Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: A systematic review

Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Tool "Catquest" in Odia Language

BACKGROUND

Healthcare is evolving to consider patient satisfaction along with any procedure's objective outcome. After cataract surgery, the quality of vision can be assessed by administering questionnaires on daily activities. Using such questionnaires in local languages enhances patient-doctor interaction. In this study, we aim to determine whether using a Catquest questionnaire in Odia can help better assess the quality of life in the setting of a tertiary care center in Eastern India.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to validate the use of a Catquest questionnaire among Eastern India's Odia-speaking population.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a prospective study on 40 patients planning to undergo cataract surgery in a tertiary care center in Eastern India. We collected demographic data and conducted a comprehensive ocular examination, including slit lamp examination, fundus examination, and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. We asked patients to complete a Catquest questionnaire before and six weeks after surgery. We translated the English version of the questionnaire into Odia and validated it for use in the study. Patients completed both Odia and English questionnaires on both occasions. We conducted a statistical analysis to check for agreement between the answers in both languages and to validate the questionnaire in Odia. First translation and back-translation were done in English and Odia. We prepared a final draft of the questionnaire in Odia. We determined intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values and compared the reliability of the responses of the same group of patients before and after surgery. We explored variability between answers in both languages.

RESULTS

The data were categorical. ICC values for various activities such as reading papers, seeing to walk on uneven ground, watching television, and preferred hobbies showed perfect reliability, with ICC = 1 both preop and postop. This indicated consistent perceptions of these activities across the two time points. Activities such as seeing prices, seeing to do needlework, reading newspapers, and shopping also showed good reliability. For reading text on television, the ICC values were -0.0588 preop. However, postop, all patients were able to watch television comfortably. Thus, there was no variability between the answers. Negative ICC preop indicated very poor reliability or inconsistency preop, which we corrected postop.

CONCLUSION

With the growing emphasis on patient-reported outcomes, both clinical and subjective parameters need to be considered for any procedure's success. In our clinical setting, the use of the Catquest questionnaire for assessing patient-reported outcomes in their day-to-day activities was beneficial. The translated version was reliable and well-applicable in the setting of the present study. As the study shows a good correlation between the original and translated versions, we can conclude that it can be incorporated in clinical practice successfully.

Ocular dominance shift in refractive cataract surgery: prospective, observational study

PURPOSE

To explore the features of the dominant and nondominant eyes in patients with cataracts and predict ocular dominance shift (ODS) based on preoperative indicators.

SETTING

Changsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

METHODS

Patients with age-related cataracts who underwent unilateral cataract surgery were enrolled in this study. Before the procedure, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was assessed and noncycloplegic subjective refraction evaluations were conducted to determine corrected distance visual acuity. Total astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, and intraocular astigmatism were measured using OPD-Scan III. Cataract type was assessed using slitlamp biomicroscopy based on the Lens Opacities Classification System III. Ocular dominance (OD) was determined under corrected conditions using the hole-in-card test. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. After 1 month, OD was re-evaluated, and participants completed the 9-item Short-Form Cataract Questionnaire.

RESULTS

94 patients (188 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The analysis showed that the ODS rate of unilateral cataract surgery was 40.4%. In addition, age, UDVA of the nondominant eye, posterior subcapsular cataract, and total astigmatism were risk factors for ODS. No difference in vision-related quality of life was detected between patients who had ODS and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Several preoperative parameters as potential risk factors of ODS after cataract surgery were identified. These findings provide guidance for predicting changes in the dominant eye and may improve the precise selection of intraocular lenses and implementation of monovision strategies.

Clinical Performance of an Omnidirectional Aberration-Free Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To assess the refractive and visual outcomes at different distances following cataract surgery with implantation of an omnidirectional aberration-free diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

A total of 24 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the TrivaT-aAY IOL were analyzed at 3-4 months post-surgery. Refractive error, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, uncorrected and corrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm, monocular and binocular defocus curve and rotational stability were measured. Patients also completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire at the last postoperative visit.

