Men are from mars, women are from venus: Factors responsible for gender differences in outcomes after surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

Male-female differences following concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement surgery

AIMS

Combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and female sex are associated with increased perioperative mortality in clinical risk scores. This study investigated male-female differences in short-term outcome stratified by age groups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients undergoing AVR and CABG between January 2001 and June 2021 at our institution were included. 1963 patients were grouped by decades into: 59 years and younger (n = 127), 60-69 (n = 471), 70-79 (n = 1070), and 80 years and older (n = 295). The primary end points of this study were 30 and 180 days mortality. Secondary end points were influence of preoperative risk factors and impact of sex on survival and postoperative major adverse events. Female patients showed higher 30 and 180 days mortality after combined CABG and AVR surgery (8.3% vs. 4.2%, P < 0.01; 15.8% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.01). Stratified by age groups, 30 and 180 days mortality remained significantly higher in septuagenarians (9.6% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.01; 16.3% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.01). Females were significantly older, had better preserved left ventricular function, and higher incidence of diabetes mellitus compared with male patients in this subgroup (P < 0.01; P = 0.01; P < 0.01). Additionally, females received significantly less internal mammary artery (IMA) conduits (P < 0.01). Female sex (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: [1.76-6.31]; 1.93, [1.22-3.06]), higher age (1.28, [1.13-1.45]; 1.16, [1.06-1.26]), diabetes mellitus (1.93, [1.03-3.60]; 1.70, [1.08-2.67]) and LVEF <30% (3.26, [1.48-7.17]; 2.23, [1.24-4.02]) were correlated with 30 and 180 days mortality, respectively. Upon multivariable testing, sex (1.77, [1.21-2.58]) and LVEF <30% (3.71, [2.39-5.76]) remained independent predictors for major adverse postoperative events. Infrequent use of IMA grafts was associated with increased 30 and 180 days mortality as well as adverse events (0.47, [0.25-0.87]; 0.46, [0.29-0.72]; 0.61, [0.42-0.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex disparities in baseline characteristics may delay operative intervention in female patients. The inherent risk profiles might be responsible for outcome differences in septuagenarians.

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Cardioplegia Yields Different Results in Aortic Valve Surgery Depending on Patient Gender: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) cardioplegia induces cardiac arrest through membrane hyperpolarization. Aortic valve pathology leads to pathophysiological changes in left ventricular vascularization that may prevent adequate cardioplegic distribution. The objective of the study was to ascertain whether the use of Bretschneider cardioplegia in aortic valve surgery yields different outcomes for male and female patients.

METHODOLOGY

Our study compares the perioperative data of 300 adult patients who underwent aortic valve replacement between June 2023 and June 2024 at the Emergency Cardiac Disease and Transplant Institute, Tîrgu Mures, Romania. Concomitant procedures, age under 18 years, retrograde or combined cardioplegia, and emergency surgery were excluded. The main outcome was operative mortality, and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and paraclinical data such as ejection fraction and cardiac enzymes.

RESULTS

Male patients comprised 190 (62%) of the sample. The most common age group was 61-70 years in both groups. The mortality rate was 6 (5.4%) for women compared to 9 (4.7%) for men. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was the primary covariate determining 30-day postoperative mortality. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased by 2.2% in men and 1.1% in women 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The myocardial adaptation to aortic valve pathology exhibits gender-specific differences. However, the utilization of HTK cardioplegia obviates this disparity.

Sex-specific aspects on prognosis after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a SWEDEHEART registry study

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term cardiovascular (CV) outcomes between men and women with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) by the type of valve implant.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 14 123 non-selected patients with AS undergoing first-time AVR and included in the Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry during 2008-2016. Comparisons were made between men and women and type of valve implant (ie, surgical implantation with a mechanical (mSAVR) (n=1 966) or biological valve (bioSAVR) (n=9 801)) or by a transcatheter approach (TAVR) (n=2 356). Outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, heart failure and myocardial infarction, continuously adjusted for significant comorbidities and medical treatment.

