1
|
Li D, Wang C, Wei W, Li B, Liu H, Cheng A, Niu Q, Han Z, Feng Z. Postoperative Complications of Free Flap Reconstruction in Moderate-Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on Real-World Data. Front Oncol 2022; 12:792462. [PMID: 35814388 PMCID: PMC9263716 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.792462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPostoperative complications (POCs) of moderate-advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after free flap reconstruction have received little attention. We investigated the risk factors that lead to POCs and their impact on management and prognosis.Patients and MethodsA single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted at Beijing Stomatological Hospital on primary HNSCC patients treated between 2015 and 2020.ResultsIn total, 399 consecutive HNSCC patients who underwent radical resection of the primary tumor and free flap reconstruction were enrolled in this study, 155(38.8%) experienced POCs. The occurrence of POCs directly led to worse short-term outcomes and poorer long-term overall survival (P=0.0056). Weight loss before the operation (P=0.097), Tumor site (P=0.002), stage T4b (P=0.016), an ACE-27 index of 2-3 (P=0.040), operation time≥8h (P=0.001) and Clindamycin as antibiotic prophylaxis (P=0.001) were significantly associated with POCs.ConclusionsThe occurrence of POCs significantly leads to worse short-term outcomes and increases the patients’ burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delong Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chong Wang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Clinical Epidemiology and EBM Unit, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Aoming Cheng
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qifang Niu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengxue Han
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhien Feng
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhien Feng,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caruntu A, Moraru L, Comaneanu R, Costache R, Farcasiu T, Scheau C, Costache D, Caruntu C. A combination of two regional flaps for the complex reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery as an alternative approach during the COVID‑19 pandemic: A case report. Exp Ther Med 2022; 23:364. [PMID: 35493435 PMCID: PMC9019615 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Caruntu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ‘Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest 010825, Romania
| | - Liliana Moraru
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ‘Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest 010825, Romania
| | - Raluca Comaneanu
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, ‘Titu Maiorescu’ University, Bucharest 031593, Romania
| | - Raluca Costache
- Department of Gastroenterology, ‘Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest 010825, Romania
| | - Titus Farcasiu
- Department of Removable Prosthodontics, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 010209, Romania
| | - Cristian Scheau
- Department of Physiology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
| | - Daniel Costache
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest 010825, Romania
| | - Constantin Caruntu
- Department of Physiology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Artopoulou II, Sarafianou A, Perisanidis C, Polyzois G. Effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation and quality of life of older edentulous head and neck cancer survivors following resection of the maxilla: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4111-4120. [PMID: 35067731 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06850-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation, as well as the quality of life (QOL) of older edentulous maxillectomy patients. METHODS Effectiveness of the complete denture obturator prosthesis and QOL of N = 44 older edentulous patients who had resection of the maxilla and were restored with a definitive prosthesis that was in use for a minimum of 1 year was assessed using three instruments: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Head and Neck Cancer Module (QLQ-HN35), and Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS). Data analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks, Spearman rank-order correlation, and hierarchical multivariable rank regression at α = .05 level of significance. RESULTS Participants' gender (P < .001), adjuvant treatment (P = .016), surgical approach (P = .017), size of the maxillary defect (P = .028), participants' prosthetic history (P = .047), and dental status of the mandible (P = .038) were significantly related to the self-reported effectiveness of the complete denture obturator prosthesis. Perceived functioning of the prosthesis (P = .001), participants' gender (P = .002), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (P = .027), and surgical approach (P = .039) were significant predictors of QOL. CONCLUSION Restoration of the edentulous maxillectomy defect is challenging. An effective definitive complete denture obturator appeared to be the strongest predictor for advanced quality of life in older maxillectomy patients. The physical status of the older participants significantly affected the overall QOL, but did not influence the self-reported functioning of the complete denture obturator prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioli Ioanna Artopoulou
- Department of Prosthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Dentistry, Athens, Greece. .,M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Aspasia Sarafianou
- Department of Prosthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Dentistry, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Perisanidis
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Evaggelismos" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gregory Polyzois
