Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples

Challenges of MS-based small extracellular vesicles proteomics

Proteomic profiling of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) is a powerful tool for discovering biomarkers of various diseases. This process most often assisted by mass spectrometry (MS) usually lacks standardization and recognition of challenges which may lead to unreliable results. General recommendations for sEV MS analyses have been briefly given in the MISEV2023 guidelines. The present work goes into detail for every step of sEV protein profiling with an overview of factors influencing such analyses. This includes reporting and defining the sEV source and vesicle isolation, protein solubilization and digestion, 'offline' and 'online' sample complexity reduction, the analysis type itself, and subsequent data analysis. Every stage in this process affects the others, which could result in different outcomes. Although characterization and comparisons of different sEV isolation methods are known and accessible and MS-based profiling details are provided for cell or tissue samples, no consensus work has been ever published to describe the whole process of sEV proteomic analysis. Reliable results can be obtained from sEV profiling provided that the analysis is well planned, prepared for, and backed by pilot studies or appropriate research.

Mass Spectrometry Advances in Analysis of Glioblastoma

Some cancers such as glioblastoma (GBM), show minimal response to medical interventions, often only capable of mitigating tumor growth or alleviating symptoms. High metabolic activity in the tumor microenvironment marked by immune responses and hypoxia, is a crucial factor driving tumor progression. The many developments in mass spectrometry (MS) over the last decades have provided a pivotal tool for studying proteins, along with their posttranslational modifications. It is known that the proteomic landscape of GBM comprises a wide range of proteins involved in cell proliferation, survival, migration, and immune evasion. Combination of MS imaging and microscopy has potential to reveal the spatial and molecular characteristics of pathological tissue sections. Moreover, integration of MS in the surgical process in form of techniques such as DESI-MS or rapid evaporative ionization MS has been shown as an effective tool for rapid measurement of metabolite profiles, providing detailed information within seconds. In immunotherapy-related research, MS plays an indispensable role in detection and targeting of cancer antigens which serve as a base for antigen-specific therapies. In this review, we aim to provide detailed information on molecular profile in GBM and to discuss recent MS advances and their clinical benefits for targeting this aggressive disease.

Infrared Laser Ablation and Capture of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a ubiquitous and invaluable resource for biomedical research and clinical applications. However, FFPE tissue proteomics is challenging due to protein cross-linking and chemical modification. Laser ablation sampling allows precise removal of material from tissue sections with high spatial control and reproducibility for offline proteomics by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. In this work, we used a pulsed mid-infrared laser for microsampling of rat liver tissue for subsequent identification and quantification of proteins. It was found that more proteins were identified by FFPE tissue laser ablation sampling compared to fresh frozen (FF) tissue laser ablation sampling and that more proteins were identified by laser ablation than by manual dissection of FFPE tissue. In contrast to previous studies, no loss of hydrophilic proteins due to residual cross-linking was observed. The efficient capture of proteins by laser ablation microsampling is attributed to efficient laser breakup of the tissue which facilitates downstream processing of the proteins.

Chloroform/Methanol Protein Extraction and In-solution Trypsin Digestion Protocol for Bottom-up Proteomics Analysis

Bottom-up proteomics utilizes sample preparation techniques to enzymatically digest proteins, thereby generating identifiable and quantifiable peptides. Proteomics integrates with other omics methodologies, such as genomics and transcriptomics, to elucidate biomarkers associated with diseases and responses to drug or biologics treatment. The methodologies employed for preparing proteomic samples for mass spectrometry analysis exhibit variability across several factors, including the composition of lysis buffer detergents, homogenization techniques, protein extraction and precipitation methodologies, alkylation strategies, and the selection of digestion enzymes. The general workflow for bottom-up proteomics consists of sample preparation, mass spectrometric data acquisition (LC-MS/MS analysis), and subsequent downstream data analysis including protein quantification and differential expression analysis. Sample preparation poses a persistent challenge due to issues such as low reproducibility and inherent procedure complexities. Herein, we have developed a validated chloroform/methanol sample preparation protocol to obtain reproducible peptide mixtures from both rodent tissue and human cell line samples for bottom-up proteomics analysis. The protocol we established may facilitate the standardization of bottom-up proteomics workflows, thereby enhancing the acquisition of reliable biologically and/or clinically relevant proteomic data. Key features • Tissue/cell pellet sample preparation for bottom-up proteomics. • Chloroform/methanol protein extraction from murine tissue samples. • In-solution trypsin digestion proteomics workflow.