RESULTS

In the mSAVR cohort, there were no significant sex differences in any CV events. In the bioSAVR cohort, a higher risk of death (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.26, p=0.007) and major bleeding (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.69, p<0.001) was observed in men. In the TAVR cohort, men suffered a higher risk of death (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.45, p=0.005), major bleeding (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.82, p=0.022) and thromboembolism (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.82, p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

No significant long-term difference in CV events was noted between men and women undergoing AVR with a mechanical aortic valve. In both the bioSAVR and TAVR cohort, mortality was higher in men who also had an increased incidence of several other CV events.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of sex on outcomes after aortic valve replacement

AIMS

In recent years, extensive literature has been produced demonstrating inferior outcomes for women when compared with men undergoing heart valve interventions. Herein, we seek to analyze the literature comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase was conducted for articles comparing differences in outcomes between adult men and women undergoing SAVR. One thousand nine hundred and ninety titles were screened, of which 75 full texts were reviewed, and a total of 19 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

RESULTS

Pooled estimates of mortality demonstrated that women tended to have lower rates of survival within the first 30 days post-SAVR, although mid-term and long-term mortality did not differ significantly up to 10 years postoperatively. Pooled estimates of postoperative data indicated no difference in the rates of stroke and postoperative bleeding. Rates of aortic valve reoperation and acute kidney injury favored women.

CONCLUSION

Despite the inferior outcomes for women post-SAVR that have been reported in recent years, the results of this meta-analysis demonstrate comparable results between the sexes with comparable mid- to long-term mortality in data pooled from the literature. Although mortality favored men in the short term, rates of aortic valve reoperation and acute kidney injury favored women. Future investigation into this field should focus on identifying discrepancies in diagnosis and initial surgical management in order to address any potential factors contributing to discrepant short-term outcomes.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/JCM/A651.

Perioperative Management of Valvular Heart Disease in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery

Postoperative cardiovascular complications (either in a hospital or within 30 days after the operation) are among the most common problems with non-cardiac surgeries (NCSs). Pre-existing cardiac comorbidities add significant risk to the development of such complications. Valvular heart disease (VHD), a rather frequent cardiac comorbidity (especially in the elderly population), can pose serious life-threatening peri-/postoperative complications. Being familiar with the recommended perioperative management of patients with VHD or an implanted prosthetic heart valve who are scheduled for NCS is of great importance in daily clinical practice. Although recently published guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) for the management of VHD and perioperative management of patients undergoing NCS addresses the mentioned problem, a comprehensive review of the guidelines that provides an easy-to-use summary of the recommendations and their similarities and differences is missing in the published literature. In this review article, we summarize all of the relevant important information based on the latest data published in both guidelines needed for practical decision-making in the perioperative management of patients with VHD or after valvular repair (with prosthetic heart valve) who are scheduled for NCS.

Impact of Procedure Volume on the Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

 Literature demonstrated that procedure volumes affect outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We evaluated the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

 All isolated surgical aortic valve replacement procedures in Germany in 2017 were identified. Hospitals were divided into five groups from ≤25 (very low volume) until >100 (very high volume) annual procedures.

RESULTS

 In 2017, 5,533 patients underwent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement. All groups were of comparable risk (logistic EuroSCORE, 5.12-4.80%) and age (66.6-68.1 years). In-hospital mortality and complication rates were lowest in the very high-volume group. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed no significant volume-outcome relationship for in-hospital mortality, stroke, postoperative delirium, and mechanical ventilation > 48 hours. Regarding acute kidney injury, patients in the very high-volume group were at lower risk than those in the very low volume group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, p = 0.04). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were previous cardiac surgery (OR = 5.75, p < 0.001), high-grade renal disease (glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min, OR = 5.61, p = 0.002), surgery in emergency cases (OR = 2.71, p = 0.002), and higher grade heart failure (NYHA [New York Heart Association] III/IV; OR = 1.80, p = 0.02). Risk factors for all four complication rates were atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

 Patients treated in very low volume centers (≤25 operations/year) had a similar risk regarding in-hospital mortality and most complications compared with very high-volume centers (>100 operations/year). Only in the case of acute kidney injury, very high-volume centers showed better outcomes than very low volume centers. Therefore, surgical aortic valve replacement can be performed safely independent of case volume.

