Comparison of gonadorelin products in lactating dairy cows: efficacy based on induction of ovulation of an accessory follicle and circulating luteinizing hormone profiles

Effect of 200 μg of gonadorelin hydrochloride at the first GnRH of a CO-Synch program on ovulation rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination in Holstein heifers

The initial ovulatory response during synchronization programs is often low in dairy heifers, largely due to follicular dynamics and hormonal dynamics. Specifically, the progesterone (P4) concentration at the time of the first GnRH treatment in a breeding program can influence the LH response, often resulting in a suboptimal ovulatory response. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the highest label dose 200 μg (100 μg vs. 200 μg) of GnRH (50 μg of gonadorelin hydrochloride per mL; Factrel, Zoetis Inc. Madison, NJ) at the first GnRH of a 6-d CO-Synch plus P4 device program on ovulatory response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in first service in Holstein heifers. A total of 1,308 Holstein heifers were randomly allocated at the beginning of a 6-d CO-Synch program at day 0 to receive either i.m. treatment of 100 μg (2CC, n = 655) or 200 μg (4CC, n = 653) of GnRH. Also, at d 0, heifers received an intravaginal insert with 1.38 g of P4 (Eazi-Breed CIDR Cattle Insert, Zoetis Inc.). On day 6, the insert was removed, and i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α (12.5 mg of dinoprost tromethamine/mL; Lutalyse HighCon Injection, Zoetis Inc.) was administered. On d 7, a second i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α was given, followed on d 9 by concurrent i.m. treatment of 100 μg of GnRH, and timed AI. A subset of 396 heifers had their ovaries scanned to evaluate ovulatory response, and blood samples were collected to measure the serum concentration of P4 at d 0 and d 6 of the study. The P4 concentrations at d 0 were categorized as low (≤3 ng/mL) or high (>3 ng/mL). The ovulatory response was greater for heifers receiving 4CC than 2CC at d 0 (54.7% vs. 42.8%). The ovulatory response was greater for low P4 than high P4 at d 0 (54.3% vs. 37.8%). However, we did not observe an interaction between treatment and P4 concentrations (low P4 2CC = 48.6% vs. high P4 2CC = 30.0%; low P4 4CC = 60.0% vs. high P4 4CC = 45.5%). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that P4 concentrations at d 0 treatment could predict the ovulatory response, although the area under the curve was only 0.6. As expected, heifers that ovulated had increased P/AI (no = 55.6% vs. yes = 67.7%); however, we found no effect of treatment on P/AI (2CC = 63.3% vs. 4CC = 59.6%), and no interactions between treatment and ovulation and treatment and P4 (high vs. low) for pregnancy outcomes. In summary, P4 concentration and increasing the dose of GnRH at d 0 positively affected ovulatory response in Holstein heifers. However, there was no interaction between treatment and P4 on ovulation and no subsequent impact of GnRH dose on P/AI.

GnRH analogs induce a LH peak and increase pregnancy per timed-AI in ewes

To date, there have been no studies testing the capacity of GnRH analogs and respective doses to induce a LH peak in sheep. In this sense, the present study aimed to evaluate the capacity of different synthetic forms and doses of GnRH in inducing LH release in sheep, and the effect of GnRH administration at timed artificial insemination (TAI) on pregnancy per timed-AI. In experiment 1, ewes (n = 40) received an intravaginal device (IVD) of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 60 mg) for 7 d and prostaglandin F2α analog on Day 5. On Day 7, the ewes were allocated randomly into one of eight groups (n = 5/group), which received a GnRH analog at a specific dose, as follows: lecirelin (12.5 or 25 μg), gonadorelin (50 or 100 μg), buserelin acetate (4.2 or 8.4 μg), or deslorelin (375 or 750 μg). Blood samples for LH determination were obtained at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after GnRH and the IVDs were removed after the last blood collection. The maximal LH concentration induced by gonadorelin at doses of 50 μg and 100 μg (12.0 ± 2.4 ng/mL and 28.6 ± 7.1 ng/mL, respectively) was lower (P < 0.05) than serum LH induced by 8.4 μg of buserelin (78.9 ± 12.9 ng/mL), 375 μg and 750 μg of deslorelin (75.6 ± 7.4 ng/mL and 72.1 ± 10.6 ng/mL, respectively) and 12.5 μg and 25 μg of lecirelin (73.3 ± 17.8 ng/mL and 61.6 ± 5.9 ng/mL, respectively). However, the maximal LH concentration induced by 4.2 μg of buserelin (49.4 ± 5.9 ng/mL) was similar (P > 0.05) to the 100 μg of gonadorelin. The total release of LH (area under the curve - AUC) after treatment with 50 μg of gonadorelin (31.7 ± 5.9 ng h/mL) was lower (P < 0.05) than after other agonists. In a second experiment, 330 ewes were treated with IVD containing MPA for 7 d. Simultaneously with IVD removal, 250 μg of cloprostenol and 200 IU of eCG were administered. Then, ewes were assigned randomly to either no further treatment (control); or to receive 4.2 μg of buserelin acetate (GnRH group) at cervical TAI, which was performed with fresh semen 54 h after IVD withdrawal in all the animals. Higher pregnancy per timed-AI was observed for GnRH (50.3 %) compared to control (40.7 %). We conclude that buserelin acetate (8.4 μg), lecirelin (12.5 and 25 μg) and deslorelin (375 and 750 μg) induced a greater stimulatory effect on LH secretion than gonadorelin treatment. Furthermore, buserelin acetate treatment at TAI increased pregnancy per timed-AI in ewes previously treated with MPA and eCG.

