1
|
Laconi G, Coppens S, Roofthooft E, Van De Velde M. High dose glucocorticoids for treatment of postoperative pain: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2024; 93:111352. [PMID: 38091865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Glucocorticoids as a component of multimodal analgesia have been studied for many years and their post-operative analgesic effects appear to be dose-dependent. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the evidence of peri-operative high dose corticosteroid therapy in comparison to placebo (placebo drug) or control group (no treatment) for improving the quality of post-operative analgesia as indicated by a reduction of 10 mm in 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or reduction of 1 point in a 0-10 point VAS scale, or a reduction of 1 point in an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, or reduction of rescue opioid analgesia, in patients undergoing all types of surgery. DESIGN Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis. SETTING Acute postoperative pain treatment in non-obese adult population. INTERVENTIONS Perioperative administration of high dose of Dexamethasone (≥ 0,2 mg/Kg or ≥ 15 mg), or a corresponding dose of a systemic glucocorticoid. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcomes were postoperative pain measured in 0-100 mm VAS score at 24 h after surgery upon rest and movement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain 0-100 mm VAS score 48 h after surgery, postoperative rescue analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), relevant adverse events. MAIN RESULTS 47 RCT's were included (3943 patients). The Mean Difference (MD) of 100 mm VAS scores for pain at rest 24 h after surgery was -6.18 mm 95% CI [-8.53, -3.83], at motion -8.86 mm 95% CI [-11.82, -5.89]. Opioid analgesic requirements evaluated in Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) was -10.00 mg 95% CI [-13.65, -6.34]. PONV events Odds Ratio of 0.29 95%CI [0.24, 0.36]. Major adverse events OR was 0.88 95% CI [0.65, 1.19]. Minor adverse events OR 1.29 95% CI [0.86, 1.92]. CONCLUSION High doses of glucocorticoids are one of the many possible tools available in multimodal postoperative analgesia, possibly reducing opioids consumption and recurrence of PONV but with no relevant effects in terms of reduction of postoperative VAS score. Available data show a safe therapeutic profile, without increase adverse events. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION CRD42020137119.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Laconi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AOU Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Steve Coppens
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eva Roofthooft
- Department of Anesthesia, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium and Department of Cardiovascular sciences, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Van De Velde
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abebe M, Alemu B, Teku G, Eshetu O, Wale E, Besha A, Kebede MY, Geta L. Effectiveness of Single Intravenous Dexamethasone in Prolongation of Spinal Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Elective Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1361-1368. [PMID: 38596353 PMCID: PMC11003431 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s451595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The analgesic effectiveness of a single perioperative dose of dexamethasone is not clearly defined. The administration of systemic medication like dexamethasone, opioids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has a positive effect on the prolongation of postoperative analgesia after cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. A single-dose administration of dexamethasone with moderate to high dose reduces postoperative pain, reduces opioid consumption, and prolongs spinal anesthesia after cesarean delivery. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of single intravenous dexamethasone in prolongation of spinal anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in elective cesarean section. Methods We conducted a search on PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, Hinari, and review articles on the effectiveness of intravenous dexamethasone for extending spinal anesthesia during elective cesarean sections, until June 2023. The searches were conducted by using keyword (IV dexamethasone OR/AND analgesia OR postoperative pain AND cesarean section OR child birth AND prolongation of spinal anesthesia). The articles included describe the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone for prolongation of spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. Results A total of 25,384 papers were found using different searching methodologies from different electronic databases. The EndNote reference manager was used to remove duplicates, and 438 articles were selected for screening. Of those, 57 were included for critical evaluation, and 49 were removed with justification. The effectiveness of IV dexamethasone on the prolongation of spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean delivery is the subject of eight RCT studies on 628 parturients that are presented in the chosen journal articles from various countries. Conclusion Intravenous dexamethasone administration immediately after clamping of the umbilical cord prolongs the duration of spinal block in patients undergoing cesarean sections and has a significant impact on reduction of postoperative pain severity, opioid consumption, and other pain requirements. When high-dose dexamethasone is administered intravenously, it can overcome complications that may arise after severe pain and increase patient satisfaction by extending the duration of postoperative analgesia and sensory block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minda Abebe