Results

The postoperative mean values of binocular logMAR CDVA, CDIVA and CDNVA were -0.06±0.06, 0.05±0.07 and 0.07±0.08, respectively. One hundred percent of patients showed a cumulative binocular CDVA ≥20/25, and 95.83% of patients showed a cumulative binocular CDIVA and CDNVA ≥20/32. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.07±0.26D and 100% and 97.92% eyes were within ±1.00D and ±0.50D, respectively. The mean postoperative refractive cylinder was -0.22±0.29D and 100% and 89.58% eyes showed a value ≤1.00D and ≤0.50D, respectively. The defocus curves showed a wide range of useful vision, with visual acuity values >0.2 logMAR. Mean absolute IOL rotation was 2.19±2.17 degrees and all eyes had a rotation <10 degrees. For the questionnaire, 95.83% of patients reported being quite satisfied to very satisfied with their vision and about 79.17% did not report any difficulty with their vision in their everyday life. Between 83.33% and 95.83% of patients reported no difficulty performing different tasks. No intra- and postoperative complications were reported during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Our study shows that the TrivaT-aAY IOL provides good visual acuities at all distances and refractive outcomes with excellent rotational stability and with high satisfaction among our patients after its implantation.

Visual and Refractive Outcomes After Bi-aspheric Trifocal Toric Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE

To assess clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of a new bi-aspheric diffractive intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent bilateral implantation of the Asqelio Trifocal Toric IOL (AST Products, Inc) and were evaluated 3 months postoperatively. Main outcomes included refractive error, photopic monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA, CDVA), intermediate (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, and near (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm visual acuities. Mesopic monocular and binocular CDNVA were also measured. Defocus curves, binocular contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare and rotational stability were determined. Patients completed Catquest-9SF and visual symptoms questionnaires.

RESULTS

Average values of binocular photopic CDVA, CDIVA, and CDNVA, and mesopic CDNVA were -0.04 ± 0.06, 0.02 ± 0.08, 0.02 ± 0.07, and 0.22 ± 0.11 logMAR, respectively. All patients achieved cumulative CDVA ⩾ 20/25, and CDIVA and CDNVA of 20/32 or better. Binocular depth of focus was approximately 3.25 diopters (D). Mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.08 ± 0.26 D, with 95% of eyes within ±0.50 D. Mean postoperative refractive cylinder was -0.22 ± 0.27 D, with 91.67% of eyes within 0.50 D or less, respectively. IOL rotation averaged 0.25 ± 0.65 degrees, all eyes having rotation of less than 5 degrees. Contrast sensitivity was within or above normal levels under photopic and mesopic conditions, with or without glare, except for 12 cpd under mesopic conditions with glare. Questionnaire responses indicated 96.67% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with postoperative vision, and 80.00% to 96.67% reported no difficulty in different daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

The Asqelio Trifocal Toric IOL demonstrated favorable outcomes, providing excellent visual performance at all distances, precise refractive results, and remarkable rotational stability. Patients reported high satisfaction levels and minimal difficulty in daily activities. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e407-e419.].

Visual performance and patient satisfaction with AcrySof® IQ Vivity® IOL: Experience from a tertiary care center in central India

PURPOSE

To study the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction profile among patients post phacoemulsification with the Vivity intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHOD

This was a hospital-based, prospective, observational study cons isting of 64 study subjects who were followed up for 1 month to look for the objective and subjective aspects of visual outcomes of Vivity IOLs. Objective parameters included distance vision, intermediate vision, near vision, and contrast-sensitivity, whereas subjective parameters were assessed using the modified Catquest 9SF Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Among the total study population, 82.5% were males and 17.5% were females, the most common age group was 41-50 years. In addition, 93.6% had a distance visual acuity of 6/9 or better, 93.7% had an intermediate vision of N18 or better, whereas 50.8% had a near vision of N18 or better. Good contrast sensitivity was reported among 79.4% of subjects, and 95.2% of study subjects were comfortable with distance vision, whereas 74.6% and 22.2% were comfortable with intermediate and near vision, respectively. Only two patients complained of glare, whereas none complained of halos and starbursts. A total of 88.8% of study subjects were satisfied with their postoperative visual outcomes, whereas 87.3% were willing to Vivity IOL in the other eye or were willing to refer this IOL to others.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated a good distance and intermediate visual acuity post-Vivity IOL implantation, whereas near activities mostly required the use of near-addition glasses, though requiring lesser near-addition power.

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens: a single-masked prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the visual outcomes of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with two different monofocal IOLs.

SETTING

Eye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center, single-masked, randomized controlled clinical study.

