Survival following surgical treatment for anorectal melanoma seems similar for local excision and extensive resection regardless of nodal involvement

Survival and Prognosis for Patients with Rectal Melanomas in the United States: A SEER-Based Study

PURPOSE

Limited attention was paid to focus on rectal melanomas (RM). This study aimed to evaluate the survival rate and prognostic factors of RM.

METHODS

The data for patients with RM from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were used to analyze tumor survival. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were employed to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). A nomogram was established based on the risk factors of survival by the forest plot for multivariate Cox regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curve were conducted for validation.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients with RM were selected to perform survival analyses. The median survival time of OS was 12 months (range: 0-146 months), and the median survival time of CSS was 12 months (range: 0-74 months). Patients' age, tumor size, stage, the number of nodes examined, surgery, and radiation were identified as prognostic indicators for CSS by the forest plot for multivariate Cox regression analysis. The nomogram was validated as a reliable model for CSS.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic relevance with tumor prognosis was confirmed in this study. Our nomogram can provide a relatively accurate prediction of the survival rate of patients with RM.

Organ preservation in anorectal melanoma: A tempting challenge-a case report

Melanoma arising from melanocytes is an uncommon neoplastic lesion, with rare occurrences in anorectal mucosa. While mucosal melanomas constitute a small portion of all melanomas, anorectal cases are even rarer and present with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Surgical management is central, with evolving debates regarding optimal approaches. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with anorectal melanoma. She complained of rectal bleeding and weight loss. Clinical examination and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3-cm budding lesion on the anterior rectal wall. Colonoscopy identified a pedunculated anorectal tumor of 3 cm, situated 4 cm from the anal margin. A biopsy led us to a malignant lesion: anorectal melanoma. Pelvic imaging displayed a localized tumor, prompting wide local excision with millimetric negative margins. These resection margins were estimated insufficient, even in front of R0 resection. Thus, and after multidisciplinary discussion, we opted for abdominoperineal resection after wide local excision. Lymph nodes were biopsied, confirming no residual tumor. Follow-up exhibited no recurrence at 1 year. Our case emphasizes the pivotal role of surgical strategy in managing anorectal melanoma, challenging the paradigm of organ preservation. Despite therapeutic progress, surgery remains integral, contributing to improved outcomes and addressing the metastatic potential inherent to this disease.

Anorectal melanoma

Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive mucosal melanoma subtype with a poor prognosis. Although recent advancements have been seen for cutaneous melanoma, the optimal treatment paradigm for management of anorectal melanoma is evolving. In this review, we highlight differences in the pathogenesis of mucosal versus cutaneous melanoma, new concepts of staging for mucosal melanoma, updates to surgical management of anorectal melanoma, and current data for adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy in this unique patient population.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 47 patients with primary anorectal malignant melanoma in the immune therapy era

PURPOSE

Primary anorectal melanoma (ARM) accounts for approximately 1.2% of all melanomas and 16.5% of all mucosal melanomas. ARM is associated with the shortest interval to disease progression and the highest rate of metastasis; however, optimal therapeutic strategies for ARM remain controversial. This study aimed to assess the ideal surgical intervention for ARM and to determine the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

We included 47 patients with ARM treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2011 to 2020. We performed a survival analysis for each of these groups: (i) patients with ARM (n = 47); (ii) operable non-stage IV cases at initial presentation (n = 35); and (iii) stage IV cases (n = 32).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 53.6%, and the median OS was 78.7 months in patients with ARM. No statistically significant difference in 5-year OS was found between rectal and anal sites (50.9% vs. 56.7%). In the non-stage IV subgroup, the type of surgery (abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision) did not correlate with OS (HR 1.85; 95% CI 0.46-7.5; p = 0.39). In the stage IV subgroup, the 2-year OS of the ICI treatment group was 61.4%, whereas that of the dacarbazine regimen group was 0% (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Our ARM prognosis was better than that of previous studies. Our findings suggest that the availability of ICI therapy may improve survival in patients with advanced ARM. However, further research is warranted to identify both the clinical and molecular predictors of response to improve patient selection.

Extensive resection improves overall and disease-specific survival in localized anorectal melanoma: A SEER-based study

Background

Anorectal melanoma is a rare tumor with a dismal prognosis. The only promising treatment for anorectal melanoma is surgery, either extensive resection (ER) or local excision (LE). However, the optimal extent of resection is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the survival outcomes of anorectal melanoma at different stages are influenced by the surgical approaches (LE or ER) using the National Institute of Health's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify patients treated for anorectal melanoma (2000–2018). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) outcomes were compared for the two surgical approaches (ER or LE) stratified by stage (localized, regional and distant).

Results

A total of 736 patients were included in the study. Details of previous surgical procedures were available for 548 of the study patients: 360 (65.7%) underwent LE, and 188 (34.3%) underwent ER. In localized cases, 199 underwent LE, and 48 underwent ER. The OS (median 45 vs. 29 months, 5-year rate 41.7% vs. 23.4%) and DSS (median 66 vs. 34 months, 5-year rate 51% vs. 30.7%) of patients undergoing ER were significantly better (p = 0.009 and 0.041, respectively) than those who received LE. Multivariate analysis showed that the type of surgery was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DSS. Among the regional cases, 89 cases had LE, and 96 cases had ER. Patients with regional disease who underwent ER had no significant differences in OS (23 vs. 21 months; p = 0.866) or DSS (24 vs. 24 months; p = 0. 907) compared to patients who underwent LE. In distant cases, 72 cases had LE, and 44 cases had ER. Patients with metastatic disease who had ER also had similar OS (median 11 vs. 8 months; p = 0.36) and DSS (median 11 vs. 8 months; p = 0.593) to those who underwent LE.

Conclusion

Extensive resection can improve the long-term prognosis of localized anorectal melanoma compared to local excision, but the prognosis of the two surgical techniques is comparable in both regional patients and distant patients.

Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage.

Methods

A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage.

Results

There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I–III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival.

Conclusion

No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.