Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries

D-dimer diagnostics: can I use any D-dimer assay? Bridging the knowledge-to-action gap

A State of the Art lecture titled "D-dimer Diagnostics: Can I use any D-dimer assay? Bridging the Knowledge-to-Action gap" was presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in 2023, included in the session on the clinical impact of variability in commonly used coagulation assays. Here, we review the role of D-dimer, primarily in the outpatient diagnosis of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) when combined with clinical decision rules. We focus on the recent large management trials that have studied adjustments of VTE exclusion thresholds for D-dimer based on either prior clinical probability of VTE or patient age, and the resultant benefit of reduced imaging for VTE and improved diagnostic efficiency. In this context, we report on the significant variability between D-dimer results and the multiple D-dimer assays in use worldwide using data from international external quality assurance programs. This variability is particularly high at typical VTE exclusion thresholds. We discuss the potential clinical impact of D-dimer assay substitution on accuracy of diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with VTE. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress and outline future priorities urgently needed to harmonize D-dimer results and reporting that will require international collaboration among multiple stakeholders with an overall goal to close this knowledge-to-action gap.

Trimester-specific reference intervals of hemostasis biomarkers for healthy pregnancy

Physiological changes in hemostasis during pregnancy have been reported by several authors. This study aimed at establishing reference intervals for the hemostasis biomarkers thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), α2-plasmininhibitor-plasmin complex (PIC), thrombomodulin (TM) and tissue plasminogen activator-inhibitor complex (tPAI-C), in healthy pregnancies. After excluding outliers, a total of 496 healthy pregnant women (128 first-trimester, 142 second-trimester, 107 third-trimester and 119 pre-labor) and 103 healthy nonpregnant women were enrolled from Shenzhen Bao'an Women's and Children's Hospital. Hemostasis biomarkers, TAT, PIC, TM and tPAI-C, were measured by using a quantitative chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay performed on HISCL automated analysers. The median and reference intervals (the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) were calculated to establish trimester-specific reference intervals for healthy pregnant women. The reference intervals for TAT, PIC, TM and tPAI-C in the first trimester were 0.7-7.6 1 µg/L, 0.2-0.9 mg/L, 2.8-11.0 TU/ml, and 1.2-6.5 1 µg/L, respectively. The reference intervals in the second trimester were 1.7-12.0 1 µg/L, 0.2-1.0 mg/L, 3.7-11.6 TU/ml, and 2.8-8.8 1 µg/L, respectively. The reference intervals in the third trimester were 2.7-16.1 1 µg/L, 0.1-1.4 mg/L, 2.9-12.9 TU/ml, and 1.9-8.0 1 µg/L, respectively. At pre-labor, the reference intervals were 4.8-32.9 1 µg/L, 0.2-1.9 mg/L, 4.2-12.6 TU/ml, and 2.8-15.4 1 µg/L, respectively. Gestational reference intervals for TAT, PIC, TM and tPAI-C in healthy pregnancies are provided, but only for TAT with increasing concentrations throughout pregnancy, the reference intervals for non-pregnant were not applicable.

Evaluation of the diagnostic management of deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional study

Background

Venous thromboembolism is an entity that encompasses both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. Although protocols for the diagnosis of these diseases are well defined, there is evidence of inappropriate use of diagnostic resources.

Objectives

To define the epidemiological profiles of patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis, to determine rates of inappropriate ordering of D-dimer assays and color venous Doppler echocardiography of the lower limbs, and to identify whether these requests followed the recommendations contained in the 2015 Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study that retrospectively evaluated 168 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis for whom D-dimer assays were requested. The most common risk factors were measured and the pretest probability was calculated with the Wells score. The epidemiological profile of these patients and the rates of inappropriate D-dimer testing were assessed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The D-dimer requests were inadequate in 55 (32.7%) patients. Venous color Doppler ultrasound was used to examine the lower limbs of 14 (8.3%) of the patients with a low probability according to the Wells score and a negative D-dimer result. No additional diagnostic methods were used in 19 (11.3%) of those with a low probability according to the Wells score and a high D-dimer result. There was unnecessary use of CDUS in 35 (20.8%) cases. The overall rate of inappropriate workup was 53.5%.

