Air embolism through open hub of external jugular vein intravenous cannula

Retrospective analysis of the feasibility and safety of external jugular vein cannulation in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Establishing intravenous (IV) access is an essential procedure in surgical patients. External jugular vein (EJV) cannulation can be a good alternative for patients forwhom it is difficult to establish peripheral IV access. We aimed to investigate the feasibilityand safety of EJV cannulation in surgical patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of EJV cannulation in patients who underwent anesthesia for surgery at a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2021. We collectedclinical characteristics, including EJV cannulation-related variables, from the anesthetic records. We also investigated the EJV cannulation-related complications, which included anyEJV cannulation-related complications (insertion site swelling, infection, thrombophlebitis,pneumothorax, and arterial cannulation) within 7 days after surgery, from the electronicmedical records during the hospitalization period for surgery.

RESULTS

We analyzed 9,482 cases of 9,062 patients for whom EJV cannulation was performed during anesthesia. The most commonly performed surgery was general surgery(49.6%), followed by urologic surgery (17.5%) and obstetric and gynecologic surgery (15.7%).Unplanned EJV cannulation was performed emergently during surgery for 878 (9.3%) cases.The only EJV cannulation-related complication was swelling at the EJV-cannula insertion site(65 cases, 0.7%). There was only one case of unplanned intensive care unit admission dueto swelling related to EJV cannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed the feasibility and safety of EJV cannulation for surgical patients with difficult IV access or those who need additional large-bore IV access during surgery. EJV cannulation can provide safe and reliable IV access with a low risk of major complications in a surgical patient.

External Jugular Vein Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: An Emergency Nurse's Guide

Insertion of a peripheral intravenous catheter into the external jugular vein is regularly performed in emergency departments to treat patients with difficult intravenous access. Although emergency nurses are experienced in inserting peripheral intravenous catheters, there is an inconsistent practice and a lack of education and training regarding the insertion of catheters in the external jugular vein. This manuscript provides a practical guide for emergency nurses to care for patients who require an external jugular peripheral intravenous catheter. Key information found in this manuscript includes indications for external jugular intravenous access, the nurse's role in performing external jugular peripheral intravenous catheters, and clinical considerations when caring for patients with an external jugular peripheral intravenous catheter.

Acceptability of external jugular venepuncture for patients with liver disease and difficult venous access

BACKGROUND

Difficult venous access (DVA) is common in liver patients requiring blood collection using traditional peripheral approaches. This study aimed to understand the experience of DVA for liver patients and the acceptability of peripheral venepuncture versus external jugular venepuncture (EJV). A secondary aim was to explore the impact of EJV on local resource utilization.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with liver outpatients with DVA (n = 10) requiring venepuncture were firstly themed inductively. We then deductively applied the acceptability framework of Sekhon et al. as a further analytic lens. Audit data from DVA encounters (n = 24) allowed analysis of issues from multiple perspectives. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research reporting checklist guides this report.

RESULTS

Peripheral venepuncture had poor prospective, concurrent, and retrospective acceptability, requiring significant mental and physical preparation. Fear, stigma, pain and distress, poor continuity of care, and poor effectiveness led to service disengagement. While EJV caused initial trepidation, it had high concurrent and retrospective acceptability. The significant improvement in patient experience was corroborated by audit data for both procedure duration (5 versus 15 minutes) and first attempt success (100 versus 28.5%) for EJV versus peripheral venepuncture, respectively. While EJV required a recumbent position, it required less staff.

CONCLUSIONS

EJV is highly acceptable to patients, using less time and staff resources. EJV protocols and staff training should be considered where DVA presentations are common. Individualized care plans and careful care coordination could divert DVA patients needing venepuncture to services that use EJV preferentially. HIGHLIGHTS Peripheral venepuncture results in fear, stigma, pain, & distress for those with DVA. This poor acceptability of traditional venepuncture leads to service disengagement. External jugular venepuncture is highly acceptable & improves resource utilization.