Thrombotic safety of prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) for dabigatran reversal in a rabbit model

Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation is essential for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events. Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists in DOAC-eligible patients. The major complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening haemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt haemostatic intervention. Reversal of DOACs may also be required for patients in need of urgent invasive procedures. This guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aims to provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions on how to manage patients on DOACs undergoing urgent or emergency procedures including the treatment of DOAC-induced bleeding.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search was performed, examining four drug comparators (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and clinical scenarios ranging from planned to emergency surgery with the outcomes of mortality, haematoma growth and thromboembolic complications. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Consensus on the wording of the recommendations was achieved by a Delphi process.

RESULTS

So far, no results from prospective randomised trials comparing two active comparators (e.g. a direct reversal agent and an unspecific haemostatic agent such as prothrombin complex concentrate: PCC) have been published yet and the majority of publications were uncontrolled and observational studies. Thus, the certainty of evidence was assessed to be either low or very low (GRADE C). Thirty-five recommendations and clinical practice statements were developed. During the Delphi process, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97.1% of recommendations and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 2.9%.

DISCUSSION

DOAC-specific coagulation monitoring may help in patients at risk for elevated DOAC levels, whereas global coagulation tests are not recommended to exclude clinically relevant DOAC levels. In urgent clinical situations, haemostatic treatment using either the direct reversal or nonspecific haemostatic agents should be started without waiting for DOAC level monitoring. DOAC levels above 50 ng ml-1 may be considered clinically relevant necessitating haemostatic treatment before urgent or emergency procedures. Before cardiac surgery under activated factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, the use of andexanet alfa is not recommended because of inhibition of unfractionated heparin, which is needed for extracorporeal circulation. In the situation of DOAC overdose without bleeding, no haemostatic intervention is suggested, instead measures to eliminate the DOACs should be taken. Due to the lack of published results from comparative prospective, randomised studies, the superiority of reversal treatment strategy vs. a nonspecific haemostatic treatment is unclear for most urgent and emergency procedures and bleeding. Due to the paucity of clinical data, no recommendations for the use of recombinant activated factor VII as a nonspecific haemostatic agent can be given.

CONCLUSION

In the clinical scenarios of DOAC intake before urgent procedures and DOAC-induced bleeding, practitioners should evaluate the risk of bleeding of the procedure and the severity of the DOAC-induced bleeding before initiating treatment. Optimal reversal strategy remains to be determined in future trials for most clinical settings.

LncRNA MSTRG.22719.16 mediates the reduction of enoxaparin sodium high-viscosity bone cement-induced thrombosis by targeting the ocu-miR-326-5p/CD40 axis

OBJECTIVE

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement promotes the development of local thrombi. Our study found that a novel material, ES-PMMA bone cement, can reduce local thrombosis. We used a simple and reproducible animal model to confirm the reduction in local thrombosis and explored the associated molecular mechanism.

METHODS

New Zealand rabbits, which were used to model thrombosis using extracorporeal carotid artery shunts, were divided into the following two groups, with 3 rabbits in each group: the PMMA bone cement group and the ES-PMMA bone cement group. Four hours after modelling, experimental samples, including thrombotic and vascular tissues, were collected. Thrombotic samples from the PMMA group and ES-PMMA group were subjected to lncRNA sequencing, and a lncRNA microarray was used to screen the differentially expressed lncRNAs. The expression of thrombomodulin in endothelial cells was quantified in vascular tissue samples. Differences in the lncRNA expression profiles between the thrombotic samples of the PMMA group and ES-PMMA group were assessed by base-to-base alignment in the intergenic regions of genomes. The lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was established in light of ceRNA theory. Thrombosis was observed in the PMMA group and ES-PMMA group.

