Assessment of goodness-of-fit for the main analytical calibration models: Guidelines and case studies

Monosaccharide Analysis After One-Pot Derivatization Followed by Reverse-Phase Liquid Chromatography Separation and UV/Vis Detection

Derivatization of monosaccharides with 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP) introduces two chromophores per sugar molecule. Their separation on a superficially porous C18 reverse-phase column, using common liquid chromatography equipment, results in short analysis times (under 20 min) and high sensitivity (limit of quantitation 1 nmol). This method allows for complex monosaccharide mixtures to be separated and quantified using a reasonably simple and safe derivatization procedure.

Monitoring of Aflatoxin M1 in Various Origins Greek Milk Samples Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Aflatoxin M1(AFM1), a major metabolite of Aflatoxin B1(AFB1), has been identified as a potential contaminant in dairy products. Because of its possible carcinogenicity, the legislation limits as set by Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 are very strict, namely 0.050 μg kg−1 in milk and 0.025 μg kg−1 in infant formulas. To meet these requirements, a sensitive and accurate method was developed, employing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Ιmmunoaffinity columns (R-Biopharm) were used for sample purification and preconcentration of the analyte of interest. The quantification of AFM1 was conducted using fortified milk samples, while Aflatoxin B2 (AFB2) was used as an internal standard (IS). The method was validated in terms of linearity, precision, trueness, limits of detection and quantification and uncertainty. The performance criteria for the method were evaluated based on European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 401/2006 and its most recent amendment, as well as the suggested criteria for revision by the EU Reference Laboratory for Mycotoxins and Plant Toxins. The recovery was in the range of 77.9–81.0% for all fortification levels (0.025–0.050–0.075 μg kg−1), with RSDR values (Relative Standard Deviation of intermediate precision) ranging from 6.1% to 12%. The method’s detection and quantification limits were 0.0027 μg kg−1 and 0.0089 μg kg−1, respectively. The occurrence of AFM1 was investigated in 40 samples of different animal origin (cow, goat and sheep milk) provided by Greek producers.

Being Uncertain in Chromatographic Calibration-Some Unobvious Details in Experimental Design

This is an introductory tutorial and review about the uncertainty problem in chromatographic calibration. It emphasizes some unobvious, but important details influencing errors in the calibration curve estimation, uncertainty in prediction, as well as the connections and dependences between them, all from various perspectives of uncertainty measurement. Nonuniform D-optimal designs coming from Fedorov theorem are computed and presented. As an example, all possible designs of 24 calibration samples (3–8, 4–6, 6–4, 8–3 and 12–2, both uniform and D-optimal) are compared in context of many optimality criteria. It can be concluded that there are only two independent (orthogonal, but slightly complex) trends in optimality of these designs. The conclusions are important, as the uniform designs with many concentrations are not the best choices, contrary to some intuitive perception. Nonuniform designs are visibly better alternative in most calibration cases.