Examination of cancer cells exposed to gastric serosa by serosal stamp cytology plus RT-PCR is useful for the identification of gastric cancer patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence

SDF1α/CXCR4 axis may be associated with the malignant progression of gastric cancer in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment

Stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF1α) and its receptor C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) have been reported to form an important chemokine signaling pathway. Our previous study reported that SDF1α from tumor stromal cells may stimulate the proliferation of gastric cancer (GC) cells through the CXCR4 axis in a hypoxic microenvironment. However, a limited number of studies have addressed the clinicopathological significance of the expression of SDF1α and CXCR4 in GC, particularly at hypoxic regions. Immunohistochemistry was used to investigate the expression levels of SDF1α, CXCR4 and the hypoxic marker carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) in 185 patients with stage II and III GC. The results demonstrated that CA9 was expressed on cancer and stromal cells in hypoxic lesions, CXCR4 was mainly expressed in cancer cells, and SDFα was mainly expressed in stromal cells. CXCR4 expression in cancer cells and SDFα expression in stromal cells were associated with the hypoxic regions with CA9 expression. The CA9 and CXCR4 expression in the cancer cells, and the SDF1α expression in the stromal cells (CA9/CXCR4/SDF1α) was significantly associated with macroscopic type 4 tumor (P=0.012) and the pattern of tumor infiltration into the surrounding tissue (P<0.001). The prognosis of the all CA9/CXCR4/SDF1α-positive patients was significantly poorer compared with that of patients with CA9-, CXCR4- or SDF1α-negative GC at Stage III (P=0.041). These results indicated that hypoxia may upregulate SDFα production in stromal cells and CXCR4 expression in cancer cells. The SDF1α/CXCR4 axis may serve an important role in the progression of GC.

Predicting Peritoneal Dissemination of Gastric Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine: Molecular Characterization and Biomarkers

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of worldwide cancer-related death. Being a highly heterogeneous disease, the current treatment of GC has been suboptimal due to the lack of subtype-dependent therapies. Peritoneal dissemination (PD) is a common pattern of GC metastasis associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to identify patients at high risk of PD. PD is found to be associated with Lauren diffuse type GC. Molecular profiling of GC, especially diffuse type GC, has been utilized to identify molecular alterations and has given rise to various molecular classifications, shedding light on the underlying mechanism of PD and enabling identification of patients at higher PD risk. In addition, a series of diagnositc and prognostic biomarkers of PD from serum, peritoneal lavages and primary GCs have been reported. This comprehensive review summarizes findings on the multi-omic characteristics of diffuse type GC, the clinical significance of updating molecular classifications of GC in association with PD risk and research advances in PD-associated biomarkers.

Targeted RNA sequencing with touch imprint cytology samples for non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

RNA‐based sequencing is considered ideal for detecting pathogenic fusion‐genes compared to DNA‐based assays and provides valuable information about the relative expression of driver genes. However, RNA from formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue has issues with both quantity and quality, making RNA‐based sequencing difficult in clinical practice. Analyzing stamp‐derived RNA with next‐generation sequencing (NGS) can address the above‐mentioned obstacles. In this study, we validated the analytical specifications and clinical performance of our custom panel for RNA‐based assays on the Ion Torrent platform.

Methods

To evaluate our custom RNA lung panel, we first examined the gene sequences of RNA derived from 35 NSCLC tissues with diverse backgrounds by conventional methods and NGS. Next, we moved to the clinical phase, where clinical samples (all stamp‐derived RNA) were used to examine variants. In the clinical phase we conducted an NGS analysis while simultaneously applying conventional approaches to assess the feasibility and validity of the panel in clinical practice.

Results

In the prerun phase, all of the variants confirmed with conventional methods were detected by NGS. In the clinical phase, a total of 80 patients were enrolled and 80 tumor specimens were sequenced from February 2018 to December 2018. There were 66 cases in which the RNA concentration was too low to be measured, but sequencing was successful in the vast majority of cases. The concordance between NGS and conventional methods was 95.0%.

Conclusions

RNA extraction using stamp specimens and panel sequencing by NGS were considered applicable in clinical settings.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Next‐generation sequencing using RNA from stamp specimens was able to detect driver gene changes in non‐small cell lung cancer including fusion genes with the same accuracy as conventional methods.

What this study adds

Using RNA from stamp specimens obtained from biopsy increases the number of candidate cases for RNA sequencing in clinical settings.