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Belete Alemu
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Gudeta Teku
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Oliyad Eshetu
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Endeshaw Wale
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Aschalew Besha
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Mengistu Yinges Kebede
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Lamesgen Geta
- Department of Anesthesia, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debremarkos University, Debremarkos, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gurmu M, Mulugeta H, Zemedkun A, Girma T, Destaw B, Tadessa M, Adamu Y, Hailu S. Postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous dexamethasone for patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at Dilla University Referral Hospital, Ethiopia, 2023: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:232-239. [PMID: 38222682 PMCID: PMC10783290 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The use of cesarean section (CS) worldwide has increased to unprecedented levels. In Ethiopia, the CS delivery rate is above the rate recommended by the WHO. The postoperative pain experience is moderate to severe in most patients during their postoperative period. The administration of intravenous dexamethasone is thought to have an analgesic effect after surgery even though the analgesic profile of preoperatively administered dexamethasone is less addressed. Objective This study aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic effect of preoperative intravenous dexamethasone for patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at Dilla University Referral Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Methodology A double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was done on 112 patients undergoing elective CS under spinal anesthesia who were allocated randomly into normal saline and dexamethasone groups. Total analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, and postoperative pain score with the numerical rating scale (NRS) were followed for 24 h in both groups. Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to check normality. Independent samples t-test was used for the comparison of means between groups, Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data, and χ 2 test for categorical variables, and P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant with a power of 80%. Result The finding of this study showed that the postoperative pain score of the dexamethasone group was significantly lower than the normal saline group at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h with a statistically significant P-value <0.05. There was also a significant difference in the time to the first rescue analgesic request between the two groups, with the dexamethasone group (median=347.5 min) and the normal saline group (median=230 min) with P=0.001. Conclusion and recommendation The authors conclude that preoperative administration of 8 mg of dexamethasone prolongs the first analgesic request time, decreases postoperative tramadol and diclofenac consumption, and decreases the postoperative pain score. The authors recommend that researchers conduct further RCTs with a different dose of dexamethasone and on a multicenter basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Seyoum Hailu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun L, Guan S, Dou D, Feng Y, Zhang H, An H. Efficacy and safety of different doses of epidural morphine coadministered with low-concentration ropivacaine after cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1126174. [PMID: 37089946 PMCID: PMC10118016 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1126174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The optimal dose of epidural morphine after cesarean section (CS) still remains unknown when combined with low-concentration ropivacaine based on a continuous basal infusion (CBI) mode. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different dose of epidural morphine plus ropivacaine on maternal outcomes.Materials and methods: Data of parturients who received epidural analgesia for CS at a teaching hospital from March 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively collected. Parturients were divided into two groups (RM3 group and RM6 group) according to different medication regimens of morphine. The implementation of epidural analgesia was performed with 3 mg morphine in RM3 group and 6 mg morphine in RM6 group in combination with 0.1% ropivacaine via a CBI pump. The primary outcomes included pain intensity at rest and movement and the incidence of urinary retention and pruritus within postoperative 48 h. The secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus, the rate of rescue analgesia and grading of motor Block.Results: Totally, 531 parturients were eligible for the final analysis, with 428 and 103 parturients in the RM3 group and RM6 group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the visual analogue scores (VAS) at rest and movement within postoperative 48 h between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with the RM6 group, the incidence of urinary retention was lower in the RM3 group within 48 h after CS (4.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.044). No significant difference was found in the incidence and severity of PONV and pruritus, the rate of rescue analgesia and grading of motor block between RM3 and RM6 groups.Conclusion: Epidural 3 mg morphine plus 0.1% ropivacaine in a CBI mode can provide equal efficacy and have lower incidence of urinary retention compared with 6 mg morphine after CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Hong Zhang
