Evaluation of a novel point-of-care enoxaparin monitor with central laboratory anti-Xa levels

Achievement of therapeutic anti-Xa levels in a proven heparin-resistant patient through the use of nontraditional high-dose enoxaparin

OBJECTIVE

To describe the successful use of high-dose enoxaparin therapy (1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily) to attain a therapeutic anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level in a cancer patient with heparin resistance.

CASE SUMMARY

A proven heparin-resistant patient with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and lung cancer who required approximately 66 000 units of unfractionated heparin daily was successfully transitioned to an off-label high-dose enoxaparin (OLHDE) 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily. The patient was maintained on this same dose, and therapeutic levels were confirmed via use of the anti-Xa monitoring test. The patient was able to be discharged from the medical floor on this same dose with no further complications of VTE noted. No adverse events from this dosing were observed during the duration of therapy.

DISCUSSION

Options for overcoming heparin resistance are limited to case reports and small studies. The best course of treatment in the cancer patient is unclear. OLHDE allowed for the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous medication and transition off the medical floor. This case supports the use of OLHDE as a therapeutic option in heparin-resistant patients with cancer. Further study is needed to confirm the efficacy of OLHDE in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

High-dose enoxaparin may be an option to treat cancer patients with confirmed heparin resistance and venous thromboembolism.

Point-of-care testing for anticoagulation monitoring in neuroendovascular procedures

POC testing is defined as diagnostic testing at or near the site of patient care. Rapid measurement of the intensity of anticoagulation and, more recently, platelet inhibition allows dose titration of adjuvant medications such a heparin and antiplatelet agents during neuroendovascular procedures. However, knowledge among practicing physicians regarding the pathophysiologic basis of these measurements and variations in knowledge about the differences among devices is often limited. This review discusses the role of anticoagulation in endovascular procedures and the currently available POC tests for anticoagulation monitoring.

Case files of the Medical Toxicology Fellowship at Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center in Phoenix, AZ: a non-warfarin anticoagulant overdose

A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) following an overdose of his "blood thinners." The patient had become increasingly depressed over financial concerns, prompting a suicide attempt. He declined to provide any details regarding his current medications or his past medical history. A review of the computerized medical record, however, revealed he had a Factor V Leiden mutation with multiple venothromboembolic events. He previously had an inferior vena cava filter placed, and had received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for a cerebrovascular accident. A toxicology consult was obtained in the ED.

Anticoagulation: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in Renal Impairment and Obesity: Available Evidence and Clinical Practice Recommendations Across Medical and Surgical Settings

Objective

To develop practical recommendations for the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) as prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndromes in patients with impaired renal function or obesity.

Data Sources

Multiple MEDLINE searches were performed (November 2008) to identify studies for inclusion, using a comprehensive list of search terms including, but not limited to, LMWH, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, obesity, weight, renal, kidney, elderly, monitoring, and anti-Xa.

Study Selection And Data Extraction

Only articles published in English that were relevant for this review were included.

Data Synthesis

In the majority of patients, standardized prophylaxis or treatment doses of LMWHs can be used without the need for monitoring and adjusting regimens. For patients with severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCl] <30 mL/min), doses of some LMWHs should be adjusted or unfractionated heparin should be used instead. CrCl should be estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault method. Differences are noted in the degree of accumulation of various LMWHs in patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment, and thus, the degree of dose adjustment may differ among the various LMWHs. Increasing the prophylactic doses of LMWH may be appropriate in morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2). The use of total body weight is appropriate for therapeutic doses of LMWH in obese patients. Laboratory monitoring of the anticoagulation effect of LMWHs is generally not necessary, but should be considered in patients with morbid obesity (weight >190 kg), those with severe renal impairment, and those with moderate renal impairment with prolonged (>10 days) LMWH use. When anti-Xa activity is monitored, it should be determined using a chromogenic method and a calibration curve based on the LMWH used.

Conclusions

Additional data are needed for specific dose guiding in obese and renally impaired patients, who are often excluded from larger clinical trials. Practice recommendations are made based on available evidence and authors' clinical opinions.

The use of a HEMOCHRON JR. HEMONOX point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin is increasingly used for the anticoagulation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several reports have suggested the utility of using point of care tests in monitoring the anticoagulation levels of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new point-of-care test (POCT) HEMONOX in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin in non citrated fresh whole blood samples from patients undergoing elective PCI procedure.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, blood samples were obtained from fifty-four patients who received two sequential intravenous doses of enoxaparin; 0.1 mg/kg followed 5 min later by 0.4 mg/kg for a total of 0.5 mg/kg. Blood was drawn at baseline and at 5, 10, 30 and 60 min post first bolus for evaluation in the clot-based POCT HEMONOX, ACT and aPTT and the chromogenic anti-Xa activity assay.

RESULTS

HEMONOX clotting time (CT) at baseline was 62.6 +/- 6.2 secs, (n = 32) in healthy donors and statistically higher in PCI patients (71.6 +/- 9.1 secs, p = 0.0001). The peak HEMONOX response that was always achieved at 10 min post bolus was >100 secs in all 54 patients, of these 83% yielded CT >150 secs (range: 150-466). There was no detectable anti-Xa activity level at baseline while peak HEMONOX CT corresponded to therapeutic levels (0.85 +/- 0.14 U/ml; range: 0.61-1.34). Both HEMONOX CT and anti-Xa level significantly decreased at the time of sheath removal. HEMONOX CT at peak response suggested 3 patient subgroups with different levels of sensitivity to enoxaparin: low, intermediate and high responders. The correlation between anti-Xa activity level and HEMONOX CT was >or=0.85 in each patient subgroup when data from the 3 critical time points; baseline (absence of drug), peak response (10 min post bolus) and sheath removal (60 min post bolus) were analyzed. The correlation diminished to >or=0.83 when the analyses included data from all 5 time points [baseline, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min post bolus]. The HEMONOX test was the most sensitive POCT to measure the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin. All patients completed PCI successfully.

CONCLUSION

The HEMONOX test may be able to guide anticoagulation with enoxaparin during PCI. The HEMONOX assay is a one step whole blood coagulation test performed on the HEMOCHRON Jr. Signature + POC system. The method was evaluated to monitor the anticoagulant level of enoxaparin in blood samples from patients undergoing PCI after receiving an intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg. The results suggest a clear distinction of HEMONOX CT between the baseline value of untreated patients and patients achieving therapeutic enoxaparin levels.