Biological variation of INR in stable patients on long-term anticoagulation with warfarin

Defining a metrologically traceable and sustainable calibration hierarchy of international normalized ratio for monitoring of vitamin K antagonist treatment in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 17511:2020 standard: communication from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine-SSC/ISTH working group on prothrombin time/international normalized ratio standardization

Calibration of prothrombin time (PT) in terms of international normalized ratio (INR) has been outlined in "Guidelines for thromboplastins and plasmas used to control oral anticoagulant therapy" (World Health Organization, 2013). The international standard ISO 17511:2020 presents requirements for manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices (MDs) for documenting the calibration hierarchy for a measured quantity in human samples using a specified IVD MD. The objective of this article is to define an unequivocal, metrologically traceable calibration hierarchy for the INR measured in plasma as well as in whole blood samples. Calibration of PT and INR for IVD MDs according to World Health Organization guidelines is similar to that in cases where there is a reference measurement procedure that defines the measurand for value assignment as described in ISO 17511:2020. We conclude that, for PT/INR standardization, the optimal calibration hierarchy includes a primary process to prepare an international reference reagent and measurement procedure that defines the measurand by a value assignment protocol conforming to clause 5.3 of ISO 17511:2020. A panel of freshly prepared human plasma samples from healthy adult individuals and patients on vitamin K antagonists is used as a commutable secondary calibrator as described in ISO 17511:2020. A sustainable metrologically traceable calibration hierarchy for INR should be based on an international protocol for value assignment with a single primary reference thromboplastin and the harmonized manual tilt tube technique for clotting time determination. The primary international reference thromboplastin reagent should be used only for calibration of successive batches of the secondary reference thromboplastin reagent.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of within-subject and between-subject biological variation data of coagulation and fibrinolytic measurands

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis and monitoring of bleeding and thrombotic disorders depend on correct haemostatic measurements. The availability of high-quality biological variation (BV) data is important in this context. Many studies have reported BV data for these measurands, but results are varied. The present study aims to deliver global within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates for haemostasis measurands by meta-analyses of eligible studies, by assessment with the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC).

METHODS

Relevant BV studies were graded by the BIVAC. Weighted estimates for CVI and CVG were obtained via meta-analysis of the BV data derived from BIVAC-compliant studies (graded A-C; whereby A represents optimal study design) performed in healthy adults.

RESULTS

In 26 studies BV data were reported for 35 haemostasis measurands. For 9 measurands, only one eligible publication was identified and meta-analysis could not be performed. 74% of the publications were graded as BIVAC C. The CVI and CVG varied extensively between the haemostasis measurands. The highest estimates were observed for PAI-1 antigen (CVI 48.6%; CVG 59.8%) and activity (CVI 34.9%; CVG 90.2%), while the lowest were observed for activated protein C resistance ratio (CVI 1.5%; CVG 4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides updated BV estimates of CVI and CVG with 95% confidence intervals for a wide range of haemostasis measurands. These estimates can be used to form the basis for analytical performance specifications for haemostasis tests used in the diagnostic work-up required in bleeding- and thrombosis events and for risk assessment.

Antithrombotic dose: Some observations from published clinical trials

The clinical doses of antithrombotics-antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents-need to balance efficacy and safety. It is not clear from the published literature how the doses currently used in clinical practice have been derived from preclinical and clinical data. There are few large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare outcomes with different doses vs placebo. For newer antithrombotics, RCT doses appear to have been chosen to maximise the probability of demonstrating noninferiority when compared to established agents such as warfarin or clopidogrel. Data from RCTs show that aspirin is an effective antithrombotic at doses below 75 mg daily, and that direct oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke in patients with coronary disease at doses 1/4 of those recommended in atrial fibrillation. Lower doses than those currently recommended are safer and still maintain substantial efficacy.

Point-of-care testing and INR within-subject variation in patients receiving a constant dose of vitamin K antagonist

Many patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) determine their INR using point-of-care (POC) whole blood coagulation monitors. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the INR within-subject variation in self-testing patients receiving a constant dose of VKA. The second aim of the study was to derive INR imprecision goals for whole blood coagulation monitors. Analytical performance goals for INR measurement can be derived from the average biological within-subject variation. Fifty-six Thrombosis Centres in the Netherlands were invited to select self-testing patients who were receiving a constant dose of either acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon for at least six consecutive INR measurements. In each patient, the coefficient of variation (CV) of INRs was calculated. One Thrombosis Centre selected regular patients being monitored with a POC device by professional staff. Sixteen Dutch Thrombosis Centres provided results for 322 selected patients, all using the CoaguChek XS. The median within-subject CV in patients receiving acenocoumarol (10.2 %) was significantly higher than the median CV in patients receiving phenprocoumon (8.6 %) (p = 0.001). The median CV in low-target intensity acenocoumarol self-testing patients (10.4 %) was similar to the median CV in regular patients monitored by professional staff (10.2 %). Desirable INR analytical imprecision goals for POC monitoring with CoaguChek XS in patients receiving either low-target intensity acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon were 5.1 % and 4.3 %, respectively. The approximate average value for the imprecision of the CoaguChek XS, i. e. 4 %, is in agreement with these goals.

