Bivalirudin as compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: A meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials

The FAST-STEMI Network in Biella From 2013 to 2019: Impact of the Delocalization of the Hospital Facilities on Ischemia Time and In-hospital Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The optimization of the strategies for myocardial revascularization has improved the outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In Piedmont, the FAST-STEMI regional network was created for improving the management and transportation of ST-segment elevation (STEMI) patients to primary percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, reducing the time to reperfusion. Within this network, the Hospital of Biella was delocalized in December 2014 to a new suburban structure designed for an easier access, which might have shortened the duration of patients' transportation and ischemia, with potential positive prognostic effects. The aim of the present study was to define the impact of the decentralization of the hospital structure on the time to reperfusion and in-hospital outcomes among STEMI patients admitted to the Hospital of Biella.

METHODS

We included STEMI patients admitted to our urban hospital between 2013 and 2019 and included in the FAST-STEMI database. The primary endpoint was the duration of ischemia, defined as pain to balloon (PTB). The primary outcome endpoint (PE) was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 276 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 2016 and 2019 in the new hospital facility, which were compared with 170 patients treated between 2013 and June 2014 in the prior structure. Patients' characteristics included a mean age of 67.5 ± 12.5 years, 72.1% males and 18.7% patients with diabetes. In the new facility, the median PTB was 188 minutes [interquartile range: 125-340 min], reduced as compared with the period 2013-2014 [215 (128.5-352 min), P = 0.002]. The median in-hospital stay was also shorter (P = 0.004), whereas a nonsignificant improvement was noted for ejection fraction (EF) at discharge (P = 0.14). A linear relationship was demonstrated between PTB and the EF (r = -0.183, P = 0.003) in patients treated between 2016 and 2019 while not affecting the length of hospitalization or in-hospital outcomes. In fact, in-hospital death occurred in 36 patients, 8% in the new structure versus 7.7% in 2013-2014 [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 1.20 (0.59-2.42), P = 0.62]. The independent predictors of mortality were patients' age and EF at discharge (age ≥ 75 y: adjusted HR [95% CI] = 6.75 [1.51-30.1], P = 0.01; EF: adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.91 [0.88-0.95], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that, among the STEMI patients treated in our center, the delocalization of the hospital facilities and the optimization of the FAST-STEMI network reduced the duration of ischemia, with positive effects on left ventricular function at discharge. However, this did not translate into a significant benefit in survival, which was instead conditioned by the aging of the population.

Impact of the Polymorphism rs5751876 of the Purinergic Receptor ADORA2A on Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aim: Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI), a severe complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) procedures, has a negative prognostic effect, both at short and long-term follow-up. So far, adenosine's role in preventing PMI has shown contrasting results. A genetic variant of ADORA2A receptor, 1976 C > T, has been suggested as a potential determinant of the interindividual response to adenosine, thus conditioning its potential benefits on PMI. In our study, we investigated whether the ADORA2A 1976 C > T polymorphism is associated with PMI occurrence in patients undergoing coronary stenting.

Methods: The study included consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità,” Novara, Italy, between January 2010 and January 2016. Their genetic status was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism technique. Myonecrosis biomarkers were measured at intervals from 6 to 48 hours. PMI was defined as CKMB increased 3 times over the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), or 50% of pre-PCI value; periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as troponin I increased 3 times over the ULN or by 50% of the baseline value.

Results: We included 1,104 patients undergoing PCI, 863 (78.2%) of whom carried the ADORA2A T-allele. No difference was found for the main demographic, clinical features, or biochemistry parameters. However, C-carriers had lower statin therapy use (p = 0.008) and lower HDL-cholesterol levels (p = 0.01). Homozygous C/C patients had more frequent multivessel disease (p = 0.03), longer lesions (p = 0.01) and Type C lesions (p = 0.01), thus requiring more complex procedures. After correction for baseline confounding factors at multivariate analysis, there was no difference in myocardial necrosis according to the ADORA2A genotype (p = 0.40). In contrast, PMI tended to increase in the homozygous C/C population (p = 0.06), but this trend was attenuated at multivariate analysis after correction for baseline confounding factors (C/C: OR[95%CI]= 1.52 [0.88–2.6], p = 0.14).

Conclusions: Our study showed that the polymorphism rs5751876 of the ADORA2A receptor is associated with a higher prevalence of complex coronary lesions and multivessel disease. However, it does not significantly influence the occurrence of periprocedural MI or myonecrosis.

