High-throughput screening (HTS)-based spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) to predict human skin sensitization potential

A rapid spectrophotometric test for assessing skin sensitization potential of chemicals by using N-acetyl-L-cysteine methyl ester in chemico

During the key event 1 of skin sensitization defined as covalent binding or haptenization of sensitizer to either thiol or amino group of skin proteins, a sensitizer not only covalently binds with skin proteins but also interacts with nucleophilic small molecules such as glutathione (GSH). Although GSH would not be directly associated with skin sensitization, this interaction may be applied for developing an alternative test method simulating key event 1, haptenization. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine whether N-acetyl-L-cysteine methyl ester (NACME), a thiol-containing compound, was selected as an electron donor to determine whether NACME reacted with sensitizers. Following a reaction of NACME with a sensitizer in a 96-well plate, the remaining NACME was measured spectrophotometrically using 5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). Following the optimization of test conditions with two different vehicles, such as acetonitrile (ACN) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 64 test chemicals were tested to determine the predictive capacity of current NACME test method. The results obtained showed, the predictive capacity of 94.6% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, and 92.2% accuracy utilizing DMSO as a vehicle with a cutoff NACME depletion of 5.85%. The three parameters were also over 85% in case of ACN. These values were comparable to or better than other OECD-approved test methods. Data demonstrated that a simple thiol-containing compound NACME might constitute as a reliable candidate for identifying reactive skin sensitizers, and that this method be considered as practical method as a screening tool for assessing a chemical's tendency to initiate skin sensitization.

A convenient spectrophotometric test for screening skin-sensitizing chemicals using reactivity with glutathione in chemico

To initiate skin sensitization, haptens react with endogenous proteins. During this process, skin sensitizers react with small endogenous molecules containing thiol or amino groups. In this study, a simple spectrophotometric method to identify skin sensitizers in chemico was developed using the reactivity of glutathione (GSH) with test chemicals in a 96-well plate. To quantitate the remaining GSH following the reaction with a skin sensitizer, 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) was employed. The optimized experimental conditions included the pH- and time-dependent stability of GSH, stability of derivatized products of GSH with optimal concentration and incubation time of DTNB, incubation time of GSH with the test chemicals, and molar ratios of GSH to the test chemicals. With the optimized conditions with both acetonitrile and DMSO as vehicles and incubation of GSH with test chemicals in 1:10 and 1:15 ratios for 24 h at 4 °C, 23 skin sensitizers and 23 non-sensitizers, based on the local lymph node assay, were tested to determine the predictive capacity of individual conditions. The best result showed a predictive capacity of 95.2% sensitivity, 91.3% specificity, and 93.2% accuracy, with 93.2% consistency in three trials, when 5.8% depletion was used as a cut-off value in 1:10 of GSH:test chemicals in DMSO. It would be an economic and useful screening tool for determining the skin sensitization potential of small molecules, because the present method employs simple endogenous GSH as an electron donor for sensitizers with a spectrophotometric detection system in 96-well plates, and because the method requires neither experimental animals nor cell cultures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00218-9.

Alternative Methods for Skin-Sensitization Assessment

Skin sensitization is a term used to refer to the regulatory hazard known as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in humans or contact hypersensitivity in rodents, an important health endpoint considered in chemical hazard and risk assessments. Information on skin sensitization potential is required in various regulatory frameworks, such as the Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH). The identification of skin-sensitizing chemicals previously required the use of animal testing, which is now being replaced by alternative methods. Alternative methods in the field of skin sensitization are based on the measurement or prediction of key events (KE), i.e., (i) the molecular triggering event, i.e., the covalent binding of electrophilic substances to nucleophilic centers in skin proteins; (ii) the activation of keratinocytes; (iii) the activation of dendritic cells; (iv) the proliferation of T cells. This review article focuses on the current state of knowledge regarding the methods corresponding to each of the key events in skin sensitization and considers the latest trends in the development and modification of these methods.

Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method

Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.

A convenient fluorometric test method for skin sensitization using glutathione in chemico

A convenient fluorometrical test method to identify skin sensitizers in chemico was developed using reactivity with glutathione (GSH), a low molecular weight endogenous substance. Following incubation of test chemicals with GSH, the remaining GSH was quantitated fluorometrically by using monobromobimane (mBBr), a thiol-detecting agent, for determining % depletion of this endogenous substance by test chemicals. The experimental conditions optimized were: (1) reactivity of thiol compounds including GSH with mBBr, (2) effects of vehicles on reactivity, (3) molar ratios of GSH to test chemicals, and (4) reactivity of endogenous substance with test substances under different incubation times. When an optimized condition with DMSO as a vehicle for test chemicals and in 1:60 ratio for 24 hr at 4°C was applied to classify 48 well-known skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers, the predictive capacity was as follows: 88.2% sensitivity, 78.6% specificity, and 85.4% accuracy with 95.8% consistency of three trials when 10.3% depletion of GSH was used as a cutoff value. Because the present method employed relatively simple GSH as an acceptor for sensitizers and/or a relatively convenient fluorometric detection system in 96-well plates for a high throughput test, it would be a useful test tool for screening skin sensitization potential of test chemicals.