Effect of progesterone from corpus luteum, intravaginal implant, or both on luteinizing hormone release, ovulatory response, and subsequent luteal development after gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in cows

This study aimed to determine the effect of circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations produced by a corpus luteum (CL) or released by an intravaginal P4 implant (IPI) on GnRH-induced LH release, ovulatory response, and subsequent CL development, after treatment with 100 μg of gonadorelin acetate (GnRH challenge). Nonlactating multiparous Holstein cows were synchronized and GnRH was used to induce ovulation (d -7). Over 4 replicates, cows that ovulated (n = 87) were randomly assigned to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (presence or absence of CL and insertion or not of an IPI at GnRH challenge), creating 4 groups: CL_IPI, CL_NoIPI, NoCL_IPI, and NoCL_NoIPI. On d -1.5, NoCL_IPI and NoCL_NoIPI received 2 doses of 0.53 mg of cloprostenol sodium (PGF2α), 24 h apart to regress CL. On d 0, cows were treated with 100 μg of GnRH and, simultaneously, cows from IPI groups received a 2-g IPI maintained for the next 14 d. Diameter of dominant follicle, ovulatory response, and subsequent CL volume were assessed by ultrasonography on d -1.5, 0, 2, 7, and 14. Blood samples were collected on d -1.5, 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 for analysis of circulating P4 and at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after GnRH challenge for analysis of circulating LH. In a subset of cows (n = 34), the development of the new CL was evaluated daily, from d 5 to 14. The presence of CL at the time of GnRH challenge affected the LH peak and ovulatory response (CL: 5.3 ng/mL and 58.1%; NoCL: 13.2 ng/mL and 95.5%, respectively). However, despite producing a rapid increase in circulating P4, IPI insertion did not affect LH concentration or ovulation. Regardless of group, ovulatory response was positively correlated with LH peak and negatively correlated with circulating P4 on d 0. Moreover, new CL development and function were negatively affected by the presence of CL and by the IPI insertion. In summary, circulating P4 produced by a CL exerted a suppressive effect on GnRH-induced LH release and subsequent ovulation of a 7-d-old dominant follicle, whereas the IPI insertion at the time of GnRH had no effect on LH concentration or ovulation. Finally, elevated circulating P4, either from CL or exogenously released by the IPI, compromised the development and function of the new CL, inducing short cycles in cows without CL at the time of GnRH treatment.

GnRH dose at initiation of a 5-day CO-Synch + P4 for fixed time artificial insemination in suckled beef cows

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of GnRH dose administered at initiation (GnRH-1) of a 5-day CO-Synch + P4 protocol on ovulatory response, expression of estrus, and fertility in suckled beef cows. Suckled beef cows (n = 1101) at four locations were randomized to receive either 100 or 200 µg of gonadorelin acetate at initiation (D-8) of a 5-day CO-Synch + P4 protocol concurrently with insertion of an intravaginal progesterone (P4) device. On D-3 the P4 device was removed, two doses of prostaglandin F2α were administered concurrently and a patch was applied to evaluate expression of estrus. Artificial insemination was performed 72 h after P4 device removal (D0) simultaneously with the administration of 100 µg of gonadorelin acetate (GnRH-2). Increasing GnRH dose at initiation of a 5-day CO-Synch + P4 did not enhance ovulatory response (P = 0.57) to GnRH-1, expression of estrus (P = 0.79), nor pregnancies per AI (P/AI; P = 0.91). Both follicle size (quadratic) and circulating P4 (linear) affected (P < 0.01) ovulatory response to GnRH-1 independent of dose. Cows that had ovulation to GnRH-1 had smaller (P < 0.001) follicle size on D-3 and reduced (P = 0.05) expression of estrus compared to cows that did not have ovulation to GnRH-1, however, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.75). In conclusion, increasing the dose of GnRH-1 in the 5-day CO-Synch + P4 protocol did not enhance ovulatory response, expression of estrus, or P/AI in suckled beef cows.

Comparison of the initial ovarian response, the synchrony of oestrus and ovulation and chronic stress response after administration of 100 or 250 μg of GnRH to randomly cycling Bos indicus cattle

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of administering saline, 100 or 250 μg of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) on ovarian response, synchrony of oestrus and ovulation and chronic stress response in Bos indicus cattle.

DESIGN

Randomised control.

METHODS

Animals were either left untreated (n = 20) or on day 0 treated with an intravaginal progesterone releasing device and either saline (n = 24), 100 μg (n = 35), or 250 (n = 35) μg of GnRH, intramuscular (IM). Blood was sampled 1.4 h after administration of treatment to monitor concentrations of luteinising hormone (LH) and P4 in serum and again 5 days later. On day 5 intravaginal P4 releasing device were removed, cloprostenol was administered IM and again 8 h later. Oestrus and ovulation were then monitored with ultrasonography for 6.5 days. Hair was clipped on day 55 for analysis of hair cortisol concentrations (HCC).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between Saline and GnRH treatments in the odds of inducing a new corpus luteum (CL) and the synchrony of oestrus or ovulation. HCC did not differ significantly between treatments. Mean concentrations of LH in serum on day 0 were less in the Saline compared to 100 and 250 μg GnRH treatments but did not differ between different doses of GnRH.

CONCLUSION

Mean concentrations of LH and the odds of inducing a new CL were not increased after administering 250 μg compared to 100 μg of GnRH. Animal handling events in the study did not influence HCC. Further research is needed to better optimise responses to GnRH in B. indicus cattle.

