Clinical and pregnancy outcomes of double and single blastocyst transfers related with morphological grades in vitrified-warmed embryo transfer

Transfer of a poor-quality along with a good-quality embryo on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect on the pregnancy rate of transfer of a good-quality embryo (GQE) and a poor-quality embryo (PQE) in comparison with a single GQE transfer.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Infertility patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection- embryo transfer.

INTERVENTION(S)

Three major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for studies those compared single GQE transfer to double embryo transfer of a GQE + PQE were searched. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the study quality. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed on all data for an overall analysis, followed by a subgroup analysis (fresh cleavage-stage embryos, fresh blastocysts, frozen-thawed blastocysts, and the same assessment criteria for blastocyst quality).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR).

RESULT(S)

A total of 17 studies with 17,612 cycles for GQE transfer and 6,431 cycles for GQE + PQE transfer were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found in CPR (relative risk [RR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.14) and live birth rate (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.07) between GQE + PQE and GQE transfers. However, the transfer of GQE + PQE increased multiple pregnancy rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.20) and multiple birth rate (RR = 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06-0.12), when compared with the patients undergoing a single GQE transfer. Subgroup analyses by type of embryo for transfer and assessment criteria for embryo quality showed similar trends.

CONCLUSION(S)

Double embryo transfer with GQE + PQE does not result in increased or decreased CPR and live birth rate when compared with a single GQE transfer but leads to a higher multiple pregnancy rate and multiple birth rate.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Prospero CRD42022296681 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=296681) registered on January 7, 2022.

LC-MS Analysis Revealed the Significantly Different Metabolic Profiles in Spent Culture Media of Human Embryos with Distinct Morphology, Karyotype and Implantation Outcomes

In this study we evaluated possible differences in metabolomic profiles of spent embryo culture media (SECM) of human embryos with distinct morphology, karyotype, and implantation outcomes. A total of 153 samples from embryos of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs were collected and analyzed by HPLC-MS. Metabolomic profiling and statistical analysis revealed clear clustering of day five SECM from embryos with different morphological classes and karyotype. Profiling of day five SECM from embryos with different implantation outcomes showed 241 significantly changed molecular ions in SECM of successfully implanted embryos. Separate analysis of paired SECM samples on days three and five revealed 46 and 29 molecular signatures respectively, significantly differing in culture media of embryos with a successful outcome. Pathway enrichment analysis suggests certain amino acids, vitamins, and lipid metabolic pathways to be crucial for embryo implantation. Differences between embryos with distinct implantation potential are detectable on the third and fifth day of cultivation that may allow the application of culture medium analysis in different transfer protocols for both fresh and cryopreserved embryos. A combination of traditional morphological criteria with metabolic profiling of SECM may increase implantation rates in assisted reproductive technology programs as well as improve our knowledge of the human embryo metabolism in the early stages of development.

Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence referring to the trade-offs between the benefits and risks of single embryo transfer (SET) versus double embryo transfer (DET) following assisted reproduction technology are insufficient, especially for those women with a defined embryo quality or advanced age.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched based on established search strategy from inception through February 2021. Pre-specified primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled by a random-effects model using R version 4.1.0.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 71 observational studies) were eligible. Compared with DET, SET decreased the probability of a live birth (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85, P < 0.001, n = 62), and lowered the rate of multiple pregnancy (0.05, 0.04-0.06, P < 0.001, n = 45). In the sub-analyses of age stratification, both the differences of LBR (0.87, 0.54-1.40, P = 0.565, n = 4) and MPR (0.34, 0.06-2.03, P = 0.236, n = 3) between SET and DET groups became insignificant in patients aged ≥40 years. No significant difference in LBR for single GQE versus two embryos of mixed quality [GQE + PQE (non-good quality embryo)] (0.99, 0.77-1.27, P = 0.915, n = 8), nor any difference of MPR in single PQE versus two PQEs (0.23, 0.04-1.49, P = 0.123, n = 6). Moreover, women who conceived through SET were associated with lower risks of poor outcomes, including cesarean section (0.64, 0.43-0.94), antepartum haemorrhage (0.35, 0.15-0.82), preterm birth (0.25, 0.21-0.30), low birth weight (0.20, 0.16-0.25), Apgar1 < 7 rate (0.12, 0.02-0.93) or neonatal intensive care unit admission (0.30, 0.14-0.66) than those following DET.

CONCLUSIONS

In women aged < 40 years or if any GQE is available, SET should be incorporated into clinical practice. While in the absence of GQEs, DET may be preferable. However, for elderly women aged ≥40 years, current evidence is not enough to recommend an appropriate number of embryo transfer. The findings need to be further confirmed.

Adding a low-quality blastocyst to a high-quality blastocyst for a double embryo transfer does not decrease pregnancy and live birth rate

INTRODUCTION

The effect of embryo quality on clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology following a double transfer is not well defined, with some studies suggesting that a low-quality embryo transferred with a high-quality embryo decreases the live birth rate (LBR), compared with transferring a single high-quality embryo. Our study examined whether the quality of a second blastocyst transferred affects the outcome, controlling for the number of the available high-quality blastocysts (HQB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A historical cohort study of 2346 fresh blastocyst transfers in a single fertility clinic between 2013 and 2019. The main outcomes were pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, and multiple gestation rates. Outcomes were compared between single embryo transfers with a high-quality blastocyst (SET-H), double embryo transfers with two HQBs (DET-HH), and transfers with one high-quality and one low-quality blastocyst (DET-HL). Outcomes were also assessed between SET and DET when only low-quality blastocysts were available.

RESULTS

With one HQB available, DET-HL increased LBR (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.49) compared with SET-H, but increased multiple gestation rate (aOR 23.1, 95% CI 3.0-177.6). With two HQBs available, DET-HH was associated with a higher LBR (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28-2.04) and lower miscarriage rate (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80), but very high twin rate (aOR 49.8, 95% CI 24.3-102.1) compared with SET-H. A SET-H with at least one or more HQB available to freeze, compared with a SET-H with no other HQB available, had a higher LBR (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17-2.45). When there were no HQBs available, compared with SET-L, a DET-LL had a higher live birth (aOR 3.20, 95% CI 1.78-7.703) and twin rate (aOR 3.72 × 10¹⁰ ) and a lower miscarriage rate (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

When there is one HQB available, transferring an additional low-quality blastocyst would only slightly increase the LBR, but significantly increase the twin rate, therefore SET should be recommended. When two or more HQBs are available, SET-H would have a reasonably good chance of success without the very high twin rate associated with DET-HH. DET-LL when compared with SET-L, would increase the LBR, but increase the risk of multiple gestation.