Factors influencing the abortion interval of second trimester pregnancy termination using misoprostol

Single versus multiple cervical dilation by osmotic dilator before induction of labor for second-trimester abortion

AIM

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there was a significant prognostic difference between single and multiple cervical dilations when inducing second-trimester abortion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 238 pregnant women who underwent termination of pregnancy at 12-21 weeks of gestation at Osaka University Hospital in Osaka, Japan, between January 2010 and May 2018. Termination of pregnancy was performed by vaginal administration of 1 mg gemeprost every 3 h for up to five doses per day after uterine cervical dilation using lamicel.

RESULTS

The women were categorized into two groups: 191 women had a delivery time of <24 h, whereas 47 had delivery times >24 h. Contrasting the groups, there were significant differences with regard to numbers of primiparas (88 [46.1%] and 32 [68.1%], respectively) and lamicel exchanges ± SD (1.9 ± 0.67 for <24 h and 2.4 ± 0.87 for >24 h, respectively). Additionally, we compared the prognosis of primiparas that received just a single lamicel with that of primiparas that had ≥2 exchanged, but no significant differences were noted in the number of patients with a delivery time of >24 h and the number of used gemeprost.

CONCLUSION

Primipara is a risk factor for delayed delivery time of induced abortion. However, increasing the number of exchanged lamicel did not significantly reduce the delivery time; therefore, it should be performed as minimally as possible.

Prospective Comparative Study of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy

Background

Various medical methods for second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) exist. Misoprostol alone has been used with myriad variations in route and dosage. Comparison between oral and vaginal routes of misoprostol forms the basis of this study.

Methods

This was a prospective comparative study of misoprostol for second-trimester (14-20 weeks) MTP, comparing oral versus vaginal routes. Sixty patients were randomly allotted to two groups; 30 received oral misoprostol 400 µg 4 h up to a maximum of five doses (2000 µg), and 30 received vaginal misoprostol in the same dose and duration. In both groups, oxytocin infusion was started if abortion did not occur. Efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol, induction-abortion interval (AI) and need for surgical intervention were analyzed.

Results

Both groups were well matched in terms of age, parity, previous LSCS, mean gestational age and indication for MTP. Overall mean induction-abortion interval was 19.59 h (21.66 vs. 18.57 h, oral vs. vaginal, respectively), with vaginal group taking lesser time (p 0.09). Sixty percentage in oral group required five doses, while 70% in vaginal group required 3-4 doses of misoprostol (p 0.010). 23.7 versus 6.7% in oral versus vaginal group required check curettage (p 0.038). There were no major complications, and there was only one failure in oral group.

Conclusions

Though both oral and vaginal misoprostol are safe, vaginal route appears to be more efficacious for second-trimester MTP.

The efficiency of the uterocervical angle in the prediction of second-trimester pregnancy terminations in multiparous women

Aim: To show how uterocervical angles are used for the prediction of second-trimester pregnancy terminations in multiparous women. Material and methods: A total of 148 multiparous singleton women in their second trimesters were enrolled in this prospective study. The intracervical Foley catheter was used for the induction of delivery. The cervical length (CL) and the uterocervical angle (UCA) were measured before the beginning of induction. The study population was subdivided into four groups; successful and failed terminations at the end of 24 and 48 h time frames. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was carried out to examine the contribution of UCA and other parameters to the induction-to-delivery time. A survival analysis was conducted to compare two groups defined by the cut-off value. Results: The UCA was broader in the successful termination group compared to the failed termination group in 24 h of induction (112.50° ± 29.00° versus 100.68° ± 27.13°, p = .02). A negative correlation was found between the UCA and the induction-to-delivery time (r = -0.27, p = .0007). A cut-off value of 97.5° was found for the UCA in predicting induction outcomes. During the 24-h period, 63.1% of women with the UCA ≥97.5° terminated successfully while 36.8% of women with the UCA <97.5° terminated successfully (p = .001). The mean induction-to-delivery time was significantly shorter in the UCA ≥97.5° group compared to the UCA <97.5° group (38.2 ± 19.5 h versus 47.8 ± 27.5 h, p = .02). The binary logistic regression analysis showed that the UCA was the only contributor to a successful termination (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1-1.02, p = .02). Conclusion: The UCA is broader in multiparous women who successfully terminated and is linked to a shorter duration of induction. The UCA by itself is the only significant contributor to the outcome of second trimester pregnancy terminations.

The predictive nature of uterocervical angles in the termination of second trimester pregnancy

AIM

To establish how useful and the predictive capacity of uterocervical angles (UCA) in the termination of second trimester pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary center with a total of 120 singleton pregnancies delivered between 14 and 24 gestational weeks. Before the beginning of misoprostol induction, patients were screened for both cervical length (CL) and uterocervical angles (UCA). The UCA is defined as an angle constructed by the measurement of the cervical canal and lower uterine segment. The study population was subdivided into four groups; successful and failed terminations at the end of 24 hours of induction and successful and failed terminations at the end of 48 hours of induction. We decided to further evaluate our study population based on their UCAs, and placed them into four categories; UCA ≥95°, UCA <95°, UCA ≥105°, and UCA <105°.

RESULTS

In the 24-hour time frame group, the mean UCA was 105.50 ± 15.38 degrees in the successful termination group and was 100.22 ± 11.12 degrees in the failed group (p = .001). In the 48-hour time frame group, the mean UCA was 104.19 ± 13.51° in the successful termination group and was 93.52 ± 7.84° in the failed group (p = .007). The mean hour of induction was shortest in the UCA ≥105° group.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the time frames, patients who had successful terminations had a broader angle, less amount of misoprostol use and shorter duration of induction as compared to the failed termination groups. What do the results of this study add? The uterocervical angle has never been measured in second trimester pregnancies to predict the timing of termination. Our study demonstrated the useful application of this ultrasonographic finding in the prediction of successful second trimester terminations.