METHODS

The study included patients undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Patients were consecutively randomized by block randomization and assigned in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to three study arms to bilaterally receive Tecnis Eyhance™ (model ICB00) or Tecnis® monofocal 1-piece (model PCB00) or Clareon® monofocal (model CNA0T0), respectively. Monocular and binocular (both corrected and uncorrected) visual acuities for far, intermediate and near were registered and compared among groups at 3 months. To track changes in patient quality of life, the Catquest-9SF questionnaire was administered to each patient before and after cataract extraction.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (30 for each group) were enrolled. At 3 months follow-up, statistically significant differences for intermediate visual acuities were found between the three groups. Nonstatistically significant differences were observed for distance visual acuities and the changes in Catquest-9SF scores.

CONCLUSION

Tecnis Eyhance™ provided better results in intermediate visual outcomes without adverse effects on patients' quality of life.

Clinical Outcomes of a Bi-Aspheric Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To assess refractive and visual outcomes post-cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of a bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

A total of 24 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Asqelio Trifocal IOL TFLIO130C were evaluated at the 6 months postoperative mark. Key outcome measures included refractive error, photopic monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, and uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm. Additionally, monocular and binocular CDNVA were assessed under mesopic conditions. Monocular and binocular defocus curves, and binocular contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, with and without glare, were measured. Catquest-9SF and visual symptoms questionnaires were also administered.

Results

Postoperative average values of binocular logMAR photopic CDVA, photopic CDIVA, photopic CDNVA and mesopic CDNVA were -0.01±0.06, 0.03±0.09, 0.02±0.05 and 0.19±0.13, respectively. About 100% of patients showed cumulative CDVA and CDNVA ≥20/25, and CDIVA ≥20/32. The average absolute depth-of-focus was about 4.50D. The average postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.05±0.30D and 100% and 93.75% eyes were within ±1.00D and ±0.50D, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was either within or above normal levels under both photopic and mesopic conditions, both with and without glare, except for 12 cpd under mesopic conditions with glare where the mean falls just below the normal range. Questionnaires revealed that 87.5% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their vision after the surgery, and higher percentages for no difficulty in performing different activities, ranging from 70.83% to 95.83%, were reported.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal IOL yields very good visual performance across distances, fostering high satisfaction levels and minimal difficulties in daily activities.

Clinical Performance of a New Trifocal IOL with a 7.0 mm Optical Zone

Purpose

To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a 7.0 mm optical zone.

Methods

A total of 23 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Triva-aXAY IOL were analyzed at 6 months post-surgery. The main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, uncorrected and corrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm, and binocular defocus curve. Patients also completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire.

Results

All eyes were within ±1.00D, and 91.30% of eyes within ±0.50D, with a mean postoperative spherical equivalent of -0.14±0.29D. Similarly, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UDVA ≥20/25, compared to 100% for CDVA, and the mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.02±0.06 and 0.00±0.05 logMAR, respectively. At intermediate vision, 65.22% of patients showed a binocular UIVA ≥20/25, compared to 86.96% for CDIVA, and the mean binocular UIVA and CDIVA were 0.07±0.06 and 0.06±0.06 logMAR, respectively. At near, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UNVA and CDNVA ≥20/25, with a mean binocular UDNVA and CDNVA of 0.04±0.07 and 0.02±0.05 logMAR, respectively. Finally, 95.65% of patients reported being quite satisfied to very satisfied with their vision and about 74% did not report any difficulty with their vision in their everyday life. Between 65.22% and 100% of patients reported no difficulty performing different tasks.

Conclusion

Our study shows good visual and refractive outcomes with high satisfaction in patients implanted with the Triva-aXAY IOL with a 7.0 mm optical zone.

Clinical Outcomes of a Monofocal, Optimized, Aspheric, Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Implant

Purpose

To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes of eyes implanted with monofocal, optimized, aspheric, hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOL) following cataract surgery.

Methods

The study assessed 55 eyes implanted with CT LUCIA® 621P IOLs (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at 3-months postsurgery. The main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, and wavefront aberrations. Patients were asked to complete the Catquest-9SF questionnaire.

Results

At 3 months, the cumulative Snellen visual acuity was 20/20 in 94.55% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 100%. The difference between the UDVA and CDVA was either the same (70.91%) or better (29.09%) in all eyes. The mean Snellen decimal UDVA and DCVA were 1.07 ± 0.15 and 1.13 ± 0.11, respectively. The safety and efficacy indexes were 1.48 and 1.40, respectively. 47.27% of eyes showed a spherical equivalent ±0.13 D, with 92.73% of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and all eyes were within ±1.00 D. The mean spherical equivalent was -0.03 ± 0.30 D and the mean refractive cylinder -0.36 ± 0.34 D. The log photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity functions were good and similar for all spatial frequencies. All patients reported being either fairly satisfied (score 3) or very satisfied (score 4) with their vision (mean = 3.64 ± 0.49). No intra- and postoperative complications were reported during the 3 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

The current study demonstrates that excellent visual and refractive outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction, can be achieved after cataract surgery with optimized, aspheric CT LUCIA 621P monofocal IOLs.

