Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: A case report and literature review

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium concomitant with Lynch syndrome: A case report

BACKGROUND

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is an uncommon type of tumor that can occur in the endometrium. This aggressive cancer requires definitive management. Here, we describe the clinical characteristics and treatment of a postmenopausal woman with large cell NEC of the endometrium.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old Asian female presented with a 1-year history of postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a thickened endometrium (30.2 mm) and a hypervascular tumor. Computed tomography revealed that the tumor had invaded more than half of the myometrium and spread to the pelvic lymph nodes. The tumor marker, carcinoembryonic antigen, was elevated (3.65 ng/mL). Endocervical biopsy revealed high-grade endometrial carcinoma. She underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Pathological examination revealed mixed neuroendocrine and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, pT2N0M0, grade 3, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2. Immunohistochemistry showed moderate estrogen and progesterone receptor expressions (20% and 1%, respectively), focal CD56 expression (NEC marker), positive staining for vimentin, p53 (wild type), and ki67 (90%), and loss of expression of PMS2 (Lynch syndrome marker). The patient received five cycles of cisplatin and etoposide after surgery. No recurrence was noted after 5 mo.

CONCLUSION

We report the characteristics and successful management of a rare case of large-cell endometrial NEC concomitant with Lynch syndrome.

Mixed high-grade serous and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from rectal endometriosis 11 years after hysterectomy

The malignant gastrointestinal endometriosis transformation is represented by endometriosis-associated intestinal tumors. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma are most common among the endometrial cancers of all organs. Only four cases of mixed serous carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma have been reported, and all these cases originated from the uterus. A 59-year-old woman with a month's history of bloody stools was admitted. She was stable until the hematochezia occurred but is 11 years post-hysterectomy. A circumferential type-3 advanced upper rectum tumor was seen on colonoscopy. Adenocarcinoma was revealed from the forceps biopsies of the type-3 tumor component. Computed tomography showed narrowed lumen with a thickened rectum wall, a continuing mass, and a component on the anorectal side. Swollen lymph nodes were observed around the rectum, but no distant metastatic lymph nodes or organs were found. To treat the lesion, rectal surgical resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed. Histological examination revealed combined high-grade serous and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Tumor was contiguous to the endometrium in the sub-serosa. Endometriosis was determined to be the origin of both carcinomas. Therefore, endometriosis-associated intestinal tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis when rectal tumors with cystic structures are found post-hysterectomy.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gynecologic tract: Prevalence, survival outcomes, and associated factors

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical behavior of gynecologic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) via a retrospective analysis of data from 469 patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with gynecologic LCNEC from 1988 to 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). OS and CSS were also evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the effects of different treatment regimens on prognosis were compared according to disease stage.

RESULTS

Cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were observed in 169, 219, and 79 patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients with cervical, ovarian, and endometrial LCNEC were 35.98%, 17.84%, and 23.21%, respectively, and the median duration of overall survival was 26, 11, and 11 months in each group. The 5-year CSS rates for the three groups were 45.23%, 19.23%, and 31.39%, respectively, and the median duration of CSS was 41, 12, and 11 months in each group. Multivariate analysis revealed that American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with cervical LCNEC. Lymph node metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in the ovarian group and for OS in the endometrial group. Lymph node metastasis and surgery were also independent prognostic factors for CSS in the endometrial group.

CONCLUSION

Surgery alone may help to improve overall survival and CSS in patients with early-stage cervical LCNEC. In contrast, surgery+chemotherapy and surgery+radiotherapy may help to improve survival in those with early-stage ovarian and endometrial LCNEC, respectively. Regardless of subtype, comprehensive treatment involving surgery, CTX, and RT should be considered to improve prognosis in patients with advanced-stage gynecologic LCNEC.

Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Endometrium: Management and Outcomes

Objective

To analyze clinical behavior of, optimal treatment regimens for, outcomes, and prognosis of 170 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the endometrium.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients with endometrial NETs diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Clinical features and treatment regimens were analyzed, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared among different stages and treatment regimens. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with endometrial NETs. Finally, prognosis was compared between small- and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC and LCNEC, respectively) of the endometrium.

Results

There were 20, 8, 47, and 95 patients with stage I, II, III, and IV NET, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients in each stage were 59.86%, 42.86%, 32.75%, and 6.04%, respectively. The 5-year CSS survival rates were 59.86%, 50.0%, 38.33%, and 6.39%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and treatment were associated with poor OS, while AJCC stage, nodal metastasis, and treatment were associated with poor CSS. Neither pathological type nor distant metastasis was associated with prognosis. The rate of distant metastasis was significantly higher for LCNEC than for SCNEC, while 5-year OS and CSS rates were significantly lower.

Conclusion

Complete surgical treatment should be selected regardless of staging for patients with endometrial NETs. For early-stage disease, individualized postoperative treatment with single chemotherapy or radiotherapy may improve OS and CSS. For advanced-stage disease, comprehensive postoperative adjuvant therapy may improve OS and CSS.

Pure large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma originating from the endometrium: A case report

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the endometrium is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor that has not been comprehensively characterized. We report a case of pure endometrial LCNEC and review the current literature of similar cases to raise awareness of the histological features, treatment, and prognosis of this tumor.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 73-year-old woman who presented with irregular postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Ultrasonography showed an enlarged uterus and a 5.1 cm × 3.3 cm area of medium and low echogenicity in the uterine cavity. Biopsy by dilatation and curettage suggested poorly differentiated carcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a heterogeneously enhanced uterine tumor with diffuse infiltration of the posterior wall of the uterine myometrium and enlarged pelvic lymph nodes. The patient underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral adnexal resection. Gross observation revealed an ill-defined white solid mass of the posterior wall of the uterus infiltrating into the serosa with multiple solid nodules on the serous surface. Microscopically, the tumor cells showed neuroendocrine morphology (organoid nesting). Immunohistochemistry revealed the tumor cells were diffusely positive for the neuroendocrine markers CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as stage IIIC endometrial LCNEC.

CONCLUSION

Pathologic findings and immunohistochemistry are essential in making a diagnosis of endometrial LCNEC.

The puzzle of gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas: State of the art and future directions

Primary gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas (gNECs) are a heterogeneous spectrum of rare and highly aggressive neoplasms, accounting for about 2% of all gynecologic malignancies, which mostly resemble the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines, their management poses a noteworthy clinical challenge. Currently, cumulative data retrieved from the management of SCLC and from retrospective studies supports a multimodality strategy, based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor and recurrences are extremely frequent. Hence, there is an urgent need for novel treatment options and promising molecular targets. Recently, there has been an increasing interest on the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in the recurrent setting. However, only scant evidence exists and there is still a long road ahead. A solid collaboration between gynecologists and oncologists worldwide is required to improve the treatment of these puzzling tumors.

INSM1 Is Less Sensitive But More Specific Than Synaptophysin in Gynecologic High-grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: An Immunohistochemical Study of 75 Cases With Specificity Test and Literature Review

