Does Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Warrant Fast Tracking of Thoracic Surgical Patients?

Outcomes of patients discharged home with a chest tube after lung resection: a multicentre cohort study

Background:

Prolonged air leaks are increasingly treated in the outpatient setting, with patients discharged with chest tubes in place. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors associated with readmission, empyema development and further interventions in this patient population.

Methods:

We undertook a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients from 4 tertiary academic centres (January 2014 to December 2017) who were discharged home with a chest tube after lung resection for a postoperative air leak lasting more than 5 days. We analyzed demographics, patient factors, surgical details, hospital readmission, reintervention, antibiotics at discharge, empyema and death.

Results:

Overall, 253 of 2794 patients were analyzed (9.0% of all resections), including 30 of 759 from centre 1 (4.0%), 67 of 857 from centre 2 (7.8%), 9 of 247 from centre 3 (3.6%) and 147 of 931 from centre 4 (15.8%) (p < 0.001). Our cohort consisted of 56.5% men, and had a median age of 69 (range 19–88) years. Despite similar initial lengths of stay (p = 0.588), 49 patients (19.4%) were readmitted (21%, 0%, 23% and 11% from centres 1 to 4, respectively, p = 0.029), with 18 (36.7%) developing empyema, 11 (22.4%) requiring surgery and 3 (6.1%) dying. Only chest tube duration was a significant predictor of readmission (p < 0.001) and empyema development (p = 0.003), with a nearly threefold increased odds of developing empyema when the chest tube remained in situ for more than 20 days.

Conclusion:

Discharge with chest tube after lung resection is associated with serious adverse events. Given the high risk of empyema development, removal of chest tubes should be considered, when appropriate, within 20 days of surgery. Our data suggest a potential need for proactive postdischarge outpatient management programs to diminish risk of morbidity and death.

Reasons for extended length of stay following chest tube removal in general thoracic surgical patients

Background

Many patients undergoing general thoracic surgery can be discharged on the same day as chest tube removal, but some are not, leading to increased resource utilization. This study assesses the frequency and duration of extended length of stay (ELOS) after tube removal and identifies risk factors for ELOS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients undergoing general thoracic surgery at a tertiary referral medical center captured in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database and obtained detailed clinical data on chest tube management from August 2013 to April 2017. Pre-operative demographics, procedures, diagnoses, comorbidities, hospital service category, and lab values were examined to identify risk factors associated with ELOS after chest tube removal using multivariable generalized linear regression models.

Results

One thousand and four hundred seventy patients had ≥1 chest tubes placed at the time of operation and discharged after chest tube removal: anatomic lung resection (34%), wedge resection (29%), decortication (16%), and other (21%). Fifty-one percent of these patients were male, 81% were white, and the mean age was 59 years (SD: 15 years). One-third of the patients had prior cardiothoracic operations. Twenty-three percent of these patients had ELOS, defined as discharge ≥1 calendar day after chest tube removal with a median additional hospital stay of 3 days (interquartile range, 2–7 days). A multivariable regression model demonstrated that risk factors for ELOS included being admitted to an oncology or transplant service, undergoing decortication procedure, active smoking, and increased disability.

Conclusions

Patients with obesity, more severe disability, or actively smoking, undergoing, decortication, admitted to transplant and oncology services were more likely to experience ELOS. These factors should be considered when identifying appropriate patient groups for fast-track algorithms.

Five-Year Experience with VATS Versus Thoracotomy Segmentectomy for Lung Tumor Resection

OBJECTIVE

Segmentectomy for lung tumors has been performed with either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy; however, there is a lack of contemporary, multicenter study that compares both approaches. The aim of this study was to compare the 30-day surgical outcomes of VATS versus thoracotomy for segmentectomy using a large national database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who underwent segmentectomy for benign or malignant tumors between 2013 and 2017 were included and divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a thoracotomy or VATS approach. All VATS patients were then into 2 subgroups: early (2013 to 2015) and late (2016 to 2017). Propensity-matched analysis was conducted, and the perioperative variables and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1,785 patients met the inclusion criteria. VATS segmentectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs 5.8 days, P < 0.001) and higher rates of home discharge (94% vs 89%, P = 0.002) compared to thoracotomy segmentectomy. VATS was also associated with less postoperative pneumonia (2.8% vs 5.8%, P = 0.007), unplanned intubation (1.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.016), prolonged intubation (0.6% vs 2.7%, P = 0.001), transfusion requirement (1.7% vs 5.8%, P < 0.001), and deep venous thrombosis (0.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.03). Compared to the earlier VATS group, the late group was associated with less cardiac arrests (0% vs 0.8%, P = 0.025) and shorter hospital stays (3.3 vs 4.2 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with thoracotomy, VATS segmentectomy is associated with less postoperative complications and shorter hospital length of stay. VATS segmentectomy has been used more frequently and with improved outcomes.

Is closed thoracic drainage tube necessary for minimally invasive thoracoscopic-esophagectomy?

Background

Closed thoracic drainage tube (CTDT) is a conventional treatment after esophagectomy, even after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Here, we report a single-center, retrospective study to explore the safety and necessity of CTDT after thoracoscopic-esophagectomy.

Methods

From October 2015 and August 2016, 50 patients were enrolled and underwent thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position by same surgical team. Perioperative demographic and surgical parameters, and patients' satisfaction with or without CTDT after thoracoscopic-esophagectomy were collected and analyzed.

