Acute in vitro effects on embryonic rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cultures by in silico predicted neurotoxic chemicals: Evaluations on cytotoxicity, neurite length, and neurophysiology

IN VIVO NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF IN SILICO PREDICTIONS OF NEUROTOXICITY: CITRONELLAL, 3,4-DICHLORO-1-BUTENE, AND BENZYL BROMOACETATE

Neurotoxicants may be widespread in the environment and can produce serious health impacts in the human population. Screening programs that use in vitro methods have generated data for thousands of chemicals. However, these methods often do not evaluate repeated or prolonged exposures, which are required for many neurotoxic outcomes. Additionally, the data produced by such screening methods may not include mechanisms which play critical biological roles necessary for in vivo neurotoxicity. The Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) in silico model focuses on chemical structure and electrophilic properties which are important to the formation of protein adducts. A group of structurally diverse chemicals have been evaluated with an in silico screening approach incorporating HSAB parameters. However, the predictions from the expanded chemical space have not been evaluated using in vivo methods. Three chemicals predicted to be cumulative toxicants were selected for in vivo neurotoxicological testing. Adult male Long-Evans rats were treated orally with citronellal (CIT), 3,4-dichloro-1-butene (DCB), or benzyl bromoacetate (BBA) for 8 weeks. Behavioral observations were recorded weekly to assess motor function. Peripheral neurophysiological measurements were derived from nerve excitability (NE) tests which involved compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in the tail and foot, and mixed nerve action potentials (MNAPs) in the tail. Compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in the tail were also quantified. Peripheral inputs into the central nervous system were examined using somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortex (SEP_CTX) and cerebellum (SEP_CEREB). CIT or BBA did not result in significant alterations to peripheral nerve or somatosensory function. DCB reduced grip-strength and altered peripheral nerve function. The MNAPs required less current to reach 50% amplitude and had a lower calculated rheobase, suggesting increased excitability. Increased CNAP amplitudes and greater NCV were also observed. Novel changes were found in the SEP_CTX with an abnormal peak forming in the early portion of the waveforms of treated rats, and decreased latencies and increased amplitudes were observed in SEP_CEREB recordings. These data contribute to testing an expanded chemical space from an in silico HSAB model for predicting cumulative neurotoxicity and may assist with prioritizing chemicals to protect human health.

The Future of Neurotoxicology: A Neuroelectrophysiological Viewpoint

Neuroelectrophysiology is an old science, dating to the 18th century when electrical activity in nerves was discovered. Such discoveries have led to a variety of neurophysiological techniques, ranging from basic neuroscience to clinical applications. These clinical applications allow assessment of complex neurological functions such as (but not limited to) sensory perception (vision, hearing, somatosensory function), and muscle function. The ability to use similar techniques in both humans and animal models increases the ability to perform mechanistic research to investigate neurological problems. Good animal to human homology of many neurophysiological systems facilitates interpretation of data to provide cause-effect linkages to epidemiological findings. Mechanistic cellular research to screen for toxicity often includes gaps between cellular and whole animal/person neurophysiological changes, preventing understanding of the complete function of the nervous system. Building Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) will allow us to begin to identify brain regions, timelines, neurotransmitters, etc. that may be Key Events (KE) in the Adverse Outcomes (AO). This requires an integrated strategy, from in vitro to in vivo (and hypothesis generation, testing, revision). Scientists need to determine intermediate levels of nervous system organization that are related to an AO and work both upstream and downstream using mechanistic approaches. Possibly more than any other organ, the brain will require networks of pathways/AOPs to allow sufficient predictive accuracy. Advancements in neurobiological techniques should be incorporated into these AOP-base neurotoxicological assessments, including interactions between many regions of the brain simultaneously. Coupled with advancements in optogenetic manipulation, complex functions of the nervous system (such as acquisition, attention, sensory perception, etc.) can be examined in real time. The integration of neurophysiological changes with changes in gene/protein expression can begin to provide the mechanistic underpinnings for biological changes. Establishment of linkages between changes in cellular physiology and those at the level of the AO will allow construction of biological pathways (AOPs) and allow development of higher throughput assays to test for changes to critical physiological circuits. To allow mechanistic/predictive toxicology of the nervous system to be protective of human populations, neuroelectrophysiology has a critical role in our future.