Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Li P, Dzyuba B, Hulak M, Rodina M, Boryshpolets S, Li ZH, Linhart O. Percoll gradient separation of cryopreserved common carp spermatozoa to obtain a fraction with higher motility, velocity and membrane integrity. Theriogenology 2010;74:1356-61. [PMID: 20688378 DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2010] [Revised: 06/01/2010] [Accepted: 06/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]

For:	Li P, Dzyuba B, Hulak M, Rodina M, Boryshpolets S, Li ZH, Linhart O. Percoll gradient separation of cryopreserved common carp spermatozoa to obtain a fraction with higher motility, velocity and membrane integrity. Theriogenology 2010;74:1356-61. [PMID: 20688378 DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2010] [Revised: 06/01/2010] [Accepted: 06/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Cheng Y, Vechtova P, Fussy Z, Sterba J, Linhartová Z, Rodina M, Tučková V, Gela D, Samarin AM, Lebeda I, Xin M, Zhang S, Rahi D, Linhart O. Changes in Phenotypes and DNA Methylation of In Vitro Aging Sperm in Common Carp Cyprinus carpio. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:5925. [PMID: 34073009 PMCID: PMC8198300 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open

Affiliation(s)

Yu Cheng South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Pavlina Vechtova Faculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (Z.F.); (J.S.) Biology Centre of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Parasitology, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Zoltan Fussy Faculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (Z.F.); (J.S.)
Jan Sterba Faculty of Science, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; (P.V.); (Z.F.); (J.S.)
Zuzana Linhartová South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Marek Rodina South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Vladimíra Tučková South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
David Gela South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Azin Mohagheghi Samarin South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Ievgen Lebeda South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Miaomiao Xin South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.) College of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
Songpei Zhang South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Deepali Rahi South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)
Otomar Linhart South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic; (Y.C.); (Z.L.); (M.R.); (V.T.); (D.G.); (A.M.S.); (I.L.); (M.X.); (S.Z.); (D.R.)

Collapse

Horokhovatskyi Y, Dietrich MA, Lebeda I, Fedorov P, Rodina M, Dzyuba B. Cryopreservation effects on a viable sperm sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) subpopulation obtained by a Percoll density gradient method. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202514. [PMID: 30114243 PMCID: PMC6095596 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open

Abstract

In many fish species, sperm cryopreservation has deleterious effects and leads to a significant decrease in spermatozoa viability. However, the effect of cryopreservation on sperm cells that survive this process and are still viable is not fully understood. The objective of this study was to compare the viability and proteomes of fresh and cryopreserved sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm samples before and after live-dead cell separation using Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Both fresh and cryopreserved sperm samples were divided into two groups (with or without application of Percoll separation). At each step of the experiment, sperm quality was evaluated by video microscopy combined with integrated computer-assisted sperm analysis software and flow cytometry for live-dead sperm viability analysis. Sperm motility and the percentage of live cells were reduced in the cryopreserved group compared to the fresh group from 89% to 33% for percentage of motility and from 96% to 70% for live cells. Straight line velocity and linearity of track were significantly lower in cryopreserved samples than in those separated by Percoll before and after cryopreservation. However, the percentages of motile and live spermatozoa were higher than 90% in samples subjected to Percoll separation. Proteomic analysis of spermatozoa by two-dimensional differences in-gel electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry revealed that 20 protein spot abundances underwent significant changes in cryopreserved samples compared to fresh ones. However, only one protein spot was significantly altered when samples before and after cryopreservation followed by Percoll separation were compared. Thus, the results of this study show that cryopreservation leads to minimal proteomic changes in the spermatozoa population, retaining high motility and viability parameters. The results also suggest that global differences in protein profiles between unselected fresh and cryopreserved samples are mainly due to protein loss or changes in the lethal and sublethal damaged cell subpopulations.

Collapse

Boccaletto P, Siddique MAM, Cosson J. Proteomics: A valuable approach to elucidate spermatozoa post –testicular maturation in the endangered Acipenseridae family. Anim Reprod Sci 2018;192:18-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]