Ontario Cataract Quality Outcome Initiative: appropriateness and prioritization of cataract surgery

OBJECTIVE

To explore the utility of the Catquest 9SF visual function (VF) questionnaire along with visual acuity (VA) for determining appropriateness and priority for cataract surgery. To evaluate the feasibility of administering the Catquest-9SF in a clinical setting using web-based electronic data capture and interpretation.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentred interventional observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects undergoing sequential cataract surgery in both eyes at 4 sites in Ontario.

METHODS

We recorded best-corrected VA (BCVA) and VA with current correction (CCVA) in each eye and both eyes (OU) and Catquest-9SF responses on a tablet before and after cataract surgery. Linear regression models were employed to test for associations between VA and visual function (VF).

RESULTS

Preoperative BCVA and CCVA in the worse eye were significant predictors of change in VF (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively); subjects with worse VA had a greater improvement in VF after surgery. There was a significant association between improvement in VF and improvement in CCVA OU (p = 0.001). Fourteen of 151 subjects (9%) had no improvement or worse VF scores after surgery. Within this group, 10 of 14 subjects had a preoperative score ≤-3, which is suggestive of minimal visual disability. Within this subset, 4 of 14 subjects (2.6%) had a preoperative BCVA of 20/30 or better in their worse eye.

CONCLUSIONS

For patient groups with equal VA, the Catquest-9SF score can help determine priority for surgery. Web-based data capture and interpretation allow for efficient virtual assessments of VF. A BCVA in the worse eye of 20/30 or better combined with a Catquest-9SF score <-3 can be used as a guideline for lowest priority.

Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

To investigate the psychometric performance and responsiveness of Catquest-9SF, a patient-reported questionnaire developed to evaluate visual function as related to daily tasks, in patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

This is a pooled analysis on prospective data collected for previous projects. Subjects were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Peel region, Hamilton, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Catquest-9SF was administered pre-operative and post-operatively to patients with cataract. Psychometric properties, including category threshold order, infit/outfit, precision, unidimensionality, targeting, and differential item functioning were tested using Rasch analysis with Winsteps software (v.4.4.4) for Catquest-9SF. Responsiveness of questionnaire scores to cataract surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

934 patients (mean age = 71.6, 492[52.7%] female) completed the pre- and post-operative Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.01, person reliability = 0.80), and confirmed unidimensionality. The infit range was 0.75-1.29 and the outfit range was 0.74-1.51, with one item ('satisfaction with vision') misfitting (outfit value = 1.51). There was mistargeting of -1.07 in pre-operative scores and mistargeting of -2.43 in both pre- and post-operative scores, meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. There was no adverse differential item functioning. There was a mean 1.47 logit improvement in Catquest-9SF scores after cataract surgery (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Catquest-9SF is a psychometrically robust questionnaire for assessment of visual function in patients with cataract in Ontario, Canada. It is also responsive to clinical improvement after cataract surgery.

Contrast Sensitivity and Patient Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Bi-Aspheric Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To assess contrast sensitivity and patient reported outcomes after uncomplicated cataract surgery with a new bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods

Twenty-five patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Asqelio Trifocal TFLIO130C IOL (AST Products Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) were analyzed at 6 months post-surgery. Binocular contrast sensitivity with and without glare was measured under photopic conditions (85 cd/m²) and mesopic conditions (3 cd/m²). Patients were asked to complete the Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire and a visual symptoms questionnaire.

Results

Photopic contrast sensitivity values were either within or above normal levels without glare; when glare was induced, the mean sensitivity values dropped just below normal range. Mesopic contrast sensitivity values were above or within normal range both with and without glare, except for 12 cpd with glare, where the mean fell just below the normal range. Differences in binocular contrast sensitivity threshold values with and without glare were significant for all spatial frequencies tested under both photopic and mesopic conditions (p<0.05). The Catquest-9SF questionnaire outcomes showed that 88% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their sight after the surgery, and in all cases, the results indicated no difficulty in performing different daily activities. The visual symptoms questionnaire indicated no relevant visual symptoms regarding frequency, intensity, or bothersomeness after implantation of the trifocal IOL.

