Validation of the LEFt score, a newly proposed diagnostic tool for deep vein thrombosis in pregnant women

Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism

Straightforward, accurate diagnostic management in patients presenting with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) is essential, since starting anticoagulant treatment may give important adverse effects of bleeding, while false exclusion of the disease may lead to recurrent VTE, with associated morbidity and mortality. In the past three decades, considerable improvement in the diagnostic management of PE has been made. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has largely replaced conventional pulmonary angiography and ventilation-perfusion lung scanning as the imaging methods of choice. Several diagnostic algorithms, all able to minimize the need for radiological imaging have been developed and validated. Lastly, within the diagnostic algorithms, varying D-dimer cut-off levels have successfully been introduced to further downsize the need for radiological imaging.

VTE risk assessment, prevention and diagnosis in pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still reported as the leading cause of direct maternal death in pregnancy in serial international reports in developed countries. VTE risk is higher during pregnancy but is further increased by additional well-characterized risk factors. International guidelines recommend that formal VTE risk assessment should be conducted at least in early pregnancy, at delivery and when risk factors change. High quality data supporting optimal VTE prevention strategies are lacking, outside the setting of prevention of VTE recurrence. Moreover, recent high-quality studies have provided much-needed data on diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy. In this review, we summarize knowledge gaps and recently published data in the prevention and diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy. Moreover, we describe ongoing high-quality randomised trials and prospective clinical management studies in this area. High quality clinical studies and trials in pregnancy can be done and must be prioritised, through international network efforts and national funding advocacy. Ultimately, translation of study results to impact upon guidelines and policy will deliver better care to and will protect the lives and health of pregnant people and those contemplating pregnancy throughout the world.

Prevention, diagnosis, and management of PE and DVT in pregnant women

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the impact of VTE on pregnant and postpartum people and on society, guidelines addressing prevention, diagnosis, and management of VTE in pregnant and postpartum people frequently are based on recommendations from expert opinion and are extrapolated from data in nonpregnant populations. Pregnant individuals are frequently excluded from clinical trials, which is a barrier to providing safe, effective care. Anchoring to a case discussion, this review provides an update on recently published and ongoing randomized clinical trials (RCTs), prospective clinical management studies, and other research in this area. It highlights, in particular, the results of the Highlow RCT, which addresses optimal prevention of recurrence during pregnancy in people with prior VTE. Finally, we raise awareness of the impact of national and international clinical trial networks on the conduct of RCTs in pregnancy. We conclude, based on these data, that academic VTE clinical trials in pregnant women can and must be done.

Excluding pregnancy-associated deep vein thrombosis with whole-leg ultrasound

Background

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common in pregnancy, yet data are limited on the best diagnostic strategies in pregnant patients suspected of DVT.

Objectives

We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of symptomatic DVT in the 90 days after a negative whole-leg compression ultrasound (CUS) in pregnant women presenting with DVT symptoms.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled pregnant patients suspected of DVT between 2011 and 2019 who were referred to the vascular imaging laboratory at a tertiary care center and had anticoagulation held after a negative whole-leg CUS. Primary outcome was objectively confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism or death due to venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Results

Whole-leg CUS yielded normal results in 186 patients (97.9%) and identified DVT in 4 (2.1%). The mean age was 30 and 164 were White. Among the 186 patients with a negative, initial whole-leg CUS who did not receive anticoagulation, there were 2 DVT events identified over the 90-day follow-up period, for an overall rate of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.2-3.4%). The study was terminated before full planned accrual for administrative reasons.

Conclusion

The rate of symptomatic DVT is low in pregnant patients who have a single, negative whole-leg CUS and did not receive anticoagulation. Adequately powered studies should prospectively assess whole-leg CUS in a larger population alone and in combination with pre-test probability scores and/or D-dimer to determine its role in the evaluation of suspected DVT in pregnancy.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Emergency Department: Results of an Italian Nominal Group Technique Study

Early diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a main issue in the Emergency setting. With the aim of assisting clinicians in the diagnosis and the subsequent management of DVT in the Emergency Departments, a Nominal Group Technique (NGT) study was conducted. A panel of 5 Italian experts developed 21 consensus statements based on available evidence and their clinical experience. The agreed consensus statements may assist clinicians in applying the results of clinical studies and clinical experience to routine care settings, providing guidance on all aspects of the risk assessment, prophylaxis, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of DVT in the EDs.