Quantitative Comparison of Deparaffinization, Rehydration, and Extraction Methods for FFPE Tissue Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are suitable for proteomic and phosphoproteomic biomarker studies by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The choice of the sample preparation method influences the number, intensity, and reproducibility of identifications. By comparing four deparaffinization and rehydration methods, including heptane, histolene, SubX, and xylene, we found that heptane and methanol produced the lowest coefficients of variation (CVs). Using this, five extraction methods from the literature were modified and evaluated for their performance using kidney, leg muscle, lung, and testicular rat organs. All methods performed well, except for SP3 due to insufficient tissue lysis. Heat n' Beat was the fastest and most reproducible method with the highest digestion efficiency and lowest CVs. S-Trap produced the highest peptide yield, while TFE produced the best phosphopeptide enrichment efficiency. The quantitation of FFPE-derived peptides remains an ongoing challenge with bias in UV and fluorescence assays across methods, most notably in SPEED. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that each method favored extracting some gene ontology cellular components over others including chromosome, cytoplasmic, cytoskeleton, endoplasmic reticulum, membrane, mitochondrion, and nucleoplasm protein groups. The outcome is a set of recommendations for choosing the most appropriate method for different settings.

Novel FFPE proteomics method suggests prolactin induced protein as hormone induced cytoskeleton remodeling spatial biomarker

Robotically assisted proteomics provides insights into the regulation of multiple proteins achieving excellent spatial resolution. However, developing an effective method for spatially resolved quantitative proteomics of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) in an accessible and economical manner remains challenging. We introduce non-robotic In-insert FFPE proteomics approach, combining glass insert FFPE tissue processing with spatial quantitative data-independent mass spectrometry (DIA). In-insert approach identifies 450 proteins from a 5 µm thick breast FFPE tissue voxel with 50 µm lateral dimensions covering several tens of cells. Furthermore, In-insert approach associated a keratin series and moesin (MOES) with prolactin-induced protein (PIP) indicating their prolactin and/or estrogen regulation. Our data suggest that PIP is a spatial biomarker for hormonally triggered cytoskeletal remodeling, potentially useful for screening hormonally affected hotspots in breast tissue. In-insert proteomics represents an alternative FFPE processing method, requiring minimal laboratory equipment and skills to generate spatial proteotype repositories from FFPE tissue.

Development of a sample preparation method for micro-proteomics analysis of the formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded liver tissue samples

Liver micro-proteomics based on the routinely used formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples is valuable for innovative research, but the technical approach for sample preparation is often challenging. In this study, we aimed to develop a method for sample preparation for micro-proteomics on using the FFPE liver samples. We collected 2000 individual cells per batch from FFPE liver slices with laser capture microdissection and used them as test samples. We used the microscale fresh-frozen liver samples or HepG2 cells as control samples. For the FFPE samples, we first established a procedure for protein extraction. 2 h incubation at 95 °C in alkaline amine buffer supplemented with 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate allows improved production, efficiency, and quality of protein extraction. Then, we developed a dedicated protocol HDMSP for the micro-concentrated (<0.05 μg/μL) protein preparation for mass spectrometry (MS) based analysis, in which 2 μg/μL carboxyl magnetic beads and 70% acetonitrile are used to induce protein precipitation. For the 0.01 μg/μL protein control samples, protein recovery rate (PRR) by HDMSP is 72.1%, while the PRR is 5.9% if using a standard method solid phase-enhanced sample preparation. For the FFPE samples, the HDMSP PRR is 88.8%, and the subsequent MS analysis demonstrates increased depth, robustness, and quantitation accuracy for HDMSP relative to the control of in-gel digestion. Moreover, the physicochemical properties and subcellular location of the FFPE liver micro-proteome are comparable to those of the fresh-frozen control samples processed with filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). HDMSP is also comparable to FASP in terms of reproducibility and physicochemical properties in liver subcellular proteomes, and meanwhile reduces the sample preparation time by 15.9% and the experimental cost by 30.8%. Overall, the new method is simple and highly effective for preparing the microscale FFPE liver protein samples for MS analysis. This study provides a useful solution for FFPE liver micro-proteomics.

A Fast-Tracking Sample Preparation Protocol for Proteomics of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissues

Archived tumor specimens are routinely preserved by formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Despite the conventional wisdom that proteomics might be ineffective due to the cross-linking and pre-analytical variables, these samples have utility for both discovery and targeted proteomics. Building on this capability, proteomics approaches can be used to maximize our understanding of cancer biology and clinical relevance by studying preserved tumor tissues annotated with the patients' medical histories. Proteomics of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues also integrates with histological evaluation and molecular pathology strategies, so that additional collection of research biopsies or resected tumor aliquots is not needed. The acquisition of data from the same tumor sample also overcomes concerns about biological variation between samples due to intratumoral heterogeneity. However, the protein extraction and proteomics sample preparation from FFPE samples can be onerous, particularly for small (i.e., limited or precious) samples. Therefore, we provide a protocol for a recently introduced kit-based EasyPep method with benchmarking against a modified version of the well-established filter-aided sample preparation strategy using laser-capture microdissected lung adenocarcinoma tissues from a genetically engineered mouse model. This model system allows control over the tumor preparation and pre-analytical variables while also supporting the development of methods for spatial proteomics to examine intratumoral heterogeneity. Data are posted in ProteomeXchange (PXD045879).

