1
|
Cozzolino I, Ronchi A, Messina G, Montella M, Morgillo F, Vicidomini G, Tirino V, Grimaldi A, Marino FZ, Santini M, Cappabianca S, Franco R. Adequacy of Cytologic Samples by Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules for Morphologic Diagnosis and Molecular Evaluations: Comparison With Computed Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144:361-369. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0346-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Context.—
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of pulmonary nodules is usually guided by computed tomography (CT), whereas ultrasonography (US) is generally considered not applicable for such purposes.
Objective.—
To evaluate the clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC of peripheral pulmonary nodules.
Design.—
Ultrasonography-guided transthoracic FNAC was obtained from 40 selected patients with peripheral, subpleural, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules. Air-dried and Diff-Quik–stained smears were used for rapid on-site evaluation; additional smears were alcohol fixed for Papanicolaou staining. Cell blocks were set up for immunocytochemical and molecular studies; in 2 cases, a flow cytometry evaluation was also performed. The series was compared to 40 CT-guided pulmonary FNAC samples from patients with pleural, peripheral, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules, to evaluate differences in terms of diagnostic rate, time of execution, safety, and cost.
Results.—
The US-guided FNAC samples had results that were adequate and representative in 95% of cases. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of diagnostic rate, number of passes, and cellularity of both smears and cell blocks. The mean time needed for the execution of US-guided FNAC was 13.1 minutes, whereas the mean time for CT-guided FNAC was 23.6 minutes. Thus, US-guided FNAC was significantly more rapid than CT-guided pulmonary FNAC. Because pneumothorax occurred in 1 individual who underwent US-guided FNAC and in 9 who underwent CT-guided FNAC, we might conclude that US-guided FNAC is a significantly safer procedure. Finally, comparing the costs of both procedures, US-guided FNAC is less expensive.
Conclusions.—
Our experience showed an elevated clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC for selected pulmonary nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Immacolata Cozzolino
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Andrea Ronchi
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Gaetana Messina
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Marco Montella
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Floriana Morgillo
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Giovanni Vicidomini
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Virginia Tirino
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Anna Grimaldi
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Mario Santini
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| | - Renato Franco
- From the Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine (Drs Cozzolino, Ronchi, Montella, Zito Marino, and Franco), the Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences (Drs Messina, Vicidomini, and Santini), the Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi-A. Lanzara” (Dr Morgillo), the Biote
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khan RA, Kumar V, Taimur M, Khan MA, Arshad MM, Amjad MA. Diagnostic Yield of Ultrasound-guided Trucut Biopsy in Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Malignancies. Cureus 2019; 11:e4802. [PMID: 31396470 PMCID: PMC6679711 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction While computed tomography (CT) guided lung biopsy has been standard in histological diagnosis of pulmonary lesions, its use is limited to the interventional radiologists only. Ultrasound (US) guided biopsy of pulmonary lesions, which can be performed in-clinic by the pulmonologists only, is becoming a more popular technique. It also has the edge of real-time techniques, multi-planar imaging, and no radiation exposure to the patients. Methods This is a retrospective review of all the patients presenting with pleural-based lung lesions who underwent US-guided biopsy for diagnosis in the Department of Pulmonology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences Hospital, Hyderabad, Pakistan from 1st January 2013 till 31st December 2017. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US-guided biopsies were evaluated for diagnoses of peripheral lung malignancies. Results Ultrasound-guided biopsies for lung lesions has a diagnostic yield of 88.3%, sensitivity of 95.80%, and specificity of 90% with an accuracy of 95.35%. Pneumothorax as an immediate complication was seen only in 1.5% cases. Conclusion US-guided biopsies are a much safer diagnostic alternative to CT-guided biopsy for lung lesions and have high diagnostic yield. It doesn't require special radiological interventionists, can be performed at patients' bedsides, and the equipment is not as expensive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vinod Kumar
- Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Muhammad Taimur
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Mahrukh A Khan
