Surgical Resection of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with N2 Disease

Pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. A National Cancer Database analysis of geographic and temporal trends, outcomes, and associated factors

BACKGROUND

The circumstances under which pneumonectomy should be performed are controversial. This study aims to investigate national trends in pneumonectomy use to determine which patients, in what geographic areas, and under what clinical circumstances pneumonectomy is performed in the United States.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database and included all patients undergoing anatomic surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer (2015-2020). The association between demographic and clinical factors and the use of pneumonectomy were investigated.

RESULTS

Who: A total of 128,421 patients were identified, of whom 738 (0.6%) underwent pneumonectomy. Those patients were younger (median 65 vs 68 years, P < .001), more often male (59.9% vs 44.9%, P < .001), more likely to be below median income level (44.2% vs 38.6%, P = .002), and more likely to have lower education indicators (53% vs 48.6%, P = .02) than those who underwent other anatomic resections. Notably, there was a decreasing trend in pneumonectomy use during the study period (0.9% down to 0.4%, P < .001). Where: Patients undergoing pneumonectomy were less likely to live in metropolitan areas (77.9% vs 81.7%, P = .008) and to live closer (<12 miles) to their treating facility (45% vs 49%, P = .02). Regional geographic differences also were identified (P < .001). Why: Patients who underwent pneumonectomy were more likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (20.6% vs 5.3%, P < .001), to be clinically N (+) (39.3% vs 12.3%, P < .001), and to have more advanced tumors (cT3-4: 46.3% vs 11.3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although primarily driven by advanced oncologic features, socioeconomic and geographic factors also were associated independently with the use of pneumonectomy. Standardizing pneumonectomy indications nationwide is crucial to prevent widening outcome gaps for patients with lung cancer.

Current Surgical Indications for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The management strategy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been transformed by our improved understanding of the cancer biology and concomitant development of novel systemic therapies. Complete surgical resection of NSCLC continues to offer the best chance for cure or local and regional disease control, and with improvements in minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery, the morbidity associated with surgical resection has been reduced. Patient-centered multi-disciplinary discussions that consider surgical therapy are associated with improved outcomes. Provided with promising novel therapeutic modalities including immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and targeted systemic therapies, indications for surgery continue to evolve and have expanded to include selected patients with advanced and metastatic disease.

Abstract

With recent strides made within the field of thoracic oncology, the management of NSCLC is evolving rapidly. Careful patient selection and timing of multi-modality therapy to permit the optimization of therapeutic benefit must be pursued. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy continue to have a role in the management of lung cancer, surgical therapy remains an essential component of lung cancer treatment in early, locally and regionally advanced, as well as in selected, cases of metastatic disease. Recent and most impactful advances in the treatment of lung cancer relate to the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, molecular profiling, and predictive biomarker discovery. Many of these systemic therapies are a part of the standard of care in metastatic NSCLC, and their indications are expanding towards surgically operable lung cancer to improve survival outcomes. Numerous completed and ongoing clinical trials in the surgically operable NSCLC speak to the interest and importance of the multi-modality therapy even in earlier stages of NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the current standard of care indications for surgical therapy in stage I-IV NSCLC as well as on the anticipated future direction of multi-disciplinary lung cancer therapy.

Intrapulmonary lymph node (stations 13 and 14) metastasis in peripheral non-small cell lung cancer

It remains unknown whether dissecting the intrapulmonary lymph nodes (stations 13 and 14) when resecting peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is necessary for accurate tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging. This study investigated intrapulmonary lymph node dissection (stations 13 and 14) on the pathological staging of peripheral NSCLC and the metastatic pattern of the lymph nodes.This retrospective study included patients with primary peripheral NSCLC who underwent radical dissection between January 2013 and December 2015. The clinical data of patients and examination results of intrapulmonary stations 12, 13, and 14 lymph nodes were analyzed.Of 3019 resected lymph nodes in a total of 234 patients (12.9/patient), 263 (8.7%) had metastasis. Ninety-nine patients had lymph node metastasis (42.3%): 40 (17.1%) were N1, 11 (4.7%) were N2, 48 (20.5%) were both N1 and N2, and 135 (57.7%) had no N1 or N2 metastasis. Sixteen (6.8%) patients had metastasis of stations 13 and/or 14. Metastasis in N1 positive patients of stations 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 were 2.7%, 10.5%, 9.8%, 10.4%, and 8.5%, respectively. Missed detection without station 13 and 14 dissection was up to 6.8% (16/234).Dissection of stations 13 and 14 could be helpful for the identification of lymph node metastasis and for the accurate TNM staging of primary NSCLC.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with completely resected pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study examined the incidence of pathologic N2 (pN2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prognostic factors affecting survival of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC (lobectomy and pneumonectomy) between January 2008 and December 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients with pN2 included in this study were assessed in two groups; single pN2 and multiple pN2.

