Postoperative pancreatic fistulas decrease the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis

Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation as an Alternative to High-risk Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and total pancreatectomy (TP) with islet autotransplantation (IAT) in patients at high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

BACKGROUND

Criteria to predict the risk of POPF occurrence after PD are available. However, even when a high risk of POPF is predicted, TP is not currently accepted as an alternative to PD, because of its severe consequences on glycaemic control. Combining IAT with TP may mitigate such consequences.

METHODS

Randomized, open-label, controlled, bicentric trial (NCT01346098). Candidates for PD at high-risk pancreatic anastomosis (ie, soft pancreas and duct diameter ≤3 mm) were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either PD or TP-IAT. The primary endpoint was the incidence of complications within 90 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, 61 patients were assigned to PD (n=31) or TP-IAT (n=30). In the intention-to-treat analysis, morbidity rate was 90·3% after PD and 60% after TP-IAT ( P =0.008). According to complications' severity, PD was associated with an increased risk of grade ≥2 [odds ratio (OR)=7.64 (95% CI: 1.35-43.3), P =0.022], while the OR for grade ≥3 complications was 2.82 (95% CI: 0.86-9.24, P =0.086). After TP-IAT, the postoperative stay was shorter [median: 10.5 vs 16.0 days; P <0.001). No differences were observed in disease-free survival, site of recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. TP-IAT was associated with a higher risk of diabetes [hazard ratio=9.1 (95% CI: 3.76-21.9), P <0.0001], but most patients maintained good metabolic control and showed sustained C-peptide production over time.

CONCLUSIONS

TP-IAT may become the standard treatment in candidates for PD, when a high risk of POPF is predicted.

Oncologic Benefits of Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Upfront Surgery in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has been primarily indicated for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in the last decade. This study is the updated meta-analysis for only patients with BRPC including recent NAT regimens such as FOLFIRINOX. The OS, R0 resection rate, and node-negativity rate was improved in NAT group compared with upfront surgery. Providing high-quality evidence is important to standardize the treatment protocol and help physicians decide the appropriate pancreatic cancer treatment.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by surgery is the primary treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, there is limited high-level evidence supporting the efficacy of NAT in BRPC. PubMed was searched to identify studies that compared the survival between BRPC patients who underwent NAT and those who underwent upfront surgery (UFS). The overall survival (OS) was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. A total of 1204 publications were identified, and 19 publications with 21 data sets (2906 patients; NAT, 1516; UFS, 1390) were analyzed. Two randomized controlled trials and two prospective studies were included. Thirteen studies performed an ITT analysis, while six presented the data of resected patients. The NAT group had significantly better OS than the UFS group in the ITT analyses (HR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.76) and resected patients (HR: 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60–0.78). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 and FOLFIRINOX improved the survival outcomes. Among the resected patients, the R0 resection and node-negativity rates were significantly higher in the NAT group. NAT improved the OS, R0 resection rate, and node-negativity rate compared with UFS. Standardizing treatment regimens based on high-quality evidence is fundamental for developing an optimal protocol.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a potential prognostic marker for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study

In pancreatic cancer, postoperative complications (POCs) are associated with disease outcomes. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is known to predict POCs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) in patients with hepatobiliary pancreatic tumors, including pancreatic cancer. Through POC occurrence risk, we aimed to determine whether GNRI could predict prognosis in patients who underwent PD or DP for resectable pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study examined 139 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer at Ehime University. All patients were subjected to nutritional screening using GNRI and were followed up for POC diagnosis and patient outcomes such as overall survival (OS). Patients were divided based on the GNRI value of 99 (Low group: N = 74, GNRI < 99; High group: N = 65, GNRI ≥ 99), which was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that GNRI < 99 was statistically correlated with POCs after curative pancreatic resection (p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that GNRI < 99 was significantly associated with long OS (p = 0.04). GNRI could be a potential prognostic marker for resectable pancreatic cancer after curative pancreatic resection despite being a simple and noninvasive approach.

Does Pancreatic Fistula Affect Long-Term Survival after Resection for Pancreatic Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The real influence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) on long-term survival after pancreatic cancer resection is unclear. The purpose of the present study was therefore to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of POPF on the disease-free and overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Our results highlighted that clinically relevant POPF after surgery for PDAC seems to be significantly associated with shorter DFS and OS. Confirmation, with future studies, of a negative impact of POPF on survival may encourage the widespread use of risk-stratification tools for assessing fistula, centralization of patients, and probably a closer oncological follow-up.

Abstract

Background: The impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) on survival after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Methods: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting on survival in patients with and without POPF. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the impact of POPF on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Sixteen retrospective cohort studies concerning a total of 5019 patients with an overall clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) rate of 12.63% (n = 634 patients) were considered. Five of eleven studies including DFS data reported higher recurrence rates in patients with POPF, and one study showed a higher recurrence rate in the peritoneal cavity. Six of sixteen studies reported worse OS rates in patients with POPF. Sufficient data for a meta-analysis were available in 11 studies for DFS, and in 16 studies for OS. The meta-analysis identified a shorter DFS in patients with CR-POPF (HR 1.59, p = 0.0025), and a worse OS in patients with POPF, CR-POPF (HR 1.15, p = 0.0043), grade-C POPF (HR 2.21, p = 0.0007), or CR-POPF after neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusions: CR-POPF after resection for PDAC is significantly associated with worse overall and disease-free survival.