Predicting fluid responsiveness

Respiratory variability of inferior vena cava at different mechanical ventilator settings

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter have been investigated as a reliable tool to estimate the volume status in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients. Our purpose was to compare the echocardiographic measurements the IVC diameter, stroke volume and cardiac output in different positive pressure ventilation parameters.

METHODS

This prospective clinical study with crossover design was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Twenty-five sedated, paralyzed, intubated, and mechanically ventilated patients with volume control mode (CMV) in the ICU due to respiratory failure were included in the study. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Tidal Volume (TV) were changed in each patient consecutively (Group A: TV 6 ml/kg, PEEP 5 cmH20, B: TV 6, PEEP 8, C: TV 8, PEEP 5, D: TV 8, PEEP 8) and the changes in vital parameters, central venous pressure (CVP) and ultrasonographic changes in IVC and cardiac parameters were measured. All measures were compared between groups by robust repeated measures ANOVA with trimmed mean.

RESULTS

The respiratory changes of the IVC diameter and echocardiographic parameters showed no significant difference in separate mechanical ventilator settings. Significant difference was found in peak and plateau pressure values among groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that IVC related parameters are not affected with different ventilatory settings. Further studies are needed to confirm the reliability of these parameters as a predictor of fluid assessment.

Continuous Estimation of Acute Changes in Preload Using Epicardially Attached Accelerometers

OBJECTIVE

A miniaturized accelerometer can be incorporated in temporary pacemaker leads which are routinely attached to the epicardium during cardiac surgery and provide continuous monitoring of cardiac motion during and following surgery. We tested if such a sensor could be used to assess volume status, which is essential in hemodynamically unstable patients.

METHODS

An accelerometer was attached to the epicardium of 9 pigs and recordings performed during baseline, fluid loading, and phlebotomy in a closed chest condition. Alterations in left ventricular (LV) preload alter myocardial tension which affects the frequency of myocardial acceleration associated with the first heart sound ( f_S1). The accuracy of f_S1 as an estimate of preload was evaluated using sonomicrometry measured end-diastolic volume (EDV[Formula: see text]). Standard clinical estimates of global end-diastolic volume using pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) measurements (GEDV[Formula: see text]) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) were obtained for comparison. The diagnostic accuracy of identifying fluid responsiveness was analyzed for f_S1, stroke volume variation (SVV[Formula: see text]), pulse pressure variation (PPV[Formula: see text]), GEDV[Formula: see text], and PAOP.

RESULTS

Changes in f_S1 correlated well to changes in EDV[Formula: see text] ( r²=0.81, 95%CI: [0.68, 0.89]), as did GEDV[Formula: see text] ( r²=0.59, 95%CI: [0.36, 0.76]) and PAOP ( r²=0.36, 95%CI: [0.01, 0.73]). The diagnostic accuracy [95%CI] in identifying fluid responsiveness was 0.79 [0.66, 0.94] for f_S1, 0.72 [0.57, 0.86] for SVV[Formula: see text], and 0.63 (0.44, 0.82) for PAOP.

CONCLUSION

An epicardially placed accelerometer can assess changes in preload in real-time.

SIGNIFICANCE

This novel method can facilitate continuous monitoring of the volemic status in open-heart surgery patients and help guiding fluid resuscitation.

Ultrasound evaluation of the respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava and axillary vein diameter at rest and during positive pressure ventilation in spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has gained favour in aiding fluid management decisions for controlled, mechanically ventilated patients as well as in non-mechanically ventilated, spontaneously breathing patients. Its utility in spontaneously breathing patients during positive pressure non-invasive ventilation has not yet been determined. The use of the axillary vein, as an alternative option to the IVC due to its ease of accessibility and independence from intra-abdominal pressure, has also not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess respiratory variation in IVC and axillary vein diameters in spontaneously breathing participants (Collapsibility Index) and with the application of increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) via positive pressure non-invasive ventilation (Distensibility Index).

METHODS

The IVC and axillary vein diameters of 28 healthy adult volunteers were measured, using ultrasound, at baseline and with increasing PEEP via non-invasive ventilation. The Collapsibility Index and Distensibility Index of these vessels were calculated and compared for each vessel. The association between increasing PEEP levels and the indices was evaluated.

RESULTS

Positive pressure delivered via non-invasive ventilation produced a similar degree of diameter change in the IVC and the axillary vein, that is, the Distensibility Index was similar whether measured in the IVC or the axillary vein (P=0.21, 0.47 and 0.17 at baseline, 5 and 10 cmH₂O PEEP, respectively). Individual study participants' IVC and axillary veins, however, had variable responses to PEEP; that is, there appeared to be no consistent relationship between PEEP and the diameter changes.

CONCLUSION

While the axillary vein could potentially be used as an alternative vessel to the IVC to assess for volume responsiveness in controlled, mechanically ventilated patients as well as in non-mechanically ventilated, spontaneously breathing patients, neither vein should be used to guide fluid management decisions in spontaneously breathing patients during positive pressure non-invasive ventilation.