- *Correspondence: Hong Zhang, ; Haiyan An,
| | - Haiyan An
- *Correspondence: Hong Zhang, ; Haiyan An,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh NP, Makkar JK, Yadav N, Goudra BG, Singh PM. The analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone for post-caesarean pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:498-510. [PMID: 35255006 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone has not been well defined after caesarean delivery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of peri-operative dexamethasone administration on postoperative pain after caesarean delivery. OBJECTIVES We investigated the impact of perioperative intravenous dexamethasone on postoperative pain after caesarean delivery. The two primary outcomes of interest were early (4 to 6 h) resting pain scores and time to first rescue analgesia. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane central registers of controlled trials were searched to identify RCTs from inception to April 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Prospective RCTs comparing the role of intravenous dexamethasone with non-active control were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included trials comparing various doses of dexamethasone without any control treatment arm, dexamethasone with other active drugs and trials comparing different routes of dexamethasone, for example, wound infiltration. RESULTS Thirteen RCTs constituting of 988 parturients undergoing caesarean delivery were included. Patients receiving dexamethasone had lower pain scores at rest at 4 to 6 h after surgery, mean difference -1.29 [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.85 to -0.73], P < 0.0001, with low quality of evidence (I2 = 94%). Moderate quality of evidence (I2 = 17%) suggested that the time to first rescue analgesia in the dexamethasone group was significantly longer, mean difference 2.64 h (95% CI, 1.85 to 3.42), P < 0.0001. Trial sequential analysis for pain scores suggested the benefit of dexamethasone; however, the requisite information size (RIS) could not be reached, whereas RIS was adequate for time to rescue analgesia. Significant reduction in pain scores at all times and opioid consumption at 24 h with dexamethasone were observed with sparse reporting on adverse effects. CONCLUSION Peri-operative intravenous dexamethasone was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain scores at rest and a longer time to first rescue analgesia, along with a small but statistically significantly reduced opioid consumption after caesarean delivery compared with nonactive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narinder Pal Singh
- From the Department of Anaesthesia, MMIMSR, MM (DU), Mullana-Ambala (NPS, NY), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (JKM), Department of Anaesthesia, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (BGG) and Department of Anaesthesia, Washington University, Saint Louis, Misssouri, USA (PMS)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veef E, Van de Velde M. Post-cesarean section analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2022; 36:83-88. [PMID: 35659962 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, the most performed surgical intervention is cesarean section. Hence, post-cesarean pain is a common problem with significant health and economic impact on the individual patient and society. Adequate treatment of post-cesarean pain is necessary to facilitate enhanced recovery, improve neonatal outcome by improving breastfeeding success and bonding between mother and child, and reduce pain-induced side effects. Therefore, optimal pain relief is important, but in the obstetric population, this is often complex due to the interplay of mother and neonate. To facilitate recovery and temper the side effects of potent analgesic drugs such as opioids, multimodal analgesia is currently advocated, and clear international guidelines and recommendations have recently been described. In the present overview, we will discuss the most recent guidelines and evaluate various analgesic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Veef
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZLeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Van de Velde
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZLeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greisman JD, Olmsted ZT, Crorkin PJ, Dallimore CA, Zhigin V, Shlifer A, Bedi AD, Kim JK, Nelson P, Sy HL, Patel KV, Ellis JA, Boockvar J, Langer DJ, D'Amico RS. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cranial Tumor Resection: A Review. World Neurosurg 2022; 163:104-122.e2. [PMID: 35381381 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols describe a standardized method of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks surrounding elective surgical intervention. A growing body of evidence is being generated as we learn to apply principles of ERAS standardization to neurosurgical patients. First applied in spinal surgery, ERAS protocols have been extended to cranial neuro-oncological procedures. This review synthesizes recent findings to generate evidence-based guidelines to manage neurosurgical oncology patients with standardized systems and assess ability of these systems to coordinate multidisciplinary, patient-centric care efforts. Furthermore, we highlight the potential utility of multimedia, app-based communication platforms to facilitate patient education, autonomy, and team communication within each of the three settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob D Greisman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY.
