Development of vitreomacular interface abnormality in patients with diabetic macular edema

Association of OCT biomarkers and visual impairment in patients with diabetic macular oedema with vitreomacular adhesion

BACKGROUND

To analyse the distribution of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers in different types of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) associated visual impairment in diabetic macular oedema.

METHODS

A total of 317 eyes of 202 patients were enrolled. Cases were divided into two groups focal VMA and broad VMA and subjects with no VMA were enrolled as controls. A grading platform was used for evaluating the morphology of diabetic macular oedema (DME), using good-quality SD-OCT images. Grading was done for VMA and the biomarkers. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) was also recorded.

RESULTS

The CRT (p = <0.001) and CSFT (p = <0.001) values were statistically significant between the groups. Except for Inner Nuclear Layer Cysts (p = <0.001), absence of Bridging Tissue that is composed of muller cell fibers and bipolar cells (p<0.001), and Hyper Reflective Dots (HRD) in cyst (p = 0.006) there were no significant differences in the distribution of OCT biomarkers among the 3 groups (focal VMA, broad VMA and no VMA). Only Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers (DRIL) (p = 0.044) showed significant association with vision impairment in all the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

The distribution of OCT biomarkers was similar across all eyes of cases and controls. However, they were more likely to be associated with visual impairment in the presence of VMA than no VMA.

Features of pathological changes in the retina and vitreoretinal interface in the macular zone in patients with diabetic macular edema

Background. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the main causes of decreased central vision. Determining the reasons for the refractoriness of DME to treatment is an urgent problem.Aims. Based on the analysis of optical coherence tomography, to study the features of pathological changes in the retina and vitreoretinal interface (VRI) in the macular zone in patients with DME.Materials and methods. We studied 587 patients (587 eyes) with diffuse DME in the setting of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. In addition to the standard ophthalmological examination, everyone underwent optical coherence tomography of the macular zone with an assessment of structural changes in the retina, morphometric parameters, and the state of the VRI.Results. In 351 patients (59.80 %) with DME, pathological variants of the VRI were revealed, in which the best corrected visual acuity was significantly lower, and the morphometric parameters (retinal thickness and macular volume) were signifi cantly higher. Analysis of morphostructural changes in the macular zone revealed that in pathological VRI, neuroepithelial detachment and high edema are more common, and cystic edema is larger in area compared to the group with a normal VRI. With detachment of neuroepithelium against the background of a pathological VRI, the worst morphometric data are determined, with solid exudates in the macula, the worst indices of visual loss are determined.Conclusions. The pathological VRI in patients with diabetic macular edema occurs in more than half of the cases and is characterized by a high incidence of neuroepithelial detachment, high edema, higher morphometric parameters with worse visual acuity. At the same time, the presence of neuroepithelial detachment corresponds to the worst morphometric indicators of the macular zone, and the presence of solid exudates corresponds to a lower maximum corrected visual acuity. Further research is needed to assess the effect of the listed morphostructural and morphometric changes in combination with various pathological variants of VRI on the effectiveness of DME treatment.

NATURAL COURSE OF VITREOMACULAR TRACTION IN EYES WITH DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SPONTANEOUS RELEASE

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the natural course of vitreomacular traction (VMT) in patients with diabetic retinopathy and to evaluate the factors associated with VMT relief.

METHODS

Seventy-four eyes of 65 patients with VMT accompanying diabetic retinopathy were evaluated retrospectively. The presence of intravitreal injection and the presence of panretinal photocoagulation were obtained from the medical records of the patients. Spontaneous release of VMT, the horizontal length of vitreomacular traction, the presence of hyperreflective retinal spots, the presence of the epiretinal membrane, and the grade of VMT were evaluated from the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. Factors associated with the spontaneous release of VMT were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Spontaneous release was observed in 28 eyes (37.8%). The horizontal length of VMT was lower in the release of the VMT group compared with the persistent VMT group (P = 0.03). The persistent VMT group had a higher rate of hyperreflective retinal spots and epiretinal membrane compared with the release of the VMT group (respectively; P = 0.003 and P = 0.031). No statistically significant difference was observed between the release of VMT and persistent VMT groups in terms of intravitreal injection and panretinal photocoagulation treatment (respectively; P = 0.938 and P = 0.36). The absence of hyperreflective retinal spots was the most important prognostic factor for the spontaneous release of VMT (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous release of VMT observed higher rates of patients without hyperreflective retinal spots, epiretinal membrane, and patients with lower horizontal length of VMT.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA).

Methods

The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throughout 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I received IVIs of RBZ and group II underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The main outcome measures were the change in the LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) on optical coherence tomography over 6 months.

Results

At 6 months, mean CDVA improved by 0.22 ± 0.21 in group I patients (p < 0.001), while in group II, it improved only by 0.09 ± 0.22 (p < 0.115). Fifty-five percent of group I and 60% of group II patients had stable CDVA (within 2 lines from baseline) at 6 months. Significant improvement in vision (gain of 2 or more lines) was seen in 45% and 30%, respectively. Worsening of vision (loss of 2 or more lines) was seen only in 2 patients in group II, but none in group I. The mean CSFT improved significantly in both groups (by 162 µ and 216 µ, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean CSFT at 6 months was similar in both groups (354 µ and 311 µ, respectively; p=0.172).