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a promising diagnostic marker for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs); however, it is controversial whether INSM1 is more sensitive than conventional markers chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Here, we investigated immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 75 gynecologic HGNECs using full tissue sections (30 small-cell carcinomas [SmCCs], 34 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas [LCNECs], and 11 mixed SmCC and LCNEC), with specificity analysis in 422 gynecologic non-neuroendocrine tumors (410 in tissue microarrays and 12 full sections) and comparison with conventional neuroendocrine markers for their sensitivity and specificity. Positive INSM1 staining was seen in 69 (92%) HGNECs, whereas chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 staining was seen in 61 (81%), 72 (96%), and 44 (69%) tumors, respectively (INSM1 vs. chromogranin, P=0.09; INSM1 vs. synaptophysin, P=0.4942; and INSM1 vs. CD56, P<0.001). The mean percentage of INSM1-positive tumor cells was 54% (median: 60%, range: 0% to 100%), similar to chromogranin (58%, P=0.2903) and higher than CD56 (30%, P=0.00001) but significantly lower than synaptophysin (89%, P<0.00001). INSM1 showed no staining difference among SmCCs, LCNECs, and mixed SmCC-LCNECs. Among the 422 non-neuroendocrine tumors, positive staining was seen in 5% tumors for INSM1, 18% for chromogranin, 19% for synaptophysin, and 25% for CD56. Our study indicates that INSM1 is a highly specific marker (95% specificity) for gynecologic HGNECs with high sensitivity (92%), but it is less sensitive than synaptophysin (96% sensitivity). INSM1 is more specific than chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 for gynecologic HGNECs. Our literature review reveals that INSM1 has consistently (the same antibody clone A8 used for all reported studies) shown higher or similar sensitivity to chromogranin (for all 3 chromogranin antibody clones LK2H10, DAK-A3, DAKO polyclonal); however, whether INSM1 is more or less sensitive than synaptophysin or CD56 for HGNECs is highly dependent on the antibody clones used for synaptophysin (clones MRQ-40 and SNP88 showing higher sensitivity than clones 27G12 and DAK-SYNAP) or CD56 (clones CD564, MRQ-42, and MRQ-54 showing higher sensitivity than clones 123C3D5, 1B6, and Leu243).

Dedifferentiated Endometrioid Carcinomas with Neuroendocrine Differentiation: A Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of Three Cases

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation and mismatch repair deficiency.

Patients and Methods

The clinicopathological records and samples of three patients were retrieved from the Pathology Department of Zhejiang University's School of Medicine Women's Hospital.

Results

The tumors comprised one dominant poorly differentiated component (60-90% of the neoplasm volume) and one well-differentiated glandular component. The poorly differentiated component showed solid sheets with organoid growth patterns and insular, trabecular and rosette/pseudorosette patterns. Large polygonal cells, vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm were observed in the poorly differentiated area. All three cases were diffusely positive for p16 and for at least two of three neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin, synaptophysin, neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56)) in >10% of cancer cells. Loss of MMR protein expression was found in two patients: MLH1 and PSM2 in patient 2 and MSH2 and MSH 6 in patient 3. Abnormal P53 and SMARCB1 (INI1) expression was noted in patient 3. All three patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and two received postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The patients survived disease-free for 60, 26 and 15 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation may be associated with mismatch repair deficiency and have an improved prognosis.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: A very rare gynecologic malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, outcome, and treatment of the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the endometrium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic and survival data of 10 patients who underwent surgery for NEC. The patients were collected between 1999 and 2017 from four referral centers in Turkey.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 67 years (range: 34-75 years). The NEC of endometrium consist of 9 cases with small cell carcinoma (SC) NEC (two with mixed histotypes), and one with a large cell (LC) NEC. According to FIGO 2009 criteria, 70 % (7/10) of patients had advanced stage (III and IV) disease. All patients except one underwent surgical staging, eight patients received platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) and of 6 those were additionally treated with radiotherapy (RT). Four patients died of disease ranging from 2 to 10 months and six were alive 12-72 months with no evidence of disease. In addition, 4 SC NEC cases raised in polypoid features had no evidence of disease from 24 to 72 months.

DISCUSSION

NEC of the endometrium is a rare disease with poor prognosis, which frequently diagnosed in advanced stages. The main treatment modality was the administration of platinum-based CTX as an adjuvant to surgery or surgery and RT. Our result suggests that the polypoid feature of the tumor might be one of the best predictors for the prognosis of SC NEC.

Clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: a retrospective analysis of 42 cases from the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup study in Japan

Objective

We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional, collaborative study to accumulate cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium, to clarify its clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors to collate findings to establish future individualized treatment regimens. To our knowledge, this is the largest case study and the first study to statistically analyze the prognosis of this disease.