Female showed favorable left ventricle hypertrophy regression during post-TAVR follow-up

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established procedure using a catheter-introduced valve prosthesis for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). This retrospective study investigated sex-related differences in pre- and post-TAVR clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and analyzed data of the first 100 cases at Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (KMUH) between December 2013 and December 2021. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, mortality rates, and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed and compared between sexes. Among the 100 patients, male (46%) and female (54%) were of similar age (mean age, male 86.0 years vs. female 84.5 years) and of the same severity of AS (mean pressure gradient, male 47.5 mmHg vs. female 45.7 mmHg) at the time receiving the TAVR procedure. Women had smaller aortic valve areas calculated by continuity equation (0.8 ± 0.3 cm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p < 0.001). In addition, women had better left ventricle ejection fraction (59.6 ± 14.0% vs. men 54.7 ± 17.2%, p < 0.01). In the post-TAVR follow-up, regression of left ventricle mass and dimension was better in women than in men. None of the patient died within 30 days after the procedure, and women tended to have a more favorable survival than men (2-year mortality and overall mortality rate in 8.3 year, women 9.1% and 22.2% vs. men 22.2% and 34.8%; p = 0.6385 and 0.1277, respectively). In conclusion, the sex-based difference in post-TAVR regression of LV remodeling suggests a need for sex-based evaluation for patients with severe AS and their post TAVR follow-up.

Sex difference and outcome trends following surgical aortic valve replacement from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database

BACKGROUND

Based on worldwide registries, approximately 50% of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical aortic valve replacement are females. Although AVR procedures have improved greatly in recent years, differences in outcome including mortality between sexes remain. We aimed to investigate the trends in SAVR outcomes in females versus males.

METHODS

Using the 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified hospitalizations for patients with diagnosis of aortic stenosis during which SAVR was performed. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, procedure complications, and mortality were analyzed. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in SAVR utilization in females versus males. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 392,087 hospitalizations for SAVR across the USA were analyzed. Utilization of SAVR in both sex patients decreased significantly during the years 2011-2017. Males compared to females had significantly higher rates of hyperlipidemia, chronic renal disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and tended to be smokers. Differences in mortality rates among sexes were observed for SAVR procedures. Women had higher in-hospital mortality with 3.7% compared to men with 2.5% (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43, P<0.001]). In a multivariable regression model analysis adjusted for potential confounders, women had higher mortality risk with odd ratio (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43], P<0.001). Women had significantly higher rates of vascular complications (5.1% compared to men with 4.6%, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of SAVR showed a downward trend during the study period. Higher in-hospital mortality was recorded in females compared to males.

Sex-Related Differences in Postoperative Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease of the heart and is increasing in prevalence. Previous literature has found inferior outcomes for females undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, while recent investigations have found equivalent or superior outcomes for females undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for articles published from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2021, for retrospective and prospective studies comparing outcomes between males and females undergoing TAVR. One thousand one hundred eighty titles and abstracts were screened, and 28 were included in this review. Risk of bias was assessed using questions derived from the ROBINS-I tool and previous literature. The data were compiled and analyzed using the RevMan 5.4 software. The results of this review confirm the previously published literature and have found rates of acute kidney injury ( P = 0.05) and postoperative pacemaker insertion ( P < 0.00001) favoring females and in-hospital mortality ( P = 0.04), stroke ( P < 0.00001), bleeding complications ( P < 0.00001), and vascular complications ( P < 0.00001) favoring males. The previously published literature has demonstrated consistently inferior outcomes for females undergoing heart valve surgery when compared to males. However, contemporary literature investigating sex differences after TAVR has found comparable outcomes for females. While the postoperative outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement and TAVR are well established, the causal factors are still unidentified. Future studies utilizing matching based on preoperative characteristics and follow-up including collection of postoperative ventricular remodeling and prosthetic valve performance data will aid in elucidating the causal factors impacting outcomes for males and females after TAVR.

Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in Men Versus Women Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Although gender-related disparities in intermediate-term outcomes have been reported after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), disparate predictors of mortality in men and women who underwent TAVI have not been well studied. This prospective institutional registry study included 297 consecutive patients (153 men, 144 women) who underwent transfemoral TAVI from December 2015 to June 2018 at an academic tertiary medical center. Baseline and clinical characteristics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes at 1 year were recorded. Mortality rates at 1 year were 11.1% and 20.3% in women and men, respectively (p = 0.033). Risk-adjusted mortality was significantly higher in men who underwent TAVI than in women (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 4.87, p = 0.010). Gender-specific risk-adjusted predictors of 1-year mortality post-TAVI included the presence of atrial fibrillation (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.31 to 13.46, p = 0.016) and peripheral artery disease (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.04 to 20.71, p = 0.044) in women and presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.72, p = 0.029), higher serum creatinine (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.15, p = 0.004), and lower body mass index (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.97, p = 0.008) in men. In this prospective institutional registry of adults who underwent TAVI, risk-adjusted 1-year mortality is significantly lower in women, and disparate predictors of risk-adjusted 1-year mortality exist in men and women.

Sex difference and outcome trends following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Based on worldwide registries, approximately 50% of patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are female patients. Although TAVR procedures have improved tremendously in recent years, differences in outcome including mortality between sexes remain. We aimed to investigate the trends in TAVR in the early and new eras of utilization and to assess TAVR outcomes in female patients vs. male patients.

Methods

Using the 2011–2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified hospitalizations for patients with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis during which a TAVR was performed. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, procedure complications, and mortality were analyzed. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in TAVR utilization in female patients and in male patients. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 150,647 hospitalizations for TAVR across the United States were analyzed during 2011–2017. During the study period, a steady upward trend was observed for TAVR procedures in both sexes. From 2011 to 2017, there were significantly more TAVR procedures performed in men [80,477 (53.4%)] than in women [70,170 (46.6%)]. Male patients had significantly higher Deyo-CCI score and comorbidities. Differences in mortality rates among sexes were observed, presenting with higher in-hospital mortality in women than in men, OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.18–1.35], p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Utilization of TAVR demonstrated a steady upward trend during 2011–2017, and a similar trend was presented for both sexes. Higher in-hospital mortality was recorded in female patients compared to male patients. Complication rates decreased over the years but without effect on mortality differences between the sex groups.

Does sex impact outcomes after mitral valve surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective:

The published literature investigating the impact of sex on outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery has demonstrated inferior outcomes for females over males. However, the true relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery continues to be poorly understood.

Materials:

PubMed, Medline, and Embase were systematically searched for articles published from 1 January 2005 to 1 August 2021. This systematic review included retrospective and prospective studies investigating the relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery. In all, 2068 articles were initially screened and 12 studies were included in this review.

Results:

Few studies were adequately powered or structured to investigate this topic. Few studies propensity matched patients or isolated for surgical approach. In individual studies, females experienced increased rates of short-term and long-term mortality and increased 1-year mortality in the pooled data. Males experienced increased rates of required pacemaker insertion. The remaining rates of morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between males and females.

Conclusions:

This review identified increased rates of 1-year mortality in the pooled data for females, while males had increased rates of pacemaker insertion. Despite this, the absence of propensity matching and isolating for surgical approach has introduced confounding variables that impair the ability of the included studies to interpret the results found in the current literature. Studies isolating for surgical approach, propensity matching patients, and examining outcomes with long-term follow-up are required to elucidate the true nature of this relationship.

TAVR for All? The Surgical Perspective

In spite of the noninferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high- and intermediate-risk patients, there are still obstacles that need to be overcome before the procedure is further expanded and clinically integrated. The lack of evidence on the long-term durability of the bioprostheses used for TAVR remains of particular concern. In addition, surgery may be preferred over TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or with concomitant pathologies such as other valve diseases (mitral regurgitation/tricuspid regurgitation), aortopathy, and coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss and summarize relevant data from clinical trials, current trends, and remaining obstacles, and provide our perspective on the indications for the expansion of TAVR.

