A safe strategy to rule out pulmonary embolism: The combination of the Wells score and D-dimer test: One prospective study

Relationship between serum uric acid levels and pulmonary embolism: an age-based stratified analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between uric acid and pulmonary embolism(PE) remains controversial, and there has been limited investigation into how uric acid influences pulmonary embolism across different age groups. Our study aimed to elucidate the relationship between uric acid levels and pulmonary embolism, considering variations across age groups.

METHODS

A total of 368 patients who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography from July 2018 to May 2022 were included in the analysis. Subsequently, the cohort was stratified by age, with separate univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses conducted for the elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) and non-elderly (aged < 60 years), respectively.

RESULTS

The study revealed that patients with PE exhibited higher uric acid levels compared to those without (325.11 ± 137.02 vs. 298.26 ± 110.54 (umol/l), p = 0.039). This disparity persisted even after adjusting for multiple confounders (OR = 1.002, 95% CI 1.000-1.005, p = 0.042). Additionally, a notable age difference was observed between PE and non-PE patients (65.7 ± 16.12 vs. 61.42 ± 15.03 (umol/l), p = 0.009). Subsequently, upon age stratification, significant differences (p < 0.05) in serum uric acid were noted between PE and non-PE patients in both elderly and non-elderly populations. However, elevated uric acid levels were independently associated with PE only in the elderly following adjustment for multiple confounders (OR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

High uric acid levels are an independent risk factor for pulmonary embolism in the elderly (≥ 60 years).

Low D-dimer in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure: Screening for large vessel diseases in patients with chest symptoms

Background

Distinguishing between large-vessel diseases such as acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and non-large-vessel diseases, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), and neurogenic diseases, in patients presenting with chest symptoms remains a challenge, which can result in a significant number of misdiagnoses. Simultaneously distinguishing both AAS and PE is essential because large-vessel diseases require angio-computed tomography (CT) during initial presentation whereas, non-large-vessel diseases do not. This study aimed to determine the optimal method for differentiating between large-vessel and non-large-vessel diseases using D-dimer, troponin I, and pretest probability scores.

Methods

From the 11683 patients who presented with chest symptoms including chest pain, discomfort, or dyspnea, this retrospective observational study included 1817 patients who had complete data for essential biomarkers; 105 with AAS, 139 with PE, 1093 with ACS, 451 with HF, and 83 with neurogenic diseases.

Results

D-dimer, D-dimer/troponin I ratio (DT ratio), and troponin I results distinguished the 2 groups: D-dimer (>2.38 μg/mL), AUC 0.935; DT ratio, AUC 0.827; and troponin I, AUC 0.653. For predicting AAS, the performances of D-dimer level and aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) were AUCs of 0.915 (p < 0.0001) and 0.67 (p = 0.0004), respectively; for predicting PE, the AUCs of D-dimer level and modified Wells score were 0.95 (p = 0.0001) and 0.857 (p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

The D-dimer levels proved to be a crucial discriminator for identifying AAS and PE, even when compared with the ADD-RS and modified Wells scores. Moderately elevated D-dimer levels suggest the need to consider AAS and PE diagnoses via angio-CT for patients with chest symptoms.

A retrospective study of the clinical characteristics of 9 children with pulmonary embolism associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment of children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) who also present with pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined the demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging characteristics, therapy, and prognosis of nine cases of children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) complicated by pulmonary embolism (PE). The study focused on patients admitted to the respiratory department of Tianjin Children's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2021.

RESULTS

The age range of the patients was 3 to 8 years old, with a median age of 7.5 years. The median number of days from pulmonary infection to the diagnosis of embolism was 14 days. All patients had refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP). Among them, three patients reported chest pain, one of whom had hemoptysis, while five patients had dyspnea, and six patients experienced radiating pain at unusual sites. Five out of the nine children tested positive for lupus anticoagulant (LA), five for anticardiolipin antibody (ACA), three for anti-2-glycoprotein antibody IgM, four for reduced protein S or protein C activity, and three for elevated coagulation factor VIII. Moreover, six out of the nine children tested positive for antinuclear antibodies. All the children underwent CT pulmonary angiograms, which revealed filling defects. After sequential low-molecular heparin anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, nine children in this study showed a good prognosis, with two of them receiving thrombolytic therapy for combined cardiac embolism. Follow-up at 0.5-9 months showed the gradual resolution of the emboli in all 9 children, with no thrombotic recurrences and normalized autoantibodies and thrombophilia markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of cases involving Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) combined with pulmonary embolism (PE) were diagnosed with refractory MPP (RMPP). However, PE did not always occur in the advanced stages of the disease. Most patients presented with transient autoantibody positivity, abnormal coagulation, and fibrinolytic balance. With timely treatment, the prognosis of MPP combined with PE is generally good. Additionally, rivaroxaban treatment has been shown to be safe and effective.