Conclusion

This novel bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal IOL provides good contrast sensitivity outcomes under bright and dim lighting conditions. Patients were satisfied with the surgery, with no relevant visual symptoms.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis

PURPOSE

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a tool measuring visual disability and vision-related limitation in patients' daily activities. The primary objective of this study was the validation of Catquest-9SF in a Greek-speaking cataract population.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated into Greek and translated back into English. A pre-final Greek version was formed and tested by 10 Greek-English bilingual participants and by the translation team, and the final version was produced. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery completed the questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis was performed for the assessment of the Catquest-9SF psychometric properties, including response category ordering, item fit statistics, principal components analysis, precision, differential item functioning and targeting for preoperative and postoperative data collectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 (55 men, 45 women, mean age = 71.94±6.63) cataract patients completed the Greek version of Catquest-9SF questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis showed a significant improvement in the median person Rasch score from -1.49 preoperatively to -4.71 logits postoperatively, while the effect size was 1.3. Unidimensionality was confirmed since infit and outfit mean square values varied between 0.66 and 1.37. Rasch analysis showed good precision and separation ability (Person Separation Index of 3.28, and Person Reliability of 0.92). Four response categories were found for all items. The item-person means difference was -1.83 logits. The difference between preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF logit score was positively correlated with preoperative Catquest-9SF logit score (coeff. = 0.798, p<0.0001) and negatively correlated with postoperative spherical equivalent (coeff. = -0.825, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The Greek version of Catquest-9SF proved to be reliable, valid, unidimensional and responsive to changes after cataract surgery presenting good psychometric properties for cataract patients. Some postoperative mistargeting was found indicating that the tasks were easily performed by respondents after cataract surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05323526 -retrospectively registered.

Self-assessed visual function outcome in cataract surgery: minimum important difference of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to study the minimum important difference (MID) of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in cataract surgery.

METHODS

A nationwide multi-center prospective randomized study was conducted using the Swedish National Cataract Register and the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Randomized patients (n = 400) who had completed the Catquest-9SF before surgery and three months after surgery were sent an anchor question on self-assessed change in visual function after cataract surgery 14 days after the postoperative Catquest-9SF. Rasch analysis was performed on the preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF questionnaires, and the patients were dichotomized with regard to their preoperative Rasch score. The MID range of the two groups was calculated based on the anchor question, and the anchor question based MID was then estimated in a scatter plot. The MID was also estimated based on distribution by calculating Cohen's effect size.

RESULTS

The analyses included 231 patients who had completed the Catquest-9SF on both occasions as well as the questionnaire with the anchor question. The group with better preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 0.5 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.07. The group with worse preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 1.80 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.46.

CONCLUSION

This article contributes detailed knowledge of the MID of Catquest-9SF, enabling even more accurate high-quality evaluation of the outcome and benefit of cataract surgery worldwide.

Visual quality analysis using the Chinese Catquest-9SF scale following different spherical aberration IOL implantation

Purpose

Based on the Chinese version of the Catquest-9SF scale, the contrast sensitivity meter and wavefront aberrometer were used to evaluate the visual quality of cataract patients implanted with different spherical aberrations IOL.

Design

Retrospective Observational Study.

Methods

Patients who had the lens implantation in our department from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. All patients underwent uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity and slit lamp microscope, high-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity test. The KR-1W wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure wavefront aberrations post-operation. The Chinese Catquest-9SF scale was used to score the postoperative visual satisfaction of the patients.

Results

145 patients were screened according to the exclusion criteria, including 51 patients in the zero aspherical IOL (SOFTEC HD) group, 42 patients in the negative aspherical IOL (ZCB00) group, and a total of 52 patients in the spherical IOL (HQ-201HEP) group. The score was the highest in the zero spherical aberration group, followed by the negative spherical aberration group with the lowest scores in the spherical IOL group. Higher-order aberrations are relatively low in eyes implanted with the zero spherical aberration group. Contrast sensitivity with spherical lenses under glare-free and glare conditions was lower than those with aspheric lenses, and at higher frequencies the zero-aberration aspheric lens performed the best.

Conclusion

The Chinese Catquest-9SF scale provides an indication of visual quality after aspheric IOL implantation.

Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens

AIM

To compare visual quality after unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL.