Graduate Student Literature Review: Effects of human chorionic gonadotropin on follicular and luteal dynamics and fertility in cattle

Circulating progesterone concentrations during the growth of the ovulatory follicle and early embryo development have been positively associated with embryo quality and survival and pregnancy success. As a potent luteotropic agent with LH-like activity, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) has been tested in different studies to improve pregnancy outcomes by increasing circulating progesterone concentrations during the growth of the ovulatory follicle or early embryonic development. Nevertheless, hCG has produced inconsistent, contradictory, and intriguing results. Furthermore, recent research indicates that hCG, when used before artificial insemination, may affect physiological events necessary for the ovulation of a viable oocyte. In addition, the use of hCG-inducing accessory corpus luteum during the estrous cycle seems to disturb luteolysis and follicle and luteal dynamics during the estrous cycle. This literature review discusses past and current research exploring the effects of hCG on the estrous cycle characteristics and pregnancy per artificial insemination and embryo transfer.

Effects of kisspeptin-10 on the reproductive performance of sows in a fixed-time artificial insemination programme

Kisspeptin (KP) is a major positive regulator of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis and affects female reproductive cyclicity in mammals. It offers an attractive alternative strategy to control reproduction in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols. We aimed to evaluate the effects of different doses of kisspeptin-10 (KP-10) on sow reproductive performance in FTAI protocols. One hundred ninety-eight weaned sows were divided into three groups at random. A FTAI-GnRH group of sows (n = 98) received 100 µg (2 mL) gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; gonadorelin) by intramuscular injection at 96 h after weaning (t = 0 h); FTAI-KPL (KPL: low-dose KP-10, n = 50), and FTAI-KPH groups of sows (KPH: high-dose KP-10, n = 50) received 0.5 or 1 mg KP-10 (2 mL) respectively at 96 h after weaning. Sows were checked twice daily for oestrus. Ultrasonographic evaluations were performed to determine the follicular diameter and time of ovulation; blood samples were collected immediately before injection (t₀ = 0 min) and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 min, 24 and 48 h postinjection. Sows were inseminated at 112 and 132 h after weaning. The oestrus rates (96 vs 92%; 96 vs 88%) and weaning-to-oestrus intervals (98.9 vs 98.6 h; 98.9 vs 97.1 h) were not affected by treatment, but oestrus in the FTAI-KPL group was significantly longer than in the FTAI-GnRH group (38.7 vs 30.0 h; P < 0.05). The peak LH concentrations were 1.29 times greater than at t₀ = 0 in the FTAI-GnRH group, and 1.45 and 1.44 times greater than at t₀ = 0 in the FTAI-KPL and FTAI-KPH groups, respectively. Follicular diameters and pregnancy rates (86 vs 88%, 86 vs 80%, respectively) did not differ between the treatments. Moreover, the total numbers of piglets born and those born alive did not differ among the three groups. These findings suggested that 0.5 mg KP-10 given at 96 h after weaning could be used in FTAI programmes to manage batch farrowing in sows.

Estradiol Priming Potentiates the Kisspeptin-Induced Release of LH in Ovariectomized Cows

The present study examined whether priming with estradiol benzoate (EB) for 12 h increased both the peak and duration of LH release in response to kisspeptin (KISS1, KP) in cows. In a Latin square design, ovariectomized Nelore cows (n = 8) received: Control, i.m. 4 mL of 0.9% saline; KP, i.m. 4 mg murine KISS1-10; EBKP, i.m. 4 mg KISS1-10 + i.m. 2 mg EB simultaneously; EB12KP, i.m. 4 mg KISS1-10 + i.m. 2 mg EB 12 h before KISS1-10. Concentrations of LH were determined in blood samples obtained at time 0 (treatment), 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 270 min. Concentrations of LH were analyzed by Proc GLIMMIX for repeated measures. In case of significance, the adjusted Tukey test was used to test for differences among treatments. GraphPad 8.0 PRISM® was used to determine the area under the LH-response curve (AUC) after injection of KISS1-10. Plasma LH remained relatively constant throughout sampling after treatment with saline. The peak in LH after injection of KISS1-10 occurred at 20 min in Groups KP and EBKP and at 40 min in Group EB12KP. The peak LH response (∆LH, ng/mL) was greater (p < 0.01) in Group EB12KP (5.6 ± 0.9) than in Groups KP (2.4 ± 0.9) and EBKP (3.5 ± 0.9), which did not differ. AUC (LH ng/mL*min) was greater (p = 0.02) in Group EB12KP (439 ± 73) than in Groups KP (176 ± 73) and EBKP (241 ± 73), with the latter two groups not differing. The findings indicated that 12 h priming with EB increased both the peak and duration of the LH response to treatment with KISS1. The incorporation of EB priming and KISS1 could improve the efficiency of estrus synchronization with fixed-time AI in cows. This would have an important practical application in assisted breeding in beef and dairy cattle.

Replacing the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in an Ovsynch protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin decreased pregnancies per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to compare the effect of treatment with GnRH at the first treatment (G1) of the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of a Double-Ovsynch (DO) protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. In experiment 1, lactating dairy cows (n = 1,932) submitted to a DO protocol for first timed artificial insemination (TAI) on 2 commercial dairy farms were blocked by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous) and were randomly assigned to receive 100 µg of GnRH versus 2,500 IU of hCG at G1. Overall, P/AI 39 d after TAI for cows inseminated with sexed dairy semen was greater for cows treated with GnRH than for cows treated with hCG within each parity (primiparous: 42.6% vs. 38.2%; multiparous: 39.4% vs. 30.3%). Similarly, P/AI 39 d after TAI for multiparous cows inseminated with conventional beef semen tended to be greater for cows treated with GnRH than for cows treated with hCG (41.1% vs. 34.3%). In experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows (n = 43) were blocked by parity and were randomly assigned to the treatment protocols described for experiment 1. Ovaries were evaluated with transrectal ultrasonography immediately before treatment and 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 h after treatment to assess time from treatment to ovulation, and blood samples were collected immediately before G1, at the first PGF_2α treatment, 8 and 16 h later, at the second PGF_2α treatment, 8 and 16 h later, at the second GnRH (G2) treatment, and at TAI to compare luteolysis based on serum progesterone (P4) concentrations. Although mean (± standard error of the mean) time from treatment to ovulation was approximately 2 h greater for cows treated with hCG than for cows treated with GnRH (33.7 ± 0.6 vs. 31.5 ± 0.6 h), P4 concentrations during luteolysis and the proportion of cows with complete luteolysis (P4 <0.4 ng/mL at G2) did not differ between treatments. We conclude that replacing 100 µg of GnRH with 2,500 IU of hCG at G1 of a DO protocol decreased fertility to TAI in lactating dairy cows but did not affect the rate or completeness of luteolysis despite the increased interval from treatment to ovulation.

