The Unfinished Business of Defining Premature Ejaculation: The Need for Targeted Research

Updating, correcting, and calibrating the narrative about premature ejaculation

INTRODUCTION

The narrative surrounding premature ejaculation (PE) has developed and solidified over the past 25 years. Unfortunately, portions of that narrative are outdated and do not reflect more recent conceptualizations or empirical findings regarding this disorder.

OBJECTIVE

In this review we sought to identify existing narratives about PE in need of updating and to provide revised narratives based on the recent research literature.

METHOD

Five PE narratives in need of revision were identified, including: the prevalence of PE, age-related differences in PE prevalence, a validated ejaculation latency (EL) for diagnosing PE, differences between lifelong and acquired PE subtypes, and the application of PE definitions beyond penile-vaginal intercourse. Extensive literature searches provided information supporting both the original narrative and the need for a revised narrative based on both consideration of more recent studies and reinterpretation of studies conducted since the establishment of the original narratives.

RESULTS

For each selected topic, the prevailing narrative based on the extant literature was first presented, followed by discussion of accumulating evidence that challenges the existing narrative. Each section ends with a suggested revised PE narrative. In 2 instances, the revised narrative required significant corrections (eg, PE prevalence, validated EL for diagnosing PE); in 2 instances, it expanded on the existing narrative (eg, PE subtype differences, inclusion of partnered sexual activities beyond penile-vaginal intercourse); and in 2 other instances, it backed off prior conclusions that have since required rethinking (eg, age-related changes in PE, PE subtype differences). Finally, a brief review of the 3-pronged criteria for PE (EL, ejaculatory control, and bother/distress) is presented and discussed.

CONCLUSION

This review reiterates the dynamic state of research on PE and demonstrates the need for and value of ongoing research that not only addresses new issues surrounding this dysfunction but also challenges and revises some of the existing narratives about PE.

Repeated sexual intercourse as a coping strategy for men with premature ejaculation

BACKGROUND

Patients with premature ejaculation (PE) are often concerned and distressed about their sexual performance. Hence, they may be more willing to exploit their refractory period to employ sexual coping strategies in order to improve their unsatisfactory sexual intercourse compared with patients without PE.

AIM

The study sought to verify the sexual coping strategies of patients with PE in the daily sexual activities.

METHODS

We included both patients with PE and individuals without PE and analyzed their sexual behaviors and attitudes by means of detailed interviews and questionnaires.

OUTCOMES

The main outcomes were perceived intravaginal ejaculatory latency time recording, Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool score, and sexual frequency, attitudes, and behavior log.

RESULTS

A total of 182 young patients with PE (age 31.2 ± 6.2 years) and 92 individuals without PE (age 30.7 ± 5.1 years) were included in the study. A total of 53.3% of patients with PE vs 17.4% of individuals without PE reported engaging in multiple sexual intercourse sessions within a single day in the past 4 weeks. PE patients who engaged in multiple intercourse sessions displayed better performance during the second attempt but performed poorly compared with individuals without PE. Scores for the first attempt in PE vs second attempt in individuals with PE vs without PE were the following: intravaginal ejaculatory latency time, 2.4 ± 1.6 vs 4.8 ± 5.7 vs 9.9 ± 9.4 (P < .001); Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool, 14.9 ± 3.1 vs 12.7 ± 4.8 vs 5.2 ± 2.5 (P < .001); satisfaction, 2.9 ± 1.0 vs 3.1 ± 0.8 vs 3.7 ± 1.4 (P < .001). A total of 57.1% of patients held a negative attitude toward precoital masturbation, for reasons such as a reduced sexual desire (21.2%), the belief that masturbation is harmful (17.6%), concerns about erectile function (15.7%), fatigue (9.8%), and other mixed reasons (35.3%).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Engaging in multiple intercourse sessions within a day is more common among the young PE population, and using precoital masturbation as a coping strategy is not universally applicable among patients with PE.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This is the first study to explore symptom-coping strategies in patients with PE compared with individuals without PE. However, the conclusions cannot be generalized to the entire male population.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PE, compared with individuals without PE, are more inclined to engage in multiple sexual intercourse sessions within a single sexual session, likely in an attempt to compensate for their first unsatisfactory sexual encounter. Moreover, the majority of patients with PE here studied hold a negative attitude toward using precoital masturbation as a coping strategy for symptoms.