- Department of Prosthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Dentistry, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sweeny L, Curry JM, Crawley MB, DiLeo M, Bonaventure CA, Luginbuhl AJ, Guice KM, Taghizadeh F, McCreary E, Buncke M, Petrisor D, Wax MK. Age and Comorbidities Impact Medical Complications and Mortality Following Free Flap Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:772-780. [PMID: 34415067 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine if age correlated with surgical or medical complications following head and neck free flap reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected databases. METHODS Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction at three tertiary care institutions were included (n = 1972). Cohorts were based on age (<65, 65-75, 75-85, and >85). Outcomes reviewed operative duration, length of stay, surgical complications (free flap failure, fistula, hematoma, dehiscence, and infection), and medical complications (thromboembolism, stroke, cardiac, and pulmonary). RESULTS Anatomic site (P < .0001) and donor site varied by age (P < .0001). There was no difference in operative duration (P = .3) or length of hospitalization (P = .8) by age. The incidence of medical complications increased with increasing age. Pulmonary complication rates: <65 (3.9%), 65 to 75 (4.8%), 75 to 85 (7.1%), and >85 (11%) (P = .02). Cardiac complication rates: <65 (2.0%), 65 to 75 (7.3%), 75 to 85 (6.1%), and >85 (16.4%) (P < .0001). Mortality increased with age: <65 (0.4%), 65 to 75 (0.8%), 75 to 85 (1.1%), and >85 (4.1%) (P < .003). Medical complications correlated with mortality rates: pulmonary (3.5% vs. 0.6%; OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.0; P = .004); cardiac (3.3% vs. 0.6%; OR: 6.0; 95% CI: 1.6-21.8; P = .002); thromboembolism (4.6% vs. 0.7%; OR: 7.3; 95% CI: 1.6-33.6; P = .003); stroke (42% vs. 0.5%; OR: 149; 95% CI: 40-558; P < .0001); and sepsis (5% vs. 0.7%; OR 7.5; 95% CI: 1.0-60.5; P = .03). Age did not correlate with free flap success (P = .5), surgical complications (hematoma, P = .33; fistula, P = .23; infection, P = .07; and dehiscence, P = .37), or thirty-day readmission (P = .3). CONCLUSION Following free flap reconstruction, patient age did not correlate with development of a surgical complication. Patient age did correlate with development of a medical complication. Postoperative medical complications were found to correlate with perioperative mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Sweeny
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Joseph M Curry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Meghan B Crawley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Michael DiLeo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Caroline A Bonaventure
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Adam J Luginbuhl
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Kelsie M Guice
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Farshid Taghizadeh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Eleanor McCreary
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Michelle Buncke
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Daniel Petrisor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakayama Y, Ohkoshi A, Ishii R, Higashi K, Nakanome A, Ogawa T, Katori Y. The geriatric-8 screening tool for predicting complications in older adults after surgery for locally advanced head and neck cancer with free flap reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:2565-2571. [PMID: 34410471 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07038-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical surgery with free flap reconstruction for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is quite challenging for older adults. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool for predicting postoperative complications in older adults with HNC. METHODS A retrospective review of 37 older adults with HNC who underwent radical surgery with free flap reconstruction and were assessed by the G8 screening tool was performed. Postoperative complications during hospitalization were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and possible contributing factors, including the G8 score, for major and minor complications were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The appropriate G8 cut-off value for both major and minor complications was 12 (area under the curve 0.56 and 0.55, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both smoking and lower G8 score (≤ 12) were independently associated with the severity of complications (p = 0.043, p = 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The G8 was a possible predictor of major and minor complications in older adults with HNC who underwent radical surgery with free flap reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Nakayama
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Akira Ohkoshi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
| | - Ryo Ishii
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Higashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Ayako Nakanome
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Takenori Ogawa
- Department of Otolaryngology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, 501-1193, Japan
| | - Yukio Katori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cordova A, Toia F, Salgarello M, Pinto V, Lucattelli E, Sgarzani R, Figus A, Cherubino M, Bassetto F, Santanelli di Pompeo F, Bonfirraro PP, Maruccia M, Faini G, Cigna E, Starnoni M, Baraziol R, Riccio M, Mazzucco W, Rubino C, Bonomi S. Safety of Reconstructive Microsurgery in the Elderly Population: a Multicentric Prospective Study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:3281-3288. [PMID: 34247960 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety of reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients is still a topic of debate, because no conclusive evidence exists that provides indications and risk evaluation in elderly patients. The purpose of this study, which the Italian Society for Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery (SICPRE) has promoted, is to evaluate the safety and the complication risk of elective reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients as well as to identify patient- or procedure-related risk factors. The secondary aim is to evaluate the predictive role for complications of the Geriatric 8 score (G8). METHODS A total of 194 consecutive patients from 18 centers, aged 65 or older, who received an elective microsurgical flap between April 2018 and April 2019 were prospectively evaluated. Patient-related, treatment-related, and outcomes data were recorded and statistically analyzed through multiple-adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS Our study showed an increased risk of complications and a longer hospitalization in patients aged ≥75 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 (or G8 score ≤11) as compared to patients >65 years of age and <75 years of age who undergo reconstruction with a microsurgical flap. Instead, flap survival did not significantly vary with age, but was associated only with ASA score ≥3 (or G8 score ≤11) and surgeries that last longer than 480 min; however, flap survival (92.3%) was slightly lower than that commonly reported for in the general population. CONCLUSIONS Reconstructive microsurgery in the elderly is generally safe. The ASA score is easier and quicker than the G8 score and equally useful for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Cordova
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences. University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesca Toia
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences. University of Palermo, Italy.