Sex Related Differences in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Inequalities in postoperative outcomes between males and females are well described with females often experiencing inferior outcomes after heart valve surgery. Recent literature has demonstrated equivalent or improved outcomes for females after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) and replacement (TMVR) is a relatively newer field with significantly less literature comparing sex differences. This systematic review and meta-analysis looks to provide a comprehensive summary of the published literature comparing outcomes between males and females undergoing transcatheter MV interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were systematically searched for all studies comparing outcomes between males and females undergoing TMVr and TMVR. 2,178 English manuscript titles and abstracts were reviewed. Articles were excluded if data was not provided regarding sex differences, transcatheter MV intervention, full-length text was not accessible, or if insufficient data was provided. 2,170 articles were excluded and 8 articles were included in this study.

RESULTS

Pooled estimates of outcomes demonstrated rates of acute kidney injury [OR 1.28 (95% CI, 1.14-1.44; p<0.0001)] favored females while rates of major bleeding favored males [OR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.96; p=0.01)]. Rates of mortality, postoperative MI, and stroke did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

A trend has emerged in heart valve interventions with males tending to have improved outcomes after surgical intervention and females experiencing equivalent or improved outcomes after transcatheter interventions. This meta-analysis identified increased rates of acute kidney injury for males, increased rates of major bleeding for females, and otherwise comparable morbidity and mortality in males and females undergoing TMVr.

Impact of sex on outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in cardiac surgery, observational studies suggest that females have poorer post-operative outcomes than males. This study is the first to review sex related outcomes following both coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and valve surgery with or without combined CABG.

METHODS

We identified 30 primary research articles reporting either short-term mortality (in-hospital/30 day), long-term mortality, and post-operative stroke, sternal wound infection and myocardial infarction (MI) in both sexes following CABG and valve surgery with or without combined CABG. Reported adjusted odds/hazard ratio were pooled using an inverse variance model.

RESULTS

Females undergoing CABG and combined valve and CABG surgery were at higher risk of short-term mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-1.49; I² = 79%) and post-operative stroke (OR 1.2; CI 1.07-1.34; I² = 90%) when compared to males. However, for isolated AVR, there was no difference found (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.74-1.89). There was no increased risk in long-term mortality (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93-1.16; I² = 82%), post-operative MI (OR 1.22; 95%CI: 0.89-1.67; I² = 60%) or deep sternal wound infection (OR 0.92; 95%CI: 0.65-1.03, I² = 87%). No evidence of publication bias or small study effect was found.

CONCLUSION

Females are at a greater risk of short-term mortality and post-operative stroke than males following CABG and valve surgery combined with CABG. However, there is no difference for Isolated AVR. Long-term mortality is equivalent in both sexes. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021244603.

Outcome implication of sex-related effective orifice area normalized to body size in aortic stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Although several echocardiographic parameters have different values according to sex, there are no studies in echocardiographic variables of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Our aim was to evaluate the sex-related prognosis of several echocardiographic parameters in AS.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-five patients with at least moderate AS (effective orifice area [EOA] ≤ 1.50 cm² ) were prospectively enrolled. EOA was normalized to body surface area (BSA), height, and body mass index (BMI). Receiver operating characteristic curves, in women and men separately, were plotted to determine the best cutoff value for predicting cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

The largest area under the curve (AUC) to predict cardiovascular death was EOA in men (AUC 0.74, P < .001) and EOA/height in women (AUC 0.81, P < .001). An EOA/height cutoff value of 0.55 cm² /m in women had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 61%; a cutoff of 0.50 cm² /m in men obtained a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 56%. During a mean follow-up of 247 ± 183 days, there were 33 cardiovascular deaths. Women with EOA/height ≤ 0.55 cm² /m had higher cardiovascular mortality (22% vs 0%, P < .001) and men with EOA/height ≤ 0.50 cm² /m (21% vs 2%, P < .001). One-year survival in women with EOA/height ≤ 0.55 cm² /m was 67 ± 8% and 100 ± 0% in EOA/height > 0.55 cm² /m (P < .001). In men, 1-year survival was 70 ± 8% in EOA/height ≤ 0.50 cm² /m, and 93 ± 6% in EOA/height > 0.50 cm² /m (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Normalization of EOA is useful in AS, especially in women. We recommend using an EOA/height cutoff value of 0.55 cm² /m in women, and 0.50 cm² /m in men to identify a subgroup with higher cardiovascular risk.