Do Ejaculation Latency and Other Sexual Measures Differ Between Men With Lifelong and Acquired Premature Ejaculation?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether men with lifelong vs acquired premature ejaculation (PE) subtypes differ on their estimated ejaculation latencies (EL) and related sexual, relationship, and behavioral parameters.

METHODS

Of 2679 men who responded to an online multinational survey about sexual health and met inclusion criteria, 540 reported "probable" or "definite" PE, as assessed by the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Lifelong and acquired PE subtypes were compared on multiple measures related to EL, as well as on sets of demographic, diagnostic, relationship, sexual behavioral, and sexual functioning measures during both partnered sex and masturbation.

RESULTS

Nearly 73% of men with PE in this sample reported the lifelong subtype. No differences emerged in EL measures between subtypes, even when parsed according to age. Specifically, men 37years or under with either definite lifelong or acquired PE reported ELs of 1.9 minutes (SD=1.3). For men over 37, lifelong ELs were 2.0 minutes (SD=1.3), acquired ELs 2.4 minutes (SD=1.4). While the lifelong subgroup was younger and reported lower erectile functioning, these differences occurred only in the probable PE group and not the definite PE group.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support different EL criteria for men with acquired vs lifelong PE, as suggested by several professional definitions. Furthermore, differences in age and erectile functioning between the groups, often reported in clinical samples though not in our definite PE group, may be an artifact of the general health/patient characteristics that lead such men to seek medical assistance.

Self-reported reasons for having difficulty reaching orgasm in men with diverse etiologies

Background

Difficulty reaching orgasm/ejaculation during partnered sex, a primary characteristic of delayed or absent ejaculation, affects about 5% to 10% of men, but the reasons underlying this problem are poorly understood.

Aim

The study sought to gain insight into possible etiologies of delayed ejaculation by assessing men's self-perceptions as to why they experience difficulty reaching orgasm.

Methods

We drew 351 men reporting moderately severe to severe difficulty reaching orgasm during partnered sex from a sample of over 3000 respondents obtained through an online survey. As part of the 55-item survey, participants responded to 2 questions asking about their self-perceived reasons for having difficulty reaching orgasm and selected from a list of 14 options derived from the research literature, a series of men's focus groups, and expert opinion. The first question allowed respondents to select all the reasons that they felt contributed to the problem, the second to select only the most important reason. In addition, both men with and without comorbid erectile dysfunction were investigated and compared.

Outcomes

Hierarchical ordering of men's self-pereceived reasons for having difficulty reaching orgasm, including typal reasons established through principal component analysis.

Results

The major reasons for difficulty were related to anxiety/distress and lack of adequate stimulation, with relationship and other factors endorsed with lower frequency. Further exploration using principal components analysis identified 5 typal reasons, in descending order of frequency: anxiety/distress (41%), inadequate stimulation (23%), low arousal (18%), medical issues (9%), and partner issues (8%). Few differences emerged between men with and without comorbid ED other than ones related to erectile problems, such as higher level of endorsement of medical issues. Typal reasons showed correlations, albeit mostly weak, with a number of covariates, including sexual relationship satisfaction, frequency of partnered sex, and frequency of masturbation.

Clinical Implications

Until supplemental medical treatments for delayed ejaculation are developed and approved, a number of men's purported reasons for difficult or absent ejaculation/orgasm-anxiety/distress, inadequate stimulation, low arousal, relationship issues-fall into areas that can be addressed in couples counseling by a trained sex therapist.