Results

All eligible patients (18 patients without CTDT and 32 patients with CTDT) were successfully underwent thoracoscopic procedures without conversion to open approach or major intraoperative complications and perioperative death. The two groups, with similar demographic parameters, had no statistically difference in thoracic operation time, blood loss, ICU stay, postoperative mobilization and oral feeding, and hospital stay. Also, the incidence of postoperative complications was similar with or without CTDT after esophagectomy. But, no-CTDT group had better post-operative satisfaction, including less pain scale scoring and better Norton scoring.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the treatment of no-CTDT after the minimally invasive thoracoscopic-esophagectomy is safe and feasible, might reduce the work intensity of medical stuff and lead to a better patients' experience.

A comprehensive protocol for physiokinesis therapy and enhanced recovery after surgery in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has recently been adopted as the gold standard surgical option for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is being progressively adopted in thoracic surgery to improve the postoperative outcomes. Even if the benefits of ERAS are universally accepted, to date a standardized and uniform approach has not been described in the medical literature. The Italian VATS group has recently proposed to include in the VATS lobectomy database a structured protocol for ERAS.

Methods

The ERAS section of the Italian VATS group is proposing a comprehensive ERAS protocol within the VATS lobectomy database, allowing the prospective collection of a dedicated set of data. Separate sections of the protocol are dedicated to different topics of ERAS. This study is specifically dedicated to the section of physiokinesis therapy. The medical literature will be extensively reviewed and a physiotherapy (PT) protocol of ERAS will be presented and discussed. A seta of structured clinical pathways will also be suggested for adoption in the VATS Group database.

Discussion

Pre- and post-operative adoption of an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy may promote an improved post-operative course, a shorter hospital stay and an overall more comfortable patients' experience. The mainstays of a physiokinesis therapy ERAS protocol are patients' education, constant physical and respiratory therapy sessions, and adoption of adequate devices. Although many studies have investigated the usefulness of physical and respiratory physiokinesis therapy, a comprehensive ERAS protocol for VATS lobectomy patients has not yet been described. The proposed ERAS platform, adopted by the VATS Group database, will contribute to a prospective data collection and allow a scientific analysis of the results.

Fast-track rehabilitation following video-assisted pulmonary sublobar wedge resection: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative morbidity and inhospital length of stay are considered major determinants of total health care expenditure associated with thoracic operations. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compared to mini-muscle-sparing thoracotomy in facilitating early recovery and hospital discharge after pulmonary sublobar wedge resections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

A total number of 120 patients undergoing elective pulmonary sublobar wedge resection were randomly assigned to VATS (n = 60) or mini-muscle-sparing thoracotomy (n = 60). The primary endpoint was time to hospital discharge. Postoperative complications, cardiopulmonary morbidity and 30-day mortality served as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS:

Patients' baseline demographic and clinical data did not differ among study arms as well as the number of pulmonary segments resected and the morphology of the nodular lesions. Total hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients assigned to the thoracoscopic technique as opposed to those who were operated using the mini-muscle-sparing thoracotomy approach (4 ± 0.6 versus 4.4 ± 0.6 days respectively, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that VATS approach was inversely associated with longer inhospital stay whereas the number of resected segments was positively associated with an increased duration of hospitalization. Patients in the VATS group were less likely to develop atelectasis (≥1 lobe) compared to those who underwent thoracotomy (0% versus 6.7% respectively, P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed similar 30-day mortality rates in both study arms (Log-rank P = 0.560).

CONCLUSION:

VATS was associated with shorter duration of hospitalization positively affecting the patients' quality of life and satisfaction. Significant suppression of the total cost of recovery after thoracoscopic pulmonary resections is expected.

Ward-based, nurse-led, outpatient chest tube management: analysis of impact, cost-effectiveness and patient safety

OBJECTIVES

Prolonged drainage and air leaks are recognized complications of elective and acute thoracic surgery and carry significant burden on inpatient stay and outpatient resources. Since 2007, we have run a ward-based, nurse-led clinic for patients discharged with a chest drain in situ. The aim of this study is to assess its cost-effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

We present a retrospective review of the activity of the clinic for a period of 12 months (November 2009-10). An analysis of the gathered data is performed, focusing specifically on the duration of chest tube indwelling, the indications, complications and cost efficiency.

RESULTS

The nurse-led clinic was housed in the thoracic ward with no additional fixed costs. Seventy-four patients were reviewed (53 males, 21 females, mean age of 59) and subsequently discharged from the clinic in this time period, accounting for 149 care episodes. Thirty-three (45%) of the patients underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery procedure, 35 (47%) of them a thoracotomy and 7 (9%) had a bedside chest tube insertion. Following hospital discharge, the chest tubes were removed after a median of 14 days (range 1-82 days). Fifty-eight percent of the patients were reviewed because of a prolonged air leak, 26% for persistent fluid drainage and 16% due to prolonged drainage following evacuation of empyemas. For the care episodes analysed, we estimate that the clinic has generated an income of €24,899 for the department. Hourly staffing costs for the service are significantly lower compared with those of the traditional outpatient clinic: €15 vs. €114.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that a dedicated chest tube monitoring clinic is a safe and efficient alternative to formal outpatient clinic review. It can lead to shorter hospital stays and is cost effective.