METHODS

The prospective nonrandom, comparative study consisted of 60 eyes of 60 patients suffering unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of two different IOLs: AT LISA tri 839MP (30 eyes; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) and LS-313 MF30 (30 eyes; Oculentis GmbH, Germany). Visual acuity, refractive outcome, contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, quality of vision, and optical phenomena were evaluated at 3mo postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between groups in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P=0.13) and uncorrected near visual acuity (P=0.54). In contrast, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was better in trifocal group compared to the refractive multifocal group (P=0.02). No significant statistical between-group difference was detected in cylinder (P=0.43). Compared to trifocal group, spherical refraction and spherical equivalent in refractive multi focal group were more myopic (P<0.01). Under photopic conditions, no significant statistical differences were found between groups in contrast sensitivity at 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd). The refractive multifocal group performed better at 12 and 18 cpd than the trifocal group (P=0.01, P=0.034, respectively). The questionnaires of quality of vision and optical phenomena showed no differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Trifocal IOL is superior to refractive multifocal IOL in intermediate visual acuity. Rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL is more myopic in automated refraction and significantly better for the photopic contrast sensitivity at high frequency.

Catquest-9SF functioning over a decade - a study from the Swedish National Cataract Register

Background

The Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) collects data on cataract surgery outcomes during March, including patient-reported outcomes using the Catquest-9SF questionnaire for over 11 years. Previous studies from NCR have shown that the preoperative visual acuity has improved over time. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the Catquest-9SF Rasch scoring performance in this changing environment. A second purpose was to describe clinical data over the same period for those who completed the questionnaire.

Methods

The performance of the Catquest-9SF was analysed by a separate Rasch analysis for each year, resulting in a preoperative and postoperative score for each participating patient in the annual cohorts. The clinical data and questionnaire scoring were analysed for each year in the period 2008–2018 inclusive.

Results

Data were available for 42,023 eyes for 11 annual cohorts (2008–2018). The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were stable during the study period. Person separation (precision) for the whole period was 2.58 and varied between 2.45 and 2.72. The person reliability was 0.87 and varied between 0.86 and 0.88. The targeting of question difficulty to person ability became less accurate over time meaning that the item activities became easier to carry out without difficulty. The average targeting for the whole period was −2.06 and changed from −1.92 in 2008 to −2.31 in 2018. The person score improved both before surgery and after surgery, indicating that patients are undergoing surgery at a more able level and getting better outcomes. The average improvement by surgery decreased from 3.41 logits in 2008 to 3.21 logits in 2018 (p = 0.003).

Over time, patient age decreased from 75 to 74 years (p < 0.001) and the proportion of women decreased from 63.9 to 57.9% (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative visual acuity in both the operated eye and the better eye improved over time (0.47 to 0.40 logMAR, p < 0.001 and 0.22 to 0.19 logMAR, p < 0.001, respectively), as did the mean postoperative visual acuity in the operated eye (0.14 to 0.09 logMAR, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The Catquest-9SF retained stable psychometric properties over this 11-year period although more recent cohorts included slightly younger patients with somewhat better vision.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population

Background

Visual acuity alone has limitations in assessing a patient’s appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. Several tools, including the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and the electronic cataract appropriateness and priority system (eCAPS) have been developed to evaluate patients–reported visual function as related to day-to-day tasks. The aim of this study was to validate Catquest-9SF and eCAPS in a Canadian population and propose a shorter version of each, in an attempt to extend their applicability in clinical practice.

Methods

The English translation of the Swedish Catquest-9SF and eCAPS were self-administered separately in pre-operative patients in tertiary care in Peel region, Ontario. Rasch analysis was used to validate both scales and assess their psychometric properties, such as category threshold order, item fit, unidimensionality, precision, targeting, and differential item functioning.

Results

A total of 313 cataract patients (mean age = 69.1, 56.5% female) completed the Catquest-9SF and eCAPS. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.09, person reliability = 0.81), unidimensionality and no misfits (infit range 0.75–1.35, outfit range 0.83–1.36). There mean for patients was equal to -1.43 (lower than the mean for items which is set automatically at zero), meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. eCAPS had 3 items that misfit the Rasch model and were excluded (infit range 0.82–1.30, outfit range 0.75–1.36). Precision was inadequate (person separation index = 0.19, person reliability = 0.04). 78.8% of subjects scored≤9 (answered that they had no issues for most questions).

Conclusions

Catquest-9SF demonstrated good psychometric properties and is suitable for assessing visual function of care-seeking patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. There was some mistargeting, suggesting that the tasks were relatively easy to perform, which is consistent with previous research. On the contrary, eCAPS is not sensitive in differentiating patients who had impaired visual functioning.