A set of six Gene expression biomarkers and their thresholds identify rat liver tumorigens in short-term assays

A new approach methodology to identify tumorigenic chemicals using short-term exposures and transcript profiling

Current methods for cancer risk assessment are resource-intensive and not feasible for most of the thousands of untested chemicals. In earlier studies, we developed a new approach methodology (NAM) to identify liver tumorigens using gene expression biomarkers and associated tumorigenic activation levels (TALs) after short-term exposures in rats. The biomarkers are used to predict the six most common rodent liver cancer molecular initiating events. In the present study, we wished to confirm that our approach could be used to identify liver tumorigens at only one time point/dose and if the approach could be applied to (targeted) RNA-Seq analyses. Male rats were exposed for 4 days by daily gavage to 15 chemicals at doses with known chronic outcomes and liver transcript profiles were generated using Affymetrix arrays. Our approach had 75% or 85% predictive accuracy using TALs derived from the TG-GATES or DrugMatrix studies, respectively. In a dataset generated from the livers of male rats exposed to 16 chemicals at up to 10 doses for 5 days, we found that our NAM coupled with targeted RNA-Seq (TempO-Seq) could be used to identify tumorigenic chemicals with predictive accuracies of up to 91%. Overall, these results demonstrate that our NAM can be applied to both microarray and (targeted) RNA-Seq data generated from short-term rat exposures to identify chemicals, their doses, and mode of action that would induce liver tumors, one of the most common endpoints in rodent bioassays.

Progress in toxicogenomics to protect human health

Toxicogenomics measures molecular features, such as transcripts, proteins, metabolites and epigenomic modifications, to understand and predict the toxicological effects of environmental and pharmaceutical exposures. Transcriptomics has become an integral tool in contemporary toxicology research owing to innovations in gene expression profiling that can provide mechanistic and quantitative information at scale. These data can be used to predict toxicological hazards through the use of transcriptomic biomarkers, network inference analyses, pattern-matching approaches and artificial intelligence. Furthermore, emerging approaches, such as high-throughput dose-response modelling, can leverage toxicogenomic data for human health protection even in the absence of predicting specific hazards. Finally, single-cell transcriptomics and multi-omics provide detailed insights into toxicological mechanisms. Here, we review the progress since the inception of toxicogenomics in applying transcriptomics towards toxicology testing and highlight advances that are transforming risk assessment.

A comparison of the TempO-Seq and Affymetrix microarray platform using RTqPCR validation

Next-generation risk assessment relies on mechanistic data from new approach methods, including transcriptome data. Various technologies, such as high-throughput targeted sequencing methods and microarray technologies based on hybridization with complementary probes, are used to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The integration of data from different technologies requires a good understanding of the differences arising from the use of various technologies.To better understand the differences between the TempO-Seq platform and Affymetrix chip technology, whole-genome data for the volatile compound dimethylamine were compared. Selected DEGs were also confirmed using RTqPCR validation. Although the overlap of DEGs between TempO-Seq and Affymetrix was no higher than 37%, a comparison of the gene regulation in terms of log2fold changes revealed a very high concordance. RTqPCR confirmed the majority of DEGs from either platform in the examined dataset. Only a few conflicts were found (11%), while 22% were not confirmed, and 3% were not detected.Despite the observed differences between the two platforms, both can be validated using RTqPCR. Here we highlight some of the differences between the two platforms and discuss their applications in toxicology.

