HIV and Men

Factors associated with sexual quality of life among men living with HIV

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess the prevalence of sexual difficulties and identify factors associated with the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) among people living with HIV (PLWHA).

METHODS

The study included 107 heterosexual men and 474 men who have sex with men (MSM) from five countries. Participants self-reported variables related to physical and mental health, as well as HIV-related parameters. Erectile or ejaculation difficulty, as well as low sexual desire, were investigated. SQoL was measured using the PROQOL-SexLife questionnaire.

RESULTS

Most of participants reported low sexual desire, predominantly among MSM. Among MSM, living with a partner and healthcare satisfaction were associated with SQoL scores in POP dimension, while consistent condom use, cardiovascular complications, and being single were associated with SQoL scores in STI dimension. Viagra use, anti-cholesterol treatment, and living with a partner were associated with SQoL scores in DIS dimension. Among heterosexual men, employment and African origin were associated with SQoL scores in the POP dimension. Alcohol consumption was associated with SQoL scores in STI dimension.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of non-clinical determinants when assessing SQoL among PLWHA, emphasizing psychological factors and the perceived quality of healthcare. Tailored interventions should incorporate these findings to enhance overall SQoL outcomes.

Barriers to adherence to antiretroviral therapy: identifying priority areas for people with HIV and healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Challenges to antiretroviral therapy adherence are well-known and continue to be a major hurdle in HIV care. The objective of this paper is to identify barriers to antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence that are relevant to HIV care from the perspective of people living with HIV and healthcare and social service professionals.

METHODS

This study used an online survey design to collect information from the two groups. A total of 100 areas that covered six domains and 20 subdomains were administered to people living with HIV and care professionals in Canada and France. The survey asked participants to rate the importance of each area for HIV care on a four-point Likert scale. Any areas rated 3 or 4 were considered important and ranked. A Chi-square test was conducted for the difference between the groups, people living with HIV and professionals, and between women and men.

RESULTS

A response rate of 87% (58/66) in Canada and 65% (38/58) was achieved. 15 of 43 (35%) areas were endorsed as important barriers by both groups, across countries and sex-covering subdomains - drug cost coverage, challenging material circumstances, HIV stigma, and privacy concerns, affect, motivation, beliefs, acceptance of HIV, comorbidity, side effects, and demands and organisation of daily life. People living with HIV identified two, and care professionals identified nine, additional areas as important barriers to HIV care across different domains and subdomains.

CONCLUSION

The study identified some common and distinct barriers to ART from the perspective of the people living with HIV and care professionals.

HIV and Sexual Dysfunction in Men

Sexual issues tend to go unaddressed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) management, although overt sexual dysfunctions are more prevalent in people living with HIV than uninfected people. Erectile dysfunction is the most frequent sexual problem, with a prevalence of 30–50% even in men <40 years of age, but other issues such as loss of libido and ejaculatory disorders should not be overlooked. Peculiar factors related to HIV infection (e.g., fear of virus transmission, changes in body image, HIV-related comorbidities, HIV distress and stigma), alongside classical factors non-related to HIV, should be considered when approaching sexual problems in HIV patients. For this reason, the diagnostic and therapeutic workout of sexual dysfunction in the context of HIV requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving specialists in both infectious diseases and sexual medicine. This narrative review presents an overview of current knowledge on sexual dysfunction in HIV men, deepening the factors driving and taking part in these issues, providing advice for the clinical approach, and underlining the importance of caring for sexual health to improve the quality of life of HIV patients.

Male Genital Dermatology: A Primer for the Sexual Medicine Physician

INTRODUCTION

The dermatologic conditions affecting the male genitalia are diverse and range from normal variants and benign growths to overt malignancy. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of urologic dermatology training in most residency programs, and many dermatologic lesions with a classic appearance on other areas of the body may have atypical presentations on the genitalia. Patients may present to a variety of physicians without receiving a definitive diagnosis, which can be highly distressing to the afflicted individual.

AIM

To provide sexual medicine physicians tools to aid in the evaluation and diagnosis of urologic dermatology lesions, whether they are limited to the genitalia or part of a widespread systemic disease.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to genital dermatology in men.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

We stratify each condition into 1 of 5 groups (normal variants and benign lesions, inflammatory lesions, transmissible lesions, premalignant lesions, and malignant lesions) and focus on presentation and prevalence of these conditions.

RESULTS

Sexual medicine physicians should emphasize the non-pathologic nature of normal variants of genital anatomy (ie, penile hyperpigmentation, pearly penile papules) and stress that removal of these lesions is only appropriate for cosmetic purposes. Benign genital growths (ie, sebaceous cysts, seborrheic keratoses) may not require intervention, but they should be monitored for atypical features and infection. In contrast, transmissible (ie, herpes, syphilis) and inflammatory (ie, psoriasis) lesions may necessitate prompt intervention to reduce transmission and complications of late-stage disease. Premalignant and malignant lesions may mimic many of the aforementioned conditions; it is important that patients receive routine follow-up after treatment. All suspicious non-healing or ulcerating lesions should undergo pathologic evaluation to rule out malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Urologic dermatology can be a diagnostic challenge for sexual medicine physicians. This review simplifies the diagnostic approach and emphasizes pathologic features of each condition to guide management. Gabrielson AT, Le TV, Fontenot C, et al. Male genital dermatology: A primer for the sexual medicine physician. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:71-83.