Strengths and Limitations

This study is unique in scope and robust in sample size. Drawbacks include those associated with online surveys, including possible bias in sample selection, limitation to Western-based samples, and the lack of differentiation between men with lifelong and acquired difficulty.

Conclusion

Men who have difficulty reaching ejaculation/orgasm identify putative reasons for their problem, ranging from anxiety/stress, inadequate stimulation, and low arousal to partner issues and medical reasons.

Why Men Masturbate: Reasons and Correlates in Men with and without Sexual Dysfunction

Men purportedly masturbate for a variety of reasons, but systematic investigation of men's reasons has been lacking. We analyzed reasons why men masturbate (n = 2967, mean age = 37.7, SD = 12.9), whether men with and without sexual problems differ in their reasons, and whether those reasons vary with the frequency of masturbation and partnered sex. Results indicated that deriving pleasure, decreasing sexual tension, and reducing anxiety/stress were among the top motives, whereas partner issues were cited less frequently. Men with sexual dysfunctions showed only minor differences from men without sexual dysfunctions, the former more often citing anxiety/stress reduction as a motive. In addition, samples tapping participants from two world regions showed only minor differences in their patterns of responding. Motives for masturbation were also related to both the frequency of masturbation and the frequency of partnered sex. Overall, these findings indicate that men, like women, masturbate primarily for the positive reinforcing effects of pleasure, but in contrast with women, men are also more likely to use masturbation for the negatively reinforcing effects of reducing anxiety/distress. Unsatisfying sex with the partner and/or relationship issues were cited as a reason for masturbation in only a minority of men.

Progressive arousal: a new concept and definition for premature ejaculation

Background

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a nosologic entity with issues in its conceptualization and definition.

Aim

To understand if the altered sexual response in men with PE is in the orgasm phase, as currently assumed, or the arousal phase with difficulties in modulating, regulating, or decreasing sexual arousal.

Methods

Men were recruited who looked for help for PE and met the diagnostic criteria according to clinical standards. The participants completed a sociodemographic survey and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. They also performed a masturbation exercise with a maximum of 5 stops, with the intention of prolonging the arousal phase. The time of the exercise was measured from the beginning of genital masturbation to ejaculation.

Outcomes

We calculated the total time of the exercise, the median time at each start, and the number of dropouts. We performed a pairwise comparison analysis between starts and made a survival curve representing the percentage of men who remained in the exercise.

Results

A total of 481 men with PE participated (mean ± SD; age, 29.25 ± 8.72 years). We found that the expected median survival time until ejaculation was 317.00 seconds (95% CI, 288.34-345.65). However, the average time during stimulation decreased as the exercise progressed, and statistically significant differences were observed in their pairwise comparison (P < .001). Also, the chances of ejaculation increased as the exercise progressed, with 62.16% of the participants ejaculating before the end of the exercise. The results indicated increasing sexual arousal, where stops in stimulation were progressively less effective at maintaining ejaculation times at starts.

Clinical Implications

We showed that the arousal phase is altered in PE, not the orgasm phase, and this could finally have implications in the diagnosis and/or treatment of this condition.

Strengths and Limitations

The analysis of the times at starts and stops in a masturbation exercise in men with PE, had been barely addressed before. In the future, it would be important to verify the effect of stops during sexual intercourse and to incorporate a control group of men without PE.

Conclusions

We propose a new conceptualization and definition for PE: progressive arousal disorder is the inability to modulate, regulate, or decrease arousal during any sexual activity, even with brief stops during sexual stimulation, causing unwanted ejaculation.

Characteristics of men who report symptoms of delayed ejaculation: providing support for empirically derived diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the demographic, sexual, and relationship characteristics of men with symptoms of delayed ejaculation (DE).

AIM

To identify differences between men with and without DE symptomology to validate face-valid diagnostic criteria and to identify various functional correlates of DE.

