The effect of altering the timing of GnRH administration and artificial insemination in a modified 5-d CO-Synch protocol using sex-sorted semen in dairy heifers

Differences in Milk Proteomic Profiles between Estrous and Non-Estrous Dairy Cows

Efficient reproductive management of dairy cows depends primarily upon accurate estrus identification. However, the currently available estrus detection methods, such as visual observation, are poor. Hence, there is an urgent need to discover novel biomarkers in non-invasive bodily fluids such as milk to reliably detect estrus status. Proteomics is an emerging and promising tool to identify biomarkers. In this study, the proteomics approach was performed on milk sampled from estrus and non-estrus dairy cows to identify potential biomarkers of estrus. Dairy cows were synchronized and timed for artificial insemination, and the cows with insemination leading to conception were considered to be in estrus at the day of insemination (day 0). Milk samples of day 0 (estrus group) and day -3 (non-estrus group) from dairy cows confirming to be pregnant were collected for proteomic analysis using the tandem mass tags (TMT) proteomics approach. A total of 89 differentially expressed proteins were identified, of which 33 were upregulated and 56 were downregulated in the estrus milk compared with the non-estrus milk. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase α (ACACA), apolipoprotein B (APOB), NAD(P)H steroid dehydrogenase-like (NSDHL), perilipin 2 (PLIN2), and paraoxonase 1 (PON1) participated in lipid binding, lipid storage, lipid localization, and lipid metabolic process, as well as fatty acid binding, fatty acid biosynthesis, and fatty acid metabolism, and these processes are well documented to be related to estrus regulation. These milk proteins are proposed as possible biomarkers of estrus in dairy cows. Further validation studies are required in a large population to determine their potential as estrus biomarkers.

Effect of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted semen on pregnancy per artificial insemination in synchronized dairy heifers managed in a seasonal-calving pasture-based system

The objective of this study was to evaluate the timing of artificial insemination (AI) with frozen-thawed sex-sorted semen on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in dairy heifers. A 6-d progesterone Co-Synch protocol was used for ovulation synchronization of dairy heifers, with timed AI (TAI) coincident with (TAI-0) or 8 h (TAI-8) after the second injection of GnRH, corresponding to either 48 h or 56 h after removal of the progesterone-releasing intravaginal device. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted by transrectal ultrasound scanning of the uterus 34 d after TAI (n = 816 records available for analysis). Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the effects of treatment on P/AI. Treatment (n = 2), herd (n = 11), and treatment × herd were included as categorical fixed effects. Heifer body weight and Economic Breeding Index values for milk production, fertility, calving performance, beef carcass, cow maintenance, cow management, and health were included as continuous fixed effects. Heifer ID was included as a random effect. Pregnancy per AI was greater for TAI-8 heifers (59%) compared with TAI-0 heifers (50%). Pregnancy per AI ranged from 38% to 75% between herds but there was no treatment × herd interaction. The fertility subindex (positive) and the cow management subindex (negative) were the only continuous animal variables associated with P/AI. Delaying the timing of AI with frozen-thawed sex-sorted semen by 8 h in dairy heifers enrolled on a 6-d progesterone Co-Synch protocol improved P/AI.

Estrous activity and pregnancy outcomes in Holstein heifers subjected to a progesterone based 5-d CO-Synch protocol with or without administration of initial GnRH

The objectives of this study were to investigate whether estrous activity and its impact on pregnancy outcomes would differ in heifers subjected to a 5 d CO-Synch plus progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID) protocol with or without an initial GnRH treatment. Holstein Heifers (n = 308) were fitted with a collar-mounted automated activity monitoring system approximately 1 week prior to the initiation of the synchronization protocol (Day -7). Heifers were assigned randomly to a 5 d CO-Synch plus PRID protocol either with (GnRH; n = 154) or without (NGnRH; n = 154) an initial administration of 100 μg of GnRH at the time of PRID insertion (Day 0). Heifers received a single administration of 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF) at the time of PRID removal (Day 5) and again 24 h later (Day 6). Approximately 72 h after PRID removal (Day 8), heifers were timed-inseminated (TAI) and concurrently 100 μg of GnRH was administered to those not exhibiting estrus. All inseminations were done by one of two technicians using either sex-sorted (n = 252) or conventional (n = 56) frozen-thawed semen. Transrectal ultrasonography was done on Day 0 to determine ovarian cyclicity and normalcy of the reproductive tract and 30 and 45 d post-TAI to determine and confirm pregnancy, respectively. The percentage of heifers determined to be in estrus following PRID removal was greater in the GnRH than in the NGnRH group (94 vs. 82%, respectively; P < 0.01). The mean interval from PRID removal to the onset of estrus was shorter for GnRH- than NGnRH-treated heifers (50.8 vs. 59.2 h, respectively; P < 0.01). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 30 d post-TAI tended to be greater for GnRH than NGnRH heifers (68 vs. 59%, respectively; P = 0.1). However, P/AI at 45 d post-TAI (65 vs. 57%, respectively) and pregnancy loss between 30 and 45 d post-TAI (6 vs. 4.5%, respectively) did not differ. The association between the interval from PRID removal to the onset of estrus and P/AI at 30 d post-TAI was linearly negative for GnRH heifers; for every 1 h increase in the interval from PRID removal to the onset of estrus, the predicted probability of P/AI at 30 d post-TAI tended (P = 0.08) to be reduced by 2.7%. The association between the interval from PRID removal to the onset of estrus and P/AI at 30 d post-TAI was not significant for NGnRH heifers. In addition, the interval from TAI to subsequent estrus, in non-pregnant heifers, was approximately 3 d longer for the GnRH than the NGnRH group (20.7 vs. 17.5 d, respectively). In summary, the initial GnRH treatment in a 5 d CO-Synch plus PRID protocol increased estrus expression and reduced the interval from PRID removal to the onset of estrus in Holstein heifers and tended to increase P/AI at 30 d, but did not affect P/AI at 45 d post-TAI.

