cytoreduction outside of the high specialized units, after applying appropriate surgery techniques macroscopically, disease-free situation is achievable and outcomes are comparable with the results of primary debulking surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmalfeldt B, Brambs C, Burges A, El-Balat A, Emons G, Fink D, Fotopoulou C, Gropp-Meier M, Hanker LC, Harter P, Hasenburg A, Hauptmann S, Hilpert F, Kimmig R, Kommoss S, Kurzeder C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Mayr D, Meier W, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Mustea A, Ortmann O, Oskay-Özcelik G, Pfisterer J, Pölcher M, Runnebaum IB, Schröder W, Tanner B, Wagner U, Wimberger P, Sehouli J. What is the evidence for lymphadenectomy in presumed early ovarian cancer? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 299:1-5. [PMID: 30374648 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4945-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Christine Brambs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Burges
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ahmed El-Balat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Günter Emons
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Fink
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Cancer Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare Trust London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Martina Gropp-Meier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oberschwabenklinik Hospital St. Elisabeth Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Lars-Christian Hanker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University-Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mainz Medical School, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center at the Jerusalem Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Doris Mayr
- Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Werner Meier
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Pölcher
- Department of Gynecology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingo B Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's Hospital Jena, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Willibald Schröder
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecology, Gynaekologicum Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Berno Tanner
- Private Practice for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany
| | - Uwe Wagner
- Dept. Gyn. Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Montavon C, Mirza U, Fedier A, Schoetzau A, Zanetti Dällenbach R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V. Diaphragmatic smears are not of additional benefit in the detection of peritoneal spread in gynecological cancers. Exp Ther Med 2018; 15:4199-4204. [PMID: 29725367 PMCID: PMC5920471 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.5957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal biopsies (PB) and peritoneal washing (PW) are routine measures in abdominal staging of gynecological malignancies and are used particularly for the assessment of occult microscopic tumor spread to the peritoneal surface including the diaphragm. Cytological diaphragmatic smears (DS) have been suggested as a supplemental tool; however, they are not routinely taken and their usefulness is still unclear. The present study retrospectively evaluated whether DS provide an additional benefit over PB and PW for the detection of peritoneal malignancies in patients with gynecological cancer. The data from patients who underwent laparotomy for suspected gynecological cancer and had DS and either PB, PW or ascites were reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity, and the number upstaged patients were determined. A total of 43 patients were excluded due to benign diagnosis (those with negative DS or PW) and 2 out of the remaining had 2 carcinomas simultaneously. Among these 41 malignancies, DS were positive in 12, PW in 18 and PB in 19 cases. No case was DS-positive while negative for both PB and PW. Four cases were missed when only PB and 5 when only PW was performed. Notably, no case of peritoneal disease was identified solely on positive DS, indicating that all 23 positive cases (presence of occult peritoneal disease in 56.1%) were identified by PB and PW together (100% sensitivity; 62% specificity). In addition, none of the cases was upstaged solely on positive DS results. Taken together, these data demonstrated that DS do not present an additional benefit to PW and PB in the detection of peritoneal gynecological disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Montavon
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Uzma Mirza
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andre Fedier
- Ovarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Schoetzau
- Ovarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rosanna Zanetti Dällenbach
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.,Ovarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ratanasrithong P, Benjapibal M. Pregnancy Outcomes after Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Ovarian Neoplasms. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:2083-2087. [PMID: 28843226 PMCID: PMC5697464 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.8.2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective, single institute study aimed to evaluate pregnancy and oncologic outcomes in reproductive-age Thai women with early-stage ovarian neoplasms undergoing conservative surgical treatment. Methods: Medical records of 84 women of reproductive age (15-45 years) with histologically confirmed early-stage (IA-IIC) borderline ovarian tumors or cancers who had undergone conservative surgery between January 2003 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 28.0 years (SD 7.2). Histologically, 30 (35.7%) had borderline ovarian tumors, 28 (33.3%) epithelial cancers, 22 (26.2%) malignant germ cell tumors, and 4 (4.8%) sex cord stromal tumors. Thirty-five women (41.7%) had complete surgical staging performed, whereas 49 (58.3%) underwent an incomplete staging procedure. Thirty-four patients (40.5%) received postoperative chemotherapy. Among 29 patients subsequently attempting pregnancy, 15 conceived successfully (51.7%). Pregnancy outcomes were one spontaneous abortion and 14 viable births. There were no serious adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes among women with documented live births and no reported fetal abnormalities. Pregnancy rates were not impacted by surgical staging (53.