Open approaches to posterior mediastinal tumor in adults

Robotic excision of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumours: Technique and surgical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Neurogenic tumours are the most common tumours of the posterior mediastinum and account for 75% of the tumours in this region. Till recently, open transthoracic approach has been the standard of care for their excision. Thoracoscopic excision of these tumours is being commonly employed because of lesser morbidity and shorter hospital stay. The robotic surgical system offers a potential advantage over conventional thoracoscopy. We herein report our technique and surgical outcomes of excision of posterior mediastinal tumours using the Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients who underwent Robotic Portal-Posterior Mediastinal Tumour (RP-PMT) Excision at our centre. The demographic data, clinical presentation, characteristics of the tumour, operative and post-operative variables including, total operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, duration of the chest tube, hospital stay and complications were noted.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent RP-PMT Excision and were included in the study. The median age was 41.2 years. The most frequent presentation was chest pain. Schwannoma was the most common histopathological diagnosis. There were two conversions. The total operative time was 110 min with an average blood loss of 30 mL. Two patients developed complications. The postoperative hospital stay was 2.4 days. With a median follow-up of 36 months (6-48 months), all except patients are recurrence-free, except the patient with malignant nerve sheath tumour who developed local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumours with good surgical outcomes.

Thoracoscopic management of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumours

Background:

This study describes the surgical technique of thoracoscopic resection of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumours and reporting the surgical outcomes.

Methods:

This is a retrospective analysis of 21 patients operated over 7 years in a dedicated thoracic surgery centre. The demographic and post-operative parameters along with complications were recorded and analysed.

Results:

Twelve patients had right-sided tumours, while 9 had left-sided lesions, and 9 were on the left side. The most common diagnosis was schwannoma (n = 15, 71.42%), followed by neurofibroma (n = 4, 19.04%). The average surgery duration was 104 min (85–135 min), and the mean blood loss was 120 ml (25 ml–250 ml). The average lesion size was 4.8 cm (2 cm–7 cm). Conversion to open procedure was required in one patient. Two patients (14.2%) developed complications. One patient developed Horner's Syndrome and the other developed post-operative lung atelectasis. The median follow-up was 36 months (6–90 months). No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions:

Thoracoscopic approach to posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumours is feasible and allows for low morbidity, short hospital stay and superior cosmesis.

Diagnosis of malignancy of adult mediastinal tumors by conventional and transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a well-established method for detecting and diagnosing heart tumors. In contrast, its role in assessing the presence, growth and evidence of malignant tumors originating from mediastinal sites remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic impact of TEE and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for determining the localization, growth and malignancy of adult mediastinal tumors (MTs).

METHODS

In a prospective and investigator-blinded study, we evaluated 144 consecutive patients with MT lesions to assess the diagnostic impact of TEE and TTE for detecting the presence of tumors spreading both inside and outside of the heart and for determining infiltration and invasion using pathological examination results as a reference.

RESULTS

All tumor lesions were diagnosed and carefully evaluated by biopsy. Biopsy revealed malignant tumors in 79 patients and benign tumors in 65 patients. When compared to histological findings, TEE predicted malignancy from the presence of tumors spreading both inside and outside of the heart and from infiltration and invasion in 49/79 patients (62.0%). TTE predicted malignancy in only 8/79 patients (10.1%, P < 0.005). TEE visualized tumor lesions in 130 patients (90.3%) while the TTE visualized tumor lesions in 110 patients (76.4%) and was less effective at detecting MT lesions (P < 0.001). TTE and TEE could detect anterior MTs and adequately verified MTs (P > 0.05); TEE detected medium MTs better than TTE (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TEE is effective and superior to TTE for predicting the localization and growth of MTs as well as for accessing evidence of tumor malignancy. TTE and TEE were able to detect anterior MTs; TEE was able to detect medium MT better than TTE.