RESULTS

The most common type of resection was lobectomy (56.3%). Ninety-four patients (79%) received adjuvant therapy. Eighty-six patients (72.3%) had single-station pN2 and 33 (27.7%) had multiple pN2. The 5-year survival rates were 29.3% overall, 38.6% in single-station pN2, and 11% in multiple-station pN2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.581, p = .037). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival rates between patients with pN1N2 and those with pN0N2 involvement (39.1% vs. 37.1%) (p = .625). Not receiving adjuvant therapy was associated with poor survival prognosis (HR: 8.2 p < .001). The 5-year survival rate was 36.2% among patients with pN2 involvement with 2 or more positive lymph nodes and 19.5% among those with fewer than 2 positive lymph nodes (HR: 0.83, p = .463).

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant prognostic factors associated with survival were pN2 status. Non-skip metastases (pN1N2) and positive lymph node count were not associated with prognosis.

Clinical outcomes of surgery after induction treatment in patients with pathologically proven N2-positive stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess the effect of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy on resectability, downstaging, and the prognosis in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eighty-four patients who underwent resections after induction therapy [76 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) and 8 with induction chemoradiotherapy (CRTx)] for clinically evident [larger than 1 cm on computed tomography (CT)] and pathologically confirmed ipsilateral N2 positive NSCLC (stage IIIA) between January 2009 and July 2013 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Partial response (PR) was observed in 39 patients (46.4%). Standard lobectomy was performed in 63 cases (75.0%), and extensive resection was conducted in 21 cases (25.0%), including four pneumonectomies. Pathologic nodal downstaging (pN2 to pN0-1) was confirmed in 38 cases (45.2%). After induction therapy plus resection, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in cases with radical resections were 37.9% and 34.2%, respectively. Patients who underwent lobectomy or pathologic nodal downstaging had better prognosis than those who had extensive resection or persistent N2 in PFS (P=0.036; P=0.025) and OS (P=0.023; P=0.024). On univariate analysis, lobectomy and pathological nodal downstaging were favourably predictive factors both in PFS and OS. Cox multivariate analyses identified only pathologic nodal downstaging to predict better PFS, and lobectomy to be significantly prognostic for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that neoadjuvant therapy was feasible, and helpful for tumor and pathologic nodal downstaging with promising rates of survival in patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. After induction therapy, patients with potentially radical lobectomy were more likely to benefit from operation. Pathological nodal downstaging of pN2 to pN0-1, rather than clinical response was predictive of a favorable outcome, and was correlated with a better chance of survival.

Adding radiation to induction chemotherapy does not improve survival of patients with operable clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy is commonly used in induction regimens for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with operable mediastinal nodal disease, although evidence has not shown a benefit over induction chemotherapy alone. We compared outcomes between induction chemotherapy and induction chemoradiation using the National Cancer Data Base.

METHODS

Induction radiation use and survival of patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy after induction chemotherapy for clinical T1-3N2M0 non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2006 were assessed using logistic regression, general linear regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1362 patients who met study criteria, 834 (61%) underwent induction chemoradiation and 528 (39%) underwent induction chemotherapy. Lobectomy was performed in 82% of patients (n = 1111), and pneumonectomy was performed in 18% of patients (n = 251). Pneumonectomy was performed more often after induction chemoradiation than after induction chemotherapy (20% vs 16%, P = .04). Downstaging from N2 to N0/N1 was more common with induction chemoradiation compared with induction chemotherapy (58% vs 46%, P < .01), but 5-year survival of patients receiving induction chemoradiation and patients receiving induction chemotherapy was similar in unadjusted analysis (41% vs 41%, P = .41). In multivariable analysis, the addition of radiation to induction chemotherapy also was not associated with a survival benefit (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.18; P = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemoradiation is used in the majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with N2 disease who undergo induction therapy before surgical resection, but it is not associated with improved survival compared with induction chemotherapy.