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-induced ovulation occurs later but with equal occurrence in lactating dairy cows: comparing hCG and gonadotropin-releasing hormone protocols

This study assessed the effects of two hormones, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), on ovulatory responses during different diestrous stages in lactating dairy cows. Estrous cycles of 21 cows were synchronized and were enrolled in stage 1 of the experiment. The cows were treated with a prostaglandin (PG) F2α analog either 9 to 10 days [mid-diestrus (MD) group] or 5.5 to 6.5 days [early-diestrus (ED) group] after synchronized ovulation (day 0 = first PGF2α administration). On day 2, the cows were administrated 250 μg GnRH or 3000 IU hCG. Ovulation was determined every 2 h from 24 to 36 h after GnRH or hCG administration, and then every 4 h up to 72 h until ovulation. Cows in stage 2 were administered these treatments in the reverse order. The results indicated that average ovulation times in cows treated with GnRH in the MD group (GnRH-MD group) and cows treated with GnRH in the ED group (GnRH-ED group) were 30.0 ± 1.0 h and 28.8 ± 0.4 h, respectively. However, ovulation times for cows treated with hCG in the MD group (hCG-MD group) and cows treated with hCG in the ED group (hCG-ED group) were 35.8 ± 4.6 h and 32.8 ± 2.2 h, respectively, and ovulation occurred significantly later in the hCG-treated groups than in the GnRH-treated groups. In summary, we found that hCG-induced ovulation occurred later than GnRH-induced ovulation regardless of different diestrous peroids; however, the two treatments did not differ in terms of percentage of ovulation.

Ovulation and fertility response to commercially available GnRH products in lactating cows synchronized with the Double-Ovsynch protocol

This study was designed to evaluate whether commonly used gonadorelin products that are commercially available in the United States results in comparable ovulation and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in synchronized lactating dairy cows. A total of 1411 Holstein cows receiving a Double-Ovsynch protocol (DOV) for conducting the first postpartum AI were randomized to receive one of the following GnRH products throughout the Double-Ovsynch: 1) Cystorelin® (CYS, gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate, n = 484); 2) Factrel® (FAC, gonadorelin hydrochloride, n = 482) or; 3) Fertagyl® (FER, gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate, n = 515). A subgroup of cows (n = 487) received ovarian ultrasound exams and collection of blood samples for progesterone (P4) analysis. Proportion of cows ovulating following the 3^rd GnRH of DOV tended (P = 0.07) to differ between GnRH salts (hydrochloride = 61.5% vs. diacetate = 72.7%) but was similar for GnRH products (FER = 74.1% vs. FAC = 61.5% vs. CYS = 72.2%). Interestingly, a logistic regression analyses that considered the circulating P4 at the time of GnRH treatment indicated lower ovulation responses to FAC compared to FER and CYS; although greater circulating P4 decreased ovulation response to all GnRH products. Results for P/AI at 60 d post-insemination differed between GnRH salts (P =  0.02) as well as GnRH products (FER = 47.8% vs. FAC = 42.0% vs. CYS = 49.8%; P = 0.04). In conclusion, fertility following use of the Double-Ovsynch was less following a hydrochloride-based GnRH product likely due to lesser ovulatory responses throughout the synchronization protocol.

Level of circulating concentrations of progesterone during ovulatory follicle development affects timing of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of high versus low progesterone (P4) during the pre-dominance or dominance phase (or both) of ovulatory follicle development on follicular dynamics and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Progesterone (P4) was manipulated to reach high (H) or low (L) serum concentrations during the pre-dominance phase (d 0 to 4 of the wave) and dominance phase (d 5 to 7 of the wave) of a second follicular wave ovulatory follicle, creating 4 treatments: H/H, H/L, L/H, and L/L. Luteolysis was induced with PGF_2α on d 7 of the wave and ovulation was induced with GnRH 56 h after PGF_2α. Cows (n = 558) received artificial insemination (AI) 16 h following GnRH. Pregnancy was determined at 6 intervals during gestation and at calving to quantify pregnancy loss beginning at d 23 post-AI utilizing pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) in novel within-cow comparisons. Cows with single ovulations assigned to the L/L treatment had greater pre-ovulatory follicle diameter compared with cows assigned to the L/H or H/L treatments. Cows with single ovulations had greater pre-ovulatory follicle diameter compared with cows with double ovulations. Low P4 in H/L, L/H, and L/L increased double ovulation rate compared with H/H. Cows with double ovulations had greater pregnancies per AI (P/AI) on d 23 post-AI compared with cows with single ovulations but had greater losses if ovulations were unilateral. Cows with low P4 during the entire period of the ovulatory follicle development also had greater P/AI on d 23 post-AI compared with cows with high P4 during both phases. However, full-term P/AI was not different between treatments. This was a result of the greater incidence of pregnancy losses between d 35 and 56 of gestation for cows with unilateral double ovulations compared with bilateral double ovulations and single ovulatory cows. Cows with single ovulation and low circulating P4 during the dominance period of follicle development had increased pregnancy losses between d 35 and 56 of gestation compared with cows with single ovulations and high P4. The PSPB measurements on d 16 and 23 post-AI were highly accurate in the prediction of pregnancy at d 28. The PSPB differed on d 23 and 28 between cows that had versus cows that did not have pregnancy losses between d 28 and 35 of gestation. In summary, circulating concentrations of P4 during ovulatory follicle development affected numbers of follicles ovulated and timing of subsequent pregnancy losses.