RESULTS

The thrombotic weight was 0.00706 ± 0.00136 g/cm in the PMMA group and 0.00551 ± 0.00115 g/cm in the ES-PMMA group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-q-CR) and Western blotting revealed that the expression of CD40, which can regulate thrombosis in vascular endothelial cells, was significantly lower in the ES-PMMA group than in the PMMA group. High-throughput sequencing was used to identify 111 lncRNAs with lower expression in the ES-PMMA group than in the PMMA group. Through bioinformatics investigation, lncRNA MSTRG22719.16/ocu-miR-326-5p/CD40 binding sites were selected. Fluorescent in situ RNA hybridization (FISH) was performed to verify the lower expression of lncRNA MSTRG.22719.16 in vascular tissues from the ES-PMMA group. A dual-luciferase reporter gene assay was applied to verify that ocu-miR-326-5p binds the CD40 3'-UTR and targets lncRNA MSTRG.22719.16.

CONCLUSION

Compared with PMMA bone cement, ES-PMMA bone cement can reduce thrombosis through the lncRNA MSTRG.22719.16/ocu-miR-326-5p/CD40 axis.

Clinical Relevance of Preclinical and Clinical Studies of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Treatment of Bleeding Related to Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke. When emergency reversal of DOAC-related anticoagulation is required, specific DOAC reversal agents are recommended, including idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa for apixaban and rivaroxaban reversal. However, specific reversal agents are not always available, andexanet alfa has not been approved for urgent surgery, and clinicians need to know the patient's anticoagulant medication before administering these treatments. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are recognized as nonspecific, alternative hemostatic agents for treatment of DOAC-related bleeding. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies shows that they may reduce the anticoagulant effects of DOACs and may help control DOAC-related bleeding. However, randomized controlled trials are lacking, and most data are from retrospective or single-arm prospective studies in bleeding associated with activated factor X inhibitors. There are no clinical data showing the efficacy of 4F-PCC for the treatment of bleeding in dabigatran-treated patients. This review focuses on the current evidence of 4F-PCC use in controlling bleeding associated with DOACs and provides an expert opinion on the relevance of these data for clinical practice. The current treatment landscape, unmet needs, and future directions are also discussed.

Antithrombotic Effects of the Novel Small-Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitor Milvexian in a Rabbit Arteriovenous Shunt Model of Venous Thrombosis

Background  Factor XIa (FXIa) is an emerging therapeutic target, and FXIa inhibition is a promising mechanism to improve therapeutic index over current anticoagulants. Milvexian (BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093) is an oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitor. Objective  Milvexian's antithrombotic efficacy was characterized in a rabbit arteriovenous (AV) shunt model of venous thrombosis and compared with the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Methods  The AV shunt model of thrombosis was conducted in anesthetized rabbits. Vehicle or drugs were administered as intravenous bolus plus a continuous infusion. Thrombus weight was the primary efficacy endpoint. Ex vivo activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT) were measured as the pharmacodynamic responses. Results  Milvexian dose dependently reduced thrombus weights by 34.3 ± 7.9, 51.6 ± 6.8 ( p  < 0.01; n  = 5), and 66.9 ± 4.8% ( p  < 0.001; n  = 6) versus vehicle at 0.25 + 0.17, 1.0 + 0.67, and 4.0 ± 2.68 mg/kg bolus + mg/kg/h infusion, respectively. Ex vivo clotting data supported a dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT (with 1.54-, 2.23-, and 3.12-fold increases from baseline upon the AV shunt start), but no changes in PT and TT. Dose-dependent inhibition in thrombus weight and clotting assays was also demonstrated for both apixaban and dabigatran as the references for the model validation. Conclusion  Results demonstrate that milvexian is an effective anticoagulant for prevention of venous thrombosis in the rabbit model, which supports the utility of milvexian in venous thrombosis, as seen in the phase 2 clinical study.