| | - Zachary T Olmsted
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Patrick J Crorkin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Colin A Dallimore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Vadim Zhigin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Artur Shlifer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Anupama D Bedi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jane K Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Priscilla Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Heustein L Sy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Kiran V Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jason A Ellis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - John Boockvar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - David J Langer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen YH, Chou WH, Yie JC, Teng HC, Wu YL, Wu CY. Influence of Catheter-Incision Congruency in Epidural Analgesia on Postcesarean Pain Management: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111099. [PMID: 34834451 PMCID: PMC8619661 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or epidural morphine may alleviate postcesarean pain; however, conventional lumbar epidural insertion is catheter–incision incongruent for cesarean delivery. Methods: In total, 189 women who underwent cesarean delivery were randomly divided into four groups (low thoracic PCEA, lumbar PCEA, low thoracic morphine, and lumbar morphine groups) for postcesarean pain management. Pain intensities, including static pain, dynamic pain, and uterine cramp, were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The proportion of participants who experienced dynamic wound pain with a VAS score of >33 mm was evaluated as the primary outcome. Adverse effects, including lower extremity blockade, pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation, and time of first passage of flatulence, were evaluated. Results: The low thoracic PCEA group had the lowest proportion of participants reporting dynamic pain at 6 h after spinal anesthesia (low thoracic PCEA, 28.8%; lumbar PCEA, 69.4%; low thoracic morphine, 67.3%; lumbar morphine group, 73.9%; p < 0.001). The aforementioned group also reported the most favorable VAS scores for static, dynamic, and uterine cramp pain during the first 24 h after surgery. Adverse effect profiles were similar among the four groups, but a higher proportion of participants in the lumbar PCEA group (approximately 20% more than in the other three groups) reported prolonged postoperative lower extremity motor blockade (p = 0.005). In addition, the first passage of flatulence after surgery reported by the low thoracic PCEA group was approximately 8 h earlier than that of the two morphine groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Epidural congruency is essential to PCEA for postcesarean pain. Low thoracic PCEA achieves favorable analgesic effects and may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery without additional adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Hsi Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (W.-H.C.); (J.-C.Y.); (H.-C.T.)
| | - Wei-Han Chou
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (W.-H.C.); (J.-C.Y.); (H.-C.T.)
| | - Jr-Chi Yie
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (W.-H.C.); (J.-C.Y.); (H.-C.T.)
| | - Hsiao-Chun Teng
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (W.-H.C.); (J.-C.Y.); (H.-C.T.)
| | - Yi-Luen Wu
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan;
| | - Chun-Yu Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (W.-H.C.); (J.-C.Y.); (H.-C.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-2356-2158; Fax: +886-2-2341-5736
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hou C, Liu F, Liu C. Comparison of Submucosal With Intramuscular or Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone for Third Molar Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:714950. [PMID: 34447785 PMCID: PMC8382880 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.714950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to review evidence on the efficacy of submucosal (SM) administration vs. intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) route of injections of dexamethasone for improving outcomes after mandibular third molar surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 20th May 2021. Early (2–3 days) and late (7 days) outcomes were compared between SM vs. IV or IM dexamethasone. Quality of evidence was assessed based on GRADE. Results: Thirteen trials were included in the systematic review and 10 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in early pain with IV dexamethasone but no such difference for late pain compared to the SM group. There was no difference in early and late swelling scores between the SM and IV groups. Pooled analysis indicated no significant difference in early and late trismus between SM and IV groups. Comparing SM with IM dexamethasone, there was no significant difference in early and late pain scores. Swelling in the early and late postoperative periods was not significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in early and late trismus between SM and IM groups. The quality of evidence was low for all outcomes. Conclusion: Low-quality evidence suggests that SM infiltration of dexamethasone results in similar outcomes as compared to IV or IM administration of the drug after third molar surgeries. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to corroborate the current conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyu Hou