A Collaborative Initiative to Establish Genomic Biomarkers for Assessing Tumorigenic Potential to Reduce Reliance on Conventional Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies

There is growing recognition across broad sectors of the scientific community that use of genomic biomarkers has the potential to reduce the need for conventional rodent carcinogenicity studies of industrial chemicals, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals through a weight-of-evidence approach. These biomarkers fall into 2 major categories: (1) sets of gene transcripts that can identify distinct tumorigenic mechanisms of action; and (2) cancer driver gene mutations indicative of rapidly expanding growth-advantaged clonal cell populations. This call-to-action article describes a collaborative approach launched to develop and qualify biomarker gene expression panels that measure widely accepted molecular pathways linked to tumorigenesis and their activation levels to predict tumorigenic doses of chemicals from short-term exposures. Growing evidence suggests that application of such biomarker panels in short-term exposure rodent studies can identify both tumorigenic hazard and tumorigenic activation levels for chemical-induced carcinogenicity. In the future, this approach will be expanded to include methodologies examining mutations in key cancer driver gene mutation hotspots as biomarkers of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemical tumor risk. Analytical, technical, and biological validation studies of these complementary genomic tools are being undertaken by multisector and multidisciplinary collaborative teams within the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. Success from these efforts will facilitate the transition from current heavy reliance on conventional 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies to more rapid animal- and resource-sparing approaches for mechanism-based carcinogenicity evaluation supporting internal and regulatory decision-making.

Genomic comparisons between hepatocarcinogenic and non-hepatocarcinogenic organophosphate insecticides in the mouse liver

Short-term biomarkers of toxicity have an increasingly important role in the screening and prioritization of new chemicals. In this study, we examined early indicators of liver toxicity for three reference organophosphate (OP) chemicals, which are among the most widely used insecticides in the world. The OP methidathion was previously shown to increase the incidence of liver toxicity, including hepatocellular tumors, in male mice. To provide insights into the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) that underlies these tumors, effects of methidathion in the male mouse liver were examined after 7 and 28 day exposures and compared to those of two other OPs that either do not increase (fenthion) or possibly suppress liver cancer (parathion) in mice. None of the chemicals caused increases in liver weight/body weight or histopathological changes in the liver. Parathion decreased liver cell proliferation after 7 and 28 days while the other chemicals had no effects. There was no evidence for hepatotoxicity in any of the treatment groups. Full-genome microarray analysis of the livers from the 7 and 28 day treatments demonstrated that methidathion and fenthion regulated a large number of overlapping genes, while parathion regulated a unique set of genes. Examination of cytochrome P450 enzyme activities and use of predictive gene expression biomarkers found no consistent evidence for activation of AhR, CAR, PXR, or PPARα. Parathion suppressed the male-specific gene expression pattern through STAT5b, similar to genetic and dietary conditions that decrease liver tumor incidence in mice. Overall, these findings indicate that methidathion causes liver cancer by a mechanism that does not involve common mechanisms of liver cancer induction.

Cross-Model Comparison of Transcriptomic Dose-Response of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins

Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) have attracted attention because of their toxicological potential in humans and wildlife at environmentally relevant doses. However, limited information is available regarding mechanistic differences across species in terms of the biological pathways that are impacted by SCCP exposure. Here, a concentration-dependent reduced human transcriptome (RHT) approach was conducted to evaluate 15 SCCPs in HepG2 cells and compared with our previous results using a reduced zebrafish transcriptome (RZT) approach in zebrafish embryos (ZFEs). Generally, SCCPs induced a broader suite of biological pathways in ZFEs than HepG2 cells, and all of the 15 SCCPs were more potent in HepG2 cells compared to ZFEs. Despite these general differences, the transcriptional potency of SCCPs in both model systems showed a significant linear relationship (p = 0.0017, r² = 0.57), and the average ratios of transcriptional potency for each SCCP in RZT to that in RHT were ∼100,000. C₁₀H₁₄Cl₈ was the most potent SCCP, while C₁₀H₁₇Cl₅ was the least potent in both ZFEs and HepG2 cells. An adverse outcome pathway network-based analysis demonstrated model-specific responses, such as xenobiotic metabolism that may be mediated by different nuclear receptor-mediated pathways between HepG2 cells (e.g., CAR and AhR activation) and ZFEs (e.g., PXR activation). Moreover, induced transcriptional changes in ZFEs associated with pathways and molecular initiating events (e.g., activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor) suggest that SCCPs may disrupt neural development processes. The cross-model comparison of concentration-dependent transcriptomics represents a promising approach to assess and prioritize SCCPs.