Effect of GnRH on ovulatory response after luteolysis induced by two low doses of PGF2α in lactating dairy cows

This study investigated the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on ovulatory response after complete luteolysis induced by two low doses of prostaglandin (PG)F2α in lactating dairy cows. Cows (n = 18) ranging between 45 and 65 days in milk were recruited for synchronization by a modified Ovsynch-48 protocol (GnRH-7 days-375 μg PGF2α-1 day-250 μg of PGF2α-1 day-GnRH) over a total of 23 estrous cycles. Synchronized cows (n = 16) were randomly assigned to GnRH and Saline groups in stage 1 of the experiment after 9-10 days of ovulation in synchronization. On days 0 and 1 (day 0 = first PGF2α administration), cows were treated with 375 and 250 μg PGF2α, respectively. On day 2, cows in the GnRH and Saline groups were administered 250 μg GnRH or 2.5 mL of 0.9% saline, respectively. Serum progesterone (P4) levels were measured and changes in the corpus luteum (CL) were ultrasonically monitored daily from day 0-3 to assess complete luteolysis. Preovulatory follicle diameter and ovulatory response were evaluated by ultrasonography. In stage 2, cows were treated in a manner converse to that in stage 1. The synchronization rate was 69.6% (16/23). In stages 1 and 2, cows showed complete luteolysis with P4 concentration <1 ng/mL or remaining CL area <50%. Average ovulation time was 29.3 ± 0.5 h, which mostly occurred between 28 and 30 h after GnRH injection. However, all cows in the Saline group ovulated later than 36 h post-injection, with an average time of 52.7 ± 8.6 h. There was no difference in preovulatory follicle diameter between the two groups (16.8 ± 0.5 and 17.3 ± 0.5 mm for GnRH and saline groups, respectively). Although ovulation rate was not correlated with treatment, the rate within 48 h of GnRH injection (93.3%) tended to be higher compared with that in the Saline group (60.0%). Thus, GnRH administration increased ovulation rate following complete luteolysis induced by two low doses of PGF2α. These results indicate that this simple protocol for dairy cows is an effective alternative to timed artificial insemination programs in the field.

Effect of different gonadorelin (GnRH) products used for the first or resynchronized timed artificial insemination on pregnancy rates in postpartum dairy cows

Different GnRH products are used for timed artificial insemination (AI) in postpartum dairy cows. Previous studies reported greater LH release and increased ovulation percentage for gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate compared with gonadorelin hydrochloride but pregnancies per AI (P/AI) were not evaluated. The objective, therefore, was to compare P/AI for cows treated with either gonadorelin hydrochloride or gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate before the first timed AI or resynchronized timed AI. Holstein cows (n = 3938) in a confinement dairy in northeast Missouri were assigned to weekly cohorts (n = 22) on the basis of calving date. Cows were treated with "Presynch Ovsynch" (PGF2α, 14 days; PGF2α, 14 days; GnRH, 7 days; PGF2α, 56 hours; GnRH, 16 hours; timed AI) so that the first timed AI was 70 to 76 days postpartum. The PGF2α was Lutalyse (5 mL; 25 mg; Zoetis). The GnRH product was either gonadorelin hydrochloride (2 mL; 100 μg; n = 1945) or gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate (2 mL; 100 μg; n = 1993) and alternated weekly for cows assigned to cohorts. There were first timed AI (n = 1790) and resynchronized timed AI (n = 2148) cows within each cohort. The resynchronization began 32 days after timed AI (GnRH, 6 days; ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis, 1 day; and then for nonpregnant cows: PGF2α, 56 hours; GnRH, 16 hours; timed AI). The trial was conducted from January to February 2012 (n = 1203) and July to October 2012 (n = 2735). Cows were fed a total mixed ration, milked thrice daily, and milk tested monthly for volume, somatic cell count (SCC), fat percentage, protein percentage, and milk urea nitrogen. Data were analyzed by fitting the binary response data to a generalized linear mixed model for repeated measures. There was no effect of the GnRH product (treatment) on P/AI (38.4 ± 1.2 vs. 35.7 ± 1.3; gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate vs. gonadorelin hydrochloride). Treatment interactions with parity, month of breeding, or insemination number were not significant. The first-service P/AI (38.8 ± 1.4%) was greater (P < 0.05) than the resynchronized P/AI (35.3 ± 1.3%). Cows inseminated in the summer had lesser P/AI (effect of month; P < 0.001) compared with cows inseminated in the winter. There was a decrease (P < 0.002) in timed AI conception for cows with a greater milk SCC and an increase (P < 0.003) in P/AI for cows with a greater milk protein percentage. In conclusion, the GnRH product did not affect P/AI for the first or resynchronized timed AI in an Ovsynch-based program. Other factors affected P/AI including service number (lesser for the second service or greater), month (lesser in summer months), SCC (lesser for cows with greater SCC), and milk protein percentage (greater for cows with greater protein percentage).

