Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for myopic macular hole: A meta-analysis

Enhancing Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Stability in Macular Hole Retinal Detachment by the "Viscoelastic Agent Pool" Technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical, anatomical, and functional results of "viscoelastic agent pool" technique-assisted stability of inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole retinal detachment.

METHODS

The innovative surgical technique was performed on 10 patients with macular hole retinal detachment. The primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity after surgery, rate of closure of macular hole, retinal reattachment, and occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean age of the individuals was 67.70 ± 8.75 (range, 55-84) years; mean axial length, 29.34 ± 1.53 (range, 27.10-30.93) mm; mean corrected MH diameter, 685.30± 345.65 (range, 172-1,325) µ m; and average follow-up period, 6.01 ± 1.71 (range, 3.10-8.4) months. In 6 eyes (60%), the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity showed improvement. All patients had macular hole closure, and the retinal reattachment rate was 100%. No postoperative complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

The "viscoelastic agent pool" technique, an innovative surgical approach designed to enhance the stability of the internal limiting membrane flap, serves as an effective adjunctive procedure for the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique. It presents a viable option for patients with macular hole retinal detachment.

Visual Improvement Despite Macular Pucker After Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Idiopathic Macular Hole

Purpose: To report a case of a macular pucker forming after macular hole (MH) repair with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique, with resolution after secondary inverted ILM flap peeling. Methods: A single case was evaluated. Results: A 76-year-old woman presented with reduced central vision (28 letters) in the right eye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) identified an idiopathic full-thickness MH measuring 629 µm in diameter. The patient had pars plana vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap formation. One month postoperatively, the visual acuity (VA) in the right eye was 47 letters and OCT confirmed MH closure. However, the patient developed deterioration in the central vision 10 months postoperatively. A macular pucker in the inverted ILM flap region was found on OCT. Repeat vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap peeling was performed. Postoperatively, the VA in the right eye improved to 60 letters and OCT showed resolution of the macular pucker. Conclusions: A complication of the inverted ILM flap technique for MH is formation of a macular pucker in the region of the inverted ILM flap. Secondary inverted ILM flap peeling results in resolution of the macular pucker.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MEDIUM-SIZED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY WITH INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING

PURPOSE

To investigate surgical results for medium-sized (251-400 µ m) macular holes (MHs).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved 266 eyes of 262 consecutive patients who underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (147 eyes in the ILM peeling group) or inverted ILM flap cover technique (119 eyes in the inverted flap group) for primary medium-sized full-thickness MHs. Macular hole associated with retinal detachment, recurrent MH, and traumatic MH were excluded.

RESULTS

The primary closure rate for overall medium-sized MHs was 100% (119 of 119 eyes) in the inverted flap group, which was significantly higher than that (94.6% [139/147 eyes]; P = 0.010) in the ILM peeling group. Notably, even after adjusting for the minimum MH diameter, presence of high myopia, or preexisting posterior vitreous detachment, the primary closure rate was significantly better in the inverted flap group than in the ILM peeling group (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, overall adjusted P = 0.006, 0.009, 0.005, respectively). The preoperative and postoperative restoration of the outer retinal layers and visual acuity were comparable between the inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling techniques.

CONCLUSION

Primary closure for medium-sized MHs was significantly superior in the inverted flap group than in the ILM peeling group.

A TITANIUM MACULAR BUCKLE IMPLANT DESIGNED FOR AN EASY PLACEMENT IN MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES

PURPOSE

A new easy-to-place titanium macular buckle implant and the surgical technique for placing it in myopic macular holes are presented. A 60-year-old patient with pathologic myopia presented with macular holes in both eyes. The hole in the right eye was recurrent and long-standing since the initial diagnosis, which was over 5 years ago. He refused surgery for the better seeing left eye. The vision of the right eye was 20/200. The patient only wanted macular hole repair in the right eye if a macular buckle could be incorporated in the surgery.

METHODS

Because there was no commercially available macular buckle in the United States, a custom-made titanium buckle was designed and manufactured for this patient. In addition to the standard pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peel, and gas tamponade, the titanium macular buckle was placed externally to provide indentation over the macula.