A Historical Perspective on the Reversal of Anticoagulants

There has been a landmark shift in the last several decades in the management and prevention of thromboembolic events. From the discovery of parenteral and oral agents requiring frequent monitoring as early as 1914, to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment in the late 20th century, great advances have been achieved. Despite the advent of these newer agents, bleeding continues to be a key complication, affecting 2 to 4% of DOAC-treated patients per year. Bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although specific reversal agents for DOACs have lagged the release of these agents, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are now available as antagonists. However, the efficacy of these reversal agents is uncertain, and complications, including thrombosis, have not been adequately explored. As such, guidelines continue to advise the use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents for patients requiring reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs. As the indications for DOACs and the overall prevalence of their use expand, there is an unmet need for further studies to determine the efficacy of specific compared with nonspecific pro-hemostatic reversal agents. In this review, we will discuss the evidence behind specific and nonspecific reversal agents for both parenteral and oral anticoagulants.

Evaluation of the prothrombotic potential of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in animal models

OBJECTIVES

Acquired coagulopathy may be associated with bleeding risk. Approaches to restore haemostasis include administration of coagulation factor concentrates, but there are concerns regarding potential prothrombotic risk. The present study assessed the prothrombotic potential of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) versus activated PCC (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), using three preclinical animal models.

METHODS

The first model was a modified Wessler model of venous stasis-induced thrombosis in rabbit, focusing on dilutional coagulopathy; the second model employed the same system but focused on direct oral anticoagulant reversal (i.e. edoxaban). The third model assessed the prothrombotic impact of 4F-PCC, aPCC and rFVIIa in a rat model of ferric chloride-induced arterial thrombosis.

RESULTS

In the first model, thrombi were observed at aPCC doses ≥10 IU/kg (therapeutic dose 100 IU/kg) and rFVIIa doses ≥50 μg/kg (therapeutic dose 90 μg/kg), but not 4F-PCC 50 IU/kg (therapeutic dose 50 IU/kg). The impact of 4F-PCC (up to 300 IU/kg) on thrombus formation was evident from 10 minutes post-administration, but not at 24 hours post-administration; this did not change with addition of tranexamic acid and/or fibrinogen concentrate. 4F-PCC-induced thrombus formation was lower after haemodilution versus non-haemodilution. In the second model, no prothrombotic effect was confirmed at 4F-PCC 50 IU/kg. The third model showed lower incidence of thrombus formation for 4F-PCC 50 IU/kg versus aPCC (50 U/kg) and rFVIIa (90 μg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 4F-PCC has a low thrombotic potential versus aPCC or rFVIIa, supporting the clinical use of 4F-PCC for the treatment of coagulopathy-mediated bleeding.

Reversing Rivaroxaban Anticoagulation as Part of a Multimodal Hemostatic Intervention in a Polytrauma Animal Model

BACKGROUND

Life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors. This study investigated the effectiveness of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in treating trauma-related hemorrhage with rivaroxaban-anticoagulation in a pig polytrauma model. This study also tested the hypothesis that the combined use of a low dose of prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate could improve its subtherapeutic effects.

METHODS

Trauma (blunt liver injury and bilateral femur fractures) was induced in 48 anesthetized male pigs after 30 min of rivaroxaban infusion (1 mg/kg). Animals in the first part of the study received prothrombin complex concentrate (12.5, 25, and 50 U/kg). In the second part, animals were treated with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid or plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate. The primary endpoint was total blood loss postinjury. The secondary endpoints (panel of coagulation parameters and thrombin generation) were monitored for 240 min posttrauma or until death.

RESULTS

The first part of the study showed that blood loss was significantly lower in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,541 ± 269 ml) and 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,464 ± 108 ml) compared with control (3,313 ± 634 ml), and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (2,671 ± 334 ml, all P < 0.0001). In the second part of the study, blood loss was significantly less in the 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate (1,836 ± 556 ml, P < 0.001) compared with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid (2,910 ± 856 ml), and there were no early deaths in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate groups. Histopathologic analyses postmortem showed no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Prothrombin complex concentrate effectively reduced blood loss, restored hemostasis, and balanced thrombin generation. A multimodal hemostatic approach using tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen concentrate enhanced the effect of low doses of prothrombin complex concentrate, potentially reducing the prothrombin complex concentrate doses required for effective bleeding control.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Evaluation of combined idarucizumab and prothrombin complex concentrate treatment for bleeding related to dabigatran in a lethal porcine model of double trauma

