Optical platelet aggregation versus thromboxane metabolites in healthy individuals and patients with stable coronary artery disease after low-dose aspirin administration

Differential scanning calorimetry in drug-membrane interactions

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) is a central technique in investigating drug - membrane interactions, a critical component of pharmaceutical research. DSC measures the heat difference between a sample of interest and a reference as a function of temperature or time, contributing essential knowledge on the thermally induced phase changes in lipid membranes and how these changes are affected by incorporating pharmacological substances. The manuscript discusses the use of phospholipid bilayers, which can form structures like unilamellar and multilamellar vesicles, providing a simplified yet representative membrane model to investigate the complex dynamics of how drugs interact with and penetrate cellular barriers. The manuscript consolidates data from various studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying drug - membrane interactions, the determinants that influence these interactions, and the crucial role of DSC in elucidating these components. It further explores the interactions of specific classes of drugs with phospholipid membranes, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticancer agents, natural products with antioxidant properties, and Alzheimer's disease therapeutics. The manuscript underscores the critical importance of DSC in this field and the need for continued research to improve our understanding of these interactions, acting as a valuable resource for researchers.

Immature platelets and platelet reactivity in patients with acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction using whole blood flow cytometry with SYTO-13 staining

BACKGROUND

Reduced effect of antiplatelet therapy has been reported in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Multiple factors may concur to explain this, including increased amount of highly reactive immature platelets.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between immature platelets and reactivity determined with multicolour flow cytometry using the SYTO-13 dye in STEMI patients.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of 59 patients with acute STEMI. Blood samples were obtained within 24 h after admission and after loading doses of dual antiplatelet therapy. For comparison, samples were obtained from 50 healthy individuals. Immature platelets and platelet reactivity were investigated using multicolour flow cytometry including the SYTO-13 dye that binds to platelet RNA and thus provides a method for subdividing platelets into immature and mature platelets. Additionally, we assessed platelet aggregation, serum-thromboxane B2 levels and standard immature platelet markers.

RESULTS

Immature platelets were more reactive than mature platelets in both STEMI patients and healthy individuals (p-values < 0.05). STEMI patients had lower platelet aggregation and thromboxane B2 levels than healthy individuals. We found a positive association between automatically determined immature platelet markers and CD63 expression on activated platelets (Spearman's rho: 0.27 to 0.58, p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that immature platelets identified with a multicolour flow cytometric method using the SYTO-13 dye are more reactive than mature platelets in patients with acute STEMI and in healthy individuals. The presence of immature platelets may be important for the overall platelet reactivity, which may have implications for the effect of antiplatelet therapy.

Twenty-four-hour time dependency of clopidogrel effects in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CiCAD-Study

Long-term evidence shows an increased risk of cardiovascular events in the morning hours and recent studies in aspirin-treated patients have shown increased platelet reactivity at the end of the dosing interval. Similar pharmacodynamic analyses of adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors are scarce. We therefore investigated changes in clopidogrel-dependent platelet function and activation over 24 h and whether enhanced platelet turnover might explain diurnal variability of platelet function and activation. Twenty-one patients after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) on maintenance doses of clopidogrel (75 mg) and aspirin (100 mg) Once per day (OD) were included. Blood was collected at five time points in 24 h. Platelet function and activation was analyzed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P), Verify Now, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and platelet PAC-1 and P-selectin (P-sel) expression. Additionally, platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and reticulated platelet fraction (RPF) were analyzed. There was significant diurnal variability of clopidogrel effects as documented with VASP-P, Verify Now, and PAC-1 and P-sel (all p < 0.05), whereas MEA did not differ over 24 h. Neither MPV nor RPF varied significantly over 24 h. In patients with high RPF, platelet function and activation was significantly higher in all assays, compared to patients with low RPF (all p < 0.05). However, the changes over time in low versus high RPF groups were similar. ADP-dependent platelet function and activation recovers significantly at the end of the 24-h dosing interval in patients with ACS on a maintenance dose of clopidogrel and aspirin. Although platelet function and activation is increased in patients with higher RPF, platelet turnover might not explain the observed diurnal variability.

