Use of the platelet function analyzer to minimize bleeding complications after renal biopsy

Abnormal coagulation and enhanced fibrinolysis due to lysinuric protein intolerance associates with bleeds and renal impairment

INTRODUCTION

Lysinuric protein intolerance (LPI), a rare autosomal recessive transport disorder of cationic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine, affects intestines, lungs, liver and kidneys. LPI patients may display potentially life-threatening bleeding events, which are poorly understood.

AIMS

To characterize alterations in haemostatic and fibrinolytic variables associated with LPI.

METHODS

We enrolled 15 adult patients (8 female) and assessed the clinical ISTH/SSC-BAT bleeding score (BS). A variety of metabolic and coagulation assays, including fibrin generation test derivatives, clotting time (CT) and clot lysis time (CLT), thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and PFA-100 and Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT), were used.

RESULTS

All patients had mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, and moderate bleeding tendency (BS 4) without spontaneous bleeds. Mild anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred. Traditional clotting times were normal, but in contrast, CT in fibrin generation test, and especially ROTEM FIBTEM was abnormal. The patients showed impaired primary haemostasis in PFA, irrespective of normal von Willebrand factor activity, but together with lowered fibrinogen and FXIII. Thrombin generation (TG) was reduced in vitro, according to CAT-derived endogenous thrombin potential, but in vivo TG was enhanced in the form of circulating prothrombin fragment 1 and 2 values. Very high D-dimer and plasmin-α2-antiplasmin (PAP) complex levels coincided with shortened CLT in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Defective primary haemostasis, coagulopathy, fibrin abnormality (FIBTEM, CT and CLT), low TG in vitro and clearly augmented fibrinolysis (PAP and D-dimer) in vivo were all detected in LPI. Altered fibrin generation and hyperfibrinolysis were associated with the metabolic and renal defect, suggesting a pathogenetic link in LPI.

Routine haemostasis testing before transplanted kidney biopsy: a cohort study

Kidney biopsy can result in bleeding complications. Prebiopsy testing using bleeding time (BT) is controversial. New whole blood haemostasis tests, such as platelet function analyser-100 (PFA-100) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), might perform better. We postulated that PFA-100 would be suitable to replace BT prebiopsy. In 154 patients, transplanted kidney biopsies were performed after measurement of bleeding time, PFA-100, MEA and mean platelet volume (MPV). Bleeding outcome (haemoglobin (Hb) drop, haematuria (±bladder catheterization), ultrasound finding of a bleeding, need for (non)surgical intervention and/or transfusion) after the biopsy was correlated to each test. Male-female ratio was 2:1. 50% had a surveillance biopsy at either three or 12 months. Around 17% (had) used acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prebiopsy. Of 17 bleeding events, one subject needed a transfusion. Most bleeding events were Hb reductions over 1 mmol/l and all resolved uneventful. BT, PFA-100, MEA and MPV did not predict a bleeding outcome; prior ASA use however could (odds ratio 3.19; 95%-CI 1.06 to 9.61). Diagnostic performance data and Bland-Altman analysis showed that BT could not be substituted by PFA-100. ASA use was the best determinant of bleeding after kidney biopsy. Routine haemostasis testing prebiopsy has no added value.

Renal biopsy practice: What is the gold standard?

Renal biopsy (RB) is useful for diagnosis and therapy guidance of renal diseases but incurs a risk of bleeding complications of variable severity, from transitory haematuria or asymptomatic hematoma to life-threatening hemorrhage. Several risk factors for complications after RB have been identified, including high blood pressure, age, decreased renal function, obesity, anemia, low platelet count and hemostasis disorders. These should be carefully assessed and, whenever possible, corrected before the procedure. The incidence of serious complications has become low with the use of automated biopsy devices and ultrasound guidance, which is currently the “gold standard” procedure for percutaneous RB. An outpatient biopsy may be considered in a carefully selected population with no risk factor for bleeding. However, controversies persist on the duration of observation after biopsy, especially for native kidney biopsy. Transjugular RB and laparoscopic RB represent reliable alternatives to conventional percutaneous biopsy in patients at high risk of bleeding, although some factors limit their use. This aim of this review is to summarize the issues of complications after RB, assessment of hemorrhagic risk factors, optimal biopsy procedure and strategies aimed to minimize the risk of bleeding.

Factors that can minimize bleeding complications after renal biopsy

Renal biopsy is a very important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of renal diseases. However, bleeding remains to be one of the most serious complications in this procedure. Many new techniques have been improved to make it safer. The risk factors and predictors of bleeding after percutaneous renal biopsy have been extensively reported in many literatures, and generally speaking, the common risk factors for renal biopsy complications focus on hypertension, high serum creatinine, bleeding diatheses, amyloidosis, advanced age, gender and so on. Our primary purpose of this review is to summarize current measures in recent years literature aiming at minimizing the bleeding complication after the renal biopsy, including the drug application before and after renal biopsy, operation details in percutaneous renal biopsies, nursing and close monitoring after the biopsy and other kinds of biopsy methods.