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, China
| | - Chengbin Liu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:888-898. [PMID: 34086002 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly used to achieve opioid-sparing analgesia after colorectal surgery. Traditionally, bupivacaine was the long-acting analgesic of choice, but the addition of dexamethasone and/or epinephrine to bupivacaine may extend block duration. Liposomal bupivacaine has also been suggested to achieve an extended analgesia duration of 72 hours but is significantly more expensive. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare pain control between laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks using liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. DESIGN This was a parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Consecutive patients between October 2018 to October 2019, ages 18 to 90 years, undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery with multimodal analgesia were included. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to ambulation and solid diet, hospital length of stay, and complications. RESULTS A total of 102 patients (50 men) with a median age of 42 years (interquartile range, 29-60 y) consented and were randomly assigned. The primary end point, total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours, was not significantly different between the liposomal bupivacaine group (median = 69 mg) and the bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone group (median = 47 mg; difference in medians = 22 mg, (95% CI, -17 to 49 mg); p = 0.60). There were no significant differences in pain scores, time to ambulation, time to diet tolerance, time to bowel movement, length of stay, overall complications, or readmission rate between groups. There were no treatment-related adverse outcomes. LIMITATIONS This study was not placebo controlled or blinded. CONCLUSIONS This first randomized trial comparing laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone showed that a liposomal bupivacaine block does not provide superior or extended analgesia in the era of standardized multimodal analgesia protocols.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533. ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO Y RANDOMIZADO DE BLOQUEO DEL PLANO MUSCULAR TRANSVERSO DEL ABDOMEN REALIZADO POR EL CIRUJANO CON BUPIVACANA VERSUS BUPIVACANA LIPOSOMAL ESTUDIO TINGLE ANTECEDENTES:El bloqueo anestésico del plano muscular transverso del abdomen se utiliza cada vez más para lograr una analgesia con menos consumo de opioides después de cirugía colorrectal. Tradicionalmente, la Bupivacaína era el analgésico de acción prolongada de elección, pero al agregarse Dexametasona y/o Adrenalina a la Bupivacaína se puede prolongar la duración del bloqueo. También se ha propuesto que la Bupivacaína liposomal logra una duración prolongada de la analgesia de 72 horas, pero es significativamente más cara.OBJETIVO:Comparar el control del dolor entre bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen usando Bupivacaína liposomal versus Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo y randomizado de una sola institución en grupos paralelos.AJUSTE:Centro médico terciario único.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos pacientes entre 18 y 90 años sometidos a cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva con analgesia multimodal, entre octubre de 2018 a octubre de 2019 incluidos de manera consecutiva.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente 1:1 para recibir un bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen con Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el total de equivalentes de morfina oral administradas en las primeras 48 horas después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron puntuaciones de dolor, inicio de dieta sólida, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, la estadía hospitalaria y las complicaciones.RESULTADOS:Un total de 102 pacientes (50 hombres) con una mediana de edad de 42 años (IQR 29-60) fueron incluidos aleatoriamente. El criterio de valoración principal, equivalentes de morfina oral total administrada en las primeras 48 horas, no fue significativamente diferente entre el grupo de Bupivacaína liposomal (mediana = 69 mg) y el grupo de Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona (mediana = 47 mg; diferencia en medianas = 22 mg, IC del 95% [-17] - 49 mg, p = 0,60). No hubo diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de dolor, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, el tiempo de tolerancia a la dieta sólida, el tiempo hasta el primer evacuado intestinal, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, las complicaciones generales o la tasa de readmisión entre los grupos. No hubo resultados adversos relacionados con el tratamiento.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no fue controlado con placebo ni de manera cegada.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio prospectivo y randomizado que comparó el bloqueo del plano de los músculos transversos del abdomen por vía laparoscópica, utilizando Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona, demostró que el bloqueo de Bupivacaína liposomal no proporciona ni mejor analgesia ni un efecto mas prolongado.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533.