RESULTS

The titanium macular buckle provided approximately 1 mm of indentation, shortening the axial length from 28.88 mm to 27.94 mm. The macular hole was closed postoperatively. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 20/200 at 1 month with no complications from the titanium macular buckle implant or the surgical technique. There was no improvement in the final visual acuity, which was attributed to foveal atrophy because of the long-standing nature of the macular hole.

CONCLUSION

This titanium macular buckle implant designed for an easy placement could be an invaluable addition for surgical success in myopic macular pathologies, including myopic macular holes.

Platelet concentrates in macular hole surgery. A journey through the labyrinth of terminology, preparation, and application: a comprehensive review

The surgical management of macular holes is undergoing continuous evolution, with recent focus on the utilization of platelet concentrates as a promising adjunctive intervention. Currently, they present a valid surgical approach for achieving anatomical and functional success with a non-inferiority comparably to the alternative surgical techniques. Nonetheless, the utilization of varied platelet concentrates terminologies, coupled with the lack of standardization in their preparation methodologies, engenders both lexical confusion and challenges in comparing scientific studies published up until now. In this review, we summarized the published evidence concerning the application of platelet concentrates in macular holes surgery, aiming to clarify the terminology and methodologies employed and to establish a common consensus facilitating further development and diffusion of this promising technique.

Macular buckling alone versus combined inverted ILM flap on macular hole-associated macular detachment in patients with high myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of macular buckling (MB) alone against a combined internal limiting membrane (ILM) inversion flap for full-thickness macular hole (FTMH)-associated macular detachment (MD) in patients with high myopia.

METHODS

This was a prospective interventional case series of patients with high myopia surgically treated with MB alone or combined with an inverted ILM flap for FTMH- associated MD. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 24-month postoperative follow-up, rate of initial retinal reattachment and macular hole closure were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 62 eyes from 62 participants (33 in the MB group, 29 in the combination group) were studied. Postoperative BCVA improved significantly in both the combination group (P < 0.001) and the MB group (P = 0.027). The postoperative BCVA at 12 months (P = 0.021) and 24 months (P = 0.041) was significantly better in the combination group than in the MB group. The postoperative BCVA was not significantly different between the eyes with closed and unclosed MH at each follow-up time point (P > 0.05). In the combination group, we observed earlier retinal reattachment and closure of the MH as well as a higher rate of MH closure (82.8% vs. 66.7%) than in the MB group, although this difference was insignificant (P = 0.248).

CONCLUSION

MB combined with the ILM flap inversion technique achieved better postoperative BCVA and a higher success rate of MH closure than MB alone. We believe that combination surgery should be preferentially recommended.

Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole

BACKGROUND

Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.

The Short-Term Results of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Adjuvant to Re-Intervention in the Treatment of Refractory Full-Thickness Macular Holes

The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma (a-PRP) as an adjuvant to revisional vitrectomy for refractory full-thickness macular holes (rFTMHs). We conducted a prospective, non-randomized interventional study including patients with rFTMH after a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade. We included 28 eyes from 27 patients with rFTMHs: 12 rFTMHs in highly myopic eyes (axial length greater than 26.5 mm or a refractive error greater than -6D or both); 12 large rFTMHs (minimum hole width > 400 μm); and 4 rFTMHs secondary to the optic disc pit. All patients underwent 25-G PPV with a-PRP, a median time of 3.5 ± 1.8 months after the primary repair. At the six-month follow-up, the overall rFTMH closure rate was 92.9%, distributed as follows: 11 out of 12 eyes (91.7%) in the highly myopic group, 11 out of 12 eyes (91.7%) in the large rFTMH group, and 4 out of 4 eyes (100%) in the optic disc pit group. Median best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved in all groups, in particular from 1.00 (interquartile range: 0.85 to 1.30) to 0.70 (0.40 to 0.85) LogMAR in the highly myopic group (p = 0.016), from 0.90 (0.70 to 1.49) to 0.40 (0.35 to 0.70) LogMAR in the large rFTMH group (p = 0.005), and from 0.90 (0.75 to 1.00) to 0.50 (0.28 to 0.65) LogMAR in the optic disc pit group. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. In conclusion, a-PRP can be an effective adjuvant to PPV in the management of rFTMHs.

The effect comparison of ILM flap and traditional ILM peeling in iMH

Purpose

To compare the changes in anatomical structure and visual function after idiopathic macular hole (iMH) treatment with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and inverted ILM flap and determine the value of the inverted ILM flap for the treatment of iMH.