Conclusions

Differences were found between clinical practice and the recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, with inappropriate use of diagnostic tests.

Evaluation of the diagnostic management of deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism is an entity that encompasses both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. Although protocols for the diagnosis of these diseases are well defined, there is evidence of inappropriate use of diagnostic resources. Objectives To define the epidemiological profiles of patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis, to determine rates of inappropriate ordering of D-dimer assays and color venous Doppler echocardiography of the lower limbs, and to identify whether these requests followed the recommendations contained in the 2015 Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional observational study that retrospectively evaluated 168 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis for whom D-dimer assays were requested. The most common risk factors were measured and the pretest probability was calculated with the Wells score. The epidemiological profile of these patients and the rates of inappropriate D-dimer testing were assessed using descriptive statistics. Results The D-dimer requests were inadequate in 55 (32.7%) patients. Venous color Doppler ultrasound was used to examine the lower limbs of 14 (8.3%) of the patients with a low probability according to the Wells score and a negative D-dimer result. No additional diagnostic methods were used in 19 (11.3%) of those with a low probability according to the Wells score and a high D-dimer result. There was unnecessary use of CDUS in 35 (20.8%) cases. The overall rate of inappropriate workup was 53.5%. Conclusions Differences were found between clinical practice and the recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, with inappropriate use of diagnostic tests.

Safety of a strategy combining D-dimer testing and whole-leg ultrasonography to rule out deep vein thrombosis

Guidelines for the diagnostic workup of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) recommend assessing the clinical pretest probability before proceeding to D-dimer testing and/or compression ultrasonography (CUS) if the patient has high pretest probability or positive D-dimer. Referring only patients with positive D-dimer for whole-leg CUS irrespective of pretest probability may simplify the workup of DVT. In this prospective management outcome study, we assessed the safety of such a strategy. We included consecutive outpatients referred to the Emergency Department at Østfold Hospital, Norway, with suspected DVT between February 2015 and November 2018. STA-Liatest D-Di Plus D-dimer was analyzed for all patients, and only patients with levels ≥0.5 µg/mL were referred for CUS. All patients with negative D-dimer or negative CUS were followed for 3 months to assess the venous thromboembolic rate. One thousand three hundred ninety-seven patients were included. Median age was 64 years (interquartile range, 52-73 years), and 770 patients (55%) were female. D-dimer was negative in 415 patients (29.7%) and positive in 982 patients (70.3%). DVT was diagnosed in 277 patients (19.8%). Six patients in whom DVT was ruled out at baseline were diagnosed with DVT within 3 months of follow-up for a thromboembolic rate of 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.2). A simple diagnostic approach with initial stand-alone D-dimer followed by a single whole-leg CUS in patients with positive D-dimer safely ruled out DVT. We consider this strategy to be a valuable alternative to the conventional workup of DVT in outpatients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02486445.

Order Indication Solicitation to Assess Clinical Laboratory Test Utilization: D-Dimer Order Patterns as an Illustrative Case

Background:

A common challenge in the development of laboratory clinical decision support (CDS) and laboratory utilization management (UM) initiatives stems from the fact that many laboratory tests have multiple potential indications, limiting the ability to develop context-specific alerts. As a potential solution, we designed a CDS alert that asks the ordering clinician to provide the indication for testing, using D-dimer as an exemplar. Using data collected over a nearly 3-year period, we sought to determine whether the indication capture was a useful feature within the CDS alert and whether it provided actionable intelligence to guide the development of an UM strategy.

Methods:

We extracted results and ordering data for D-dimer testing performed in our laboratory over a 35-month period. We analyzed order patterns by clinical indication, hospital service, and length of hospitalization.

Results:

Our final data set included 13,971 result-order combinations and indeed provided actionable intelligence regarding test utilization patterns. For example, pulmonary embolism was the most common emergency department indication (86%), while disseminated intravascular coagulation was the most common inpatient indication (56%). D-dimer positivity rates increased with the duration of hospitalization and our data suggested limited utility for ordering this test in the setting of suspected venous thromboembolic disease in admitted patients. In addition, we found that D-dimer was ordered for unexpected indications including the assessment of stroke, dissection, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Conclusions:

Indication capture within a CDS alert and correlation with result data can provide insight into order patterns which can be used to develop future CDS strategies to guide appropriate test use by clinical indication.