Percutaneous Versus Surgical Revascularization for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Large-Scale Meta-Analysis in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

The best treatment options for left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are still debated. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for LM or MVD. Primary end point was overall mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, or stroke. A total of 8 randomized trials were included, involving 8694 patients, 50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). At a mean follow-up of 39.7 months, mortality was 8.2% with no difference for PCI versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 [0.90-1.55]; P = .24, P for heterogeneity [ Phet] = .01). However, CABG was slightly favored for MVD (OR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.12-2.13]; P = .008, Phet = .14 for PCI) whereas noninferior for LM disease (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.60-1.29]; P = .50, Phet = .10, P interaction = .03). A similar benefit with CABG was also observed in terms of repeated coronary revascularization, whereas PCI significantly reduced stroke. This meta-analysis shows that surgical coronary revascularization still offers advantages in survival and recurrent ischemic events compared to PCI using drug-eluting stents (DES) in MVD although burdened by an increased risk of stroke. In LM disease, CABG did not provide outcome benefits but was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared to PCI. Additional randomized trials are certainly needed with new-generation DES.

Impact of Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Immature Platelet Count and Platelet Reactivity

The immature platelet count (IPC) is a potential marker of platelet reactivity. We assessed the relationship between IPC during chronic dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the response to antiplatelet drugs (acetylsalycilic acid + clopidogrel/ticagrelor). We included 286 patients: 167 (58.4%) patients received ticagrelor and 119 (41.6%) received clopidogrel. At a median follow-up of 46.5 days, the variation in IPC displayed an absolute median (interquartile range [IQR]) of −11.9 × 103/µL (−182.7 to 160.8), corresponding to a median percentage change in IPC ([%ΔIPC] IQR) of −0.3% (−21.9% to 35.5%), with an increase in IPC levels in those on ticagrelor and a decrease in IPC levels in those on clopidogrel. We observed an inverse association of lower platelet reactivity at different tests and a higher increase in IPC ( r = −0.14, P = .04 for arachidonic acid test; r = −0.12, P = .05 for collagen test; and r = −0.13, P = .02 for adenosine diphosphate test [ADP]). The rate of poor effectiveness of ADP antagonists was the only independent predictor of a ΔIPC above the third tertile (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.32-0.99]; P = .048). We showed that in patients treated with chronic DAPT, an increase in IPC is significantly related to lower levels of platelet reactivity.

Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Contrasting data have been reported on bivalirudin as an anticoagulation strategy during percutaneous coronary interventions, offering theoretical benefits on bleeding complications but raising concerns on a potential increase in the risk of stent thrombosis. We performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions for acute coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Literature archives and main scientific sessions were scanned. The primary efficacy endpoint was 30-day overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis and major bleeding. A prespecified analysis was conducted according to clinical presentation.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized trials were included, involving 32 746 patients (52.5% randomized to bivalirudin). Death occurred in 1.8% of the patients, with no differences between bivalirudin and heparin (odds ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.08; P = .28; P for heterogeneity = .41). Similar results were obtained for patients with non-ST-segment elevation and in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A significantly higher rate of stent thrombosis was observed with bivalirudin (odds ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.83; P = .008; P for heterogeneity = .09). Bivalirudin was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of major bleeding (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.75; P < .00001; P for heterogeneity < .0001), which, however, was related to the differential use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (r = -0.02 [-0.033 to -0.0032]; P = .02) and did not translate into survival benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin is not associated with a reduction in mortality compared with heparin but does increase stent thrombosis. The reduction in bleeding complications observed with bivalirudin does not translate into survival benefits but is rather influenced by a differential use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

An updated comprehensive meta-analysis of bivalirudin vs heparin use in primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Despite several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, the ideal anticoagulant for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We performed an updated meta-analysis including recently reported randomized clinical trials that compare bivalirudin and heparin with or without provisional administration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) for primary PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Scientific databases and Web sites were searched for randomized clinical trials. Data from 6 trials involving 14,095 patients were included. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. Moderator analyses examined the impact of routine use of GPI, radial access, and P2Y12 inhibitors on safety outcomes. At 30 days, patients receiving bivalirudin had rates of major adverse cardiac events similar to those receiving heparin with or without provisional GPI (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19, P = .800), myocardial infarction (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.94-2.11, P = .089), target vessel revascularization (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-2.04, P = .122), and net adverse clinical events (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.01, P = .069). However, bivalirudin use decreased the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99, P = .041) and cardiac mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91, P = .009) at 30 days, There were higher rates of acute stent thrombosis (RR 3.31, 95% CI 1.79-6.10, P < .001) in patients receiving bivalirudin. Bivalirudin use also decreased the risk of major bleeding at 30 days by 37% (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, P = .012), but bleeding risk varied depending on routine GPI use with heparin (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.81, P = .009) vs bailout (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42-1.25, P = .252), predominantly radial access (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.15, P = .114) vs non-radial access (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99, P = .049), and second-generation P2Y12 inhibitor use with bivalirudin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40-1.24, P = .226) vs clopidogrel use (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.85, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

In primary PCI, relative to heparin, bivalirudin reduces the risk for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and major bleeding but yields similar rates of major adverse cardiac event and net adverse clinical event at 30 days. However, the benefit of a reduction in bleeding with bivalirudin appears to be modulated by the concurrent administration of second-generation P2Y12 inhibitors with bivalirudin, using radial access, and avoiding routine GPI use with heparin.