Mosaic 45,X/46, XX at amniocentesis with high-level mosaicism for 45,X in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line

Perinatal detection of disomy X cell line by fluorescence in situ hybridization in a pregnancy with 45,X/47,XXX at amniocentesis, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present perinatal detection of disomy X cell line by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a pregnancy with 45,X/47,XXX at amniocentesis, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old, gravida 3, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[22]/47,XXX[10]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (X) × 1-2, (1-22) × 2, consistent with 32% mosaicism for monosomy X. She was referred for genetic counseling at 19 weeks of gestation. Prenatal ultrasound findings and parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis at 29 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 45,X[36]/47,XXX[4] (Fig. 1) in cultured amniocytes. Simultaneous molecular analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22) × 2, Y × 0 by aCGH with no genomic imbalance, and 15% (15/100 cells) mosaicism for disomy X, 61% (61/100 cells) mosaicism for monosomy X and 24% (24/100 cells) mosaicism for triple X by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The pregnancy was encouraged to continue and at 37 weeks of gestation, a 2834-g phenotypically normal female baby was delivered. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 45,X[33]/47,XXX[7], 45,X[30]/47,XXX[10] and 47,XXX[38]/45,X[2], respectively. When follow-up at age three months, the neonate was normal in development. FISH analysis on 99 buccal mucosal cells showed 49% (48/99 cells) mosaicism for monosomy X, 8% (8/99 cells) mosaicism for triple X and 43% (42/99 cells) mosaicism for disomy X (Fig. 2). Peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[38]/47,XXX[2]. When follow-up at age nine months, the neonate was normal in development. FISH analysis on 102 buccal mucosal cells showed 11% (11/102 cells) mosaicism for monosomy X, 12% (12/102 cells) mosaicism for triple X and 77% (79/102 cells) mosaicism for disomy X. Peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[30]/47,XXX[10].

CONCLUSION

45,X/47,XXX at amniocentesis may detect disomy X cell line by FISH analysis and can be associated with postnatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell lines, increase of the disomy X cell line and a favorable outcome.

45,X/46,XX at the first amniocentesis, and 45,X/47,XXX/46,XX at the repeat amniocentesis and at birth in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, perinatal progressive decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes

OBJECTIVE

We present 45,X/46,XX at the first amniocentesis, and 45,X/47,XXX/46,XX at the repeat amniocentesis and at birth in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, perinatal progressive decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old, gravida 3, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[4]/46,XX[20]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (X) × 3 [0.24], consistent with 24% mosaicism for triple X. Repeat amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed the result of 45,X[17]/47,XXX[8]/46,XX[121]. She was referred for genetic counseling, and the third amniocentesis performed at 30 weeks of gestation revealed the result of 45,X[3]/47,XXX[2]/46,XX[16]. The mother had a karyotype of 46,XX. aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed arr Xp22.33q28 × 2.2 (log2 ratio = 0.15), consistent with 20% mosaicism for triple X. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 100 uncultured amniocytes showed that 11 cells (11%) were monosomy X, seven cells (7%) were triple X, and the others were disomy X. At 39 weeks of gestation, a 3,620-g phenotypically normal female baby was delivered without any phenotypic abnormality. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XXX[7]/45,X[1]/46,XX[32], 47,XXX[13]/46,XX[27] and 47,XXX[2]/46,XX[38], respectively. When follow-up at age one month, the neonate was phenotypically normal, and FISH analysis on 106 buccal mucosal cells showed that eight cells (7.5%) were monosomy X, seven cells (6.6%) were triple X, and the others were disomy X.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic 45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis may be in fact mosaic 45,X/47,XXX/46,XX and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the 45,X cell line.

High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing for Turner syndrome, normal male external genitalia and positive SRY in the fetus, a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues

OBJECTIVE

We present high-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Turner syndrome, normal male external genitalia and positive SRY in the fetus, a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of positive NIPT for Turner syndrome (Z score = -11.72 for X chromosome) at 10 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,X,+mar[8]. Simultaneous molecular analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the results of arr (X) × 1, (Yp) × 0-1 (0.63), (Yq) × 0, (1-22) × 2 in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and rsa(X) × 1, Yp11.31 × 0-1, Yq11.21 × 0, (13, 18, 21) × 2 in multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound revealed normal male external genitalia. She was referred for genetic counseling, and continuing pregnancy was advised. A 2875-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation with normal male external genitalia. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,X,+mar[27]/45,X[13], 46,X,+mar[24]/45,X[16] and 45,X[22]/46,X,+mar[18], respectively. SRY testing on cord blood revealed a positive result. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was normal in development. The karyotype of peripheral blood was 46,X,+mar[25]/45,X[13]/46,X,idic r(Y) [2]. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 103 buccal mucosal cells using Yp11.2-specific probe RP11-119E4 and Xp22.31-specific probe RP11-143E20 showed that 90 cells (90/103 = 87%) had double Yp signals, 3 cells (3/103 = 3%) had single Yp signal and 10 cells (10/103 = 10%) had no Yp signal.

CONCLUSION

High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis with positive Yp and SRY can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and in different amniocenteses and a favorable fetal outcome with a normal karyotype at birth

OBJECTIVE

We present 45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and in different amniocenteses and a favorable fetal outcome with a normal karyotype at birth.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old, gravida 3, para 2, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[11]/46,XX[108], consistent with 9.2% mosaicism for 45,X. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 25 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis at 26 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 45,X[4]/46,XX[16], consistent with 20% mosaicism for 45,X. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes using SurePrint G3 Unrestricted CGH ISCA v2, 8 × 60K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) revealed arr (1-22, X) × 2, Y × 0 with no genomic imbalance. The woman was advised to continue pregnancy, and at 38 weeks of gestation, a healthy 3140-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX (40/40 cells). When follow-up at age two months, the neonate had normal development and a normal karyotype.

CONCLUSION

Confirmation of 45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis should include conventional cytogenetic analysis and karyotyping on cultured amniocytes, and sole molecular analysis on uncultured amniocytes may miss the diagnosis of 45,X/46,XX.