Base-promoted reaction of C60Cl6 with thioamides: an access to [60]fullereno[1,9-d] thiazoles

Synthesis of Benzothieno[60]fullerenes through Fullerenyl Cation Intermediates

Benzothieno[60]fullerenes were synthesized using fullerenyl cations as key intermediates. The reaction proceeded through a nucleophilic attack of the sulfur atom as a weak nucleophile to the fullerenyl cation electrophile. A monoarylated fullerene, (2-methylthiophenyl)hydro[60]fullerene, C₆₀ArH (Ar = C₆H₄-SMe-2 and so on; four derivatives) was subjected to deprotonation with KO tBu to form a fullerenyl anion ArC₆₀^-, followed by oxidation using I₂ to generate a fullerenyl cation ArC₆₀⁺, leading to intramolecular demethylative cyclization via fullerene cation-S interaction to the product. Electrochemical and computational studies revealed slightly narrower band gap of this compound than usual fullerene derivatives because of the relatively high-lying HOMO of the fused thieno moiety.

Relative Stability of Empty Exohedral Fullerenes: π Delocalization versus Strain and Steric Hindrance

Predicting and understanding the relative stability of exohedral fullerenes is an important aspect of fullerene chemistry, since the experimentally formed structures do not generally follow the rules that govern addition reactions or the making of pristine fullerenes. First-principles theoretical calculations are of limited applicability due to the large number of possible isomeric forms, for example, more than 50 billion for C₆₀X₈. Here we propose a simple model, exclusively based on topological arguments, that allows one to predict the relative stability of exohedral fullerenes without the need for electronic structure calculations or geometry optimizations. The model incorporates the effects of π delocalization, cage strain, and steric hindrance. We show that the subtle interplay between these three factors is responsible for (i) the formation of non-IPR (isolated pentagon rule) exohedral fullerenes in contrast with their pristine fullerene counterparts, (ii) the appearance of more pentagon-pentagon adjacencies than predicted by the PAPR (pentagon-adjacency penalty rule), (iii) the changes in regioisomer stability due to the chemical nature of the addends, and (iv) the variations in fullerene cage stability with the progressive addition of chemical species.