Microscopic distance from tumor invasion front to serosa might be a useful predictive factor for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of T3-gastric cancer

Background

Peritoneal recurrence is one of the most frequent recurrent diseases in gastric cancer. Although the exposure of cancer cells to the serosal surface is considered a common risk factor for peritoneal recurrence, there are some cases of peritoneal recurrence without infiltration to the serosal surface even after curative surgery. This study sought to clarify the risk factors of peritoneal recurrence in the absence of invasion to the serosal surface.

Materials and methods

Ninety-six patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery were enrolled. In all 96 cases, the depth of tumor invasion was subserosal (T3). The microscopic distance from the tumor invasion front to the serosa (DIFS) was measured using tissue slides by H&E staining and pan-cytokeratin staining. E-cadherin expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining.

Results

Among the 96 patients, 16 developed peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery. The DIFS of the tumors with peritoneal recurrence (156±220 μm) was significantly shorter (p = 0.011) than that without peritoneal recurrence (360±478 μm). Peritoneal recurrence was significantly correlated with DIFS ≤234 μm (p = 0.023), but not with E-cadherin expression. The prognosis of DIFS ≤234 μm was significantly poorer than that of DIFS >234 μm (log rank, p = 0.007). A multivariate analysis of the patients' five-year overall survival revealed that DIFS ≤234 μm and lymph node metastasis were significantly correlated with survival (p = 0.005, p = 0.032, respectively).

Conclusion

The measurement of the DIFS might be useful for the prediction of peritoneal recurrence in T3-gastric cancer patients after curative surgery.

Bioinformatics analysis suggests that COL4A1 may play an important role in gastric carcinoma recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Cancer recurrence is a complicated problem for clinicians that contributes to poor prognosis. This study aimed to use advanced gastric carcinoma genes profiles to predict increased risk of cancer recurrence in order to identify patients in need of adjuvant therapy for prognosis improvement.

METHODS

Differentially expressed genes were identified for advanced gastric carcinoma by analyzing the GSE2685 from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) using R package. The candidate genes were then obtained by gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway, protein-protein interaction analysis and survival analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between candidate genes and the recurrence of gastric carcinoma.

RESULTS

Collagen type IV alpha 1 (COL4A1) was overexpressed in gastric carcinoma tissue by analyzing the GSE2685 gene expression profiles from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. COL4A1 was also overexpressed in gastric carcinoma tissue from the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and further determined that higher COL4A1 expression led to poorer overall survival. A univariate analysis suggested that COL4A1 was strongly correlated with T stage and gastric carcinoma recurrence (P = 0.014 and 0.041, respectively). Moreover, a multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that COL4A1 was significantly associated with gastric carcinoma recurrence (hazard ratio 1.605, 95% confidence interval 1.063-2.677, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

COL4A1 may promote gastric carcinoma recurrence and could be used as a therapeutic target for gastric carcinoma recurrence.

A better prognostic stratification for the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system of gastric cancer by incorporating pT4aN0M0 into stage IIIA

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognosis of gastric cancer patients categorized as pT4aN0M0, pT1N3aM0/pT2N2M0/pT3N1M0 of stage IIB and stage IIIA and to compare the optimistic prognostic stratification between the AJCC 8th edition staging system and the AJCC modified 8th (m8th) edition staging system by incorporating pT4aN0M0 into stage IIIA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1770 patients who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. The homogeneity, the discriminatory ability, the monotonicity of the gradient assessments, and the discriminatory ability of the AJCC 8th and m8th edition staging systems were compared by using the likelihood ratio χ2 test, a linear trend χ2 test, the Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) calculations, respectively.

RESULTS

For patients staged IIB, the 5-year survival rate of the patients categorized as pT4aN0M0 were significantly worse than that of the patients categorized as pT1N3aM0/pT2N2M0/pT3N1M0 (59.9% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.036). By contrast, the prognoses of the patients between the pT4aN0M0 category and those staged IIIA were analogous (59.9% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.693). Compared with the 8th edition system, the modified 8th edition staging system had a better homogeneity (higher likelihood ratio χ [2] score, 441.17 vs. 436.24), discriminatory ability, monotonicity of gradients (higher linear trend χ2 score, 436.78 vs. 416.15) and smaller AIC (10364.98 vs. 10369.91) and BIC values (10447.13 vs. 10452.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of pT4aN0M0 was poorer than those of pT1N3aM0, pT2N2M0, and pT3N1M0, which were staged IIB. There is a better prognostic stratification for the AJCC 8th edition staging system of gastric cancer by incorporating pT4aN0M0 into stage IIIA.