Surgical resection of leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: A case series and literature review

Inferior vena cava reconstruction with non-fascial autologous peritoneum: Retrospective study and literature review

BACKGROUND

Inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is essential for complete (R0) excision of some malignancies. However, the optimal material for IVC reconstruction remains unclear. Our objective is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and advantages of using Non-Fascial Autologous Peritoneum (NFAP) for IVC reconstruction. To conduct a literature review of surgical strategies for tumors involving the IVC.

METHODS

We reviewed all IVC reconstructions performed at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Preoperative, operative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 consecutive IVC reconstructions were identified: seven direct sutures, eight venous homografts (VH), and 18 NFAP. With regard to NFAP, eight tubular (mean length, 12.5 cm) and 10 patch (mean length, 7.9 cm) IVC reconstructions were performed. Resection was R0 in 89% of the cases. Two patients had Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, 2 grade II, 2 grade III and 2 grade V complications. The only graft-related complication was a case of early partial thrombosis, which was conservatively treated. At a mean follow-up of 25.9 months, graft patency was 100%. There were seven recurrences and six deaths. Mean overall survival (OS) was 23.4 months and mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 14.4 months. According to our results, no statistically significant differences were found between NFAP and VH.

CONCLUSIONS

NFAP is a safe and effective alternative for partial or complete IVC reconstruction and has many advantages over other techniques, including its lack of cost, wide and ready availability, extreme handiness, and versatility. Further comparative studies are required to determine the optimal technique for IVC reconstruction.

Resection of retroperitoneal tumors with inferior vena cava involvement without caval reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Retroperitoneal tumors with involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) often require resection of the IVC to achieve complete tumor removal. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of IVC ligation without caval reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent IVC ligation (IVC-Ligation) and IVC resection with reconstruction (IVC-Reconstruction) at our institution between May 2004 and April 2021 was performed. Outcomes from the two surgical techniques were compared via univariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Forty-nine IVC-Ligation and six IVC-Reconstruction surgeries were identified. There were no differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, complication rates, postoperative morbidity, or overall 5-year survival between groups. IVC-Reconstruction patients were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (83% vs. 33%; p = 0.0257) and the IVC-Ligation cohort had a tendency to present with nondebilitating postoperative lymphedema (35% vs. 0%; p = 0.1615), which resolved for most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IVC-Ligation is a viable surgical option for select patients presenting with retroperitoneal tumors with IVC involvement and provides acceptable short- and medium-term outcomes.