ASAP─Automated Sonication-Free Acid-Assisted Proteomes─from Cells and FFPE Tissues

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are an invaluable resource for retrospective studies, but protein extraction and subsequent sample processing steps have been shown to be challenging for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Streamlined high-throughput sample preparation workflows are essential for efficient peptide extraction from complex clinical specimens such as fresh frozen tissues or FFPE. Overall, proteome analysis has gained significant improvements in the instrumentation, acquisition methods, sample preparation workflows, and analysis pipelines, yet even the most recent FFPE workflows remain complex and are not readily scalable. Here, we present an optimized workflow for automated sonication-free acid-assisted proteome (ASAP) extraction from FFPE sections. ASAP enables efficient protein extraction from FFPE specimens, achieving similar proteome coverage as established methods using expensive sonicators, resulting in reduced sample processing time. The broad applicability of ASAP on archived pediatric tumor FFPE specimens resulted in high-quality data with increased proteome coverage and quantitative reproducibility. Our study demonstrates the practicality and superiority of the ASAP workflow as a streamlined, time- and cost-effective pipeline for high-throughput FFPE proteomics of clinical specimens.

Evaluation of Fast and Sensitive Proteome Profiling of FF and FFPE Kidney Patient Tissues

The application of proteomics to fresh frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissues is an important development spurred on by requests from stakeholder groups in clinical fields. One objective is to complement current diagnostic methods with new specific molecular information. An important goal is to achieve adequate and consistent protein recovery across and within large-scale studies. Here, we describe development of several protocols incorporating mass spectrometry compatible detergents, including Rapigest, PPS, and ProteaseMax. Methods were applied on 4 and 15 μm thick FF tissues, and 4 μm thick FFPE tissues. We evaluated sensitivity and repeatability of the methods and found that the protocol containing Rapigest enabled detection of 630 proteins from FF tissue of 1 mm² and 15 μm thick, whereas 498 and 297 proteins were detected with the protocols containing ProteaseMax and PPS, respectively. Surprisingly, PPS-containing buffer showed good extraction of the proteins from 4 μm thick FFPE tissue with the average of 270 protein identifications (1 mm²), similar to the results on 4 μm thick FF. Moreover, we found that temperature increases during incubation with urea on 4 μm thick FF tissue revealed a decrease in the number of identified proteins and increase in the number of the carbamylated peptides.

Comprehensive comparison of sample preparation workflows for proteomics

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments can be subject to a large variability, which forms an obstacle to obtaining deep and accurate protein identification. Here, to obtain an optimal sample preparation workflow...

Comparison of Sample Preparation Methods for Shotgun Proteomic Studies in Aquaculture Species

Proteomics has been recently introduced in aquaculture research, and more methodological studies are needed to improve the quality of proteomics studies. Therefore, this work aims to compare three sample preparation methods for shotgun LC–MS/MS proteomics using tissues of two aquaculture species: liver of turbot Scophthalmus maximus and hepatopancreas of Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. We compared the three most common sample preparation workflows for shotgun analysis: filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), suspension-trapping (S-Trap), and solid-phase-enhanced sample preparations (SP3). FASP showed the highest number of protein identifications for turbot samples, and S-Trap outperformed other methods for mussel samples. Subsequent functional analysis revealed a large number of Gene Ontology (GO) terms in turbot liver proteins (nearly 300 GO terms), while fewer GOs were found in mussel proteins (nearly 150 GO terms for FASP and S-Trap and 107 for SP3). This result may reflect the poor annotation of the genomic information in this specific group of animals. FASP was confirmed as the most consistent method for shotgun proteomic studies; however, the use of the other two methods might be important in specific experimental conditions (e.g., when samples have a very low amount of protein).

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics

Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics.

The role of proteomics in the multiplexed analysis of gene alterations in human cancer

INTRODUCTION

Proteomics has played a pivotal role in identifying proteins perturbed in disease conditions when compared with healthy samples. Study of dysregulated proteins aids in identifying diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets. Cancer is an outcome of interplay of several such disarrayed proteins and molecular pathways which perturb cellular homeostasis, resulting in transformation. In this review, we discuss various facets of proteomic approaches, including tools and technological advancements, aiding in understanding differentially expressed molecules and signaling mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we have taken the approach of documenting the different methods of proteomic studies, ranging from labeling techniques, data analysis methods, and the nature of molecule detected. We summarize each technique and provide a glimpse of cancer research carried out using them, highlighting the advantages and drawbacks in comparison with others. Literature search using online resources, such as PubMed and Google Scholar were carried out for this approach.

EXPERT OPINION

Technological advancements in proteomics studies have come a long way from the study of two-dimensional mapping of proteins separated on gels in the early 1970s. Higher precision in molecular identification and quantification (high throughput), and greater number of samples analyzed have been the focus of researchers.