Platelet Aggregometry Testing: Molecular Mechanisms, Techniques and Clinical Implications

Platelets play a fundamental role in normal hemostasis, while their inherited or acquired dysfunctions are involved in a variety of bleeding disorders or thrombotic events. Several laboratory methodologies or point-of-care testing methods are currently available for clinical and experimental settings. These methods describe different aspects of platelet function based on platelet aggregation, platelet adhesion, the viscoelastic properties during clot formation, the evaluation of thromboxane metabolism or certain flow cytometry techniques. Platelet aggregometry is applied in different clinical settings as monitoring response to antiplatelet therapies, the assessment of perioperative bleeding risk, the diagnosis of inherited bleeding disorders or in transfusion medicine. The rationale for platelet function-driven antiplatelet therapy was based on the result of several studies on patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), where an association between high platelet reactivity despite P2Y12 inhibition and ischemic events as stent thrombosis or cardiovascular death was found. However, recent large scale randomized, controlled trials have consistently failed to demonstrate a benefit of personalised antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function testing.

Thromboxane Formation Assay to Identify High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Aspirin

Platelet inhibition by aspirin is indispensable in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]) are frequent. This is associated with an enhanced risk of cardiovascular events. The current gold standard to evaluate platelet hyper-reactivity despite aspirin intake is the light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA). However, pharmacologically, the most specific test is the measurement of arachidonic acid (AA)-induced thromboxane (TX) B2 formation. Currently, the optimal cut-off to define HTPR to aspirin by inhibition of TX formation is not known. Therefore, in this pilot study, we aimed to calculate a TX formation cut-off value to detect HTPR defined by the current gold standard LTA. We measured platelet function in 2,507 samples. AA-induced TX formation by ELISA and AA-induced LTA were used to measure aspirin antiplatelet effects. TX formation correlated nonlinearly with the maximum of aggregation in the AA-induced LTA (Spearman's rho R = 0.7396; 95% CI 0.7208-0.7573, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Youden's J statistics revealed 209.8 ng/mL as the optimal cut-off value to detect HTPR to aspirin with the TX ELISA (area under the curve: 0.92, p < 0.0001, sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity of 90.3%). In summary, TX formation ELISA is reliable in detecting HTPR to aspirin. The calculated cut-off level needs to be tested in trials with clinical end points.

Cardiovascular events occur independently of high on-aspirin platelet reactivity and residual COX-1 activity in stable cardiovascular patients

Several studies have indicated that approximately 25 % of patients treated with aspirin exhibit high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), which is potentially associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs). However, this association is still controversial, since the mechanisms by which HTPR contributes to CVEs remain unclear and a no standardised definition of HTPR has been established. To determine whether HTPR is associated with CVE recurrence and what type of assay would best predict CVE recurrence, we conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study of 592 stable cardiovascular outpatients treated with aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention. Their HTPR was determined by arachidonic acid- or collagen-induced aggregation assays using two different agonist concentrations. Residual cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 activity was assessed by measuring serum thromboxane (TX)B2 or urinary 11-dehydro TXB2. Shear-induced platelet thrombus formation was also examined. We followed all patients for two years to evaluate how these seven indexes were related to the recurrence of CVEs (cerebral infarction, transient ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularisation, other arterial thrombosis, or cardiovascular death). Of 583 patients eligible for the analysis, CVEs occurred in 69 (11.8 %). A Cox regression model identified several classical risk factors associated with CVEs. However, neither HTPR nor high residual COX-1 activity was significantly associated with CVEs, even by applying cut-off values suggested in previous reports or a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. In conclusion, recurrence of CVEs occurred independently of HTPR and residual COX-1 activity. Thus, our findings do not support the use of platelet or COX-1 functional testing for predicting clinical outcomes in stable cardiovascular patients.

