Combined effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and vATPase inhibitors in NSCLC cells

BNIP3 in Lung Cancer: To Kill or Rescue?

Simple Summary

Bcl-2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) is a pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein of the Bcl-2 family. Its function in various biological processes was described. Although potential involvement of BNIP3 in cancer progression has been discussed in many review articles, its specific role in lung cancer is still unclear. In this review, we shed light on the BNIP3‘s role in different types of cancer in general and lung cancer, in particular, as well as suggested its potential for targeting therapy of lung cancer.

Abstract

Bcl-2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) is a pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein of the Bcl-2 family. Initially, BNIP3 was described as one of the mediators of hypoxia-induced apoptotic cell death in cardiac myocytes and neurons. Besides apoptosis, BNIP3 plays a crucial role in autophagy, metabolic pathways, and metastasis-related processes in different tumor types. Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive types of cancer, which is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, there is still urgent demand for reliable biochemical markers for lung cancer and its efficient treatment. Mitochondria functioning and mitochondrial proteins, including BNIP3, have a strong impact on lung cancer development and progression. Here, we summarized current knowledge about the BNIP3 gene and protein features and their role in cancer progression, especially in lung cancer in order to develop new therapeutic approaches associated with BNIP3.

Targeting Autophagy for Overcoming Resistance to Anti-EGFR Treatments

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays critical roles in cell proliferation, tumorigenesis, and anti-cancer drug resistance. Overexpression and somatic mutations of EGFR result in enhanced cancer cell survival. Therefore, EGFR can be a target for the development of anti-cancer therapy. Patients with cancers, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), have been shown to response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and anti-EGFR antibodies. However, resistance to these anti-EGFR treatments has developed. Autophagy has emerged as a potential mechanism involved in the acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatments. Anti-EGFR treatments can induce autophagy and result in resistance to anti-EGFR treatments. Autophagy is a programmed catabolic process stimulated by various stimuli. It promotes cellular survival under these stress conditions. Under normal conditions, EGFR-activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling inhibits autophagy while EGFR/rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling promotes autophagy. Thus, targeting autophagy may overcome resistance to anti-EGFR treatments. Inhibitors targeting autophagy and EGFR signaling have been under development. In this review, we discuss crosstalk between EGFR signaling and autophagy. We also assess whether autophagy inhibition, along with anti-EGFR treatments, might represent a promising approach to overcome resistance to anti-EGFR treatments in various cancers. In addition, we discuss new developments concerning anti-autophagy therapeutics for overcoming resistance to anti-EGFR treatments in various cancers.

Leptomycin B reduces primary and acquired resistance of gefitinib in lung cancer cells

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib has demonstrated dramatic clinical efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, its therapeutic efficacy is ultimately limited by the development of acquired drug resistance. The aim of this study was to explore the potential utility of chromosome region maintenance 1 (CRM1) inhibitor leptomycin B (LMB) in combination with gefitinib to overcome primary and acquired gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells. The combinative effects of gefitinib and LMB were evaluated by MTT and its underlining mechanism was assessed by flow cytometry and Western blot. LMB displayed a synergistic effect on gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity in A549 (IC50: 25.0±2.1μM of gefitinib+LMB vs. 32.0±2.5μM of gefitinib alone, p<0.05). Gefitinib+LMB caused a significantly different cell cycle distribution and signaling pathways involved in EGFR/survivin/p21 compared with gefitinib. A549 cells then were treated with progressively increased concentrations of gefitinib (A549GR) or in combination with LMB (A549GLR) over 10months to generate gefitinib resistance. IC50 of gefitinib in A549GLR (37.0±2.8μM) was significantly lower than that in A549GR (53.0±3.0μM, p<0.05), which indicates that LMB could reverse gefitinib-induced resistance in A549. Further mechanism investigation revealed that the expression patterns of EGFR pathway and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers in A549, A549GR, and A549GLR were significantly different. In conclusion, LMB at a very low concentration (0.5nM) combined with gefitinib showed synergistic therapeutic effects and ameliorated the development of gefitinib-induced resistance in lung cancer cells.

Effects of lapatinib on cell proliferation and apoptosis in NB4 cells

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), characterized by the presence of the promyelocytic leukemia (PML)-retinoic acid α receptor (RARα) fusion protein, responds to treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). However, drug resistance and side effects restrict the application of these reagents. Hence, the development of novel therapeutic drugs for APL treatment is critical. Lapatinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been used in the treatment of different tumors. However, it is unclear whether lapatinib exerts antitumor effects on APL. The present study investigated the antitumor effects and potential mechanisms of lapatinib on NB4 cells derived from APL. Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and colony forming analysis indicated that lapatinib inhibited NB4 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that lapatinib induced cell cycle arrest at the S phase and promoted cell apoptosis. Furthermore, Liu's staining and Hoechst 33258 staining revelaed that lapatinib treatment induced an apoptotic nuclear phenomenon. Furthermore, lapatinib induced apoptosis by decreasing Bcl-2 and PML-RARα levels, and by increasing the levels of Bax, cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-9. In addition, lapatinib increased the levels of phospho-p38 MAPK and phospho-JNK, and decreased the levels of phospho-Akt. The p38 inhibitor PD169316 partially blocked lapatinib-induced proliferation inhibition and apoptosis, whereas the JNK inhibitor SP600125 had no such effects. Therefore, treatment with lapatinib may be a promising strategy for APL therapy.

Clinical Impact of Gastric Acid-Suppressing Medication Use on the Efficacy of Erlotinib and Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

BACKGROUND

Gastric acid-suppressing medications (AS), namely, proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists, increase gastric pH, which may reduce the absorption of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors-erlotinib and gefitinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2011, 130 consecutive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations were treated with either erlotinib or gefitinib at our institution. The clinical characteristics of the patients were reviewed, and the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib and gefitinib were compared for patients receiving and not receiving AS.

RESULTS

Among the 130 patients, 47 received AS (AS users group), while the remaining 83 patients did not (AS non-users group). The overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the subject population was 60% and 10 months, respectively. In the AS users and non-users groups, the ORR was 64% and 63% (P = .92), while the median PFS was 8.7 and 10.7 months (P = .13), respectively. No significant difference in either ORR or PFS was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to the toxicity, the frequencies of rash (83% vs. 86%; P = .60) and diarrhea (34% vs. 29%; P = .55) were similar for both groups. A multivariate analysis identified that AS use was not a significant factor for either PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent use of AS did not affect the efficacy or toxicity of erlotinib and gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.