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab (IDA) is approved for emergency reversal of dabigatran; prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are recommended in the absence of specific antidote. The combined effects of IDA and PCC in trauma-related bleeding are unknown. The efficacy and safety of combined IDA + PCC were assessed in a lethal porcine model of double trauma under dabigatran anticoagulation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Male pigs (n = 28) received oral dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days; a non-dabigatran control group (n = 7) received placebo. On Day 4, dabigatran-treated animals were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo + placebo (dabigatran-treated control), IDA + PCC (60 mg/kg + 50 IU/kg), PCC + IDA, or IDA + IDA. Trauma was induced at t = 0 (bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury) and t = 60 minutes (second blunt liver injury). Study treatment was administered 15 minutes after each trauma. Animals were monitored for 5 hours or until death.

RESULTS

Total blood loss in IDA + PCC, PCC + IDA, and IDA + IDA was 1673 ± 370, 1981 ± 361, and 1417 ± 135 mL, respectively, with 100% survival at 5 hours. Blood loss in dabigatran-treated controls was 4427 ± 162 mL with 100% mortality. With IDA + IDA, plasma coagulation parameters and thrombin generation were similar to non-dabigatran control group levels after the second dose and remained stable over time. In the IDA + PCC and PCC + IDA groups, thrombin generation and d-dimer levels after the second dose were higher than with IDA + IDA. No thromboembolic complications were found.

CONCLUSION

IDA and PCC are effective in treating trauma-related bleeding with dabigatran anticoagulation. IDA is preferable for emergency reversal of dabigatran, but PCC may be valuable when the anticoagulant is unknown.

The impact of prothrombin complex concentrates when treating DOAC-associated bleeding: a review

Background

Bleeding complications are a risk associated with all anticoagulants. Currently, the treatment options for the management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding are limited. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have been proposed as a potential therapeutic option, and evidence regarding their use is increasing.

Review

Many studies supporting PCC have used preclinical models and healthy volunteers; however, more recently, observational studies have further improved insight into current DOAC reversal strategies. Multiple clinical practice guidelines now specifically suggest use of PCCs for this indication. Specific reversal agents for Factor Xa inhibitors may become available in the near future, but data on their efficacy are still emerging.

Conclusions

Ultimately, a multimodal approach may be the optimal strategy to restore haemostasis in patients presenting with DOAC-associated coagulopathy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-018-0215-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Therapy with activated prothrombin complex concentrate is effective in reducing dabigatran-associated blood loss in a porcine polytrauma model

Clinical use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is increasingly well established. However, specific agents for reversal of these drugs are not currently available. It was to objective of this study to investigate the impact of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in a randomised, controlled, porcine trauma model. Twenty-one pigs received oral and intravenous dabigatran, resulting in supratherapeutic plasma concentrations. Twelve minutes after injury (standardised bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury), animals (n=7/group) received 25 or 50 U/kg aPCC (aPCC25 and aPCC50) or placebo (control) and were followed for 5 hours. The primary endpoint was total volume of blood loss (BL). Haemodynamic and coagulation variables (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time, diluted thrombin time, thrombin–antithrombin complexes, thromboelastometry, thrombin generation and D-dimers) were measured. Twelve minutes post-injury, BL was similar between groups. Compared with control (total BL: 3807 ± 570 ml) and aPCC25 (3690 ± 454 ml; p=0.77 vs control), a significant reduction in total BL (1639 ± 276 ml; p< 0.0001) and improved survival (p< 0.05) was observed with aPCC50. Dabigatran’s anticoagulant effects were effectively treated in the aPCC50 group, as measured by several parameters including EXTEM clotting time (CT) and PT. In contrast, with aPCC25, laboratory values were initially corrected but subsequently deteriorated due to ongoing blood loss. Thromboembolic or bleeding effects were not detected. In conclusion, blood loss following trauma in dabigatran-anticoagulated pigs was successfully reduced by 50 U/kg aPCC. Optimal methodology for measuring amelioration of dabigatran anticoagulation by aPCC is yet to be determined.

Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation ex vivo: Porcine study comparing prothrombin complex concentrates and idarucizumab

Urgent surgery or life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. This study assessed the ability of three- and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and idarucizumab (specific antidote for dabigatran) to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in a porcine model of trauma. Twelve animals were given dabigatran etexilate (DE) orally and dabigatran intravenously, before infliction of trauma. Six animals received tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen concentrate 12 minutes post-injury. Six PCCs (each 30 and 60 U/kg) and idarucizumab (30 and 60 mg/kg) were added to blood samples ex vivo. Coagulation was assessed by several coagulation assays. All coagulation parameters were altered after dabigatran infusion (plasma level: 442 ± 138 ng/ml). Both threeand four-factor PCCs mostly or completely reversed the effects of dabigatran on thromboelastometry variables and PT but not on aPTT. Idarucizumab neutralised plasma concentrations of dabigatran, and reversed the effects of the drug on coagulation variables. Thrombin generation showed dose-dependent over-correction following the addition of PCC, implying that elevated levels of thrombin are required to overcome dabigatran-induced coagulopathy. In contrast, treatment with idarucizumab returned thrombin generation to baseline levels. Following trauma, therapy with tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen improved correction of coagulation parameters by PCC, and thromboelastometry parameters by idarucizumab. All investigated PCCs improved dabigatran- and trauma-induced coagulopathy to a similar degree. In conclusion, this study shows that three- and four-factor PCCs are similarly effective for dabigatran reversal. Idarucizumab also reversed the effects of dabigatran and, unlike PCCs, was not associated with over-correction of thrombin generation.

Note: This study was performed at the RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.

Reversing Dabigatran Anticoagulation with Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Idarucizumab as Part of Multimodal Hemostatic Intervention in an Animal Model of Polytrauma

BACKGROUND

Although idarucizumab is the preferred treatment for urgent dabigatran reversal, it is not always available. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may be an alternative and, with bleeding in trauma, additional hemostatic therapy may be required. The authors investigated multimodal treatment in a preclinical polytrauma model.

METHODS

Dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg twice daily) was given orally to 45 male pigs for 3 days. On day 4, animals received a dabigatran infusion before blunt liver injury and bilateral femur fractures. After injury, animals were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive placebo (control), tranexamic acid (TXA; 20 mg/kg) plus human fibrinogen concentrate (FCH; 80 mg/kg) (TXA-FCH group), PCC (25 U/kg or 50 U/kg) plus TXA plus FCH (PCC25 and PCC50 groups), or 60 mg/kg idarucizumab (IDA) plus TXA plus FCH (IDA group). Animals were monitored for 240 min after trauma, or until death.

RESULTS

The degree of injury was similar in all animals before intervention. Control and TXA-FCH animals had the highest total postinjury blood loss (3,652 ± 601 and 3,497 ± 418 ml) and 100% mortality (mean survival time 96 and 109 min). Blood loss was significantly lower in the PCC50 (1,367 ± 273 ml) and IDA (986 ± 144 ml) groups, with 100% survival. Thrombin-antithrombin levels and thrombin generation were significantly elevated in the PCC50 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab may be considered the optimal treatment for emergency reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation. However, this study suggests that PCC may be similarly effective as idarucizumab and could therefore be valuable when idarucizumab is unavailable. (Anesthesiology 2017; 127:852-61).

The Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Animal Models

Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors, have been approved as alternatives to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. As with any anticoagulant, DOAC use carries a risk of bleeding. In patients with major bleeding or needing urgent surgery, reversal of DOAC anticoagulation may be required, presenting a clinical challenge. The optimal strategy for DOAC reversal is being refined, and may include use of hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs; a source of concentrated clotting factors), or DOAC-specific antidotes (which bind their target DOAC to abrogate its activity). Though promising, most specific antidotes are still in development.Preclinical animal research is the key to establishing the efficacy and safety of potential reversal agents. Here, we summarize published preclinical animal studies on reversal of DOAC anticoagulation. These studies (n = 26) were identified via a PubMed search, and used rodent, rabbit, pig, and non-human primate models. The larger of these animals have the advantages of similar blood volume/hemodynamics to humans, and can be used to model polytrauma. We find that in addition to varied species being used, there is variability in the models and assays used between studies; we suggest that blood loss (bleeding volume) is the most clinically relevant measure of DOAC anticoagulation-related bleeding and its reversal.The studies covered indicate that both PCCs and specific reversal agents have the potential to be used as part of a clinical strategy for DOAC reversal. For the future, we advocate the development and use of standardized, clinically, and pharmacologically relevant animal models to study novel DOAC reversal strategies.

Coagulation Management in Jersey Calves: An ex vivo Study

OBJECTIVE

Jersey calves are frequently used as an experimental animal model for in vivo testing of cardiac assist devices or orthopedic implants. In this ex vivo study, we analyzed the coagulation system of the Jersey calves and the potential of human-based coagulation management to circumvent perioperative bleeding complications during surgery. Experimental Procedure: Blood from 7 Jersey calves was subjected to standard laboratory tests and thromboelastometry analysis. An ex vivo model of dilutional coagulopathy was used to study the effects of fibrinogen or prothrombin complex concentrate supplementation. Fibrinolysis was induced with tissue plasminogen activator to identify potential therapeutic strategies involving tranexamic acid or aprotinin. Furthermore, anticoagulation strategies were evaluated by incubating the blood samples with dabigatran or rivaroxaban.

RESULTS

Baseline values for thromboelastometry and standard laboratory parameters, including prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, antithrombin III, and D-dimers, were established. Fifty percent diluted blood showed a statistically significant impairment of hemostasis. The parameters significantly improved after the administration of fibrinogen or prothrombin complex concentrate. Tranexamic acid and aprotinin ameliorated tissue plasminogen activator-induced fibrinolysis. Both dabigatran and rivaroxaban significantly prolonged the coagulation parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In this ex vivo study, coagulation factors, factor concentrate, antifibrinolytic reagents, and anticoagulants regularly used in the clinic positively impacted coagulation parameters in Jersey calf blood.

Efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrates for the emergency reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation

Dabigatran is effective in decreasing the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, like all anticoagulants, it is associated with a risk of bleeding. In cases of trauma or emergency surgery, emergency reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation may be required. A specific reversal agent for dabigatran, idarucizumab, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Alternative reversal agents are available, such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and activated PCCs (aPCCs). In this review we evaluate the role of PCCs and aPCCs in the reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation and consider which tests are appropriate for monitoring coagulation in this setting. Pre-clinical studies, small clinical studies and case reports indicate that PCCs and aPCCs may be able to reverse dabigatran-induced anticoagulation in a dose-dependent manner. However, dosing based on coagulation parameters can be difficult because available assays may not provide adequate sensitivity and specificity for measuring anticoagulation induced by dabigatran or the countering effects of PCCs/aPCCs. In addition, PCCs or aPCCs can potentially provoke thromboembolic complications. Despite these limitations and the fact that PCCs and aPCCs are not yet licensed for dabigatran reversal, their use appears to be warranted in patients with life-threatening haemorrhage if idarucizumab is not available.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Is Effective in Treating the Anticoagulant Effects of Dabigatran in a Porcine Polytrauma Model

Background

In the event of trauma, emergency reversal of anticoagulation therapy may be required. However, no specific reversal agents are routinely available for the direct oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran. The authors investigated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for treating dabigatran-induced anticoagulation in a porcine polytrauma model.

Methods

Dabigatran etexilate was given orally for 3 days and intravenously on day 4 to 32 pigs. Animals were randomized 1:1:1:1 to PCC (25, 50, or 100 U/kg) or saline. Study medication was administered 12 min after bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury. The primary endpoint was blood loss at 300 min.