Methods

At medical institutions participating in the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup, cases diagnosed at a central pathologic review as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium between 1995 and 2014 were enrolled. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features, treatment, prognosis and prognostic factors of this disease.

Results

A total of 65 cases were registered from 18 medical institutions in Japan. Of these, 42 (64.6%) cases were diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium based on the central pathological review and thus included in the study. Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (stage III and IV) and pure type small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma cases had a significantly worse prognosis. Upon multivariate analysis, only histologic subtypes and surgery were significant prognostic factors. Pure type cases had a significantly worse prognosis compared to mixed type cases and complete surgery cases had a significantly better prognosis compared to cases with no or incomplete surgery.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that complete surgery improves the prognosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium. Even among cases with advanced disease stages, if complete surgery is expected to be achieved, clinicians should consider curative surgery to improve the prognosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium.

Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium with serous carcinoma: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Endometrial neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare histological subtype of endometrial cancer, divided into low-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (carcinoid) and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma). It is characterized by high invasiveness and poor prognosis. L/SCNEC is an extremely rare pathological type of endometrial carcinoma, and the number of reports on this condition is few globally.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 54-year-old Chinese female presented with vaginal bleeding.

DIAGNOSES

Outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were performed, and the pathological examination revealed that cervix was invaded by endometrial malignancy. The patient underwent a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was diagnosed with the mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L/SCNEC) of the endometrium combined with serous carcinoma III C2 (FIGO2009).

INTERVENTIONS

Chemotherapy-radiotherapy-chemotherapy "sandwich" treatment was performed as postoperative therapy.

OUTCOMES

After three chemotherapy circles, the patient showed no evidence of further disease progression.

LESSONS

L/SCNEC is a rare and invasive disease. Once diagnosed, comprehensive treatments including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy can prolong the survival of patients and improve the prognosis.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: a report and review of the literature

Large-cell neuroendocrine tumor of the endometrium is a rare tumor type which is difficult to diagnose. Our routine tissue sampling is often non-productive and these tumors can be mistaken for other poorly differentiated carcinomas. Sites of metastatic disease sometimes confuse the identification of the primary organ, and histological diagnosis requires a choice of neuroendocrine biomarkers. In addition, there are no published diagnostic criteria for LCNEC of the endometrium and diagnostic criteria must be translated from the WHO classification of tumors of the lung. Once a diagnosis is reached, there are no large series to direct treatment. Consensus opinion appears to favor surgery for early stage disease followed by chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum-based agents. While there are many hurdles to overcome, the proper diagnosis of LCNEC of the endometrium is of utmost importance in a disease characterized by rapid progression and poor prognosis. We examine a case of large cell neuroendocrine tumor of the endometrium with rapid progression over a period of two months which precluded her planned chemotherapy.

•

There are 20 cases of large cell neuroendocrine tumor of the endometrium reported.

•

It is difficult to make the diagnosis with traditional tissue sampling procedures.

•

The prognosis is poor with disease that may progress rapidly.

•

There may be a role for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy but this is poorly studied.

Primary endometrial large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with melanocytic differentiation

High-grade endometrial carcinomas are aggressive neoplasms of difficult histological classification. Neuroendocrine differentiation in endometrial carcinomas is rare. This is the report of an endometrial large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with foci of melanocytic differentiation in a 75-year-old woman with abnormal post-menopausal uterine bleeding for 2 years. Two initial biopsies were inconclusive. Histopathological examination of the uterus revealed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma associated with endometrioid carcinoma and foci of melanocytic differentiation, pT3a (FIGO IIIA). There were metastases in the rectum serosa and lungs. After 8 months of diagnosis and surgical treatment, the patient is on chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We highlight the morphological characteristics and criteria that allow the definitive anatomopathological diagnosis, including immunohistochemical markers used to identify the cell types present in this unprecedented association.