Quantifying neuronal structural changes over time using dynamic morphometrics

Gamma-protocadherins regulate dendrite self-recognition and dynamics to drive self-avoidance

Neurons form cell-type-specific morphologies that are shaped by cell-surface molecules and their cellular events governing dendrite growth. One growth rule is dendrite self-avoidance, whereby dendrites distribute uniformly within a neuron's territory by avoiding sibling branches. In mammalian neurons, dendrite self-avoidance is regulated by a large family of cell-recognition molecules called the clustered protocadherins (cPcdhs). Genetic and molecular studies suggest that the cPcdhs mediate homophilic recognition and repulsion between self-dendrites. However, this model has not been tested through direct investigation of self-avoidance during development. Here, we performed live imaging and four-dimensional (4D) quantifications of dendrite morphogenesis to define the dynamics and cPcdh-dependent mechanisms of self-avoidance. We focused on the mouse retinal starburst amacrine cell (SAC), which requires the gamma-Pcdhs (Pcdhgs) and self/non-self-recognition to establish a stereotypic radial morphology while permitting dendritic interactions with neighboring SACs. Through morphogenesis, SACs extend dendritic protrusions that iteratively fill the growing arbor and contact and retract from nearby self-dendrites. Compared to non-self-contacting protrusions, self-contacting events have longer lifetimes, and a subset persists as loops. In the absence of the Pcdhgs, non-self-contacting dynamics are unaffected but self-contacting retractions are significantly diminished. Self-contacting bridges accumulate, leading to the bundling of dendritic processes and disruption to the arbor shape. By tracking dendrite self-avoidance in real time, our findings establish that the γ-Pcdhs mediate self-recognition and retraction between contacting sibling dendrites. Our results also illustrate how self-avoidance shapes stochastic and space-filling dendritic outgrowth for robust pattern formation in mammalian neurons.

Circuit formation in the adult brain

Neurons in the mammalian central nervous system display an enormous capacity for circuit formation during development but not later in life. In principle, new circuits could be also formed in adult brain, but the absence of the developmental milieu and the presence of growth inhibition and hundreds of working circuits are generally viewed as unsupportive for such a process. Here, we bring together evidence from different areas of neuroscience—such as neurological disorders, adult‐brain neurogenesis, innate behaviours, cell grafting, and in vivo cell reprogramming—which demonstrates robust circuit formation in adult brain. In some cases, adult‐brain rewiring is ongoing and required for certain types of behaviour and memory, while other cases show significant promise for brain repair in disease models. Together, these examples highlight that the adult brain has higher capacity for structural plasticity than previously recognized. Understanding the underlying mechanisms behind this retained plasticity has the potential to advance basic knowledge regarding the molecular organization of synaptic circuits and could herald a new era of neural circuit engineering for therapeutic repair.

The branching code: A model of actin-driven dendrite arborization

The cytoskeleton is crucial for defining neuronal-type-specific dendrite morphologies. To explore how the complex interplay of actin-modulatory proteins (AMPs) can define neuronal types in vivo, we focused on the class III dendritic arborization (c3da) neuron of Drosophila larvae. Using computational modeling, we reveal that the main branches (MBs) of c3da neurons follow general models based on optimal wiring principles, while the actin-enriched short terminal branches (STBs) require an additional growth program. To clarify the cellular mechanisms that define this second step, we thus concentrated on STBs for an in-depth quantitative description of dendrite morphology and dynamics. Applying these methods systematically to mutants of six known and novel AMPs, we revealed the complementary roles of these individual AMPs in defining STB properties. Our data suggest that diverse dendrite arbors result from a combination of optimal-wiring-related growth and individualized growth programs that are neuron-type specific.