LH peak and ovulation after two different estrus synchronization treatments in buffalo cows in the daylight-lengthening period

The aim of this study was to determine the timing of ovulation in relation to the LH peak after synchronization using PRID or Ovsynch protocols, to assess the effects of the period of treatment on these parameters and to provide information concerning how to use the two main protocols for fixed-time artificial insemination in buffalo. Forty-eight lactating Italian Mediterranean buffalo cows were used. The buffaloes were treated in various periods as follows: February to March (n = 12 PRID, n = 12 Ovsynch), end of the breeding season, May to June (n = 12 PRID, n = 12 Ovsynch), beginning of low-breeding season according to Italian environmental conditions. To determine the LH, blood samples were taken at 4-hour intervals, starting 24 hours from PRID removal (PRID group) or 12 hours from (PGF2α) injection (Ovsynch group) up to 108 hours. The ovaries were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography to verify ovulation. The LH-ovulation interval was similar in both groups (30.10 ± 1.05 and 32.77 ± 1.15 hours, respectively, in PRID and Ovsynch group). In the PRID group, the timing of ovulation in relation to device removal was 76.83 ± 3.65 hours with a high level of variability among the animals. In the Ovsynch group, we observed a better synchronization of LH peaks and ovulations, and the timing of ovulation in relation to the last GnRH injection was 35.67 ± 1.15 hours. The percentage of animals reaching the LH peak and ovulation was lower (P ≤ 0.05) in May to June (respectively 75.0% and 54.1%) compared to February to March (respectively 95.8% and 83.3%), indicating a reduction of hypothalamus-pituitary responsiveness to the synchronization treatments in the daylight-lengthening period.

Evaluation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone hydrogen chloride at 3 doses with prostaglandin F2α for fixed-time artificial insemination in dairy cows

The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the efficacy and field safety of GnRH HCl administered at 3 doses in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) programs (Ovsynch) in dairy cows. A common protocol was conducted at 6 commercial dairies. Between 188 and 195 cows were enrolled at each site (total enrolled = 1,142). Cows had body condition scores ≥ 2 and ≤ 4, were between 32 to 140 d in milk, and were clinically healthy. Within pen and enrollment day (enrollment cohort), cows were assigned randomly in blocks of 4 to each of 4 treatments: (1) 25mg of PGF2α on d 7 with FTAI 72 ± 2 h later (control); (2) 100 μg of GnRH on d 0, d 7 a dose of 25mg of PGF2α, and the second administration of 100 μg of GnRH (T100) administered either at 48 ± 2 h (d 9) after PGF2α with FTAI 24 ± 2 h later or 56 ± 2 h (d 9) after PGF2α and FTAI 17 ± 2 h later; (3) same as T100 with both injections of 150 μg of GnRH (T150); and (4) same as T100 with both injections of 200 μg of GnRH (T200). Three sites selected the first option and 3 sites selected the second option for the timing of the second injection of all doses of GnRH. Cows were observed daily for signs of estrus and adverse clinical signs. Cows not returning to estrus had pregnancy diagnosis between 42 and 65 d following FTAI. Pregnancies per FTAI (P/FTAI) were analyzed as a binary variable (1 = pregnant, 0 = not pregnant) using a generalized linear mixed model with a binomial error distribution and a logit link function. The statistical model included fixed effects for treatment, random effects of site, site by treatment, enrollment cohort within site, and residual. Parity (first vs. second or greater) was included as a covariate. For demonstration of effectiveness, α=0.05 and a 2-tailed test were used. Fifty-two cows were removed from the study because of either deviation from the protocol, injury, illness, culling, or death. Among the remaining 1,090 cows, 33.9% were primiparous and 66.1% were multiparous. Back-transformed least squares means for P/FTAI were 17.1, 27.3, 29.1, and 32.2% for control, T100, T150 and T200, respectively. The P/FTAI for each GnRH dose differed from that of the control. No differences were detected in P/FTAI between GnRH doses. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Mastitis was the most frequently observed adverse clinical sign, followed by lameness and pneumonia. This study documents the efficacy and safety of doses of 100 to 200 μg of GnRH as the HCl salt when used in Ovsynch programs.

Effect of intrauterine administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone with glycerol on serum LH concentrations in lactating dairy cows

The objectives of the study were to assess: (1) preovulatory serum LH concentrations and (2) synchrony of ovulation after im or iu administration of GnRH with or without the addition of glycerol. Cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α given 14d apart (starting at 26±3DIM) followed by Ovsynch (OV; GnRH-7d-PGF2α-48h-GnRH) 12d later. At the time of the second GnRH of OV (GnRH2), cows were blocked by parity and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 treatments: (1) control (CON; n=8) received 2mL of sterile water im; (2) im (IM; n=8) received 100μg of GnRH im; (3) cows were infused with 200μg GnRH into the uterus (IU; n=9); and (4) iu administration of 200μg GnRH plus glycerol 7% v/v (IUG; n=8). Serum circulating progesterone concentrations at hour 0 did not differ (P>0.05) among groups. Concentrations of LH were greater (P<0.05) in IM than IU, IUG, and CON cows at hours 1, 1.5, 2, and 3. All cows ovulated within 48h in the IM (8/8) group followed by IU (6/9) and IUG (4/8) groups, and only two out of eight cows ovulated in the CON group. Although iu administration of GnRH in the IU and IUG groups resulted in lower serum concentrations of LH than IM cows, IU or IUG cows were able to ovulate within 48h after GnRH2 administration.

Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows

Ovsynch-type synchronization of ovulation protocols have suboptimal synchronization rates due to reduced ovulation to the first GnRH treatment and inadequate luteolysis to the prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) treatment before timed artificial insemination (TAI). Our objective was to determine whether increasing the dose of the first GnRH or the PGF2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of Double-Ovsynch could improve the rates of ovulation and luteolysis and therefore increase pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI). In experiment 1, cows were randomly assigned to a two-by-two factorial design to receive either a low (L) or high (H) doses of GnRH (Gonadorelin; 100 vs. 200 μg) and a PGF2α analogue (cloprostenol; 500 vs. 750 μg) resulting in the following treatments: LL (n = 263), HL (n = 277), LH (n = 270), and HH (n = 274). Transrectal ultrasonography and serum progesterone (P4) were used to assess ovulation to GnRH1, GnRH2, and luteal regression after PGF2α during Breeding-Ovsynch in a subgroup of cows (n = 651 at each evaluation). Pregnancy status was assessed 29, 39, and 74 days after TAI. In experiment 2, cows were randomly assigned to LL (n = 220) or HH (n = 226) treatment as described for experiment 1. For experiment 1, ovulation to GnRH1 was greater (P = 0.01) for cows receiving H versus L GnRH (66.6% [217/326] vs. 57.5% [187/325]) treatment, but only for cows with elevated P4 at GnRH1. Cows that ovulated to GnRH1 had increased (P < 0.001) fertility compared with cows that did not ovulate (52.2% vs. 38.5%); however, no effect of higher dose of GnRH on fertility was detected. The greater PGF2α dose increased luteal regression primarily in multiparous cows (P = 0.03) and tended to increase fertility (P = 0.05) only at the pregnancy diagnosis 39 days after TAI. Overall, P/AI was 47.0% at 29 days and 39.7% at 74 days after TAI; P/AI did not differ (P = 0.10) among treatments at 74 days (LL, 34.6%; HL, 40.8%; LH, 42.2%; HH, 40.9%) and was greater (P < 0.001) for primiparous cows than for multiparous cows (46.1% vs. 33.8%). For experiment 2, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.21) between H versus L treatments (44.2% [100/226] vs. 40.5% [89/220]). Thus, despite an increase in ovulatory response to GnRH1 and luteal regression to PGF2α, there were only marginal effects of increasing dose of GnRH or PGF2α on fertility to TAI after Double-Ovsynch.

Effect of progesterone on magnitude of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by two different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in lactating dairy cows

Ovulation to the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch-type protocols is lower in cows with high progesterone (P4) concentrations compared with cows with low P4 concentrations, suggesting that P4 may suppress the release of LH from the anterior pituitary after GnRH treatment. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of 1) circulating P4 concentrations at the time of GnRH treatment on GnRH-induced LH secretion in lactating dairy cows and 2) increasing the dose of GnRH from 100 to 200 μg on LH secretion in a high- and low-P4 environment. A Double-Ovsynch (Pre-Ovsynch: GnRH, PGF(2α) 7d later, GnRH 3d later, and Breeding-Ovsynch 7d later: GnRH, PGF(2α) 7d later, and GnRH 48 h later) synchronization protocol was used to create the high- and low-P4 environments. At the first GnRH injection of Breeding-Ovsynch (high P4), all cows with a corpus luteum ≥ 20 mm were randomly assigned to receive 100 or 200 μg of GnRH. At the second GnRH injection of Breeding-Ovsynch (low P4) cows were again randomized to receive 100 or 200 μg of GnRH. Blood samples were collected every 15 min from -15 to 180 min after GnRH treatment, and then hourly until 6h after GnRH treatment. As expected, mean P4 concentrations were greater for cows in the high- than the low-P4 environment. For cows receiving 100 μg of GnRH, the LH peak and area under the curve (AUC) were greater in the low- than in the high-P4 environment. Similarly, for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH, the LH peak and AUC were greater in the low- than the high-P4 environment. Cows receiving 100 or 200 μg of GnRH had greater mean LH concentration in the low- than the high-P4 environment from 1 to 6h after GnRH treatment. On the other hand, when comparing the effect of the 2 GnRH doses in the high- and low-P4 environments, cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH had a greater LH peak and AUC than cows treated with 100 μg of GnRH both in the high- and low-P4 environments. For the high-P4 environment, mean LH was greater from 1.5 to 5h after GnRH treatment for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH than for those receiving 100 μg of GnRH. In the low-P4 environment, mean LH was greater for cows receiving 200 μg of GnRH than for those receiving 100 μg of GnRH from 1 to 2.5h after GnRH treatment. We conclude that the P4 environment at GnRH treatment dramatically affects GnRH-induced LH secretion, and that a 200-μg dose of GnRH can increase LH secretion in either a high- or a low-P4 environment.

Effect of intrauterine administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone on serum LH concentrations in lactating dairy cows

The objectives were to compare: (1) preovulatory serum LH concentrations, and (2) synchronization of ovulation, after im or iu administration of the second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. Lactating cows (N = 23) were presynchronized with two injections of PGF(2α) given 14 days apart (starting at 34 ± 3 days in milk), followed by Ovsynch (GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH) 12 days later. At the time of the second GnRH of Ovsynch (Hour 0), cows were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control group (CON; N = 7) were given 2 mL sterile water im; (2) intramuscular group (IM; N = 8) received 100 μg of GnRH im; and (3) intrauterine group (IU; N = 8) had 100 μg GnRH infused in the uterus (2 mL). Blood samples for serum LH concentrations were collected at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, ultrasonography was performed twice daily (12-h intervals) from Hours 0 to 60 to confirm ovulation. The LH concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in the IM than IU and CON groups at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4. Although LH concentrations were numerically higher in the IU group, LH concentrations within the IU and CON groups did not change over time. More cows ovulated in the IM (8/8) and IU (7/8) groups within 60 h after the second GnRH administration compared with the CON (2/7) group. In summary, serum LH concentrations were lower in the IU versus IM group, but the proportion of cows that ovulated within 60 h was similar between these two groups. Therefore, iu administration of GnRH may be an alternative route of delivery to synchronize ovulation in beef and dairy cattle.