Comparison of reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen based on expression of estrus, pregnancy outcomes, and cost per pregnancy

Our objective was to evaluate reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen. In experiment 1, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 462) were submitted to a 5-d progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID)-Synch protocol [d 0, GnRH + PRID; d 5, PGF_2α - PRID; d 6, PGF_2α; d 8, GnRH + TAI] and were randomly assigned for PRID removal on d 5 or 6 of the protocol followed by timed artificial insemination (TAI) with conventional semen. Delaying PRID removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.9 vs. 12.2%), and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ between treatments. In experiment 2, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 736) from 3 commercial farms were randomized within farm to 1 of 3 treatments for first AI with sexed semen: (1) CIDR5 [d -6, GnRH + controlled internal drug release (CIDR); d -1, PGF_2α - CIDR; d 0, PGF_2α; d 2, GnRH + TAI]; (2) CIDR6 (d -6, GnRH + CIDR; d -1, PGF_2α; d 0, PGF_2α - CIDR; d 2, GnRH + TAI); and (3) EDAI (PGF_2α on d 0 followed by once-daily estrous detection and AI). Delaying CIDR removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.004 vs. 27.8%); however, CIDR5 heifers tended to have more P/AI at 35 (53 vs. 45 vs. 46%) and 64 (52 vs. 45 vs. 45%) days after AI than CIDR6 and EDAI heifers, respectively. Overall, CIDR5 and CIDR6 heifers had fewer days to first AI and pregnancy than EDAI heifers which resulted in less feed costs than EDAI heifers due to fewer days on feed until pregnancy. Despite greater hormonal treatment costs for CIDR5 heifers, costs per pregnancy were $16.66 less for CIDR5 than for EDAI heifers. In conclusion, delaying PRID removal by 24 h within a 5-d PRID-Synch protocol in experiment 1 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, and P/AI for heifers inseminated with conventional semen did not differ between treatments. By contrast, although delaying CIDR removal by 24 h within a 5-CIDR-Synch protocol in experiment 2 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, delaying CIDR removal by 24 h tended to decrease P/AI for heifers inseminated with sexed semen. Further, submission of heifers to a 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol for first AI tended to increase P/AI and decrease the cost per pregnancy compared with EDAI heifers.

Economic comparison of an ear tag automated activity monitor for estrus detection with timed-AI in Holstein heifers

The objective of this study was to compare the economic performance of an ear tag automated activity monitor system (AAM) versus a timed-AI (TAI) protocol in Holstein heifers. In total, 340 heifers were enrolled onto the study at 13.5 mo of age and randomly assigned to receive either an AAM (n = 170) or TAI (n = 170) protocol before breeding eligibility (D 0). Heifers in the AAM group were fitted with an ear tag AAM and bred based on high activity alert from the system. Heifers in the TAI group received a progesterone releasing intravaginal device on D -8, followed by device removal and prostaglandin on D -3 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone with TAI on D 0. In both treatments, the majority of heifers received sex-sorted semen for the first AI and conventional semen for subsequent AIs, with three opportunities to become pregnant. All heifers were diagnosed for pregnancy approximately 25 d post AI using transrectal ultrasonography, with confirmation at 30 and 45 d. Non-pregnant heifers in the TAI group, were resynchronized using the same TAI protocol. A partial budget was used to compare the costs and benefits of switching from a TAI to an AAM protocol in heifers, including protocol, labour, and rearing costs for each treatment, as well as estimated calf and milk value. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to determine the effect of pregnancy per AI (P/AI), outsourcing AI, AAM tag cost and herd size on the net outcome. There was no difference in overall P/AI or days to pregnancy between treatments. However, number of AI was greater in the TAI than the AAM group. For the first AI, the P/AI was less in the TAI compared to the AAM group; however, the interval to first AI was less in TAI. There was minimal difference in performance for the second and third AI. There was a net gain of $11.97 per heifer when switching from a TAI to AAM protocol, due to the increased P/AI to the first AI and reduced cost of hormones. Several variables in the sensitivity analyses affected the net outcome. Considering only the first AI, switching to an AAM collar and a larger herd size all increased the net gain. Considering a greater P/AI to the first AI in the TAI group, outsourcing AI, using more AAM ear tags, and smaller herd sizes resulted in a net loss when switching from TAI to AAM. The AAM system resulted in exceptional P/AI and may be an economically viable alternative to improve heifer reproductive efficiency in herds with suboptimal P/AI to TAI.