Inappropriate use of D-dimer and impact on the test characteristics for deep vein thrombosis exclusion

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of the inappropriate use of D-dimer testing for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) exclusion, and to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer testing compared between testing in appropriate and inappropriate conditions. A retrospective chart review of patients with D-dimer requests at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand during January-September 2017 was performed. Data relating to D-dimer requests, Wells score, imaging investigations, and coexisting conditions that cause elevated D-dimer without correlation to DVT were analyzed. From 2196 cases, there were 300 D-dimer requests for DVT diagnosis. Of those, 5 (1.7%) and 158 (53.6%) requests were considered to be absolutely inappropriate D-dimer test requests due to the absence of pre-test Wells score evaluation and testing in DVT-likely patients, respectively. One-hundred and forty-eight (49.3%) requests were considered to be the relatively inappropriate D-dimer test requests due to testing in patients with coexisting conditions that included malignancies, sepsis, surgery, trauma, arterial thrombosis, and pregnancy. Three patients had more than one of these conditions. Comparatively higher negative predictive values (NPVs) of D-dimer assay for DVT exclusion were observed when used in DVT-unlikely (100% versus 80%), and in patients without coexisting conditions (100% versus 66.7%). The present study revealed the rate of inappropriate D-dimer testing for DVT exclusion to be high and this may lead to missed DVT diagnosis, overuse of imaging study, and unnecessary cost of D-dimer testing. Appropriate patient selection before test request can improve the NPV of D-dimer for DVT exclusion.

D-dimer: Preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical variables, and clinical applications

D-dimer is a soluble fibrin degradation product deriving from the plasmin-mediated degradation of cross-linked fibrin. D-dimer can hence be considered a biomarker of activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and it is routinely used for ruling out venous thromboembolism (VTE). D-dimer is increasingly used to assess the risk of VTE recurrence and to help define the optimal duration of anticoagulation treatment in patients with VTE, for diagnosing disseminated intravascular coagulation, and for screening medical patients at increased risk of VTE. This review is aimed at (1) revising the definition of D-dimer; (2) discussing preanalytical variables affecting the measurement of D-dimer; (3) reviewing and comparing assay performance and some postanalytical variables (e.g. different units and age-adjusted cutoffs); and (4) discussing the use of D-dimer measurement across different clinical settings.

Managing inappropriate utilization of laboratory resources

Background The inappropriate use of laboratory resources, due to excessive number of tests not really necessary for patient care or by failure to order the appropriate diagnostic test, may lead to wrong, missed or delayed diagnosis, thus potentially jeopardizing patient safety. It is estimated that 5-95% of tests are currently used inappropriately, depending on the appropriateness criteria, thus significantly contributing to the potential of generating medical errors, the third leading cause of death in the US. Content In this review, we discuss the reasons as well as the medical and financial consequences of inappropriate utilization of laboratory tests. We then provide demand management (DM) tools as a means for overcoming this issue and also discuss their benefits, challenges, limitations and requirements for successful implementation. Summary and outlook When based on current evidence, adapted to local conditions and developed in close collaboration with clinicians, DM is a reasonable strategy for progressing toward better management of over- and underuse of laboratory resources.

Highly Elevated Quantitative D-Dimer Assay Values Increase the Likelihood of Venous Thromboembolism

Objectives  In patients with suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE), the D-dimer assay is commonly utilized as part of the workup. The assay is primarily used to determine whether to proceed with radiographic imaging. We compared D-dimer levels in patients suspected of having VTE. We hypothesized that higher D-dimer values predict a higher likelihood of subsequent VTE diagnosis.

Methods  We conducted a secondary analysis of a multinational, prospective observational study of low- to intermediate-risk adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspicion of VTE. Demographic and clinical data were collected in a structured manner. Advanced imaging including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography, and ventilation/perfusion scanning was obtained at the discretion of the treating physicians. Imaging was evaluated by board-certified radiologists in real time. D-dimer values' bins were evaluated using a logistic regression model.