Methods

Forty-nine patients with iMH (49 eyes) were included in this study and followed up for 1 year (12 months) after treatment with inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling respectively. The main foveal parameters assessed included the preoperative minimum diameter (MD), intraoperative residual fragments, and postoperative ELM reconstruction. Visual function was assessed using best-corrected visual acuity.

Results

The hole closure rate was 100% for 49 patients; 15 patients were treated with the inverted ILM flap, and 34 patients underwent ILM peeling. There were no differences between the postoperative best-corrected visual acuities and the rates of ELM reconstruction for the flap and peeling groups with different MDs. In the flap group, ELM reconstruction was associated with the preoperative MD, presence of an ILM flap, and hyperreflective changes in the inner retina 1 month after surgery. In the peeling group, ELM reconstruction was associated with the preoperative MD, intraoperative residual fragments at the hole edge, and hyperreflective changes in the inner retina.

Conclusion

The inverted ILM flap and the ILM Peeling were both able to obtain high closure rate. However, the inverted ILM flap showed no obvious advantages related to anatomical morphology and visual function over ILM peeling.

COMPARISON OF AIR VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE INTRAOCULAR TAMPONADE COMBINED WITH VITRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR HOLE IN HIGH MYOPIA

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of air and perfluoropropane (C3F8) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in highly myopic macular holes (HMMHs) and explore the factors related to surgical prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of a consecutive series of HMMHs undergone vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. According to tamponade type, they were divided into air group and C3F8 group, which were further divided into subgroups based on hole diameter or axial length (AXL). Anatomical and functional outcomes were compared between tamponades. Related factors of initial closure rate and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics in air group (n = 63) and C3F8 group (n = 37) were similar except the age of air was older ( P = 0.019). The mean follow-up period was 17.16 ± 17.97 months. After surgery, the initial closure rate of air group was 85.7% and that of C3F8 group was 83.7% ( P = 0.780). And the initial closure rate showed no difference between tamponades in the same subgroup classified by hole diameter or AXL (all P > 0.05). Postoperative BCVA improved significantly in both groups ( P < 0.001), but no difference between them ( P = 0.793). Logistic regression showed that age, minimum linear diameter, and AXL were risk factors of initial closure rate, and preoperative BCVA was the only factor associated with postoperative BCVA (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

With a long-term follow-up of HMMH, we found air had a similar tamponade effect anatomically and functionally compared with C3F8. Air may also be a good choice for patients with HMMH.

Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis

BACKGROUND

Vitrectomy and peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was an effective therapeutic approach for myopic foveoschisis with progressive visual loss. This study investigated the anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing ILM peeling with or without the inverted flap technique for patients with symptomatic myopic foveoschisis (MF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with MF. Vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade was performed in all patients. The primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean macular thickness (MMT), and central foveal thickness (CFT). Depending on whether an inverted ILM flap technique was utilized, further subgroup comparisons between the inverted flap group and the non-inverted flap group were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes of 22 patients were included. Fifteen eyes were underwent fovea-sparing ILM peeling without inverted ILM flap and 11 of the 26 eyes were treated with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and an inverted ILM flap technique. In the mean follow-up period of 10.74 ± 4.58 months, a significant improvement in BCVA was observed from 0.97 ± 0.45 logMAR to 0.58 ± 0.51 logMAR (P < 0.01), during which the BCVA of 20 eyes (76.92%) improved and remained stable in 5 eyes (19.23%). Moreover, a positive correlation was also found between the preoperative BCVA and the postoperative BCVA (r = 0.50, P = 0.01). At the last visit, the final MMT decreased from 492.69 ± 209.62 μm to 234.73 ± 86.09 μm, and the CFT reduced from 296.08 ± 209.22 μm to 138.31 ± 73.92 μm (all P < 0.01). A subgroup analysis found no significant differences in BCVA, MMT, or CFT between the inverted and non-inverted flap groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fovea-sparing ILM peeling with or without inverted flap technique resulted in favorable visual and anatomical outcomes for the treatment of MF. An important factor affecting the postoperative visual outcome was the preoperative visual acuity. Our study found no significant difference between the presence and absence of the inverted ILM flap.

Comparative Study of Conventional Inverted ILM Flap Covering and ILM Flap Filling Technique in Idiopathic Macular Hole Treatment: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the anatomical efficacy and functional improvement of the conventional inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM), flap covering technique, and ILM flap filling technique for patients with idiopathic macular hole (MH).