METHODS

A total of 2679 men meeting inclusion criteria were partitioned into groups with and without DE symptomology on the basis of their self-reported "difficulty reaching ejaculation/orgasm during partnered sex." Men were then compared on a broad array of demographic and relationship variables, as well as sexual response variables assessed during partnered sex and masturbation.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes included the identified differences between men with and without DE symptomology.

RESULTS

Men with DE-whether having comorbid erectile dysfunction or not-differed from men without DE on 5 face-valid variables related to previously proposed diagnostic criteria for DE, including ones related to ejaculation latency (P < .001); self-efficacy related to reaching ejaculation, as assessed by the percentage of episodes reaching ejaculation during partnered sex (P < .001); and negative consequences of the impairment, including "bother/distress" and (lack of) "orgasmic pleasure/sexual satisfaction" (P < .001). All such differences were associated with medium to large effect sizes. In addition, men showed differences on a number of functional correlates of DE, including anxiety, relationship satisfaction, frequency of partnered sex and masturbation, and level of symptomology during partnered sex vs masturbation (P < .001).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Face-valid criteria for the diagnosis of DE were statistically verified, and functional correlates of DE relevant to guiding and focusing treatment were identified.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

In this first comprehensive analysis of its kind, we have demonstrated widespread differences on sexual and relationship variables relevant to the diagnosis of DE and to its functional correlates between men with and without DE symptomology during partnered sex. Limitations include participant recruitment through social media, which likely biased the sample; the use of estimated rather than clocked ejaculation latencies; and the fact that differences between men with acquired and lifelong DE were not investigated.

CONCLUSION

This well-powered multinational study provides strong empirical support for several face-valid measures for the diagnosis of DE, with a number of explanatory and control covariates that may help shed light on the lived experiences of men with DE and suggest focus areas for treatment. Whether or not the DE men had comorbid erectile dysfunction had little impact on the differences with men having normal ejaculatory functioning.

Description of and Relationships among Potential Variables Supported for the Diagnosis of Delayed Ejaculation

The lack of empirically based diagnostic criteria for delayed ejaculation (DE) not only undermines confidence in the reported prevalence rates for this sexual dysfunction, but it has also resulted in a lack of validated patient reported outcomes (PROs) for assessing this condition. The current study was designed to describe and evaluate six face-valid variables previously shown to discriminate between men with and without DE for their utility as diagnostic measures for DE. A sample of 1285 men (mean age = 37.8, SD = 12.7) free of erectile problems and premature ejaculation completed an online sexual health survey that included potential questions intended for use in the diagnosis of DE. Questionnaire items included ones reflective of previously proposed diagnostic constructs related to DE: ejaculation timing/latency, ejaculation efficacy/control, and negative effects of DE. Results indicated that five of the six proposed items showed moderate intercorrelations, suggesting that each constituted a distinct (i.e., non-redundant) though relevant criterion related to the diagnosis of DE. Based on the level of interrelatedness, the better items representing each construct were included in commonality analysis to assess their unique contributions to the diagnosis of DE. Perceived lack of ejaculatory efficacy/control contributed the largest portion of the variance to the diagnosis of DE (58%), with bother/distress (an index of the negative effects of DE) contributing the second largest portion (25%), and ejaculation timing/latency contributing only a small portion of the variance (6%) to the diagnosis of DE. The relevance of these findings to developing a patient report outcome (PRO) for diagnosing DE that considers both empirically supported questions/items and an appropriate balance of items regarding the three constructs was discussed.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and premature ejaculation: an overview of systematic reviews/meta-analyses using the AMSTAR 2, ROBIS, and GRADE tools

Introduction

The place of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in treating premature ejaculation (PE) remains a therapeutic challenge.

Objectives

(1) To summarize the evidence of the efficacy and safety of PDE5-Is from published systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs). (2) To evaluate the reporting, methodological quality, and evidence quality of SRs/MAs concerning PE.