Results  We evaluated 1,752 patients for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with 191 (10.4%) DVT positive. We evaluated 1,834 patients for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), with 108 (5.9%) PE positive. Higher D-dimer values in both groups were associated with higher likelihood of subsequent VTE diagnosis, with D-dimer values > 3,999 ng/mL in both groups having the highest incidence of VTE. More than 50% of those patients were VTE positive.

Conclusions  Increasing D-dimer values predict increased likelihood of being found VTE positive in this patient population. Among those in the highest D-dimer category, > 3,999 ng/mL, over half of patients were VTE positive. Further research could determine additional nuance in D-dimer as a tool to work up suspected VTE.

Decision-Making with D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

The measurement of D-dimer can provide useful information to aid in the diagnosis of patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. D-dimer measurement in conjunction with adequate estimation of pretest probability can facilitate the safe discharge of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and limit unnecessary investigation or anticoagulation. We review clinical decision-making strategies in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and propose means to minimize diagnostic error that might arise from knowledge of the D-dimer result prior to clinical assessment.

An overview of EFLM harmonization activities in Europe

The European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has initiated many harmonization activities in all phases of the examination process. The EFLM is dealing with both the scientific and the educational aspects of harmonization, with the intention of disseminating best practice in laboratory medicine throughout Europe. Priorities have been given (1) to establish a standard for conducting and assessing biological variation studies and to construct an evidence based EFLM webpage on biological variation data, (2) to harmonize preanalytical procedures by producing European guidelines, (3) to improve test ordering and interpretation, (4) to produce other common European guidelines for laboratory medicine and play an active part in development of clinical guidelines, (5) to establish a common basis for communicating laboratory results to patients, (6) to harmonize units of measurement throughout Europe, (7) to harmonize preanalytical procedures in molecular diagnostics and (8) to harmonize and optimize test evaluation procedures. The EFLM is also now launching the 5th version of the European Syllabus to help the education of European Specialists in Laboratory Medicine (EuSpLM), which is being supported by the development of e-learning courses. A register of EuSpLM is already established for members of National Societies in EU countries, and a similar register will be established for specialists in non-EU countries.

Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off leads to more efficient diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a comparison of four assays

Essentials Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs decrease the false positives in the elderly. Four D-dimer assays were compared in venous thromboembolism outpatients in an emergency ward. Age-adjusted cut-off resulted in improved specificity with maintained sensitivity for all assays. There was a substantial decrease in false positive results, especially in the older population.

SUMMARY

Background The study compares different D-dimer assays and age-adjusted cut-offs in outpatients with suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The plasma concentration of this sensitive biomarker is increased by activated coagulation, but also by several conditions that are linked to an increased risk of VTE. One such condition is old age, which poses a common clinical problem where many prefer not to analyze D-dimer in elderly patients. Age-adjusted cut-offs have been validated for both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, aiming to increase specificity without notably decreasing sensitivity. Objectives We evaluated four common D-dimer assays in parallel, with and without applying age-adjusted cut offs for VTE. Patients/methods The prospective single-center study was conducted in 940 outpatients attending the emergency department with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism or DVT. Four automated D-dimer assays were compared (Siemens INNOVANCE® , Roche Tina-quant, Medirox MRX and STA® -Liatest® D-Di PLUS). Results All assays performed with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) > 0.9 and maintained their sensitivities after implementation of age-adjusted cut-offs. Specificities increased by 6-7% and number needed to test decreased by < 0.3. The rate of false positive results decreased by 6% overall and by 10-20% for patients ≥ 70. Conclusions Age-adjusted cut-offs resulted in maintained high sensitivity and a modest improvement in specificity and number needed to test for all evaluated D-dimer assays. There was a significant reduction in false positive results, which reflects avoidable unnecessary imaging without any compromise of clinical safety. This suggests a potential to benefit the management of VTE in elderly patients, both clinically and economically.

An overview of the European Organization for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)

The European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) was founded in 1996 and currently has members from 29 European countries and 6 countries from outside Europe. EQALM provides a forum for co-operation and exchange of knowledge on quality-related matters in laboratory medicine, especially with regard to external quality assessment (EQA) programs in Europe. In addition, EQALM represent the EQA providers in laboratory medicine at European level vis-ŕ-vis political, professional, scientific and other bodies, including patients’ organisations. To this end EQALM promotes activities such as organizing meetings with scientific and practical themes for members and other interested parties, issuing scientific publications, developing EQA projects and representing laboratory medicine EQA activities within other organisations and networks. EQALM is active in scientific and educational activity in different fields such as survey frequency, haematology, haemostasis, microbiology, nomenclature, virtual microscopy, traceability, accreditation, and quality assurance of the total testing process. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the EQALM organisation.