Anticoagulant management of atrial fibrillation: the influence of dosing algorithm and recall schedule on time in therapeutic range

BACKGROUND

The quality of anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation patients is reflected by the concept of time spent in therapeutic range (TTR). In a primary care setting, the implementation of a dose nomogram could help increase the mean TTR among these patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the influence of a dose algorithm with an integrated recall on TTR prior to standard care and after the implementation of the protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a purposive sample of patients with AF, an uncontrolled 'before' and 'after' study design was utilized to measure the effects of the protocol on TTR. Demographic data, TTR levels, frequency of international normalized ratio (INR) within therapeutic range, clinician adherence to dose nomogram and warfarin dose changes were captured from consultations at the anticoagulation clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients with AF were entered into the final analysis. The increment in mean TTR in the 'after' intervention phase (2.9%) was not statistically significant (57.5-60.4%, P=0.252). The increase in the frequency of INR values within therapeutic range in the 'after' intervention phase was significant (50.0-56.0%, P<0.05) but with a very low effect size (r=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a dose nomogram has the potential of reducing unnecessary dose changes for minor fluctuations in INR levels. The findings in this study needs to be confirmed in a future study involving other indications for anticoagulation, various regional primary care clinics and a larger population size.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban: a randomized study in healthy subjects

AIMS

This study investigated relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

Ninety-six healthy men were randomized into the following three groups: warfarin [international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0] transitioned to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (od; group A); warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) followed by placebo od (group B); and rivaroxaban alone 20 mg od (group C) for 4 days. Anti-factor Xa activity, inhibition of factor Xa activity, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, HepTest, prothrombinase-induced clotting time, factor VIIa activity, factor IIa activity, endogenous thrombin potential and pharmacokinetics were measured.

RESULTS

An additive effect was observed on the PT and PT/INR during the initial transition period. The mean maximal prolongation of PT was 4.39-fold [coefficient of variation (CV) 18.03%; range 3.39-6.50] of the baseline value in group A, compared with 1.88-fold (CV 10.35%; range 1.53-2.21) in group B and 1.57-fold (CV 9.98%; range 1.37-2.09) in group C. Rivaroxaban had minimal influence on the PT/INR at trough levels. Inhibition of factor Xa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time and endogenous thrombin potential were also enhanced, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, the effects of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity, HepTest and prothrombinase-induced clotting time were not affected by pretreatment with warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in pharmacodynamics during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban vary depending on the test used. A supra-additive effect on PT/INR is expected during the initial period of transition, but pretreatment with warfarin does not influence the effect of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity.

Analytical accuracy and precision of two novel Point-of-Care systems for INR determination

BACKGROUND

Portable point-of-care (POC) instruments for determination of the whole blood prothrombin time (PT) have been available for the last three decades. Recently, two novel POC instruments for PT and International Normalized Ratio (INR) determination in whole blood have been manufactured. The purpose of this study was to compare INR values obtained with the novel instruments (microINR® and ProTime InRhythm™) to the INR determined with the international standard for thromboplastin rTF/09.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 60 patients treated with vitamin K-antagonists, venous whole blood was analysed with four different types of POC instruments including the novel ones. In the same patients, citrated plasma was analysed with the international standard rTF/09 and the manual tilt tube technique for clotting time determination. We assessed the bias of the INR read from the POC instruments relative to the international standard. To study the imprecision of the two novel POC instruments, duplicate INR determinations were performed.

RESULTS

The results obtained with the two novel POC instruments were positively correlated with those of the international standard rTF/09. However, there was a significant bias between INR read from the novel instruments and the INR determined with rTF/09 (P < 0.001). The mean bias was -13.7% (MicroINR) and -9.3% (InRhythm). The imprecision coefficient of variation in venous blood was 5.0% and 5.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The imprecision of the two novel instruments is acceptable with respect to the average within-subject variation of the INR. The accuracy of the systems is borderline and should be improved by the manufacturers.

The influence of coagulation factors on the in-treatment biological variation of international normalized ratio for patients on warfarin

BACKGROUND

Biological variation is usually estimated in healthy individuals during steady-state conditions. The aim of this study was to estimate the in-treatment biological variation of the International normalised ratio (INR) and to investigate to what extent the different levels of coagulation factors could explain this variation.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from randomly included patients on warfarin treatment. INR was determined on a laboratory instrument (STA Compact(®)) and on three point-of-care instruments (Simple Simon(®)PT, CoaguChek(®)XS and INRatio(™)). The level of fibrinogen, and the activity of coagulation factors II, V, VII and X were determined.

RESULTS

The in-treatment within- and between-subject coefficients of variation of INR were dependent on the method and varied between 18 and 24% and 13 and 19%, respectively, and were reduced to 3.9-5.1% and 2.3-5.8%, after correction for coagulation factors which could explain 91-95% of the variance of INR.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-treatment biological variation of INR was higher than reported for healthy individuals as well as patients in a steady-state condition, but by correcting for appropriate coagulation factors it was reduced. The association between INR and coagulation factors was different for the different PT methods mainly due to different sensitivity towards FII and FVII.

CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms influence warfarin dose variability in patients on long-term anticoagulation

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this study was to determine whether CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms influence warfarin dose variability during initial dose-finding phase and during maintenance treatment after 360 days.

METHODS

Two hundred and six consecutive patients who were beginning warfarin therapy were selected. They were assessed for general and clinical characteristics; prescribed warfarin dose; response to therapy on days 7-10, 30, 60, 180, and 360; adverse events; and CYP2C9 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, and VKORC1 1639G >A assays.

RESULTS

During the first 30 days of anticoagulation, the relative variability of warfarin dose was significantly associated with CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 polymorphisms (p = 0.02) and with VKORC1 1639G >A genotypes (p = 0.04). Warfarin variability was also statistically different according to predicted metabolic phenotype and to VKORC1 genotypes after 360 days of treatment, and in the phase between 180 and 360 days (long-term dose variability). Both CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms were associated with the international normalized ratio (INR) made between 7 and 10 days/initial dose ratio, adjusted for covariates (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Patients carrying VKORC1 and CYP2C9 variants presented lower required dose (at the end of follow-up of 360 days) compared to patients carrying wild-type genotypes (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic information on CYP2C9 and VKORC1 is important both for the initial dose-finding phase and during maintenance treatment with warfarin.