Collapse
|
11
|
Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: a reply. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1280-1281. [PMID: 33891309 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - G P Joshi
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - N Rawal
- Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao C, Wang S, Pan Y, Ji N, Luo F. Pre-Emptive Incision-Site Infiltration with Ropivacaine Plus Dexamethasone for Postoperative Pain After Supratentorial Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res 2021; 14:1071-1082. [PMID: 33907455 PMCID: PMC8064677 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s300943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Incision-site infiltration with local anesthetics prevents pain on incision site, but pain relief is limited to the first few postoperative hours. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to local infiltration successfully achieves better postoperative pain relief; however, this has not been studied in craniotomy patients yet. Study Design and Methods This is a prospective, single-center, blinded, randomized, controlled trial included patients aged between 18 and 64 years, ASA physical status of I–II, scheduled for elective supratentorial tumor craniotomy under general anesthesia. We screened patients for enrollment from April 4, 2019 through August 15, 2019. The final study visit of the last patient was conducted on February 13, 2020. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1:1) to either the dexamethasone group who received incision-site infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 0.033% dexamethasone (N=70) or the control group who received 0.5% ropivacaine alone (N=70). Primary outcome was the cumulative sufentanil consumption (μg) within 48 hours postoperatively. Primary analysis was performed based on the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) principle. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Sufentanil consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively was 29.0 (10.7) μg in the dexamethasone group and 38.3 (13.7) μg in the control group (mean difference −9.3, 95% CI −13.4 to −5.1; p<0.001). There was no serious adverse effect directly associated with incision-site infiltration or local dexamethasone use. Conclusion The addition of dexamethasone to pre-emptive incision-site infiltration with the local anesthetic can reduce about 27% of opioids consumption and the postoperative pain scores within 72 hours after craniotomy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT03618264).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunmei Zhao
- Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaoheng Wang
- Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuesong Pan
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.,China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Ji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang Luo
- Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marr R. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section and the administration of dexamethasone. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1278-1279. [PMID: 33858031 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Marr
- Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:665-680. [PMID: 33370462 PMCID: PMC8048441 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Caesarean section is associated with moderate‐to‐severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction as well as breastfeeding success and mother‐child bonding. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after elective caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia. A systematic review utilising procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language between 1 May 2014 and 22 October 2020 evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating pain management for emergency or unplanned operative deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia were excluded. A total of 145 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients undergoing elective caesarean section performed under neuraxial anaesthesia, recommendations include intrathecal morphine 50–100 µg or diamorphine 300 µg administered pre‐operatively; paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone administered after delivery. If intrathecal opioid was not administered, single‐injection local anaesthetic wound infiltration; continuous wound local anaesthetic infusion; and/or fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane or quadratus lumborum blocks are recommended. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs with opioids used for rescue. The surgical technique should include a Joel‐Cohen incision; non‐closure of the peritoneum; and abdominal binders. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation could be used as analgesic adjunct. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations. Some interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence. Of note, these recommendations may not be applicable to unplanned deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Roofthooft
- Department of Anesthesiology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven and UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - N Rawal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - M Van de Velde
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven and UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shoab AY, Maged AM, Ramadan W, Dahab S, Deeb WS, Ali YZA, Mostafa WAI, Hussein EA. The value of endocervical and endometrial lidocaine flushing before office hysteroscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 148:113-117. [PMID: 31593299 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flushing the cervical canal and the uterine cavity with local anesthetic in order to reduce the pain felt by patients during office hysteroscopy. METHODS A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 1, 2018, and February 28, 2019, involving 260 women undergoing office hysteroscopy at Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Women were randomized using a computerized random number generator to intrauterine and intracervical instillation 5 minutes before the procedure of either 5 mL lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 mL normal saline, or 20 mL normal saline alone. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score reported by women during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included VAS score at 10 and 30 minutes after the procedure, the need for analgesia, and occurrence of vasovagal attacks. RESULTS Women in the lidocaine flushing group reported a significantly lower VAS score during the procedure (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.8) and 10 and 30 minutes after it (1.3 ± 1.15 and 0.8 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 2.1 and 2.98 ± 1.96) when compared with control women (P<0.001). More women without lidocaine flushing experienced vasovagal attacks (25/130 vs 9/130, P<0.001) and needed analgesia (84/130 vs 13/130, P<0.001) when compared with women with lidocaine flushing. CONCLUSION Flushing of the cervical canal and uterine cavity with local anesthetic significantly decreased pain sensation in women undergoing office hysteroscopy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03530488.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Y Shoab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Maged