Methods

Nine databases were searched to retrieve SRs/MAs on using PDE5-Is for PE from inception to July 2022. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with the AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews). GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) were used to assess the evidence quality.

Results

The literature search revealed 15 relevant SRs/MAs covering 28 primary studies (9 pairwise MAs and 6 network MAs) rated as low or very low quality and high risk of bias except 1 review that was rated as moderate quality and low risk of bias. Among the 27 outcome measures related to efficacy and safety, the quality of evidence according to GRADE criteria was low in 4 and critically low in 23. Oral PDE5-Is have demonstrated a possible benefit over placebo in lifelong PE and mixed PE. The results of pairwise and network MAs advocated that the combined use of PDE5-Is and SSRIs is of possible benefit as compared with either SSRIs or PDE5-Is alone. The total adverse effects were more frequent with PDE5-Is than placebo.

Conclusion

PDE5-Is are of a possible benefit than placebo in lifelong PE and mixed PE. The results favor coadministration of PDE5-Is plus SSRIs over SSRIs alone or PDE5-I monotherapy. These conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to the low methodological quality and low quality of evidence of most available reviews. Additional higher-quality randomized controlled trials, SRs, and MAs are warranted to provide a better estimate of any effect size.

Effects of One-Shot Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Lifelong Premature Ejaculation: A Pilot Study

The therapeutic management of premature lifelong ejaculation (PE) ranges from behavioral therapy to pharmacological and surgical treatments. Hyaluronic Acid (HA) injection into the glans penis is a non-surgical procedure, intended to reduce glans hypersensitivity, improving the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT). HA injection can be performed through different techniques that, although safe and effective, rarely can cause local complications. In this pilot uncontrolled study, we tested the effectiveness of a new technique based on a single HA injection into the frenulum of the glans, to improve IELT in a sample of patients affected by PE. We observed a significant increase of the IELT after one (median 73.3, IQR 66.2–79.9 s) and two months (66.2, 63.1–73.9) that gradually decreased at three months, remaining still significantly higher than at baseline (34.8, 30.9–37.4). PEDT and IIEF questionnaires significantly improved compared to baseline in the first two months of follow-up (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the preliminary results emerging from this pilot uncontrolled study, highlight the effectiveness of this one-shot HA injection approach, although a larger sample and longer follow-up time are needed to standardize the procedure.

Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?

Introduction

The role of bother/distress in the diagnosis of premature ejaculation (PE) has received minimal investigation compared with the 2 other diagnostic criteria, ejaculatory control and ejaculatory latency (EL).

Aim

This study assessed (i) the added variance explained by bother/distress to the diagnostic accuracy of PE and (ii) determined its overall contribution to a PE diagnosis.

Methods

The 3 diagnostic criteria for PE were assessed in 2,589 men (mean age = 38.2 years, SD = 13.5) in order to determine the contribution of each factor to a dysfunctional diagnosis. A series of regression and discriminant analyses were used to assess the value of bother/distress in explaining ejaculatory control and in predicting accuracy of PE group status. Commonality analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each of these factors to the diagnosis of PE.

Main Outcome Measure

The major outcome was the quantified contribution of “bother/distress” to a PE diagnosis.

Results

Bother/distress accounted for about 3–4% of the variation in ejaculatory control and added only minimally to the prediction accuracy of PE group status (no, probable, definite PE). Commonality analysis indicated that bother/distress comprised about 3.6% of the unique explained variation in the PE diagnosis, compared with ejaculatory control and EL which contributed 54.5% and 26.7%, respectively. Common variance among factors contributed the remaining 15.5% to the PE diagnosis.

Clinical Translation

Bother/distress contributes least to the determination of a PE diagnosis. Its contribution is largely redundant with the unique and combined contributions of ejaculatory control and EL.

