Clinicopathologic significance of mismatch repair protein expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer

Cervical cancer: Part II the landscape of treatment for persistent, recurrent and metastatic diseases (I)

The WHO (World Health Organization) conducted an elimination of cervical cancer program using triple pillar intervention strategy to target 90%-70%-90% of women before the year 2030, including (1) a full vaccination of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine to 90% of girls <15 years of age; (2) a high-performance screening procedure to 70% of women during the reproductive age (at the age of 35 and 45 years of age); and (3) an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Among the aforementioned three pillars, a full HPV vaccination has been introduced in our previous review, of which we have discussed the policy and strategy of HPV vaccination in the world and also reviewed the efficacy of HPV vaccination, with a successful reduction of over 90% of HPV-associated neoplasms. The aims of the current review will target another pillar-an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Since the early-stage cervical cancer has a favorable outcome and the treatment recommendation has been established, therefore, the current review focuses on women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers (advanced cervical cancers), which are still a biggest challenge based on its extremely worse outcomes before the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Integration of ICIs into conventional chemotherapy (paclitaxel-cisplatin) has become the new standard therapy for those patients with advanced cervical cancers. The recent clinical trials, such as KENOTE 826 and KENOTE A18 showing a dramatical improvement of both progression free survival and overall survival have approved the therapeutic efficacy of this combination as ICI plus paclitaxel-platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) with/without bevacizumab to women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers.

Assessment of Immune Status in Patients with Mismatch Repair Deficiency Endometrial Cancer

Objective

This study introduced a novel subtype classification method for endometrial cancer (EC) with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) by employing immune status and prognosis as the foundational criteria. The goal was to enhance treatment guidance through precise subtype delineation.

Methods

Study Cohort: This study encompassed a cohort of 119 patients diagnosed with MMRd-EC between 2015 and 2022. Analyses using t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to assess prognostic markers and peripheral blood immune cell profiles in patients with MutS deficiency (MutS-d) versus those with MutL deficiency (MutL-d). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors. Bioinformatics Analysis: An online database was used to assess the prognostic implications, immune cell infiltration, and immune checkpoint involvement associated with the deficiency of MutS versus MutL in EC.

Results

Patients with MutL-d exhibited heightened risk factors, including elevated cancer grade and increased myometrial invasion, leading to poorer prognosis and shorter overall survival and progression-free survival. Regarding systemic immune status, patients with MutL-d demonstrated decreased peripheral blood lymphocyte percentage, lymphocyte count, and CD8+ T cell percentage. For local immunity, the infiltration of natural killer cells, CD8+ T cells, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the tumor tissue was reduced in patients with MutL-d. Additionally, patients with MutL-d exhibited lower expression of immune checkpoint markers. The composition of immune subtypes and survival outcomes also indicate that patients with MutL-d have a poorer immune status and prognosis than the patients with MutS-d.

Conclusion

Patients with MMRd-EC can be subclassified according to MutS or MutL deficiency. Patients with MutS-d exhibited better immune status, prognosis, and immunotherapy benefits than those with MutL-d. These results can help guide patients to a more precise treatment.

Front-line chemoimmunotherapy for treating epithelial ovarian cancer: Part II promising results of phase 2 study of paclitaxel-carboplatin-oregovomab regimen

In the Part I, we have discussed the background of CA125 and the development of anti-CA125 monoclonal antibody (MAb) to highlight the potential role of CA125 and anti-CA125 MAb in the management of women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Glycosylation change either by N-link or by O-link of CA125 is supposed to play a role in the modification of immunity. Anti-CA125 MAb, which can be classified as OC 125-like Abs, M11-like Abs, and OV197-like Abs, is often used for diagnosing, screening, monitoring and detecting the mesothelin-related diseases of the abdominal cavity, particular for those women with EOC. Additionally, anti-CA125 MAb also plays a therapeutic role, named as OvaRex MAb-B43.13 (oregovomab), which has also been extensively reviewed in the Part I review article. The main mechanisms include (a) forming CA125 immune complexes to activate the antigen-presenting cells; (b) triggering induction of CA125-specific immune responses, including anti-CA125 Abs against various epitopes and CA125-specific B and T cell responses; and (c) triggering CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses specific for B43.13 to produce specific and non-specific immune response. With success in vitro, in vivo and in primitive studies, phase II study was conducted to test the effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) for the management of EOC patients. In the 97 EOC patients after optimal debulking surgery (residual tumor <1 cm or no gross residual tumor), patients treated with CIT had a dramatical and statistically significant improvement of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone with a median PFS of 41.8 months versus 12.2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.7) and OS not yet been reached (NE) versus 42.3 months (HR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.16-0.74), respectively. The current review as Part II will explore the possibility of using CIT as front-line therapy in the management of advanced-stage EOC patients after maximal cytoreductive surgery based on the evidence by many phase 2 studies.