Second consensus document on diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: updated document elaborated by the ESC Working Group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and the ESC Working Group on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function

This consensus document is proposed to clinicians to provide the whole spectrum of deep vein thrombosis management as an update to the 2017 consensus document. New data guiding clinicians in indicating extended anticoagulation, management of patients with cancer, and prevention and management of post-thrombotic syndrome are presented. More data on benefit and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants are highlighted, along with the arrival of new antidotes for severe bleeding management.

Current opinion and emerging trends on the treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolic disease: a review

Pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of international guidance on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment, practice differs between countries and clinical institutions. The evidence base in this area is limited due to the vulnerable population who are affected, with the majority of guidelines deriving their recommendations from experience in surgical and medical venous thromboembolic disease. This review includes best evidence in PA-VTE management, highlighting specific literature which supports current diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies. Additionally, we hope to demonstrate emerging trends in the field through discussion of ongoing trials designed to progress towards evidence-based practice in the context of PA-VTE.

Current Challenges in Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism

In patients with suspected venous thromboembolism, the goal is to accurately and rapidly identify those with and without thrombosis. Failure to diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE) can lead to fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and unnecessary anticoagulation can cause avoidable bleeding. The adoption of a structured approach to VTE diagnosis, that includes clinical prediction rules, D-dimer testing and non-invasive imaging modalities, has enabled rapid, cost-effective and accurate VTE diagnosis, but problems still persist. First, with increased reliance on imaging and widespread use of sensitive multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanners, there is a potential for overdiagnosis of VTE. Second, the optimal strategy for diagnosing recurrent leg deep venous thrombosis remains unclear as is that for venous thrombosis at unusual sites. Third, the conventional diagnostic approach is inefficient in that it is unable to exclude VTE in high-risk patients. In this review, we outline pragmatic approaches for the clinician faced with difficult VTE diagnostic cases. In addition to discussing the principles of the current diagnostic framework, we explore the diagnostic approach to recurrent VTE, isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pregnancy associated VTE, subsegmental PE, and VTE diagnosis in complex medical patients (including those with impaired renal function).

Ability of a single negative ultrasound to rule out deep vein thrombosis in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) for suspected lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in nonpregnant patients has been well validated. However, in pregnant women with suspected DVT and an initial negative US, serial US is generally recommended. We aimed to determine the ability of single negative US to exclude DVT in symptomatic pregnant women.

METHODS

Two authors independently reviewed the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception until February 2019. We assessed the risk of bias using the CLARITY group tool for prognostic studies and performed a random effects meta-analysis to report the pooled false negative rate of a single leg ultrasound.

RESULTS

Eight studies (seven prospective and one retrospective) were included. An overlap among study populations was identified in four of the manuscripts. Two authors performed data re-extraction from these hard copy research charts. Risk of bias was low for the included populations and method of measurement, and low or high for completeness of follow up. A total of 635 pregnant patients with symptoms of DVT had an initial negative US examination. Of those, six were diagnosed with DVT during repeat serial testing (0.94%) and three developed DVT or PE during 3-month follow-up after serial ultrasonography (0.47%). The pooled false-negative rate of a single ultrasound was 1.27% (95% confidence interval, 0.42-2.56), I2  = 27%.

CONCLUSION

The false-negative rate is low with a single US for suspected DVT in pregnancy. Our results will help inform shared decision-making around planning repeat ultrasound scans in these patients.

A systematic review of clinical prediction scores for deep vein thrombosis

Objective Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis remains a challenging problem. Various clinical prediction rules have been developed in order to improve diagnosis and decision making in relation to deep vein thrombosis. The purpose of this review is to summarise the available clinical scores and describe their applicability and limitations. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance using the keywords: clinical score, clinical prediction rule, risk assessment, clinical probability, pretest probability, diagnostic score and medical Subject Heading terms: 'Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis' OR 'Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis'. Both development and validation studies were eligible for inclusion. Results The search strategy returned a total of 2036 articles, of which 102 articles met a priori criteria for inclusion. Eight different diagnostic scores were identified. The development of these scores differs in respect of the population included (hospital inpatients, hospital outpatients or primary care patients), the exclusion criteria, the inclusion of distal deep vein thrombosis and the use of D-dimer. The reliability and applicability of the scores in the context of specific subgroups (inpatients, cancer patients, elderly patients and those with recurrent deep vein thrombosis) remains controversial. Conclusion Detailed knowledge of the development of the various clinical prediction scores for deep vein thrombosis is essential in understanding the power, generalisability and limitations of these clinical tools.