Methods

Literature from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were comprehensively retrieved. The primary outcomes included the MH closure rate and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcomes were the proportion of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) defect recovery. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using STATA 17.0 software.

Results

7 studies that contained 139 eyes in the inverted ILM flap covering group and 121 eyes in the ILM flap filling group were selected. Pooled data suggested that the surgical treatment resulted in an overall MH closure rate of up to 97.12% (135/139 eyes) in the inverted ILM flap covering group and 99.17% (120/121 eyes) in the filling group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.55 to 7.09, and P=0.29). Similarly, the 2 techniques demonstrated equal effectiveness on the anatomical closure in MH with the average diameter smaller than 650 μm (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.48 to 9.77, and P=0.31) and larger than 650 μm (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.14 to 17.37, and P=0.71). However, compared with the filling technique, the inverted ILM flap covering technique was superior in postoperative BCVA (WMD = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.18, and P=0.0017) and presented a significantly higher proportion of reconstitution of ELM (OR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.08, and P < 0.0001) and EZ (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.32, and P=0.0001).

Conclusion

The inverted ILM flap covering technique was associated with the superior reconstitution of outer layers of the retina, including ELM and EZ, and more improvement in postoperative BCVA than the ILM flap filling technique.

INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR MACULAR HOLE COEXISTENT WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT

PURPOSE

To report the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with macular hole coexistent with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgically treated with pars plana vitrectomy and inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macular hole who underwent vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with the inverted flap technique between December 2017 and February 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The main outcome measures were retinal reattachment rate, macular hole closure rate, and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity. A nonsystematic literature review was performed to compare the study outcomes with those previously reported.

RESULTS

The primary retinal reattachment rate was 90% (10/11) with one surgery and 100% with 2 surgical procedures. Macular hole closure was achieved in all patients (11/11). All patients showed an improvement in visual acuity at the final postoperative visit, and the mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 0.60 ± 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/80 Snellen equivalent).

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique achieved not only favorable anatomical retinal reattachment rates but also an encouraging recovery of central macular anatomy and visual function in patients with macular hole coexistent with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane flap for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia

To investigate the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia. We retrospectively analysed the medical records of macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) patients with high myopia. The patients were divided into two groups with different surgical procedure: inverted multi-layer ILM flap group (group 1, 27 eyes) and the ILM peeling group (group 2, 29 eyes). Retinal reattachment rate, macular hole closure rate at last follow-up and BCVA at 6 months post-operation were compared between the two groups. After primary PPV and silicone oil removal, the retinal reattachment rate was 96.3% in group 1 and 93.1% in group 2 respectively at last follow-up, showing no statistically significant difference (odds ratio = 0.525, P = 1.000). All eyes in group 1 had type I macular closure (100%, 27/27), while only 7 eyes (24.1%, 7/29) in group 2 have type I macular hole closure. The difference was statistically significant (odds ratio = 0, P < 0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA both improved significantly at 6 months post-operation compared with pre-operation (t = 4.181, P < 0.001; t = 3.217, P < 0.001), however the difference of post-operation BCVA between the two groups was not statistically significant (t = 0.906, P > 0.05). PPV combined with inverted multi-layer ILM flap could achieve better anatomical outcomes than ILM peeling technique with no significant advantage in functional outcomes.

Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives

Pars plana vitrectomy has become the standard procedure for primary macular holes (MHs) repair, including the removal of the posterior cortical vitreous, the stripping of eventual epiretinal membranes, and finally an intraocular gas tamponade. During this procedure, peeling the internal limiting membrane (ILM) has been proven to increase closure rates and avoid postoperative reopening in several researches. In fact, even in large MHs more than 400 µm, the advantage of peeling off the ILM was highlighted by better anatomical closure rates. Nevertheless, some authors suggested that ILM peeling is not always essential, because it generates various side effects in retinal structure and function. Furthermore, the ideal amount of ILM peeling and the most effective strategies for removing the ILM are still subject of research. Different surgical modifications have been reported as alternatives to traditional peeling in certain clinical settings, including ILM flaps, ILM scraping, and foveal sparing ILM peeling. As regards large MHs, the introduction of ILM inverted flap appeared as a game changer, offering a significantly higher >90% closure rate when compared to traditional ILM peeling. Modifications to inverted ILM flap procedures have been claimed in recent years, in order to define the best area and direction of ILM peeling and its correlation with functional outcomes. Moreover, several innovations saw the light in the setting of recurrent MHs, such as ILM free flap transposition, inverted ILM flap combined autologous blood clot technique, neurosensory retinal flap, and human amniotic membrane (HAM) plug, claiming higher anatomical success rate also in those complex settings. In conclusion, the aim of this review is to report how the success rate of contemporary macular surgery has grown since the turn of the century, especially for big and chronic MHs, analyzing in which way ILM management became a crucial point of this kind of surgery.