Anti-platelet Therapy Resistance - Concept, Mechanisms and Platelet Function Tests in Intensive Care Facilities

It is well known that critically ill patients require special attention and additional consideration during their treatment and management. The multiple systems and organ dysfunctions, typical of the critical patient, often results in different patterns of enteral absorption in these patients. Anti-platelet drugs are the cornerstone in treating patients with coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the treatment of choice in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions and is still widely used in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, despite the use of dual anti-platelet therapy, some patients continue to experience cardiovascular ischemic events. Recurrence of ischemic events is partly attributed to the fact that some patients have poor inhibition of platelet reactivity despite treatment. These patients are considered low- or non-responders to therapy. The underlying mechanisms leading to resistance are not yet fully elucidated and are probably multifactorial, cellular, genetic and clinical factors being implicated. Several methods have been developed to asses platelet function and can be used to identify patients with persistent platelet reactivity, which have an increased risk of thrombosis. In this paper, the concept of anti-platelet therapy resistance, the underlying mechanisms and the methods used to identify patients with low responsiveness to anti-platelet therapy will be highlighted with a focus on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy and addressing especially critically ill patients.

Antiplatelet drugs in patients with enhanced platelet turnover: biomarkers versus platelet function testing

Platelets are key players in atherothrombosis. Antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin alone or with P2Y12-inhibitors are effective for prevention of atherothrombotic complications. However, there is interindividual variability in the response to antiplatelet drugs, leaving some patients at increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events. Several risk factors associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), including elevated platelet turnover, have been identified. Platelet turnover is adequately estimated from the fraction of reticulated platelets. Reticulated platelets are young platelets, characterised by residual messenger RNA. They are larger, haemostatically more active and there is evidence that platelet turnover is a causal and prognostic factor in atherothrombotic disease. Whether platelet turnover per se represents a key factor in pathogenesis, progression and prognosis of atherothrombotic diseases (with focus on acute coronary syndromes) or whether it merely facilitates insufficient platelet inhibition will be discussed in this state-of-the art review.

A brief review on high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity

Although aspirin is effective in secondary prevention in coronary heart disease, new thromboembolic events in patients on aspirin are frequently seen. In trials on aspirin-treated patients, platelet function tests have revealed large variability in platelet aggregation. This phenomenon has been named aspirin resistance, aspirin non-responsiveness or high-on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity. The mechanism of aspirin antiplatelet effect is due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme in platelets. In some trials, almost all patients on aspirin have a very low level of serum thromboxane B2, indicating that the measured platelet reactivity in aspirin-treated patients might be due to platelet activation via other pathways, such as ADP or thrombin. The prevalence of real aspirin resistance seems to be very low, and probably the term "high-on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity" should be preferred to describe this phenomenon.

Platelet function tests: a comparative review

In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation – adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation – have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered.

Confirmation of reported aspirin use in community studies: utility of serum thromboxane B2 measurement

Aspirin (ASA) is recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease; however, the compliance is low. Reported use may not reflect actual use. Serum thromboxane B2 (STxB2) measurement was evaluated to validate reported ASA use. Males aged 45 to 79 years and females aged 55 to 79 years completed a survey and STxB2 measurement (Thromboxane B2 EIA Kit; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan). The 107 patients were grouped by use of ASA (56 ASA+ and 51 ASA-) and possible interfering medications (INT) such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The STxB2 levels (ng/mL) were significantly lower in ASA users: ASA+ INT- 3.0 (0.7, 8.4), ASA+ INT+ 2.0 (0.8, 4.9), ASA- INT+ 176 (75, 390), and ASA- INT- 271 (199, 366). The INT use did not cause a significant difference in STxB2 levels. A STxB2 cut point of 25 ng/mL had high sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (91.1%) for ASA use. The STxB2 was a reliable marker of ASA use and could be used to confirm ASA exposure in population-based health studies.