Results

The mean plasma concentration of dabigatran was 487 ± 161 ng/ml after intravenous administration. Blood loss was 3,855 ± 258 ml in controls and 3,588 ± 241 ml in the PCC25 group. In the PCC50 and PCC100 groups, blood loss was significantly lower: 1,749 ± 47 ml and 1,692 ± 97 ml, respectively. PCC50 and PCC100 effectively reduced dabigatran’s effects on coagulation parameters, whereas control and (to a lesser extent) PCC25 animals developed severe coagulopathy. Sustained increases in endogenous thrombin potential occurred with PCC50 and PCC100.

Conclusion

Four-factor PCC (50 or 100 U/kg) is effective in reducing blood loss in dabigatran-anticoagulated pigs, but higher doses may induce a procoagulant state.

Perioperatively acquired disorders of coagulation

Purpose of review

To provide an overview of acquired coagulopathies that can occur in various perioperative clinical settings. Also described are coagulation disturbances linked to antithrombotic medications and currently available strategies to reverse their antithrombotic effects in situations of severe hemorrhage.

Recent findings

Recent studies highlight the link between low fibrinogen and decreased fibrin polymerization in the development of acquired coagulopathy. Particularly, fibrin(ogen) deficits are observable after cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery, on arrival at the emergency room in trauma patients, and with ongoing bleeding after child birth. Regarding antithrombotic therapy, although new oral anticoagulants offer the possibility of efficacy and relative safety compared with vitamin K antagonists, reversal of their anticoagulant effect with nonspecific agents, including prothrombin complex concentrate, has provided conflicting results. Specific antidotes, currently being developed, are not yet licensed for clinical use, but initial results are promising.

Summary

Targeted hemostatic therapy aims to correct coagulopathies in specific clinical settings, and reduce the need for allogeneic transfusions, thus preventing massive transfusion and its deleterious outcomes. Although there are specific guidelines for reversing anticoagulation in patients treated with antiplatelet agents or warfarin, there is currently little evidence to advocate comprehensive recommendations to treat drug-induced coagulopathy associated with new oral anticoagulants.

Effective Reversal of Edoxaban-associated Bleeding with Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in a Rabbit Model of Acute Hemorrhage

Background:

Edoxaban is an oral, selective direct factor Xa inhibitor approved in Japan for venous thromboembolism prevention after orthopedic surgery. Data are lacking regarding reversal strategies for edoxaban; this study assessed whether four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex®/Kcentra®; CSL Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany) can effectively reverse its effects on hemostasis using a previously described rabbit model.

Methods:

The study comprised assessments of thrombin generation in vitro, pharmacokinetic parameters, and edoxaban reversal in vivo. In a blinded in vivo stage, a standardized kidney incision was performed in animals (n = 11 per group) randomized to receive vehicle + saline, edoxaban (1,200 μg/kg) + saline, or edoxaban (1,200 μg/kg) + four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (50 IU/kg). Animals were monitored for treatment impact on hemostasis and coagulation parameters. Data are median (range). Statistical tests were adjusted for multiple testing.

Results:

Edoxaban administration increased blood loss (30 [2 to 44] ml) and time to hemostasis (23 [8.5 to 30.0] min) compared with the control group (3 [1 to 8] ml and 3 [2.0 to 5.0] min, respectively). Biomarkers of coagulation (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, whole blood clotting time) and thrombin generation parameters (e.g., peak thrombin, endogenous thrombin potential, lag time) were also affected by edoxaban. Administration of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate significantly reduced time to hemostasis (to 8 [6.5 to 14.0] min, observed P &lt; 0.0001) and total blood loss (to 9 [4 to 22] ml, observed P = 0.0050) compared with the edoxaban + saline group. Of the biomarkers tested, prothrombin time, whole blood clotting time, and endogenous thrombin potential correlated best with clinical parameters.

Conclusion:

In a rabbit model of hemostasis, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate administration significantly decreased edoxaban-associated hemorrhage.