In vitro co-culture model of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells and T cells to evaluate the sensitization of dinitrochlorobenzene

Exposure to sensitizer has been suggested to be hazardous to human health, evaluation the sensitization of sensitizer is particularly important and urgently needed. Dendritic cells (DCs) exert an irreplaceable function in immunity, and the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is key to ensuring immune response to foreign antigens. We hypothesized that a co-culture model of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) and T cells could be employed to evaluate the sensitization of DNCB. An experimental model of DNCB-induced sensitization in rat was employed to examine alterations of cluster of differentiation CD103⁺ DCs and T cells. A co-cultured model of Mo-DCs and T cells was developed in vitro to assess the sensitization of DNCB through the phenotypic and functional alterations of Mo-DCs, as well as the TCR repertoire. We found that the CD103⁺ DCs phenotype and T-helper (Th) cells polarization altered in sensitization rats. In vitro, phenotypic alteration of Mo-DCs caused by DNCB were consistent with in vivo results, antigen uptake capacity of Mo-DCs diminished and capacity of Mo-DCs to prime T cell increased. Clones of the TCR repertoire and the diversity of TCR repertoire were enhanced, changes were noted in the usage of variable, joining, and variable-joining gene combinations. DNCB exposure potentiated alterations and characteristics of Mo-DCs and the TCR repertoire in a co-culture model. Such changes provided innovative ideas for evaluating sensitization of DNCB.

In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?

Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remains to be causal for biosafety warrant. As such, commercial products such as ointments or cosmetics can fulfill the topically safe requirements in animal and non-animal models including allergy. Europe, nevertheless, has banned animal tests for the safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients since 2013, followed by other countries. A variety of non-animal in vitro tests addressing different key events of the AOP, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), KeratinoSens™, LuSens and human cell line activation test h-CLAT and U-SENS™ have been developed and were adopted in OECD test guideline to identify the skin sensitizers. Other methods, such as the SENS-IS are not yet fully validated and regulatorily accepted. A broad spectrum of in silico models, alternatively, to predict skin sensitization have emerged based on various animal and non-animal data using assorted modeling schemes. In this article, we extensively summarize a number of skin sensitization predictive models that can be used in the biopharmaceutics and cosmeceuticals industries as well as their future perspectives, and the underlined challenges are also discussed.

A direct peptide reactivity assay using a high-throughput mass spectrometry screening platform for detection of skin sensitizers

Chemical-peptide conjugation is the molecular initiating event in skin sensitization. The OECD test guideline uses a high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet (HPLC/UV) detection method to quantify chemical-peptide conjugation in a direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), which measures the depletion of two synthetic peptides containing lysine or cysteine residues. To improve assay throughput, sensitivity and accuracy, an automated 384-well plate-based RapidFire solid-phase extraction (SPE) system coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) DPRA was developed and validated in the presence of a newly designed internal standard. Compared to the HPLC/UV-based DPRA, the automated SPE-MS/MS-based DPRA improved throughput from 16 min to 10 s per sample, and substrate peptides usage was reduced from 100 mM to 5 μM. When implementing the SPE-MS/MS-based DPRA into a high-throughput platform, we found 10 compounds that depleted lysine peptide and 24 compounds that depleted cysteine peptide (including 7 unreported chemicals from 55 compounds we tested) in a concentration-response manner. The adduct formation between cysteine and cinnamic aldehyde and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate were further analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-TOF-MS) to confirm the conjugation. Overall, the automated SPE-MS/MS-based platform is an efficient, economic, and accurate way to detect skin sensitizers.

Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells as an in vitro alternative model cell to evaluate the immunotoxicity of 2, 4-Dinitrochlorobenzene

Improvements in science and technology have led to the increasing threats of new chemicals to the public health. It is crucial to evaluate the toxicity, especially immunotoxicology. Dendritic cells (DCs) are believed to be more favorable choices in immunotoxicity evaluations. To obtain and evaluate the value of human monocyte-derived immature DCs (imDCs) in vitro applications in immunotoxicology, compared the results in vitro. DCs were obtained from enriched leukocytes of peripheral blood by using magnetic cell sorting and cytokine (rhGM-CSF + rhIL-4) co-induction. imDCs function in vitro and the surface antigens changes both in imDCs and THP-1 after 24 h of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) exposure were determined. The results were compared with those of DNCB-induced rats. The feasibility of imDCs applications in immunotoxicology was evaluated. In vivo, the splenic nodules, lymphocytes, and CD103+DC surface antigen expression were altered in the spleen of DNCB-induced rats. Moreover, DNCB exposure increased CD8+ T cell numbers both in peripheral blood and in the spleen of DNCB-induced rats. In vitro, DNCB exposure reduced the antigen uptake capacity and enhanced the T cell proliferative capacity of imDCs. The results are consistent with in vivo, but superior to that of the THP-1. Our results suggest that human monocyte-derived DCs may have potential applications as an attractive in vitro alternative cell model to evaluate the sensitization of DNCB.

Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients

Ethical issues in animal toxicity testing have led to the search for alternative methods to determine the skin sensitization potential of cosmetic products. The emergence of ethical testing issues has led to the development of many alternative methods that can reliably estimate skin sensitization potentials. However, a single alternative method may not be able to achieve high predictivity due to the complexity of the skin sensitization mechanism. Therefore, several prediction assays, including both in chemico and in vitro test methods, were investigated and integrated based on the skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway. In this study, we evaluated three different integrated approaches to predict a human skin sensitization hazard using data from in vitro assays (KeratinoSens™ and human cell line activation test [h-CLAT]), and a newly developed in chemico assay (spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay [Spectro-DPRA]). When the results of the in chemico and in vitro assays were combined, the predictivity of human data increased compared with that of a single assay. The highest predictivity was obtained for the approach in which sensitization potential was determined by Spectro-DPRA followed by final determination using the result of KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT assays (96.3% sensitivity, 87.1% specificity, 86.7% positive predictive value, 96.4% negative predictive value and 91.4% accuracy compared with human data). While further optimization is needed, we believe this integrated approach may provide useful predictive data when determining the human skin sensitization potential of chemicals.