The Use of Collaborative Testing with Baccalaureate Nursing Students

Effect of collaborative nursing method based on RAM model on postoperative functional reconstruction, soft tissue pain and living quality in patients with femoral trochanter fracture

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of collaborative nursing based on Roy Adaptive Mode (RAM) on postoperative functional reconstruction, soft tissue pain and quality of life in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective matched control method was used in this study. A total of 96 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture admitted to our hospital from July 2018 to September 2021 were selected. According to different nursing methods, the patients were divided into a collaborative group and a routine group, with 48 cases in each group. Patients in both groups were treated with intramedullary nail surgery. The routine group was given routine perioperative nursing intervention, and the collaborative group was given collaborative nursing intervention on this basis. The hip function recovery and quality of life before and after the intervention were compared between the two groups. The preoperative and postoperative pain degree, and the perioperative complications of the two groups were recorded. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, thereby constructing a risk prediction model. ROC curve was used to analyze the clinical value of influencing factors in predicting postoperative hip function recovery in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

RESULTS

Harris score each dimension after intervention in the collaborative group was obviously higher than that of before intervention and the conventional group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the excellent and good rate of hip joint function the collaborative group was 83.33%, which was significantly higher than 60.42% in the routine group (P < 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores each time point in the collaborative group was obviously lower than that in the routine group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of physiological function, physiological role, body pain and general health in the collaborative group were significantly higher than those in the routine group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the collaborative group was 6.25%, which was significantly lower than 22.92% in the routine group (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in age, preoperative ASA grade, internal fixation method, osteoporosis grade and perioperative nursing methods between the excellent hip recovery group and the poor hip recovery group (P < 0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that age, preoperative ASA grade, internal fixation method and osteoporosis grade were the risk factors affecting the recovery of hip joint function after operation, and perioperative nursing method was the protective factor (P < 0.05). Among the influencing factors, the internal fixation method and the grade of osteoporosis had certain clinical value in predicting the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation.

CONCLUSION

The RAM model-based collaborative nursing method may effectively restore the hip joint function of patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, and may reduce the perioperative pain degree of patients, improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the incidence of complications, which can be popularized and applied in clinical practice. In addition, there are many factors influencing the recovery of hip joint function in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture after operation, and targeted measures should be taken according to the influencing factors to improve the effect of intramedullary nail treatment.

2-Stage Collaborative Testing Results in Improved Academic Performance and Student Satisfaction in a PreLicensure Nursing Course

BACKGROUND

The results remain mixed regarding improved student academic performance and satisfaction when 2-stage collaborative testing (CT) is used in nursing education.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate student academic performance and perceived satisfaction after a CT experience and to compare academic performance between a CT and non-CT cohort.

METHODS

A quantitative design was used to evaluate the effect of CT on academic performance by comparing examination scores and item difficulty values (IDVs) within a CT cohort (n = 111) and between the CT cohort and non-CT retrospective cohort (n = 105). A faculty-created survey was used to measure student-perceived satisfaction in the CT cohort.

RESULTS

Student examination scores increased after the CT experience on a duplicate unit examination. The IDVs on 8 content-specific duplicate final examination items 1 month after the CT experience were significantly increased. There were no significant differences in the IDVs on the 8 content-specific items between a CT and non-CT retrospective cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaborative testing is an active learning modality that can be used in nursing programs to aid students in their learning of specific nursing concepts.