Enhancing follicular growth as a prerequisite for GnRH treatment of true anestrum in buffalo

A total of 140 true anestrous buffalo were divided on the basis of receiving short-term (20 days) nutritional supplementation (N, n=80) or not (WN, n=60). The animals in N group were subdivided into NQ (n=40) where the quantity of the offered diet was increased by 20% and NF (n=40) where the offered diet was supplemented by 3% of dry protected fat. Buffaloes in either NQ or NF were equally allotted on the following treatment regimens: Insulin/GnRH (NQi or NFi, n=10 for each); rbST/GnRH (NQr or NFr, n=10 for each); GnRH alone treated (NQG or NFG, n=10 for each) and saline-treated control (NQc or NFc, n=10 for each). Insulin-treated subgroups (NQi or NFi) received s/c injection of insulin at a dose of 0.25 I.U./kg on Days 21, 22 and 23 while rbST-treated subgroups (NQr or NFr) received single IM injection of rbST (500 mg Sometribove) on Day 21. GnRH was injected at a dose of 0.020 mg buserelin (5 ml Receptal(®)) on Day 24 in all subgroups except NQCand NFC where Day 1 was the first day of the short-term nutritional improvement. Buffalo in the WN (n=60) were equally allotted on the same treatment regimens applied in the first group insulin/GnRH (WNi, n=15), rbST/GnRH (WNr, n=15); GnRH alone treated (WNG, n=15) and saline-treated control (WNC, n=15). Ultrasonic scanning of ovaries was conducted on Day 24 to measure largest follicle diameter (LFD). The results showed increases (P<0.05) in the LFD following nutritional supplementation with insulin or rbST. The recorded EIRs for GnRH pre-treated with nutritional improvement - metabolic hormones combinations (9/10 and 8/10 for NQi and NFi or 8/10 for NQr) were greater (P<0.05) than those pre-treated with either metabolic hormone alone (7/15 for WNi and/or WNr) or nutritional improvement alone (6/10 for NQG and/or NFG) and control as well. The greatest CR was recorded in the NQi group. It could be concluded that pre-GnRH nutritional improvement plus administration of insulin or rbST increases LFD in true anestrous buffalo having LFD<8.5 mm thereby increasing their fertility response to GnRH in terms of EIRs and CRs.

Intravaginal progesterone devices in synchronization protocols for artificial insemination in beef heifers

Two experiments were designed to investigate the administration of intravaginal progesterone in protocols for oestrus and ovulation synchronization in beef heifers. In Experiment 1, cyclic Black Angus heifers (n = 20) received an Ovsynch protocol and were randomly assigned to receive (CIDR-Ovsynch) or not (Ovsynch) a progesterone device between Days 0 and 7. Treatment with a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device significantly increased the size of the dominant follicle prior to ovulation (12.8 ± 0.4 CIDR-Ovsynch vs 11.4 ± 0.4 Ovsynch) (p < 0.02). Plasma progesterone concentrations throughout the experiment were affected by the interaction between group and day effects (p < 0.004). In Experiment 2, cyclic Polled Hereford heifers (n = 382) were randomly assigned to one of the six treatment groups (3 × 2 factorial design) to receive a CIDR, a used bovine intravaginal device (DIB), or a medroxiprogesterone acetate (MAP) sponge and GnRH analogues (lecirelin or buserelin). All heifers received oestradiol benzoate plus one of the devices on Day 0 and PGF on Day 7 pm (device withdrawal). Heifers were detected in oestrus 36 h after PGF and inseminated 8-12 h later, while the remainder received GnRH 48 h after PGF and were inseminated on Day 10 (60 h). The number of heifers detected in oestrus on Day 8 and conception rate to AI on Day 9 were higher (p < 0.01) in the used-DIB than in the CIDR or MAP groups, while the opposite occurred with the pregnancy rate to FTAI on Day 10 (p < 0.01). There was no effect of progesterone source, GnRH analogue or their interaction on overall pregnancy rates (64.9%). Progesterone treatment of heifers during an Ovsynch protocol resulted in a larger pre-ovulatory follicle in beef heifers. Progesterone content of intravaginal devices in synchronization protocols is important for the timing of AI, as the use of low-progesterone devices can shorten the interval to oestrus.

Gene expression profiling of preovulatory follicle in the buffalo cow: effects of increased IGF-I concentration on periovulatory events

The preovulatory follicle in response to gonadotropin surge undergoes dramatic biochemical, and morphological changes orchestrated by expression changes in hundreds of genes. Employing well characterized bovine preovulatory follicle model, granulosa cells (GCs) and follicle wall were collected from the preovulatory follicle before, 1, 10 and 22 h post peak LH surge. Microarray analysis performed on GCs revealed that 450 and 111 genes were differentially expressed at 1 and 22 h post peak LH surge, respectively. For validation, qPCR and immunocytochemistry analyses were carried out for some of the differentially expressed genes. Expression analysis of many of these genes showed distinct expression patterns in GCs and the follicle wall. To study molecular functions and genetic networks, microarray data was analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis which revealed majority of the differentially expressed genes to cluster within processes like steroidogenesis, cell survival and cell differentiation. In the ovarian follicle, IGF-I is established to be an important regulator of the above mentioned molecular functions. Thus, further experiments were conducted to verify the effects of increased intrafollicular IGF-I levels on the expression of genes associated with the above mentioned processes. For this purpose, buffalo cows were administered with exogenous bGH to transiently increase circulating and intrafollicular concentrations of IGF-I. The results indicated that increased intrafollicular concentrations of IGF-I caused changes in expression of genes associated with steroidogenesis (StAR, SRF) and apoptosis (BCL-2, FKHR, PAWR). These results taken together suggest that onset of gonadotropin surge triggers activation of various biological pathways and that the effects of growth factors and peptides on gonadotropin actions could be examined during preovulatory follicle development.