Conclusions

Both treatments resulted in anatomical improvement of DME with concurrent VMIA. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVI group, although this may have been affected by other confounding factors.

The effects of epiretinal membranes on the treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept injection in diabetic macular edema: a real-life study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation on the anatomic and functional results of subjects with diabetic macular edema (DME) who are receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective comparative study includes 29 eyes with DME (Group 1) and 43 eyes with DME and ERM (Group 2). After three consecutive monthly 2.0 mg IAIs, subjects received monthly follow-ups and retreatment was performed if needed. Corrected visual acuity (CVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV) parameters were recorded tri-monthly, and the 36-month follow-up was designated the primary endpoint of the study.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups when comparing the mean ages and male-to-female ratios (p > 0.05, for both). At the baseline, the mean CVA value was significantly worse (p = 0.002), and the mean CMT was significantly lower (p = 0.016) in Group 1, while there was no significant difference in terms of the mean CMV (p = 0.625). The mean number of IAIs was similar at the first (p < 0.102), second (p = 0.363), and third year (p = 0.850) follow-ups. The mean CVA was significantly worse, and CMT was significantly lower in Group 1 at most of the visits in the first half of the follow-up period (p < 0.05, for all), while there was no significant difference in the second half of the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CMV at any visit (p > 0.05, for all).

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar number of IAIs needed, worse baseline clinical parameters are associated with poorer early- or mid-term outcomes. At the long-term follow-up, CVA and CMT became similar in DME independent of ERM.

Revisiting pars plana vitrectomy in the primary treatment of diabetic macular edema in the era of pharmacological treatment

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of moderate visual loss in diabetic patients. The current treatment of choice for center-involved DME is anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Most patients that undergo pharmacological inhibition with anti-VEGF agents need multiple monitoring visits that include optical coherence tomography imaging and multiple injections. Despite this intensive treatment, up to 60% of eyes will have persistent DME after six consecutive monthly injections of an anti-VEGF. Its sustainability over the long term has been questioned. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) by increasing the vitreous cavity oxygenation, relieving vitreomacular traction, and removing cytokines from the vitreous cavity may cause long-term resolution of DME without the aforementioned concerns in selected cases. Eyes with vitreomacular traction clearly benefit from PPV as the primary treatment. The role of PPV for eyes with DME without tractional elements is less clear and needs to be explored further.

Vitreomacular interface abnormalities in patients with diabetic macular oedema and their implications on the response to anti-VEGF therapy

Purpose

To determine whether the presence of vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) modifies the response to ranibizumab.

Methods

Medical records and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans of consecutive patients with centre-involving DMO initiating therapy with ranibizumab between December 2013 and March 2014 at the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust were reviewed. Patients were identified through an electronic database. Demographics; systemic baseline characteristics; history of previous ocular surgery/laser; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and stage of retinopathy at presentation; and BCVA, CRT and presence/absence of fluid at the last follow-up were recorded. OCT scans were reviewed by a masked investigator who graded them for the presence/absence of VMIA at baseline and during follow-up and for the change in the posterior hyaloid face during follow-up. The association between (1) VMIA at baseline and (2) the change in the posterior hyaloid face during the follow-up and functional/anatomical outcomes was evaluated.

Results

One hundred forty-six eyes of 100 patients (mean age 63.5 years) followed for a mean of 9 months (range 2–14 months; only 9/146 dropped to follow-up before month 6) were included. Statistically significant differences were observed at baseline in BCVA (p = 0.007), previous macular laser and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) (p = 0.006) and previous cataract surgery (p = 0.01) between eyes with and without VMIA, with better levels of vision, higher frequency of macular laser and lower frequency of PRP in eyes where no VMIA was present. Multivariable regression analysis did not disclose any statistically significant associations between VMIA at baseline or change in the posterior hyaloid face during the follow-up and functional and anatomical outcomes following treatment.

Conclusion

VMIA are associated with worse presenting vision in patients with DMO; VMIA or change in the posterior hyaloid face during the follow-up did not modify the response to ranibizumab in this study.

The incidence and risk factors for the development of vitreomacular interface abnormality in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF

PurposeTo report the incidence and associated factors for the development of vitreomacular interface abnormality (VMIA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who received intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-VEGF (Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab) treatment.MethodsA retrospective observational study. Patients with DME followed at least 6 months were reviewed. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and final BCVA, CRT in eyes with and without VMIA were compared. Multiple logistic regression was also used to investigate the risk factors of VMIA formation in patients with DME treated by anti-VEGF.ResultsA total of 201 eyes in 142 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. VMIA developed in 44 eyes (21.89%) of patients during a mean follow-up period of 40.84 months. The estimated mean incidence of VMIA formation was 6.43% per year. Poor baseline BCVA was found to be a risk factor for VMIA development (P=0.001, odds ratio=5.299, 95% confidence interval: 1.972 to 14.238). There was no difference between eyes with and without VMIA formation in improving BCVA (P=0.557) and lowering the macular edema (eyes without VMIA formation: -107.72±171.91 μm; eyes with VMIA formation: -155.02±212.27 μm, P=0.133).ConclusionsThis study revealed the incidence of VMIA formation in IVI anti-VEGF treated DME eyes was 6.43%. Poor baseline BCVA was found to be a risk factor for VMIA formation. Both eyes with and without VMIA development had favorable response to anti-VEGF treatment.