Low-dose of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 nanoparticle cause energy metabolism disorder through lysosome-mitochondria dysfunction

3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol esters induce HepG2 cells necroptosis via CTSB/TFAM/ROS pathway

3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol esters (3-MCPDE) are toxic substances that form in food thermal processing and have a diverse range of toxicities. In this study, we found that 3-MCPDE triggered necroptosis by RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL pathway in HepG2 cells. Previous studies have shown that ROS is an important activator of RIPK1 and RIPK3. The data showed that 3-MCPDE induced excessive ROS production through mitochondrial damage. After treatment with ROS inhibitor N-acetylcysteine (NAC), 3-MCPDE-induced necroptosis was relieved. Further, we explored how 3-MCPDE destroys mitochondria. The data suggested that 3-MCPDE induced mitochondrial dysfunction through the CTSB/TFAM pathway. Overall, the results indicated that 3-MCPDE induced necroptosis through CTSB/TFAM/ROS pathway in HepG2 cells. Our study provided a new mechanism for 3-MCPDE hepatotoxicity.

ROS/mtROS promotes TNTs formation via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway to protect against mitochondrial damages in glial cells induced by engineered nanomaterials

BACKGROUND

As the demand and application of engineered nanomaterials have increased, their potential toxicity to the central nervous system has drawn increasing attention. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are novel cell-cell communication that plays a crucial role in pathology and physiology. However, the relationship between TNTs and nanomaterials neurotoxicity remains unclear. Here, three types of commonly used engineered nanomaterials, namely cobalt nanoparticles (CoNPs), titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs), and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), were selected to address this limitation.

RESULTS

After the complete characterization of the nanomaterials, the induction of TNTs formation with all of the nanomaterials was observed using high-content screening system and confocal microscopy in both primary astrocytes and U251 cells. It was further revealed that TNT formation protected against nanomaterial-induced neurotoxicity due to cell apoptosis and disrupted ATP production. We then determined the mechanism underlying the protective role of TNTs. Since oxidative stress is a common mechanism in nanotoxicity, we first observed a significant increase in total and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (namely ROS, mtROS), causing mitochondrial damage. Moreover, pretreatment of U251 cells with either the ROS scavenger N-acetylcysteine or the mtROS scavenger mitoquinone attenuated nanomaterial-induced neurotoxicity and TNTs generation, suggesting a central role of ROS in nanomaterials-induced TNTs formation. Furthermore, a vigorous downstream pathway of ROS, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, was found to be actively involved in nanomaterials-promoted TNTs development, which was abolished by LY294002, Perifosine and Rapamycin, inhibitors of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR, respectively. Finally, western blot analysis demonstrated that ROS and mtROS scavengers suppressed the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which abrogated TNTs formation.

CONCLUSION

Despite their biophysical properties, various types of nanomaterials promote TNTs formation and mitochondrial transfer, preventing cell apoptosis and disrupting ATP production induced by nanomaterials. ROS/mtROS and the activation of the downstream PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are common mechanisms to regulate TNTs formation and mitochondrial transfer. Our study reveals that engineered nanomaterials share the same molecular mechanism of TNTs formation and intercellular mitochondrial transfer, and the proposed adverse outcome pathway contributes to a better understanding of the intercellular protection mechanism against nanomaterials-induced neurotoxicity.