A contemporary viewpoint on 'aspirin resistance'

Aspirin is an irreversible inhibitor of platelet prostaglandin synthase activity, and is the most widely prescribed drug for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In recent years, clinical and laboratory evidence has shown significant individual variability in the response to aspirin and its link to clinical outcome. The term 'aspirin resistance' has been introduced to describe situations when clinical or ex-vivo effects of aspirin are less than expected. The accumulating evidence of increased risk of major adverse clinical events (MACE) associated with 'aspirin resistance' in the settings of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease has stimulated the search for ways of overcoming aspirin resistance. Existence of the link between high on-treatment platelet reactivity and atherothrombotic events suggests the common mechanisms for atherosclerosis progression and thrombotic complications with the platelets, being a key cellular interface between coagulation and inflammation. This review article provides a contemporary view on 'aspirin resistance' and discusses its definition, clinical importance, and possible mechanisms in light of recent data on the role of platelets in atherothrombosis.

High On-Aspirin Platelet Reactivity and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Results From ASCET (Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial)

Background

Patients with stable coronary artery disease on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are still at risk for atherothrombotic events, and high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity (RPR) has been suggested as a risk factor.

Methods and Results

In this randomized trial, the association between platelet function determined by the PFA100 platelet function analyzer system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Germany) and clinical outcome in 1001 patients, all on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (160 mg/d) was studied. Patients were randomized to continue with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75 mg/d. A composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unstable angina was used. At 2-year follow-up, 106 primary end points were registered. The prevalence of high RPR was 25.9%. High on-aspirin RPR did not significantly influence the primary end point in the aspirin group (13.3% versus 9.9%, P=0.31). However, in post hoc analysis, patients with von Willebrand factor levels or platelet count below median values and high on-aspirin RPR had a statistically significant higher end point rate than that of patients with low RPR (20% versus 7.5%, P=0.014, and 18.2% versus 10.8%, P=0.039, respectively). The composite end point rate in patients with high on-aspirin RPR treated with clopidogrel was not different from that of patients treated with aspirin (7.6% versus 13.3%, P=0.16).

Conclusions

In stable, aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease, high on-aspirin RPR did not relate to clinical outcome and did not identify a group responsive to clopidogrel. Post hoc subgroup analysis raised the possibility that high on-aspirin RPR might be predictive in patients with low von Willebrand factor or platelet count, but these findings will require confirmation in future studies.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00222261. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000703 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000703.)

Platelet aggregation is dependent on platelet count in patients with coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Platelet function testing in whole blood is widely used to evaluate the effect of antiplatelet agents, but it is not known whether results are affected by whole blood parameters. This study investigated the importance of platelet count, haematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), and white blood cells in whole blood platelet aggregometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 417 patients with coronary artery disease on aspirin mono-therapy and 21 aspirin-naïve healthy individuals. Blood sampling was performed one hour after aspirin ingestion. The antiplatelet effect of aspirin was evaluated using the VerifyNow® Aspirin assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate®) induced by collagen (1.0 μg/mL) and arachidonic acid (1.0 or 0.75 mmol/L). Measurements of whole blood parameters were performed to evaluate the three major cell lines in circulating blood.

RESULTS

In patients, platelet count correlated significantly with platelet aggregation (MEA(collagen), p<0.0001; MEA(arachidonic acid), p<0.0001; VerifyNow®, p=0.03). Haematocrit and RBC correlated inversely with MEA induced by collagen (p(haematocrit)<0.001; p(RBC)=0.07) and with VerifyNow® (p(haematocrit)<0.0001; p(RBC)<0.0001), but not with MEA induced by arachidonic acid (p(haematocrit)=1; p(RBC)=0.87). White blood cells correlated significantly with platelet aggregation (MEA(collagen), p<0.001; MEA(arachidonic acid), p<0.0001; VerifyNow®, p=0.05). Similar associations were observed in aspirin-naïve healthy individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole blood aggregometry is dependent on all major cell lines in whole blood. Importantly, platelet aggregation is significantly associated with platelet count even within the normal range.