New biomarkers and imaging approaches for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Symptoms suggestive of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are extremely common in clinical practice, but unfortunately nonspecific. In both ambulatory and inpatient settings, clinicians are often tasked with evaluating these concerns. Here, we review the most recent advances in biomarkers and imaging to diagnose lower extremity DVT.

RECENT FINDINGS

The modified Wells score remains the most supported clinical decision rule for risk stratifying patients. In uncomplicated patients, the D-dimer can be utilized with risk stratification to reasonably exclude lower extremity DVT in some patients. Although numerous biomarkers have been explored, soluble P-selectin has the most promise as a novel marker for DVT. Imaging will be required for many patients and ultrasound is the primary modality. Nuclear medicine techniques are under development, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance venography are reasonable alternatives in select patients.

SUMMARY

D-dimer is the only clinically applied biomarker for DVT diagnosis, with soluble P-selectin a promising novel biomarker. Recent studies have identified several other potential biomarkers. Ultrasound remains the imaging modality of choice, but CT, MRI, or nuclear medicine tests can be considered in select scenarios.

Critical laboratory values in hemostasis: toward consensus

The term "critical values" can be defined to entail laboratory test results that significantly lie outside the normal (reference) range and necessitate immediate reporting to safeguard patient health, as well as those displaying a highly and clinically significant variation compared to previous data. The identification and effective communication of "highly pathological" values has engaged the minds of many clinicians, health care and laboratory professionals for decades, since these activities are vital to good laboratory practice. This is especially true in hemostasis, where a timely and efficient communication of critical values strongly impacts patient management. Due to the heterogeneity of available data, this paper is hence aimed to analyze the state of the art and provide an expert opinion about the parameters, measurement units and alert limits pertaining to critical values in hemostasis, thus providing a basic document for future consultation that assists laboratory professionals and clinicians alike. KEY MESSAGES Critical values are laboratory test results significantly lying outside the normal (reference) range and necessitating immediate reporting to safeguard patient health. A broad heterogeneity exists about critical values in hemostasis worldwide. We provide here an expert opinion about the parameters, measurement units and alert limits pertaining to critical values in hemostasis.

Troponin I and D-Dimer for Discriminating Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism from Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) is a life-threatening condition, often manifesting with chest pain, dyspnea, and increased cardiac biomarkers including cardiac troponin I (CTI) and D-dimer. Therefore, APTE is often misdiagnosed with classical non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), resulting in unnecessary coronary interventions and a delay of therapy.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to distinguish APTE from NSTEMI based on CTI and D-dimer levels.

METHODS

Complete clinical and laboratory data sets from APTE patients (n = 123) were compared with matched NSTEMI patients (n = 123) who presented with chest pain. The APTE diagnosis was confirmed by chest tomography, angiography, or radionuclide ventilation-perfusion scan, while NSTEMI was established by clinical symptoms, cardiac biomarkers, and coronary angiography. Clinical characteristics, CTI (initial and peak), and D-dimer levels at presentation were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics were not different between APTE and NSTEMI patients. However, significantly lower initial CTI (0.2 ± 0.5 vs. 4.4 ± 9.5 ng/ml) and peak CTI (0.7 ± 2.7 vs. 17.1 ± 20.4 ng/ml), but higher initial D-dimer (9.8 ± 9.4 vs. 1.6 ± 3.6 ng/ml), distinguished APTE from NSTEMI. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values for initial CTI, peak CTI, and D-dimer were 0.25, 0.98, and 3.18 ng/ml, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with APTE exhibited lower initial and peak CTI but higher D-dimer levels than NSTEMI patients. Assessing cardiac biomarkers is useful for differentiating APTE from NSTEMI. Further large randomized biomarker studies are urgently needed to facilitate a better APTE diagnosis since clinical characteristics are not particularly helpful.