A biodegradable rectal balloon implant to protect the rectum during prostate cancer radiotherapy for a patient with active Crohn's disease

Inflammatory bowel disease-associated malignancies and considerations for radiation impacting bowel: a scoping review

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), subdivided into Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is an auto-inflammatory gastrointestinal condition with an established increased risk of certain malignancies. Compared to sporadic cancers in the general population, IBD-associated malignancies present unique challenges to providing quality care. Radiation therapy (RT) targeting IBD-associated malignancies may directly impact inflamed bowel, with special considerations for the risk of toxicities. Historically, patients with IBD have been less likely to receive radiotherapy in proximity to bowel due to a poor understanding of the potential for acute and chronic toxicities and unclear treatment outcomes. We present a scoping review, to more fully assess IBD-associated malignancies and their treatment. As opposed to a systematic review, this approach allows us to analyze the broadest range of literature, including experimental and non-experimental research, and reflect on current guidelines and practices.

Methods

Literature search: a systematic, scoping search of published literature was conducted using applicable PRISMA scoping review (ScR) guidelines. The literature search was conducted on PubMed and was searched systematically by screening all publications from January 1990 to June 2021. Citations from the included articles were also manually searched. Relevant National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were reviewed. Final query was December 2021 in editing. Articles were selected for full text reading if the abstract reported on malignancy in IBD or bowel toxicities.

Results

The pelvic malignancies found in the IBD patient population, including colorectal carcinoma, anal carcinoma, lymphoma, small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), and prostate cancer (PCa) are outlined in this scoping review. Additional cancers that have a contested relationship with IBD, including cervical, bladder, and upper GI cancers, are also explored. This review provides literature guided recommendations on the eligibility of patients with IBD to receive RT, management of IBD during and after treatment, and counseling for radiation-induced toxicities.

Conclusions

After review of the literature, IBD should not be considered an absolute contraindication to radiation therapy, given the lack of evidence for increased toxicities, and the evolution of RT techniques which limit radiation dose to the bowel.

Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK

OBJECTIVES

To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK.

DESIGN

Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire.

SETTING

Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK.

INTERVENTIONS

Rectal hydrogel spacer.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

None reported.

RESULTS

The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK.

Is prostate cancer radiotherapy using implantable rectum spacers safe and effective in inflammatory bowel disease patients?

•

Radiotherapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease remains controversial.

•

A biodegradable balloon is inserted between the prostate and the rectal wall.

•

The balloon pushes the anterior rectal wall outside of the high-dose area.

•

No grade 3 or more rectal toxicities were observed.

Background

Prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT) in patients with (active) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial. We hypothesized that RT in combination with a biodegradable prostate-rectum spacer balloon implantation, might be a safe treatment approach with acceptable toxicities for these high risk for rectal toxicity patients.

Materials and methods

We report on a small prospective mono-centric series of 8 patients with all-risk prostate cancer with the comorbidity of an IBD. Four patients had Crohn’s disease and 4 patients had ulcerative colitis. One out of four had an active status of IBD. All patients were intended to be treated with curative high-dose RT: 5 patients were treated with external beam RT (70 Gray (Gy) in 28 fractions), and 3 patients were treated with ¹²⁵I-implant (145 Gy). Toxicities were scored according to the CTCAE v4.03: acute side effects occur up to 3 months after RT, and late side effects start after 3 months.

Results

Median follow-up was 13 months (range: 3–42 months). Only one acute grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was observed: an increased diarrhea (4–6 above baseline) during RT, which resolved completely 6 weeks after treatment. No late grade 3 or more GI toxicity was reported, and no acute and late grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity events were observed.

Conclusion

Prostate cancer patients with IBD are a challenge to treat with RT. Our results suggest that RT in combination with a balloon implant in selective patients with (active) IBD may be promising, however additional validation is needed.