Antiplatelet therapy and vascular disease: an update

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse, systemic disorder of the large and medium-sized arterial vessels, affecting the coronary, cerebral and peripheral circulation. Chronic inflammatory processes are the central pathophysiological mechanism largely driven by lipid accumulation, and provide the substrate for occlusive thrombus formation. The clinical sequelae of acute arterial thrombosis, heart attack and stroke, are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Such acute events are characterized by rupture or erosion of the atherosclerotic plaque leading to acute thrombosis. The atherosclerotic process and associated thrombotic complications are collectively termed atherothrombosis. The platelet is a pivotal mediator of various endothelial, immune, thrombotic and inflammatory responses and therefore a key player in the initiation and progression of atherothrombosis. A robust evidence base supports the clear clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents in the primary and secondary therapy of atherothrombotic disorders. Percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions have an established central role in the management of atherothrombotic disease and demand a greater understanding of platelet biology. In this article, we provide a clinically orientated overview of the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and the evidence supporting the use of the various established antiplatelet therapies, and discuss new and future agents.

Antiplatelet resistance in stroke

Although the exact prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in ischemic stroke is not known, estimates about the two most widely used antiplatelet agents - aspirin and clopidogrel - suggest that the resistance rate is high, irrespective of the definition used and parameters measured. Inadequate antiplatelet responsiveness correlates with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic vascular events in patients with stroke and acute coronary syndrome. It is not currently known whether tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function test results translates into a more effective strategy to prevent secondary vascular events after stroke. Large-scale clinical trials using a universally accepted definition and standardized measurement techniques for antiplatelet resistance are needed to demonstrate whether a 'platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment' strategy translates into improved stroke care. This article gives an overview of the clinical importance of laboratory antiplatelet resistance, describes the challenges for platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment and discusses practical issues about the management of patients with aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance.

The contribution of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 to persistent thromboxane biosynthesis in aspirin-treated essential thrombocythemia: implications for antiplatelet therapy

We tested whether cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) expression and unacetylated COX-1 in newly formed platelets might contribute to persistent thromboxane (TX) biosynthesis in aspirin-treated essential thrombocythemia (ET). Forty-one patients on chronic aspirin (100 mg/day) and 24 healthy subjects were studied. Platelet COX-2 expression was significantly increased in patients and correlated with thiazole orange–positive platelets (r = 0.71, P < .001). The rate of TXA2 biosynthesis in vivo, as reflected by urinary 11-dehydro-TXB2 (TXM) excretion, and the maximal biosynthetic capacity of platelets, as reflected by serum TXB2, were higher in patients compared with aspirin-treated healthy volunteers. Serum TXB2 was significantly reduced by the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 added in vitro. Patients were randomized to adding the selective COX-2 inhibitor, etoricoxib, or continuing aspirin for 7 days. Etoricoxib significantly reduced by approximately 25% TXM excretion and serum TXB2. Fourteen of the 41 patients were studied again 21 (± 7) months after the first visit. Serum TXB2 was consistently reduced by approximately 30% by adding NS398 in vitro, while it was completely suppressed with 50μM aspirin. Accelerated platelet regeneration in most aspirin-treated ET patients may explain aspirin-persistent TXA2 biosynthesis through enhanced COX-2 activity and faster renewal of unacetylated COX-1. These findings may help in reassessing the optimal antiplatelet strategy in ET.

Update on oral antiplatelet therapy: principles, problems and promises

Platelets are major players in arterial thrombosis, and antiplatelet therapy has a clear clinical benefit in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular events. In particular, aspirin and clopidogrel have become cornerstones in the treatment of patients with atherothrombosis. However, despite the proven efficacy of antiplatelet drugs, cardiovascular events remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Furthermore, a considerable variability in platelet reactivity during treatment with established oral antiplatelet therapy has prompted the search for novel drugs against platelet-dependent thrombosis. Possible benefits of upcoming drugs include a more efficient platelet inhibition and a reversible effect on platelet function. Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, terutroban, E5555, SCH 530348 and cilostazol are discussed. This review highlights the rationale for important oral antiplatelet drugs in development and provides clinical perspectives on their pharmacological advantages and challenges.