Extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

Prediction models for the survival in patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influencing factors of survival in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma (IGA) and set up prediction model for the prediction of survival of patients diagnosed with IGA.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2232 patients with IGA who came from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' overall survival (OS) rate and cancer-specific survival (CSS) at the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the total population, 25.72% survived, 54.93% died of IGA and 19.35% died of other causes. The median survival time of patients was 25 months. The result showed that age, race, stage group, T stage, N stage, M stage, grade, tumour size, radiotherapy, number of lymph nodes removed and gastrectomy were independent prognostic factors of OS risk for patients with IGA; age, race, race, stage group, T stage, N stage, M stage, grade, radiotherapy and gastrectomy were associated with CSS risk for patients with IGA. In view of these prognostic factors, we developed two prediction models for predicting the OS and CSS risk for patients with IGA separately. For the developed OS-related prediction model, the C-index was 0.750 (95% CI: 0.740 to 0.760) in the training set, corresponding to 0.753 (95% CI: 0.736 to 0.770) in the testing set. Likewise, for the developed CSS-related prediction model, the C-index was 0.781 (95% CI: 0.770 to 0.793) in the training set, corresponding to 0.785 (95% CI: 0.766 to 0.803) in the testing set. The calibration curves of the training set and testing set revealed a good agreement between model predictions in the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival for patients with IGA and actual observations.

CONCLUSION

Combining demographic and clinicopathological features, two prediction models were developed to predict the risk of OS and CSS in patients with IGA, respectively. Both models have good predictive performance.

Gastrectomy with or without Complete Omentectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Surgery remains the only possible curative treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Peritoneal metastases are estimated to occur in approximately 55–60% AGC patients. Greater omentum is the most common metastatic area in AGC. At present, omentectomy alone or bursectomy are usually carried out during gastric cancer surgery. We performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate long-term and short-term outcomes among AGC patients, who have undergone radical gastrectomy with or without complete omentectomy (CO). Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed by use of RevMan (Computer program) Version 5.4. Results: The eight included studies covered an approximately 20 years long study period (2000–2018). Almost all included studies were retrospective ones and originated from Asian countries. Meta-analysis indicated gastrectomy without CO as significantly associated with longer 3-year (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98, p = 0.005) and 5-year overall survivals (OS) (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88–0.98, p = 0.007). Moreover, we found longer operative time (MD: 24.00, 95% CI: −0.45–48.45, p = 0.05) and higher estimated blood loss (MD: 194.76, 95% CI: 96.40–293.13, p = 0.0001) in CO group. Conclusions: Non-complete omentectomy (NCO) group had a statistically greater rate in 3-year and 5-year OSs than the CO group, while the CO group had significantly longer operative time and higher estimated blood loss than the NCO group. Further randomized, possibly multi-center trials may turn out of paramount importance in confirming our results.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Resectable Proximal Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction and Distal Esophageal Cancer

Simple Summary

The five-year survival for resectable proximal gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and distal esophageal cancer ranges from 30 to 60% globally. Neoadjuvant and/or perioperative therapy has emerged as a treatment tool to improve patient selection for surgery, resectability, and locoregional control of the disease. As a result, treatment strategies have evolved from the first trials in the late 1980s to the pivotal CROSS trial updated in 2015. The review summarizes current clinical trials and treatment recommendations with regard to neoadjuvant and/or perioperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus, GEJ, and proximal stomach.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable proximal gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and distal esophageal cancer have evolved over several decades. Treatment recommendations differ based on histologic type—squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) versus adenocarcinoma (AC)—as well as the exact location of the tumor. Recent and older clinical trials in this area were critically reviewed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with concurrent taxane- or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has an established role for both AC and SCC of the distal esophagus and GEJ. The use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric AC is based on the FLOT4 and MAGIC trials; however, the utility of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in this setting requires further evaluation. Additional clinical trials evaluating chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiation that are currently in process are highlighted, given the need for further disease control.