Diagnostic management of inpatients with a positive D-dimer test: developing a new clinical decision-making rule for pulmonary embolism

Background

A positive D-dimer test has high sensitivity but relatively poor specificity for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, causing difficulty for clinicians unskilled in pulmonary embolism diagnosis in determining whether a patient with a positive D-dimer test needs to undergo computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.

Objectives

We sought to develop a new clinical decision-making rule based on a positive D-dimer result to predict the probability of pulmonary embolism and to guide clinicians in making decisions regarding the need for computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, multicenter study in three hospitals in China. A total of 3014 inpatients with positive D-dimer results were included. In the derivation group, we built a multivariate logistic regression model and deduced a regression equation from which our score was derived. Finally, we validated the score in an independent cohort.

Results

Our score included nine variables (points): chest pain (1.4), chest tightness (2.3), shortness of breath (3.6), hemoptysis (3.4), heart rate ≥100 beats/min (3.6), blood gas analysis (2.9), electrocardiogram presenting a typical S1Q3T3 pattern (4.1), electrocardiogram findings (2.4), and ultrasonic cardiogram findings (3.7). The sensitivities and specificities were 100% and 86.94%, respectively, in the derivation group and 100% and 90.82%, respectively, in the validation group. Additionally, the observed and predicted proportions of patients who underwent computed tomographic pulmonary angiography were 16.82% and 10.76%, respectively, in the derivation group and 18.72% and 11.40%, respectively, in the validation group.

Conclusions

The new score can categorize inpatients with a positive D-dimer test as pulmonary embolism-likely or pulmonary embolism-unlikely, thus reducing unnecessary computed tomographic pulmonary angiography examinations.

The diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition characterised by an obstruction of the pulmonary arterial system by one or more emboli. Advanced clinical practitioners are often faced with ruling out a diagnosis of PE in patients with non-specific symptoms such as dyspnoea and pleuritic chest pain, which can be fairly mild and therefore a diagnosis of PE easily missed. PEs can be a challenge to diagnose, especially in elderly people, since it can be difficult to differentiate their symptoms from other less serious illnesses. Widely used scoring tools are helpful to calculate a patient's probability of having a PE. The Wells score is the most widely used pre-test clinical probability indicator of PE used in the UK, which scores the patient's probability of having a PE based on their risk factors. The D-dimer test is a relatively simple investigation to rule out venous thromboembolism (VTE) but can be raised for various reasons other than PE. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is regarded as the gold standard imaging modality for investigation of acute PE but ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scans can be used as an alternative imaging technique for diagnosing PE in those where CTPA is contraindicated. Thrombolysis is underused in clinical practice due to the fear of adverse bleeding events. Patients without a massive or sub-massive PE are treated with anticoagulant therapy, usually commencing with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin and switching over to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). There has been a shift away from treatment with warfarin for the prevention and treatment of VTE over the past decade.

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Following the evidence from suspicion to certainty

Accurate, timely and cost-effective identification of pulmonary embolism remains a diagnostic challenge. This article reviews the pulmonary embolism diagnostic process with a focus on the best practice advice from the American College of Physicians. Benefits and risks of each diagnostic step are discussed. Emerging diagnostic tools, not included in the algorithm, are briefly reviewed.

Wells and Geneva Scores Are Not Reliable Predictors of Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients are at high risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). Specific PE prediction rules have not been validated in this population. The present study assessed the Wells and revised Geneva scoring systems as predictors of PE in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Pulmonary computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) performed for suspected PE in critically ill adult patients were retrospectively identified. Wells and revised Geneva scores were calculated based on information from medical records. The reliability of both scores as predictors of PE was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of 138 patients, 42 (30.4%) were positive for PE based on pulmonary CTA. Mean Wells score was 4.3 (3.5) in patients with PE versus 2.7 (1.9) in patients without PE (P < .001). Revised Geneva score was 5.8 (3.3) versus 5.1 (2.5) in patients with versus without PE (P = .194). According to the Wells and revised Geneva scores, 56 (40.6%) patients and 49 (35.5%) patients, respectively, were considered as low probability for PE. Of those considered as low risk by the Wells score, 15 (26.8%) had filling defects on CTA, including 2 patients with main pulmonary artery embolism. The area under the ROC curve was 0.634 for the Wells score and 0.546 for the revised Geneva score. Wells score >4 had a sensitivity of 40%, specificity of 87%, positive predictive value of 59%, and negative predictive value of 77% to predict risk of PE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of critically ill patients, Wells and revised Geneva scores were not reliable predictors of PE.