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.837) or adjuvant chemotherapy (55.6% vs 50.0%, p=0.782). The 5-year disease-free survival was 91.0% and pregnancy after conservative surgery did not affect progression-free survival (p=0.194). Conclusion: Conservative surgery with or without appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy can be offered to young women with early-stage ovarian neoplasms who wish to preserve their fertility potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panwad Ratanasrithong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Suk-Joon Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Individualized Treatment of Patients With Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Incomplete Initial Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 26:73-81. [PMID: 26569056 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Incomplete initial surgery complicates subsequent management of early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (ESEOC). This study aimed to determine the most appropriate strategies for individualized treatment of these patients. METHODS Medical records of ESEOC patients treated at our hospital between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed, and 246 patients initially treated by incomplete surgery were included. A scoring system was established to assess the quality of initial surgery (QOIS). RESULTS Of 246 patients, 130 underwent restaging surgery and 116 received chemotherapy only. Follow-up duration ranged from 4 to 148 months (median, 72 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 74.7% in the restaging and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Survival analysis showed significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in the restaging group (P = 0.043 and P = 0.029, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that histologic grade was an independent predictor for RFS and OS in the restaging group (P = 0.035 and P = 0.038, respectively), and histologic grade (P = 0.005 and P = 0.015, respectively) and QOIS (P = 0.044 and P = 0.024, respectively) were independent predictors for RFS and OS in the chemotherapy group. Subgroup analysis showed that restaging surgery produced better RFS and OS than chemotherapy in patients with low QOIS and unfavorable histology (5-year RFS, 58.5% vs 33.4%, P = 0.007; 5-year OS, 82.2% vs 54.4%, P = 0.011), whereas the outcomes between the treatment options were comparable in patients with high QOIS or favorable histology. CONCLUSIONS Our results support individualized treatment of ESEOC patients initially treated by incomplete surgery. Restaging surgery is recommended only for patients with low QOIS and unfavorable histology.
Collapse
|
14
|
Heitz F, Harter P, du Bois A. Staging laparoscopy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:592-3. [PMID: 23796645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2013] [Accepted: 06/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbH, Henricistrasse 92, 45136 Essen, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Querleu D, Ray-Coquard I, Classe JM, Aucouturier JS, Bonnet F, Bonnier P, Darai E, Devouassoux M, Gladieff L, Glehen O, Haie-Meder C, Joly F, Lécuru F, Lefranc JP, Lhommé C, Morice P, Salengro A, Stoeckle E, Taieb S, Zeng ZX, Leblanc E. Quality indicators in ovarian cancer surgery: report from the French Society of Gynecologic Oncology (Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Gynecologique, SFOG). Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2732-9. [PMID: 23857961 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on registries, the European experience has been that <50% of patients are treated according to protocols and/or benefit from the minimum required surgery for ovarian cancer. The French Cancer Plan 2009-2013 considers the definition of qualitative indicators in ovarian cancer surgery in France. This endeavour was undertaken by the French Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SFOG) in partnership with the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and all concerned learned societies in a multidisciplinary mindset. METHODS The quality indicators for the initial management of patients with ovarian cancer were based on the standards of practice determined from scientific evidence or expert consensus. RESULTS The indicators were divided into structural indicators, including material (equipment), human (number and qualification of staff), and organizational resources, process indicators, and outcome indicators. CONCLUSIONS The enforcement of a quality assurance programme in any country would undoubtedly promote improvement in the quality of care for ovarian cancer patients and would result in a dramatic positive impact on their survival. Such a policy is not only beneficial to the patient, but is also profitable for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS. Analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the renal vessels in apparent early-stage ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2013; 24:29-36. [PMID: 23346311 PMCID: PMC3549504 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2012] [Revised: 06/03/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels on the accurate staging in ovarian cancer patients presumed preoperatively to be confined to the ovary. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data on 124 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer who were preoperatively thought to have tumor confined to the ovary and underwent primary staging surgery. The distribution of lymph node metastasis and various risk factors for nodal involvement were investigated. Results Surgical staging yielded: 87 (70.2%) patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I disease and 37 (29.8%) patients had stage II-III disease: 4 IIA, 6 IIB, 9 IIC, 1 IIIA, and 17 IIIC. Eighty-six patients had pelvic lymphadenectomy only and 69 had pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymph node metastases were found in 17 (24.6%) of 69 patients; 5 (7.2%) patients had lymph node metastasis in the pelvic lymph nodes only, 8 (11.6%) in the para-aortic lymph nodes only, and 4 (5.8%) in both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. Six (8.7%) patients had lymph node metastasis in the para-aortic lymph node above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. On multivariate analysis, grade 3 tumor (p=0.01) and positive cytology (p=0.03) were independent predictors for lymph node metastasis. Conclusion A substantial number of patients with apparently early ovarian cancer had upstaged disease. Of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, some patients had lymph node metastasis above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels may detect occult metastasis and be of help in tailoring appropriate adjuvant treatment as well as giving useful information about the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk-Joon Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Outcome of immediate re-operation or interval debulking after chemotherapy at a gynecologic oncology center after initially incomplete cytoreduction of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 126:54-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2012] [Revised: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
18
|
Powless CA, Aletti GD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Cliby WA. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Implications for surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122:536-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 05/03/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|