COMPARISON OF INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING WITH THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT COEXISTING WITH MACULAR HOLE

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and the inverted ILM flap technique for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment coexisting with macular hole.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of 79 eyes with concurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macular hole received vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade, with ILM peeling on 56 eyes and the inverted ILM flap technique on 23 eyes.

RESULTS

The Type 1 closure rate was greater in the inverted ILM flap group than the ILM peeling group (82.6% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.038). Lines of improvement were 7.8 ± 5.3 in the ILM peeling group and 8.9 ± 5.6 in the inverted ILM flap group. Postoperative epiretinal membrane and retinal reattachment rates were similar in two surgical groups (16.1% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.535 and 94.6% vs. 95.7%, P = 0.999, respectively). Type 1 closure was significantly correlated with the inverted ILM flap technique (OR = 5.568, P = 0.023). The inverted ILM flap technique showed no significant association with the final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity in multivariate model analysis.

CONCLUSION

The inverted ILM flap technique was more effective in restoring the macular structure in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and coexisting macular hole, but the functional outcomes of the two strategies were comparable.

Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the reduction in defect length of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) in small ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), medium ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), and large ([Formula: see text] 400 μm) full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) treated with inverted internal limiting membrane (I-ILM) flap technique over a follow-up period of 12 months.

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 87 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. BCVA and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted preoperatively as well as after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The defect length of the ELM and the EZ was measured using the caliper tool at each follow-up time point.

RESULTS

BCVA improved significantly in the group of small, medium, and large FTMH over the time of 12 months, whereby the improvement did not depend on FTMH size over 9 months. Only after 12 months, large FTMH showed significantly higher BCVA improvement compared to small and medium FTMH. The closure rate was 100% (91/91). The defect length of ELM and EZ reduced continuously over the period of 12 months. There was a significant correlation between defect length of ELM and EZ with postoperative BCVA.

CONCLUSION

The I-ILM flap technique has very good morphological and functional outcomes in small, medium, and large FTMH over a long-time period, indicating that it can be considered as a treatment option in small and medium FTMH. The defect length of ELM and EZ is directly connected to postoperative BCVA.

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Flap Inverting under Air in Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling combined with modified flap inverting under air in the treatment of large idiopathic macular hole (MH).

Methods

Eyes with a large idiopathic MH (minimum diameter >550 μm) were included in this study. The surgical procedure included standard 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), ILM peeling, complete fluid-gas exchange, and ILM flap inversion under air. The patients underwent follow-up exam including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement.

Results

Sixteen eyes from 16 patients were included. Mean MH diameter was 681.43 ± 112.12 μm. After a mean follow-up time of 6.25 ± 2.65 months, in all cases, the MH was closed, and the ILM flap could be seen at the inner surface of the fovea. U-shaped and V-shaped MH closure was achieved in 11 and 5 cases, respectively. The BCVA improved significantly from 1.49 ± 0.35 logMAR to 0.89 ± 0.35 logMAR (p < 0.05), and visual acuity of 20/100 or better was achieved in 8 eyes.

Conclusion

ILM flap inverting under air was helpful in improving the functional and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy for large idiopathic MH.

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique: Is It the Best Option for Macular Holes?

Surgical treatment is generally necessary to repair full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Although vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains the standard surgical technique, the inverted ILM flap procedure has increasingly assumed a role in the primary surgical repair of FTMHs. Some vitreoretinal surgeons reserve this technique to treat large or myopic holes, whereas others use it routinely in all cases. This paper is a comprehensive review of the current scientific evidence on the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique in the repair of macular holes, following the International Vitreomacular Traction Study (IVTS) group classification.