Strengths and Limitations

Using a well-powered and multivariate analysis, this study parsed out the relative contributions of the 3 diagnostic criteria to a PE diagnosis. The study is limited by its use of estimated EL, a single item assessment of bother/distress, and the lack of differentiation of PE subtypes, lifelong and acquired.

Conclusion

Bother/distress contributes minimally to the PE diagnosis, yet its assessment may be key to understanding the experiences of the patient/couple and to developing an effective treatment strategy.

Rowland DL, McNabney SM, Hevesi K. Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?. Sex Med 2022;10:100548.

The Tenuous Role of Distress in the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Unlike the other 2 criteria for diagnosing premature ejaculation (PE), namely lack of ejaculatory control and short ejaculation latency (EL), the role of bother/distress has received only minimal consideration and investigation.

AIM

The specific aim was to determine both why distress is included in the PE diagnosis and whether such inclusion is advantageous to achieving better diagnostic outcomes. To this end, the review explored the historical and theoretical underpinnings of the inclusion of "bother/ distress" in the diagnosis of PE, with reference to the larger role that distress has played in the diagnosis of mental disorders, in an attempt to understand the utility (or lack thereof) of this construct in making a PE diagnosis.

METHODS

We reviewed the role of bother/distress across current professional definitions for PE and then expanded this discussion to include the role of distress in other sexual dysfunctions. We then included a brief historical perspective regarding the role that distress has played in the diagnosis of PE. This discussion is followed by a deeper look at 2 nosological systems, namely DSM and ICD, to allow perspective on the inclusion of the bother/distress construct in the diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders, including the assumptions/arguments put forward to include or exclude bother/distress as an important criterion underlying various professional assumptions.

OUTCOME

Determination of the value and/or need of including bother/distress as a necessary criterion for the diagnosis of PE.

RESULTS

Based on the research literature, bother/distress does not appear to be as critical for a PE diagnosis as either the lack of ejaculatory control or short EL. It is the weakest of the differences among men with and without PE, and recent evidence suggests that its inclusion is generally redundant with the severity of the 2 other criteria for PE, ejaculatory control and EL.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

Bother/distress appears to serve little purpose in the diagnosis of PE yet its assessment may be important for the treatment strategy and for assessing treatment effectiveness.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This review did not provide a critical analysis of the literature regarding the role of bother/distress in PE, but rather focused on its potential value in understanding and diagnosing PE.

CONCLUSION

Although bother/distress appears to add little to the improvement of accuracy for a PE diagnosis, understanding and assessing the man's or couple's experience of distress has important implications for the treatment strategy and focus, as well as for assessing treatment success. Rowland DL, Cooper SE. The Tenuous Role of Distress in the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation: A Narrative Review. Sex Med 2022;XX:XXXXXX.

Premature Ejaculation Measures During Partnered Sex and Masturbation: What These Findings Tell Us About the Nature and Rigidity of Premature Ejaculation

Men with premature ejaculation (PE) during partnered sex (as defined by poor ejaculatory control) show significantly reduced PE symptomology during masturbation, but the reasons for this disparity are not clear. This study investigated the other two PE-related diagnostic criteria, namely ejaculatory latency (EL) and bother/distress, in order to explore possible explanations for this disparity between types of sexual activity. Specifically, 1,447 men with either normal or poor ejaculatory control were compared on EL parameters, bother/distress, and sexual satisfaction/pleasure during both partnered sex and masturbation. Results indicated that men with PE reported longer ELs during masturbation than partnered sex, in contrast with men without PE who reported shorter ELs during masturbation. Bother/distress was lower for both groups during masturbation, but bother/distress in men with PE during masturbation was comparable to that of men without PE during partnered sex. Minimal difference in these patterns was found across lifelong and acquired PE subtypes, whereas men with PE with comorbid erectile dysfunction appeared to represent a distinct group. These findings have implications for PE management or treatment as well as for the overall conceptualization of PE as a pathophysiological condition.