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khosla R, McLean AW, Smith JA. Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-scan guided biopsy of pleural-based lung lesions. Lung India 2016; 33:487-92. [PMID: 27625440 PMCID: PMC5006326 DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.188961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT) guided biopsies have long been the standard technique to obtain tissue from the thoracic cavity and is traditionally performed by interventional radiologists. Ultrasound (US) guided biopsy of pleural-based lesions, performed by pulmonologists is gaining popularity and has the advantage of multi-planar imaging, real-time technique, and the absence of radiation exposure to patients. In this study, we aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy, the time to diagnosis after the initial consult placement, and the complications rates between the two different modalities. Methods: A retrospective study of electronic medical records was done of patients who underwent CT-guided biopsies and US-guided biopsies for pleural-based lesions between 2005 and 2014 and the data collected were analyzed for comparing the two groups. Results: A total of 158 patients underwent 162 procedures during the study period. 86 patients underwent 89 procedures in the US group, and 72 patients underwent 73 procedures in the CT group. The overall yield in the US group was 82/89 (92.1%) versus 67/73 (91.8%) in the CT group (P = 1.0). Average days to the procedure was 7.2 versus 17.5 (P = 0.00001) in the US and CT group, respectively. Complication rate was higher in CT group 17/73 (23.3%) versus 1/89 (1.1%) in the US group (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: For pleural-based lesions the diagnostic accuracy of US guided biopsy is similar to that of CT-guided biopsy, with a lower complication rate and a significantly reduced time to the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Khosla
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna W McLean
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jessica A Smith
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee JE, Kim HY, Lim KY, Lee SH, Lee GK, Lee HS, Hwangbo B. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010; 70:51-6. [PMID: 20138390 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2009] [Revised: 01/09/2010] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed this study to evaluate the role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the pathologic diagnosis of lung cancer including lung masses as well as lymph nodes as targets. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 126 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA to diagnose radiologically suspected lung cancer. The patients had masses or lymph nodes that were highly suspicious for malignancy and accessible by EBUS-TBNA. RESULTS EBUS-TBNA was performed on 195 lesions (lymph nodes, n=151; lung masses, n=44). In 61 cases, other diagnostic methods had failed previous to EBUS-TBNA. In 118 patients, no definite endobronchial mucosal tumor invasion was observed. In eight patients with endobronchial tumor invasion, EBUS-TBNA was chosen due to tumor bleeding, necrosis, or difficult location for endobronchial biopsy. EBUS-TBNA confirmed 105 lung cancers, five other malignancies and six specific benign cases, demonstrating a diagnostic yield of 92.1% (116/126). Nine cases were diagnosed by other methods (lung cancer, n=2; other malignancies, n=2; benign cases, n=5). One case that was not confirmed by any diagnostic method was considered false negative. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lung cancer were 97.2% (105/108) and 97.6% (123/126), respectively. CONCLUSIONS EBUS-TBNA targeting lymph nodes or masses highly suspicious for malignancy demonstrated high diagnostic value in the diagnosis of lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA is recommended for these cases, especially when other diagnostic methods have failed or are difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Eun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University, 33 Munhwa-ro, Gung-gu, Daejeon, 301-721, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee B, Lim A, Lalvani A, Descamps MJL, Leonard R, Nallamala S, Lewis JS, Coombes RC, Stebbing J. The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:2001-6. [PMID: 18641008 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of patients with early cancer undergo routine staging using computerized tomography (CT). Those in whom indeterminate pulmonary nodules are visualized without the presence of other metastatic lesions represent a clinical dilemma regarding their management as early breast cancer or metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records of breast cancer patients who underwent thoracic CT scans between the years 2002 and 2008 were analyzed. Those with obvious metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were identified via the radiology database by searching for the terms: 'suspicious lung metastases' and 'indeterminate nodules'. RESULTS Out of 1578 new patients assessed from 2002 to 2008, we carried out 802 staging CT scans. Thirty-four cases (4.2%) with indeterminate pulmonary nodules were identified. We categorized cases by size and number of nodules. At a median follow-up of 18 months, there were no changes in lesion size in 86% of patients with a solitary nodule <1 cm and 89% with multiple subcentimeter nodules. In contrast, in 100% of cases with pulmonary nodules >1 cm, the nodules had progressed at follow-up (chi(2), P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer cases with subcentimeter indeterminate pulmonary lesions and no evidence of metastases elsewhere are unlikely to represent metastatic disease. Treatment with curative intent or entry into clinical trials should not be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial College, The Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|