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elena Lucattelli
- Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Sgarzani
- U.O.Centro Grandi Ustionati, Servizio di Chirurgia Plastica, Ospedale Maurizio Bufalini, Cesena, Italy
| | - Andrea Figus
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mario Cherubino
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Franco Bassetto
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
- Plastic Surgery, Nesmos Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University La Sapienza of Rome-Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Maruccia
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Faini
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Emanuele Cigna
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Starnoni
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Baraziol
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Plastic Surgery Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Michele Riccio
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti," Ancona, Italy
| | - Walter Mazzucco
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Plastic Surgery Unit of Oncology and Haematology, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Sassari University Hospital Trust, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonomi
- Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramos-Zayas A, López-Medrano F, Urquiza-Fornovi I, Zubillaga I, Gutiérrez R, Sánchez-Aniceto G, Acero J, Almeida F, Galdona A, Morán MJ, Pampin M, Cebrián JL. The Impact of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Undergoing Oncological Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicentre Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092109. [PMID: 33925543 PMCID: PMC8123773 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in an increased morbidity and a delay in adjuvant therapy—thus increasing the cancer recurrence rates—in patients undergoing oncological microvascular head and neck reconstruction. HAIs also result in a cost increase for the Health System. We prospectively analysed the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors and impacts of these infections in 65 patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction in three third-level university hospitals in Madrid (Spain). The three of them implemented the same antibiotic prophylactic regimen for surgical interventions. The rate of HAIs was 61.54%. The following complications were significantly more frequent in patients with HAIs: need to reoperate (p = 0.009), duration of hospital admission (p < 0.001) and delay in starting radiotherapy (p = 0.009). This manuscript aims to point out the importance of preventing HAIs in head and neck cancer patients, as they have shown a higher risk of postoperative complications. Abstract (1) Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) after head and neck free-flap reconstruction are a common postoperative complication. Risk factors for HAIs in this context and their consequences have not been adequately described. (2) Methods: Ongoing prospective multicentre study between 02/2019 and 12/2020. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were analysed, focusing on infections. (3) Results: Forty out of 65 patients (61.54%) suffered HAIs (surgical site infection: 52.18%, nosocomial pneumonia: 23.20%, bloodstream infection: 13% and urinary tract infection: 5.80%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae were the most frequently implicated. The significant risk factors for infection were: previous radiotherapy (Odds ratio (OR): 5.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39–21.10), anaemia (OR: 8.00; 95% CI, 0.96–66.95), salvage surgery (eight out of eight patients), tracheostomy (OR: 2.86; 95% CI, 1.01–8.14), surgery duration (OR: 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02), microvascular reoperation <72 h (eight/eight) and flap loss (eight/eight). The major surgical complications were: a need to reoperate (OR: 6.89; 95% CI, 1.42–33.51), prolonged hospital admission (OR: 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06–1.27) and delay in the initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (OR: 9.07; 95% CI, 1.72–47.67). The sixth month mortality rate in patients with HAIs was 7.69% vs. 0% in patients without HAIs (p = 0.50). (4) Conclusions: HAIs were common after this type of surgery, many of them caused by resistant microorganisms. Some modifiable risk factors were identified. Infections played a role in cancer prognosis by delaying adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Ramos-Zayas
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (I.U.-F.); (I.Z.); (R.G.); (G.S.-A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-617955504
| | - Francisco López-Medrano
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Irene Urquiza-Fornovi
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (I.U.-F.); (I.Z.); (R.G.); (G.S.-A.)
| | - Ignacio Zubillaga
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (I.U.-F.); (I.Z.); (R.G.); (G.S.-A.)
| | - Ramón Gutiérrez
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (I.U.-F.); (I.Z.); (R.G.); (G.S.-A.)
| | - Gregorio Sánchez-Aniceto
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “12 de Octubre” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research (i+12), Universidad Complutense, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (I.U.-F.); (I.Z.); (R.G.); (G.S.-A.)
| | - Julio Acero
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “Ramón y Cajal” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.A.); (F.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Fernando Almeida
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “Ramón y Cajal” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.A.); (F.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Ana Galdona
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “Ramón y Cajal” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.A.); (F.A.); (A.G.)
| | - María José Morán
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “La Paz” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.J.M.); (M.P.); (J.L.C.)
| | - Marta Pampin
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “La Paz” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.J.M.); (M.P.); (J.L.C.)
| | - José Luis Cebrián
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, “La Paz” University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.J.M.); (M.P.); (J.L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|