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Wafaa Ramadan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sherif Dahab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Wesam S Deeb
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Yahia Z A Ali
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Walaa A I Mostafa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eman A Hussein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al Ainy, Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sao CH, Chan-Tiopianco M, Chung KC, Chen YJ, Horng HC, Lee WL, Wang PH. Pain after laparoscopic surgery: Focus on shoulder-tip pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 2019; 82:819-826. [PMID: 31517775 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy, one of minimally invasive procedures, is a commonly used procedure in diagnosis and management of various kinds of clinical problems, including gynecologic organ-related diseases. Compared with conventional exploratory laparotomy, the benefits of laparoscopic surgery include reduction of surgical wound, decreasing in postoperative pain, shortening hospital stay, rapid recovery, and a better cosmetic result. However, there are still up to 80% of patients after laparoscopic surgery complaining of high levels of pain and needing pain relief. Postlaparoscopic pain can be separated into distinct causes, such as surgical trauma- or incision wound-associated inflammatory change, and pneumoperitoneum (carbon dioxide [CO2])-related morphological and biochemical changes of peritoneum and diaphragm. The latter is secondary to irritation, stretching, and foreign body stimulation, leading to phrenic neuropraxia and subsequent shoulder-tip pain (STP). STP is the most typical unpleasant experience of patients after laparoscopic surgery. There are at least 11 strategies available to attempt to decrease postlaparoscopic STP, including (1) the use of an alternative insufflating gas in place of CO2, (2) the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in place of standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, (3) the use of warmed or warmed and humidified CO2, (4) gasless laparoscopy, (5) subdiaphragmatic intraperitoneal anesthesia, (6) local intraperitoneal anesthesia, (7) actively expelling out of gas, (8) intraperitoneal drainage, (9) fluid instillation, (10) pulmonary recruitment maneuvers, and (11) others and combination. The present article is limited in discussing postlaparoscopic STP. We extensively review published articles to provide a better strategy to reduce postlaparoscopic STP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hsuan Sao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | | | - Kai-Cheng Chung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Huann-Cheng Horng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Ling Lee
- Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Peng-Hui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jia Y, Zhao C, Ren H, Wang T, Luo F. Pre-emptive scalp infiltration with dexamethasone plus ropivacaine for postoperative pain after craniotomy: a protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res 2019; 12:1709-1719. [PMID: 31213883 PMCID: PMC6542215 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s190679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Approximately 55–87% of the patients undergoing craniotomy experience moderate to severe pain during the first 48 hrs after surgery, which negatively influences patients’ postoperative rehabilitation. Recently, local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) has been widely performed clinically as a promising analgesic method that could avoid the side effects of analgesics but only has a short pain-free duration; researchers have clarified that the addition of dexamethasone to LIA could provide significant analgesic effects and significantly prolong the duration of analgesic effects without obvious complications for various types of surgeries. To date, no studies have evaluated the addition of dexamethasone to LIA for patients receiving craniotomy. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that pre-emptive scalp infiltration with a steroid (dexamethasone) plus a local anesthetic (ropivacaine) could achieve superior postoperative analgesic effects to a local anesthetic (ropivacaine) alone in adult patients undergoing a craniotomy. Study design and methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial that will include one intervention and one control group involving a total of 140 adults scheduled for elective craniotomy for resection of supratentorial tumors under general anesthesia and with an anticipated full recovery within 2 hrs postoperatively. The intervention will involve pre-emptive scalp infiltration with ropivacaine plus dexamethasone (the dexamethasone group) or ropivacaine alone (the control group), and the participants in both groups will complete a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be the cumulative sufentanil consumption within 48 hrs postoperatively. Discussion: The intervention, if effective, this study will provide clinically important information on the role of dexamethasone in scalp infiltration for post-craniotomy pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yitong Jia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Chunmei Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Hao Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Fang Luo
- Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heesen M, Rijs K, Hilber N, Eid K, Al‐Oweidi A, Rossaint R, Klimek M. Effect of intravenous dexamethasone on postoperative pain after spinal anaesthesia – a systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1047-1056. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.14666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Heesen
- Department of Anaesthesia Kantonsspital Baden BadenSwitzerland
| | - K. Rijs
- Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus University Medical Centre RotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - N. Hilber
- Department of Anaesthesia Kantonsspital Baden BadenSwitzerland
| | - K. Eid
- Department of Orthopaedics Kantonsspital Baden BadenSwitzerland
| | - A. Al‐Oweidi
- Department of Anaesthesia University Hospital of Amman AmmanJordan
| | - R. Rossaint
- Department of Anaesthesia University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany
| | - M. Klimek
- Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus University Medical Centre RotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|