Iodixanol activation of mast cells: Implications in the pathogenesis of iodixanol-induced delayed cutaneous adverse reactions

Radiocontrast medium induces histamine release in association with upregulation of miR‑19a‑3p and miR‑362‑3p expression

In Taiwan, the use of radiocontrast medium for clinical image diagnosis recently surpassed one million times and the overall prevalence of radiocontrast hypersensitivity was ~7%. A microRNA (miRNA/miRs) is a small non-coding RNA molecule that mostly plays a suppressor role in cells. However, the roles of miRNA expression in radiocontrast-induced mast cells activation remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of miRNA on radiocontrast-induced mast cell activation. Computed tomography radiocontrast, ultravist and mouse mast cell line, P815, were used in the present study. Cell viability was detected by CCK-8 experiment. Levels of histamine and β-hexosaminidase were measured by ELISA. miRNA expression was detected by miRNA sequencing and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The results showed that ultravist could increase histamine release and reduce intracellular β-hexosaminidase levels of mast cells. A total of 102 miRNAs could be significantly upregulated by ultravist stimulation. Selected candidate miRNAs for the validation included miR-19a-3p and miR-362-3p which were also increased expression following stimulation with ultravist. In conclusion, ultravist could induce mast cell activation through upregulation of miR-19a-3p and miR-362-3p. Thus, miR-19a-3p and miR-362-3p could be promising candidates for development as novel targets for preventing radiocontrast-induced allergy in the future.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media

At present, iodinated contrast media (ICM) are mostly non-ionic, have low osmolality, and are safe. Even if adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur, most are chemo-toxic symptoms and require only observation or H1 antihistamines. However, rare, unpredictable, and even life-threatening hypersensitivity can still occur. The aim of this review is to summarize the issues that all relevant staff need to know about and be able to respond to. The most significant risk factor for ICM hypersensitivity is a history of ICM hypersensitivity. For high-risk populations, we must cautiously weigh the advantages and disadvantages of premedication and be aware that breakthrough reactions may still occur. The best policy for patients with a history of severe ICM hypersensitivity is to avoid the same ICM. If ICM are inevitable, skin tests, in vitro tests, and drug provocation tests may help to find a feasible alternative that is safer. The severity of the hypersensitivity is correlated with the positivity rate of these tests, so there is no need for further investigations for patients with only mild reactions. We should also keep in mind that even excipients in ICM may induce hypersensitivity. Detailed, standardized documentation is essential for correct diagnosis and the prevention of future occurrence.